Current challenges of family mediation in Estonia

References

• Aaltonen, A.-K. 2000. “Tuomari sovinnontekijäna perheoikeusasiossa.” Lakimies 7–8: 1320–1324.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, N. 2001. “Mediation in Practice: Common Law and Civil Law Perspectives Compared.” International Trade & Business Law 6: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Avruch, K., and P. W. Black. 1991. “The Culture Question and Conflict Resolution.” Peace & Change 16 (1): 22–45. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0130.1991.tb00563.x.
   Google Scholar
• Bercovitch, J., V. Kremenyuk, and I. W. Zartman, eds.. 2008. The SAGE Handbook of Conflict Resolution. London, California, New Dehli, Singapore: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chereji, C. R. 2016. “Mediation in the European Union: The Directive 2008/52/EC and Its Effects on National Legislations.” Conflict Studies Quarterly 15: 3-16.
   Google Scholar
• “Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence.” 2011. https://www.coe.int/fr/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e
   Google Scholar
• COM. (2016) 542. European Commission Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and Social Committee on the application of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain aspects of mediation in the civil and commercial matters. Brussels 26.08.2016.
   Google Scholar
• Crampton, A. 2015. “Etnographic Refusal as Research Method: Example from a Study of a Family Court Child Custody Mediation Program.” Qualitative Social Work 14 (4): 453–470. doi:10.1177/1473325014557577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Urso, L. 2018. “A New European Parliament Mediation Resolution Calls on Member States and the EC to Promote More Use.” Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation 36 (2): 19–20. doi:10.1002/alt.21721.
   Google Scholar
• De Palo, G., and M. B. Trevor, eds. 2012. EU Mediation Law and Practice. Oxford: OUP Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union. “’Rebooting’ the Mediation Directive Assessing the Limited Impact of Its Implementation and Proposing Measures to Increase the Number of Mediations in the EU – Study.” https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5e15b678-0cf9-414a-9ce8-dac3f8e9317d/language-en/format-PDF/source-51786602
   Google Scholar
• “Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers (European Commission Study for an Evaluation and Implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC – The ‘Mediation Directive’).” Final report. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/bba3871d-223b-11e6-86d0-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-51786602
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General for Internal Policies of the Union. “The Implementation of the Mediation Directive.” In Workshop 29 November 2016: Compilation of In-Depth Analysis – Study. 2016. https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/5369bfbc-b2db-11e6-9e3c-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
   Google Scholar
• Estonian Code of Civil Procedure State Gazette I 2005, 26, 197.
   Google Scholar
• Estonian Conciliation Law Act State Gazette I 2009, 59, 385.
   Google Scholar
• European Code of Conduct for Mediatiors. ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/adr/adr_ec_code_conduct_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• “European Parliament Resolution of 12 September 2017 on the Implementation of Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on Certain Aspects of Mediation in Civil and Commercial Matters (The ‘Mediation Directive’) (2016/2066(INI)).” http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P8-TA-2017-0321+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
   Google Scholar
• “European Parliament Resolution of 13 September 2011 on the Implementation of the Directive on Mediation in the Member States, Its Impact on Mediation and Its Take-Up by the Courts (2011/2026(INI)).” http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//TEXT+TA+P7-TA-2011-0361+0+DOC+XML+V0//EN
   Google Scholar
• Explanatory Notes of the Conciliation Act (In Estonian). www.riigikogu.ee/download/0c8ba3f6-6aa9-8a9c-0d63-3c5fd5ba33f2
   Google Scholar
• Feasley, A. 2011. “Regulating Mediator Qualifications in the 2008 EU Mediation Directive: The Need for a Supranational Standard.” Journal of Dispute Resolution, 2011 (2): 333–350.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., W. L. Ury, and B. Patton. 2011. Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement without Giving In. New York: Penguin Book.
   Google Scholar
• Folberg, J., D. Golann, T. J. Stipanowich, and L. A. Kloppenberg. 2016. Resolving Disputes: Theory, Practice, and Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
   Google Scholar
• Hanks, M. 2012. “Perspectives on Mandatory Mediation.” UNSW Law Journal 35 (3): 929–952.
   Google Scholar
• Hietanen-Kunwald, P. 2013. “Sovittelun oikeudellistumine – Eurooppalaisen sovitteludirektiivin sovittelukäsite.” Oikeus 42 (1): 71–91.
   Google Scholar
• James, A. L., G. M. D. Haugen, M. Rantalaiho, and R. Marples. 2010. “The Voice of the Child in Family Mediation: Norway and England.” International Journal for Children’s Rights 18 (3): 313–333. doi:10.1163/157181810X494173.
   Google Scholar
• Lappi-Seppälä, T., and A. Storgaard. 2015. “Nordic Mediation Comparing Denmark and Finland.” New Criminal Policy 27 (2): 136–147.
   Google Scholar
• Laurence, M., and Hyde Jr. 1984–1985. “Mediation.” Ch.6, Juvenile & Fam. Ct. J., 57–72.
   Google Scholar
• Luca, A. 2015. “Mediation in Italy: Feature and Trends.” In New Developments in Civil and Commercial Mediation, 345–365. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Menkel-Meadow, C. 1997. “Introduction: What Will We Do When Adjudication Ends? A Brief Intellectual History of ADR.” Ucla Law Review 44: 1613-1639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, C. W. 2014. The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. San Francisco: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mosten, F. S. 1999. “Mediation and the Process of Family Reform.” Family Court Review 37 (4): 429–447.
   Google Scholar
• Nelle, A. 1992. “Making Mediation Mandatory: A Proposed Framework.” 7 Ohio St. J. on Disp. Resol, 227–313.
   Google Scholar
• Nolan-Haley, J. 2007. “Teaching Comparative Perpectives in Mediation: Some Preliminary Reflections.” John’s Law Review 81: 259.
   Google Scholar
• Nylund, A. 2010. “Lapsi riidan kohteena – Lapsen asemaa koskevien asioiden haasteita.” Lakimies 7–8: 1166–1182.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, L. 2013. “The Place of Mediation in The Family Justice System.” Child and Family Law Quaterly 25 (2): 200-214.
   Google Scholar
• Pickar, D. B. 2011. “Intermittent Evaluative Mediation With Enduring Postdivorce Conflict.” Journal of Child Custody 143–165. doi:10.10.80/15379418.2011.594722.
   Google Scholar
• “Recommendation No. R (98)1 on Family Mediation (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 21 January 1998 at the 616th Meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies); Text and Commentary.” https://www.coe.int/t/dghl/cooperation/cepej/series/Etudes5Ameliorer_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Requena, M., 2000. “Activities of the Council of Europe in the Field of Family Law”. Cal. W. Int’l LJ, 31.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. M. 2014. Mediation in Family Disputes: Principles of Practice. Hampshire: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Roşu, A. 2010. “Mediation -Voluntary or Mandatory Procedure”. Acta U. Danubius Jur, 121–126.
   Google Scholar
• Schepard, A. 2001. “An Introduction to the Model Standards of Practice for Family and Divorce Mediation.” Family Law Quarterly 35 (1): 1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semple, N. 2012. “Mandatory Family Mediation and the Settlement Mission: A Feminist Critique.” Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 24 (1): 207–239. doi:10.3138/cjwl.24.1.207.
   Google Scholar
• Solarte Vasquez, M. C. 2014. “The Institutionalization Process of Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanisms in the European Union; the Estonian Legal Developments Experience.” L’Europe Unie 7-8: 94−111.
   Google Scholar
• Solarte Vasquez, M. C. 2016. “Legal Regulation of Mediation and Involved Institutions: Estonia.” In Mediation to Foster European Wide Settlement of Disputes, edited by F. Pesce and D. Rone, 57−76. Arricia: Aracne Editrice.
   Google Scholar
• Stalford, H. 2010. “Crossing Boundaries: Reconciling Law, Culture and Values in International Family Mediation.” Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 32 (2): 155–168. doi:10.1080/09649069.2010.506311.
   Google Scholar
• Stavros, T. 2012–2013. Compulsory mediation: A contradiction? Dissertation. School of Economics, Business Administration and Legal Studies. International Hellenic University.
   Google Scholar
• Stipanowich, T. J., and J. R. Lamare, 2014. “Living with ADR: Evolving Perceptions and Use of Mediation, Arbitration, and Conflict Management in Fortune 1000 Corporations”. Harv. Negot. L. Rev., 19.
   Google Scholar
• Valma, K., L. Surva, and H. Hääl. 2014. “Lepitusmenetlus perevaidlustes.” Juridica 1: 86–103.
   Google Scholar
• Wall, J. A., J. B. Stark, and R. L. Standifer. 2001. “A Current Review and Theory Development.” The Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (3): 370-391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, R. 2001–2002. “Mandatory Family Mediation and Domestic Violence”. 26 S. Ill. U. L.J., 559–573.
   Google Scholar