Translation and the materialities of communication

References

• Armstrong, Guyda. 2013. The English Boccaccio: A History in Books. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armstrong, Guyda. 2015. “Coding Continental: Information Design in Sixteenth-Century English Vernacular Language Manuals and Translations.” Renaissance Studies 29 (1): 78–102. doi:10.1111/rest.12115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assmann, Aleida, and Jan Assmann. 1990. “Schrift – Kognition – Evolution: Eric A. Havelock und die Technologie kultureller Kommunication.” In Eric A. Havelock, Schriftlichkeit. Das griechische Alphabet als kulturelle Revolution, edited and introduced by A. Assmann and J. Assmann, 1–35. Weinheim: VCH Acta Humanoria.
   Google Scholar
• Barker, S. K., and Brenda M. Hosington, eds. 2013. Renaissance Cultural Crossroads: Translation, Print and Culture in Britain, 1473–1640. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan. 2002. Translation Studies. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan. 2014. Translation. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bassnett, Susan, and André Lefevere, eds. 1990. Translation, History and Culture. London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Bernheimer, Charles, ed. 1995. Comparative Literature in the Age of Multiculturalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bolter, Jay David, and Richard Grusin. 1999. Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boutcher, Warren. 2015. “From Cultural Translation to Cultures of Translation? Early Modern Readers, Sellers and Patrons.” In The Culture of Translation in Early Modern England and France, 1500–1660, edited by Tania Demetriou and Rowan Tomlinson, 22–40. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Coldiron, A. E. B. 2012. “Visibility now: Historicizing Foreign Presences in Translation.” Translation Studies 5 (2): 189–200.
   Google Scholar
• Coldiron, A. E. B. 2015. Printers without Borders: Translation and Textuality in the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Michael. 2003. Translation and Globalization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, Michael. 2013. Translation in the Digital Age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Debray, Régis. 1996. Media Manifestos. Translated by Eric Rauth.London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 2005. Paper Machine. Translated by Rachel Bowlby. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Derrida, Jacques. 1982. “Différance.” In Margins of Philosophy, translated by Alan Bass, 1–27. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, Jeffrey. 2012. Books without Borders in Enlightenment Europe: French Cosmopolitanism and German Literary Markets. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, Iain. 2003. “Cyberculture: Technology, Nature and Culture.” In New Media: A Critical Introduction, edited by Martin Lister, Jon Dovey, Seth Giddings, Iain Grant, and Kieran Kelly, 287–382. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich. 2004. Production of Presence: What Meaning Cannot Convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gumbrecht, Hans Ulrich, and K. Ludwig Pfeiffer, eds. 1994. Materialities of Communication. Translated by William Whobrey. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayles, Katherine N., and Jessica Pressman, eds. 2013. Comparative Textual Media. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hosington, Brenda M. 2015. “Introduction: Translation and Print Culture in Early Modern Europe.” Renaissance Studies 29 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1111/rest.12111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howsam, Leslie, and James Raven, eds. 2011. Books Between Europe and the Americas: Connections and Communities, 1620–1860. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Ingarden, Roman. 1974. The Cognition of the Literary Work of Art. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1960. “Linguistics and Poetics.” (1958). In Style in Language, edited by Thomas A. Sebeok, 350–377. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, Roman. 1966. “On Linguistic Aspects of Translation.” In On Translation, edited by Reuben A. Brower, 232–239. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kittler, Friedrich A. 1999. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Translated and introduced by Geoffrey Winthrop-Young and Michael Wutz. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefevere, André. 1992. Translation, Rewriting, and the Manipulation of Literary Fame. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. 2006. Theories of Reading: Books, Bodies, and Bibliomania. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. 2011. “First Steps towards a Media History of Translation.” Translation Studies 4 (3): 261–281. doi:10.1080/14781700.2011.589651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. Forthcoming a. “‘In the Beginning’ … An Intermedial Babel.” In “Intermediality,” special issue, edited by Éric Méchoulan, SubStance: A Review of Theory and Literary Criticism 44 (3).
   Google Scholar
• Littau, Karin. Forthcoming b. “Translation’s Histories and Digital Futures.” In “Babel and Globalization: Translating in the 21st Century,” special section, edited by Paolo Sigismondi, International Journal of Communication 9.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. 1993. Grundrisse. Translated and edited by Martin Nicolaus. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• McGann, Jerome J. 1991. The Textual Condition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, D. F. [1986] 1999. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, D. F. 2002. “Typography and Meaning.” In Making Meaning: “Printers of the Mind” and Other Essays, edited by Peter D. McDonald and Michael F. Suarez, 198–236. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, Marshall. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• McLuhan, Marshall. 1964. Understanding Media. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Milton, John, and Paul Bandia, eds. 2009. Agents of Translation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Christine. 2010. “Translation and Materiality: The Paradox of Visible Translation.” Translating Media 30 (1): 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, W. J. T., and Mark B. N. Hansen, eds. 2010. Critical Terms for Media Studies. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Neuland für Kinematographentheater.” (1910) 1978. In Kino-Debatte. Texte zum Verhältnis von Literatur und Film 1909–1929, edited by Anton Kaes, 41. Tübingen: Max Niemayer.
   Google Scholar
• Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1981. “An Heinrich Köselitz in Venedig (Typoscript), [Genua] Ende Februar 1882.” In Briefwechsel. Kritische Gesamtausgabe, Vol. III.1: Briefe von Nietzsche: 1880–1884, edited by Giorgio Colli and Mazzino Montinari, 172. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• O’Hagan, Minako. 2013. “The Impact of New Technologies on Translation Studies: A Technological Turn?” In The Routledge Handbook of Translation Studies, edited by Carmen Millán and Francesca Bartrina, 503–518. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Olohan, M. 2014. “History of Science and History of Translation: Disciplinary Commensurability?” The Translator 20 (1): 9–25. doi: 10.1080/13556509.2014.899091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong, Walter J. 1982. Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. London: Methuen.
   Google Scholar
• Pérez Fernández, José María, and Edward Wilson-Lee, eds. 2014. Translation and the Book Trade in Early Modern Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, John Durham. 2003. “Space, Time, and Communication Theory.” Canadian Journal of Communication 28: 397–411.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, John Durham. 2009. “Strange Sympathies: Horizons of Media Theory in America and Germany.” http://www.electronicbookreview.com/thread/criticalecologies/myopic.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, Ludwig. N.d. From the Materiality of Communication to an Anthropology of Media. https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/type/www/116/Theory_OtherTexts/Theory/Pfeiffer_MaterialityodCommun.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Philippi, Donald. 1989. “Translation between Typologically Diverse Languages.” Meta: journal des traducteurs/Meta: Translators’ Journal 34 (4): 680–685. doi:10.7202/003834ar.
   Google Scholar
• Price, Leah. 2006. “Introduction: Reading Matter.” PMLA 121 (1): 9–16. doi: 10.1632/003081206X96087
   Google Scholar
• Reid, Joshua. 2014. “The Enchantments of Circe: Translation Studies and the English Renaissance.” Spenser Review 44 (1.6). http://www.english.cam.ac.uk/spenseronline/review/volume-44/441/translation-studies/translation-studies-and-the-english-renaissance/.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Matthew. 2011. The Poetry of Translation: From Chaucer and Petrarch to Homer and Logue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schleiermacher, Friedrich. 1992. “From On the Different Methods of Translating (1813).” Translated by Waltraud Bartscht. In Theories of Translation: An Anthology of Essays from Dryden to Derrida, edited by Rainer Schulte and John Biguenet, 36–54. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon, Claude. 1948. “A Mathematical Theory of Communication.” The Bell System Technical Journal 27 (3): 379–423. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, George. [1975] 1999. After Babel. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venuti, Lawrence. 2000. “Neoclassicism and Enlightenment.” In The Oxford Guide to Literature in English Translation, edited by Peter France, 55–64. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellbery, David E. 1990. “Foreword” to Discourse Networks, 1800/1900, by Friedrich A. Kittler, vii–xxxiii. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whorf, Benjamin Lee. 1956. “Science and Linguistics (1940).” In Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf, edited by John B. Carroll, 207–219. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winthrop-Young, Geoffrey. 2013. “Cultural Techniques: Preliminary Remarks.” Theory, Culture & Society 30 (6): 3–19. doi:10.1177/0263276413500828.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1921) 2001. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by David Francis Pears and Brian McGuinness, introduced by Bertrand Russell. London: Routledge Classics.
   Google Scholar