The perceived rationale, variegated institutional take and impact of the EU’s human rights policy in Armenia and Georgia

References

• Balfour, R., and A. Missiroli. 2007. “Reassessing He Neighbourhood Policy”. EPC Issue Paper No 54, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Barbe, E., and E. Johansson-Nogues. 2008. “The EU as a Modest ‘Force for Good’: The European Neighbourhood Policy.” International Affairs 84 (1): 81–96. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2346.2008.00690.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetham, D. 1997. “Linking Democracy and Human Rights.” Peace Review 9 (3): 351–356. doi:10.1080/10402659708426076.
   Google Scholar
• Bosse, G. 2007. “Values in the EU’s Neighbourhood Policy: Political Rhetoric or Reflection of a Coherent Policy?” European Political Economy Review 7 (2): 38–62.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Europe. n.d.. The Evolution of Human Rights. Strasbourg. Accessed 2 April 2020. https://www.coe.int/en/web/compass/the-evolution-of-human-rights
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2003. A Secure Europe in A Better World: European Security Strategy. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2009. Joint Declaration of the Prague Eastern Partnership Summit. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2011. Declaration on Establishment of European Endowment for Democracy. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2012. Strategic Framework on Democracy and Human Rights. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Delcour, L. 2011. “The Institutional Functioning of the Eastern Partnership: An Early Assessment.” Eastern Partnership Review 1.
   Google Scholar
• Delegation of the European Union to Armenia. n.d.. List of Projects. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Delegation of the European Union to Georgia. n.d.. List of Projects. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Duchene, F. 1973. “The European Community and the Uncertainties of Interdependence.” In A Nation Writ Large? Foreign-Policy Problems before the European Community, edited by M. Kohnstamm and W. Hager, 1–21. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum, Open Society European Policy Institute, International Renaissance Foundation and PASOS (Policy Association for an Open Society 2015. “European Integration Index 2014 for Eastern Partnership Countries”. Ukrainian Print Center.
   Google Scholar
• EU Neighbourhood Barometer. n.d. EU Neighbourhood Barometer Surveys. Accessed 1 June 2015. http://euneighbourhood.eu/
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. Wider Europe—neighbourhood: A New Framework for Relations with Our Eastern and Southern Neighbours. COM (2003) 104 Final. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006a. EU/Armenia Action Plan. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006b. EU/Georgia Action Plan. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2007. The European Union: Furthering Human Rights and Democracy across the Globe. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. European Neighbourhood Policy: Working Towards a Stronger Partnership. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. n.d.. The Copenhagen Summit Conference. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Council. n.d.. Document Register.
   Google Scholar
• European Endowment for Democracy. n.d.. Initiatives.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2006. European Neighbourhood Policy (2004/2166(INI)). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2007. Strengthening the European Neighbourhood Policy (2007/2088(INI)). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2008. A More Effective EU Policy for the South Caucasus (2007/2076(INI)). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2009. On the Review of the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (2008/2236(INI)). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2010. The Need for an EU Strategy for the South Caucasus” (2009/2216(INI)). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2011. Review of the European Neighbourhood Policy - Eastern Dimension. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. 2013.European Neighbourhood Policy,Working towards a Stronger Partnership: EP's Position on the 2012 Progress Reports (2013/2621(RSP)). Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 1992. Treaty on the European Union. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 1997. Treaty of Amsterdam. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2001. Treaty of Nice. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2007. Treaty of Lisbon. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2012. The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union”. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union External Action. 2011. Thematic Programme: Non-State Actors and Local Authorities in Development. Strategy Paper 2011-2013. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union External Action. n.d.. ENP Progress Reports. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, T. 2001. “If Democracy, Then Human Rights?” Third World Quarterly 22 (4): 623–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freyburg, T. 2010. “National Identity Matters: The Limited Impact of EU Political Conditionality in the Western Balkans.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (1): 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galstyan, N. 2016. “Armenia’s Foreign Policy in the Public Perception.” In Values and Identity as Sources of Foreign Policy in Armenia and Georgia, edited by K. Kakachia and A. Markarov, 233–264. Tbilisi: Publishing House “Universal”.
   Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, T. 2013. Georgia in Transition: Report on the Human Rights Dimension: Background, Steps Taken and Remaining Challenges. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, J. 2006. “New Wine in Old Wineskins: Promoting Political Reforms through the European Neighbourhood Policy.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44 (1): 29–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kotzian, P., M. Knodt, and S. Urdze. 2011. “Instruments of EU’s External Democracy Promotion.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49 (5): 995–1018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. A. 2013. “Human Rights without Democracy? A Critique of the Separationist Thesis.” Human Rights Quarterly 25 (4): 990–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, H. 2013. “The EU as a Normative Power and the Research on External Perceptions: The Missing Link.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52 (4): 896–910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S., and F. Schimmelfennig. 2011. “EU Democracy Promotion in the Neighbourhood: From Leverage to Governance?” Democratization 18 (4): 885–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebanidze, B. 2014. “What Makes Authoritarian Regimes Sweat? Linkage, Leverage and Democratization in post-Soviet South Caucasus.” Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 14 (2): 199–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manners, I. 2002. “Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms.” Journal of Common Market Studies 40 (2): 235–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, G. R. 2007. “Promotion of Democracy as a Foreign Policy Instrument of ‘Europe’: Limits to International Idealism.” Democratization 2 (1): 143–167.
   Google Scholar
• Reinhard, J. 2010. “EU Democracy Promotion through Its Neighborhood: The Temptation of Membership Perspective or Flexible Integration.” Caucasian Review of International Affairs 4 (3): 196–213.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, S., and U. Ziemer. 2018. “Explaining the Pattern of Russian Authoritarian Diffusion in Armenia.” East European Politics 34 (2): 152–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasse, G. 2008. “The European Neighbourhood Policy: Conditionality Revisited for the EU’s Eastern Neighbours.” Europe-Asia Studies 60 (2): 295–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. E. 2005. “The Outsiders: The European Neighbourhood Policy.” International Affairs 81 (4): 757–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stritecky, V. 2006. “The South Caucasus: A Challenge for the ENP.” In The European Union and Its Neighbourhood: Policies, Problems and Priorities, edited by P. Kratochvil, 59–76. Prague: Institute of International Relations.
   Google Scholar
• Terzyan, A. 2017. “The EU Vs. Russia in the Foreign Policy Discourse of Armenia: The Fragility of Normative Power or the Power of Russian Coercion?” Eastern Journal of European Studies 8 (2): 185–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilyan, S. 2010. “The ‘European’ ‘Neighbourhood’ ‘Policy’ (ENP): A Holistic Account.” In Handbook on the European Union and Global Governance, edited by D. Bailey and U. Wunderlich, 177–187. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyan, S. 2011a. “Dizygotic Twins: The EU and US Promoting Democracy in the South Caucasus.” In Competing Powers: Security in the Wider Black Sea Region, edited by S. N. Romaniuk, 120–163. Saarbrucken: LAP Lambert.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyan, S. 2011b. “The External Legitimacy of the European Union (EU) in the South Caucasus.” European Foreign Affairs Review 16 (3): 341–357.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyan S. 2016. “'Swinging on a Pendulum': Armenia in the Eurasian Economic Union and With the European Union”, Problems of Post-Communism 64 (1): 32-46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilyan, S. 2019. ‘“Moral Power’ of the European Union in the South Caucasus”. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyan, S. and Petrossian S. 2014. “Russia's Policy towards the South Caucasus: Triangulation of Domestic, Border and Foreign Logics”, In Challenges and Perspectives of Contemporary Russia, edited by L. Asta, 37-63. Padova: Digital Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, F. 2009. “International Human Rights Law: A Short History, UN Chronicle XLVI (1 & 2).” Accessed 2 April 2020. https://unchronicle.un.org/article/international-human-rights-law-short-history
   Google Scholar
• Wood, S. 2009. “The European Union: A Normative or Normal Power?” European Foreign Affairs Review 1: 113–128.
   Google Scholar
• Youngs, R. 2003. “European Approaches to Democracy Assistance: Learning the Right Lessons?” Third World Quarterly 24 (1): 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar