Contesting the European Union in a changing climate: policy narratives and the justification of supranational governance

References

• Adler, N., R. Ensel, and M. J. Wintle. 2019. Narratives of War: Remembering and Chronicling Battle in Twentieth-Century Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andonova, L. B., T. Hale, and C. B. Roger. 2018. The Comparative Politics of Transnational Climate Governance. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Anshelm, J., and M. Hultman. 2015. Discourses of Global Climate Change: Apocalyptic Framing and Political Antagonisms. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Archer, D., and S. Rahmstorf. 2010. The Climate Crisis: An Introductory Guide to Climate Change. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., and E. Ole. 2013. “The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader to ‘Leadiator’: Journal of European Public Policy: Vol 20, No 10.” Journal of European Public Policy 20 (10).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, G., A. Underdal, and S. Andresen. 2015. The Domestic Politics of Global Climate Change: Key Actors in International Climate Cooperation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Boykoff, M. T. 2011. Who Speaks for the Climate?: Making Sense of Media Reporting on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, D. A. 2013. Climate Change Ethics Navigating the Perfect Moral Storm. 1. Publ. Routledge [u.a.].
   Google Scholar
• Cann, H. W., and L. Raymond. 2018. “Does Climate Denialism Still Matter? the Prevalence of Alternative Frames in Opposition to Climate Policy.” Environmental Politics 27 (3): 433–454. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1439353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, N., R. Ladrech, C. Little, and V. Tsagkroni. 2018. “Political Parties and Climate Policy: A New Approach to Measuring Parties’ Climate Policy Preferences.” Party Politics 24 (6): 731–742. doi:10.1177/1354068817697630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daviter, F. 2011. Policy Framing in the European Union. Basingstoke [u.a.]: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Delbeke, J., and P. Vis. 2019. Towards a Climate-Neutral Europe: Curbing the Trend. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., and J. Pickering. 2019. The Politics of the Anthropocene. First ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and A. M. McCright. 2011. “Organized Climate Change Denial.” In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, edited by J. S. Dryzek, 144–160.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. 1993. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (4): 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EPRS (European Parliament Research Service). 2019. “European Green Deal.” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2019/644205/EPRS_ATA(2019)644205_EN.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. The European Green Deal. Brussels: COM (2019) 640 final.
   Google Scholar
• Farkas, J. 2019. Post-Truth, Fake News and Democracy : Mapping the Politics of Falsehood. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gardiner, S. M. 2011. “Climate Justice.” In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, edited by J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg, 309–320. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henning, B. G., and Z. Walsh. 2020. Climate Change Ethics and the Non-Human World. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoggett, P. 2019. Climate Psychology. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. 2009. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Inhofe, J. M. 2012. The Greatest Hoax: How the Global Warming Conspiracy Threatens Your Future. 1st ed. Washington, D.C: WND Books.
   Google Scholar
• Jafry, T., M. Mikulewicz, and K. Helwig. 2019. Routledge Handbook of Climate Justice. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson, D. 2014. Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle against Climate Change Failed - and What It Means for Our Future. New York [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., and M. K. McBeth. 2010. “A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong?” Policy Studies Journal 38 (2): 329–353. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00364.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. D., M. K. McBeth, and E. A. Shanahan. 2014. “Introducing the Narrative Policy Framework.” In The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework in Public Policy Analysis, edited by M. D. Jones, E. A. Shanahan, and M. K. McBeth, 1–25. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US.
   Google Scholar
• Kalantzakos, S. 2017. The EU, US and China Tackling Climate Change: Policies and Alliance for the Anthropocene. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lacroix, J., and K. Nicolaïdis. 2010. European Stories: Intellectual Debates on Europe in National Contexts. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M. 2018. “Right-Wing Populism and the Climate Change Agenda: Exploring the Linkages.” Environmental Politics 27 (4): 712–732. doi:10.1080/09644016.2018.1458411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luterbacher, U., and D. F. Sprinz. 2018. Global Climate Policy: Actors, Concepts, and Enduring Challenges. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. 2014. Don’t Even Think about It. WHy Our Brains are Wired to Ignore Climate Change. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, F. S. 2019. Transforming Psychological Worldviews to Confront Climate Change: A Clearer Vision, A Different Path. Oakland, California: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Methmann, C., D. Rothe, and B. Stephan. 2013. Interpretive Approaches to Global Climate Governance: (De)constructing the Greenhouse. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, L., and P. Sanklecha. 2017. Climate Justice and Historical Emissions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, T. 2017. The Death of Expertise : The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K., A. L. St Clair, and B. Kristoffersen. 2010. “The Framing of Climate Change: Why It Matters.” In Climate Change, Ethics and Human Security, edited by K. O’Brien, 3–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., and C. Dupont. 2015. Decarbonization in the European Union: Internal Policies and External Strategies. 2015th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Proksch, S.-O., and Slapin, J. 2015. The Politics of Parliamentary Debate Parties, Rebels and Representation. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rebich-Hespanha, S. et al. 2015. “Image Themes and Frames in US Print News Stories about Climate Change.” Environmental Communication 9 (4): 491–519. DOI:10.1080/17524032.2014.983534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. 2014. “European Public Spheres: Politics Is Back.” Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigo-Alsina, M. “Talking about Climate Change: The Power of Narratives.” In Climate Change Denial and Public Relations, edited by N. Almiron and J. X. I. Triadú, 103–120. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romm, J. 2018. Climate Change: What Everyone Needs to Know. Second edition ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, C. 2018. Why Narratives of History Matter : Serbian and Croatian Political Discourses on European Integration. 1st ed. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2006. Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford Univ. Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E., M. Jones, M. McBeth, and C. Radaelli. 2017. “The Narrative Policy Framework.” In Theories of the Policy Process, edited by C. Weible and P. Sabatier, 173–214. Fourth ed. New York: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., M. D. Jones, and M. K. McBeth. 2011. “Policy Narratives and Policy Processes.” Policy Studies Journal 39 (3): 535–561. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Surel, Y. 2000. “The Role of Cognitive and Normative Frames in Policy-Making.” Journal of European Public Policy 7 (4): 495–512. doi:10.1080/13501760050165334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendler, F. 2016. Debating Europe in National Parliaments: Public Justification and Political Polarization. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R., J. Connelly, and D. Liefferink. 2017. The European Union in International Climate Change Politics: Still Taking a Lead? London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis group.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, J. 2016. “Boomerangs versus Javelins: How Polarization Constrains Communication on Climate Change.” Environmental Politics 25 (5): 788–811. doi:10.1080/09644016.2016.1166602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zürn, M. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar