Carrying stories: digital storytelling and the complexities of intimacy, relationality, and home spaces

References

• Ackerly, B., and J. True. 2008. Reflexivity in practice: Power and ethics in feminist research on international relations. International Studies Review 10 (4):581–600. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2486.2008.00826.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, S. 2017. Living a feminist life. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Archibald, J. 2008. Indigenous storywork. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barad, K. 2007. Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Battersby, C. 1998. The phenomenal woman: Feminist metaphysics and the patterns of identity. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bombak, A. E., D. McPhail, and P. Ward. 2016. Reproducing stigma: Interpreting “overweight” and “obese” women’s experiences of weight-based discrimination in reproductive healthcare. Social Science & Medicine 166:94–101. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.08.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunila, K., and P. Valero. 2018. Anxiety and the making of research(ing) subjects in neoliberal academia. Subjectivity 11 (1):74–89. doi:10.1057/s41286-017-0043-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess-Proctor, A. 2015. Methodological and ethical issues in feminist research with abused women: Reflections on participants’ vulnerability and empowerment. Women’s Studies International Forum 48:124–34. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2014.10.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, M. L. 2006. Bodies that speak: Examining the dialogues in research interactions. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (1):3–18. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp050oa.
   Google Scholar
• Chadwick, R. 2021. On the politics of discomfort. Feminist Theory 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Changfoot, N., C. Rice, S. Chivers, A. Olsen Williams, A. Connors, A. Barrett, A. Gordon, and G. Lalonde. 2021. ahead of print). Re-imagining aging: Crip, queer, and Indigenous futures. Journal of Aging Studies . doi:10.1016/j.jaging.2021.100930.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cook, K., A. LaMarre, C. Rice, and M. Friedman, 2019. 'This isn't a high-risk body': Re-framing risk and reducing weight stigma in midwifery practice. Canadian Journal of Midwifery Practice and Research. 18(1):22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Couture, A. L., A. U. Zaidi, and E. Maticka-Tyndale. 2012. Reflexive accounts: An intersectional approach to exploring the fluidity of insider/ outsider status and the researcher’s impact on culturally sensitive post-positivist research. Qualitative Sociology Review 8 (1):86–105. doi:10.18778/1733-8077.8.1.05.
   Google Scholar
• Denborough, D. 2008. Collective narrative practice: Responding to individuals, groups, and communities who have experienced trauma. Adelaide, Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, P., R. Rice, K. Runswick-Cole, A. Easton, M. Gibson, J. Gruson-Wood, E. Klar & R. Shields .2021. Restorying autism: A body becoming disability studies in education approach. Journal of Inclusive Education. 25(5), 605–22. 10.1080/13603116.2018.1563835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, N., and . 2018. Exploring the lived experience of fibromyalgia using creative data collection methods. Cogent Social Sciences 4 (1):1447759. doi:10.1080/23311886.2018.1447759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., C. Rice, and E. R. M. Lind. 2020. A high-risk body for whom? On fat, risk, recognition and reclamation in restorying reproductive care through digital storytelling. Feminist Encounters 4 (2):1–12. no. 36.
   Google Scholar
• Glass, R. D., and A. Newman. 2015. Ethical and epistemic dilemmas in knowledge production: Addressing their intersection in collaborative, community-based research. Theory and Research in Education 13 (1):23–37. doi:10.1177/1477878515571178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gubrium, A. C., A. L. Hill, and S. Flicker. 2014. A situated practice of ethics for participatory visual and digital methods in public health research and practice: A focus on digital storytelling. American Journal of Public Health 104 (9):1606–14. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimaraes, E. (2007). Feminist research practise: Using conversa- tion analysis to explore the researcher’s interaction with par- ticipants. Feminism and Psychology, 17, 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, P. 2020. ‘Now that I know what you’re about’: Black feminist reflections on power in the research relationship. Qualitative Research 20 (5):519–33. doi:10.1177/1468794119891583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, E. F. (2018). Feminist conference time: Aiming (not) to have been there. In Y. Taylor, and K. Lahad (Eds). Feeling Academic in the Neoliberal University. Palgrave Studies in Gender and Education (pp. 33–60). London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, B. A., A. J. Schulz, E. A. Parker, and A. E. Becker. 1998. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health 19 (1):173–202. doi:10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, K. 2021. “What should I do now?”: Navigating relational ethics in practice as an early career researcher as illustrated by a qualitative interview study about women’s drinking practices. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 20:160940692098604. doi:10.1177/1609406920986044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., and L. A. Mazzei. 2012. Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, A. Y., and L. A. Mazzei. 2013. Plugging one text into another: Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry 19 (4):261–71. doi:10.1177/1077800412471510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirpitchenko, L., and L. Voloder. 2014. Insider research method: The significance of identities in the field. SAGE Research Methods Cases Part 1. doi:10.4135/978144627305014533940.
   Google Scholar
• LaMarre, A., C. Rice, K. Cook, and M. Friedman, 2021. Fat reproductive justice: Navigating the boundaries of reproductive health care. Journal of Social Issues, 76(2): 338–62. 10.1111/josi.12371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, J. 2010. The digital storytelling cookbook. San Francisco, California: Digital Diner Press.
   Google Scholar
• Limes-Taylor Henderson, K., and J. Esposito. 2019. Using others in the nicest way possible: On colonial and academic practice(s), and an ethic of humility. Qualitative Inquiry 25 (9–10):876–89. doi:10.1177/1077800417743528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lizarazo, T., E. Oceguera, D. Tenorio, D. P. Pedraza, and R. M. Irwin. 2017. Ethics, collaboration and knowledge production: Digital storytelling with sexually diverse farmworkers in California. Lateral: Journal of the Cultural Studies 6 (1). https://csalateral.org/issue/6-1/ethics-digital-storytelling-lizarazo-oceguera-tenorio-pedraza-irwin/ Retrieved 18 November 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Mahutte, N., C. Kamga-Ngande, C. Sharma, and C. Sylvestre. 2018. Obesity and reproduction. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Canada 40 (7):950–66. doi:10.1016/j.jogc.2018.04.030.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, T. 2017. Telling the difficult things: Creating spaces for disclosure, rapport and ‘collusion’ in qualitative interviews. Women’s Studies International Forum 61:81–86. doi:10.1016/j.wsif.2016.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, G. 2014. Mothers at large: Responsibilizing the pregnant self for the “obesity epidemic. Fat Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society 3 (2):101–18. doi:10.1080/21604851.2014.889491.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G. 2017. Shamed into health? Fat pregnant women’s views on obesity management strategies in maternity care. Women’ S Studies Journal 31 (1):22–33. http://www.wsanz.org.nz/journal/docs/WSJNZ311Parker22-33.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., and C. Pause ́. 2018. Pregnant with possibility: Negotiating fat maternal subjectivity in the “war on obesity. Fat Studies 7 (2):124–34. doi:10.1080/21604851.2017.1372990.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, G., and C. Pause ́. 2019. Productive but not constructive: The work of shame in the affective governance of fat Pregnancy. Feminism & Psychology 29 (2):250–68. doi:10.1177/0959353519834053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puwar, N. (2004). Space invaders: Race, gender, and bodies out of place. Oxford, UK: Berg
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C. 2009. Imagining the other? Ethical challenges of researching and writing women’s embodied lives. Feminism & Psychology 19 (2):245–66. doi:10.1177/0959353509102222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C. 2020. Digital/ multi-media storytelling. In The Routledge companion for health humanities, ed. P. Crawford, B. Brown, and A. Charise, 341–46. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C., A. Bailey, and K. Cook. (2022). “Mobilizing interference as methodology and metaphor in disability arts inquiry.” Qualitative Inquiry 28 (3–4) 287–99. doi:10.1177/10778004211046249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., E. Chandler, E. Harrison, M. Ferrari, and K. Liddiard. 2015. Project Re•Vision: Disability at the edges of representation. Disability & Society 30 (4):513–27. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1037950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., E. Chandler, K. Liddiard, J. Rinaldi, and E. Harrison. 2018. Pedagogical possibilities for unruly bodies. Gender & Education 30 (5):663–82. doi:10.1080/09540253.2016.1247947.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C, E. Chandler, J. Rinaldi, N. Changfoot, K. Liddiard, R. Mykitiuk, and I. Mündel. 2017. Imagining disability futurities. Hypatia 32, (2): 213–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., K. Cook, and K. A. Bailey. (2021). Difference-attuned witnessing: Risks and potentialities of arts-based research. Feminism & Psychology 31 (3): 345–65. doi:10.1177/0959353520955142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., S. Dion, H. Fowlie, and A. Breen. (2022). “Identifying and working through settler ignorance.” Critical Studies in Education 63 (1): 15–30. doi:10.1080/17508487.2020.1830818.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., S. Dion, I. Mündel, and H. Fowlie. (2020a, Ahead of print). “Re/Turning the gaze: Unsettling settler logics through multimedia storytelling.” Feminist Media Studies 1–18. doi:10.1080/14680777.2019.1707256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., A. LaMarre, N. Changfoot, and P. Douglas. 2020b. Making spaces: Multimedia storytelling as reflexive, creative praxis. Qualitative Research in Psychology 17 (2):222–39. doi:10.1080/14780887.2018.1442694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., A. LaMarre, and R. Mykitiuk. 2018. Cripping the ethics of disability arts research. In Palgrave handbook of ethics in critical research, ed. C. MacLeod, J. Marx, P. Mnyaka, and G. Treharne, 257–72. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C., and I. Mündel. 2018. Storymaking as methodology: Disrupting dominant stories through multimedia storytelling. Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 55 (2):211–31. doi:10.1111/cars.12190.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C., and I. Mündel. 2019. Multimedia storytelling methodology: Notes on access and inclusion in neoliberal times. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies 8 (2):118–46. doi:10.15353/cjds.v8i1.473.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, C., K. Pendleton Jiménez, E. Harrison, M. Robinson, J. Rinaldi, A. LaMarre, and J. Andrew. 2020c. Bodies at the intersection: Reconfiguring intersectionality through queer women’s complex embodiments. Signs 46 (1):177–200. doi:10.1086/709219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, C., C. Temple Jones, and I. Mündel. 2022. Slow story-making in urgent times. Cultural Studies, ≤> Critical Methodologies 1–10 doi:10.1177/15327086211072230 . Ahead of print
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringrose, J., and E. Renold. 2014. “F**k Rape!”: Exploring affective intensities in a feminist research assemblage. Qualitative Inquiry 20 (6):772–80. doi:10.1177/1077800414530261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sholock, A. 2012. Methodology of the privileged: White anti-racist feminism, systematic ignorance, and epistemic uncertainty. Hypatia 27 (4):701–14. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01275.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, P., and D. McPhail. 2019. Fat shame and blame in reproductive care: Implications for ethical health care interactions. Women’s Reproductive Health 6 (4):225–41. doi:10.1080/23293691.2019.1653581.
   Google Scholar
• Waycott, J., H. Davis, D. Warr, F. Edmonds, and G. Taylor. 2017. Co-constructing meaning and negotiating participation: Ethical tensions when ‘giving voice’ through digital storytelling. Interacting with Computers 29 (2):237–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Womersley, G., A. Maw, and S. Swartz. 2011. The construction of shame in feminist reflexive practice and its manifestations in a research relationship. Qualitative Inquiry 17 (9):876–86. doi:10.1177/1077800411423205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar