The persistent dilemma of supranational representation. Framing the weakness of the European Parliament’s representative function in light of the rise of Euroscepticism

References

• Auel, K., O. Rozenberg, and A. Tacea. 2015. “Fighting Back? And, if So, How? Measuring Parliamentary Strength and Activity in EU Affairs.” In The Palgrave Handbook of National Parliaments and the European Union, edited by C. Hefftler, C. Neuhold, O. Rozenberg, and J. Smith, 60–93. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bartolini, S. 2005. Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building and Political Structuring between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Behm, A. S., and N. Brack. 2019. “Sheep in Wolf’s Clothing? Comparing Eurosceptic and Non-eurosceptic MEPs’ Parliamentary Behavior.” Journal of European Integration 41 (8): 1069–1088. doi:10.1080/07036337.2019.1645845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., and S. Kröger. 2013. “Representation Deficits and Surpluses in EU Policy Making.” Journal of European Integration 35 (5): 477–497. doi:10.1080/07036337.2013.799937.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy, R., and S. Kröger. 2014. “Domesticating the Democratic Deficit? The Role of National Parliaments and Parties in the EU’s System of Governance.” Parliamentary Affairs 67 (2): 437–457. doi:10.1093/pa/gss045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, N. 2015. “The Roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and Their Implications for the EU.” International Political Science Review 36 (3): 337–350. doi:10.1177/0192512115571590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brack, N., and O. Costa. 2018. “Democracy in Parliament Vs. Democracy through Parliament? Defining the Rules of the Game in the European Parliament.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 24 (1): 51–71. doi:10.1080/13572334.2018.1444625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandsma, G. J. 2019. “Transparency of EU Informal Trilogues through Public Feedback in the European Parliament: Promise Unfulfilled.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (10): 1464–1483. doi:10.1080/13501763.2018.1528295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, D., S. A. Popa, and H. Schmitt. 2019. “Responding to the Crisis: Eurosceptic Parties of the Left and Right and Their Changing Position Towards the European Union.” European Journal of Political Research 58 (3): 797–819. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12321.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. 2017. “Will Vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government.” American Political Science Review 111 (1): 54–67. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlotti, B. 2020. Patterns of Opposition in the European Parliament: Opposing Europe from the Inside? London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Costa, O., and N. Brack. 2013. “The Role of the European Parliament in Europe’s Integration and Parliamentarization Process.” In Parliamentary Dimensions of Regionalization and Globalization, edited by O. Costa, C. Dri, and S. Stavridis, 45–69. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, B. 2018. “Parliamentary Accountability in Multilevel Governance: What Role for Parliaments in Post-crisis EU Economic Governance?” Journal of European Public Policy 25 (2): 268–286. doi:10.1080/13501763.2017.1363270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum, B. and Fossum, J.E. 2009. “The multilevel parliamentary field: a framework for theorizing representative democracy in the EU”. European Political Science Review EPSR, 1 (2): 249–271.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E. 2018. Euroscepticism and the Future of European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, C. E., and S. B. Hobolt. 2012. “When Dimensions Collide: The Electoral Success of Issue Entrepreneurs.” European Union Politics 13 (2): 246–268. doi:10.1177/1465116511434788.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., A. Leupold, and H. Schmidtke. 2016. “Introduction: The Differentiated Politicisation of European Governance.” West European Politics 39 (1): 3–22. doi:10.1080/01402382.2015.1081505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, P., and M. Zürn. 2012. “Can the Politicization of European Integration Be Reversed?” JCMS:Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 137–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., and W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, L. 2015. “The “Constructivist Turn” in Democratic Representation: A Normative Dead‐end?” Constellations 22 (4): 487–499. doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabbrini, S., and U. Puetter. 2016. “Integration without Supranationalisation: Studying the Lead Roles of the European Council and the Council in post-Lisbon EU Politics.” Journal of European Integration 38 (5): 481–495. doi:10.1080/07036337.2016.1178254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossum, J.E. 2014. “The structure of EU representation and the crisis.” In Political Representation in the European Union: Still democratic in time of crisis, edited by S. Kröger, 52–68. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, P., and B. Geissel. 2019. “Saward’s Concept of the Representative Claim Revisited: An Empirical Perspective.” Politics and Governance 7 (3): 98–111. doi:10.17645/pag.v7i3.2103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héritier, A., C. Moury, M. G. Schoeller, K. L. Meer, and I. Mota. 2016. The European Parliament as a Driving Force of Constitutionalisation. 2015/PE 536.467, Study of the European Parliament, Policy Department of Citizens’ rights and Constitutional Affairs.Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., A. Noury, and G. Roland. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S., and B. Høyland. 2013. “Empowerment of the European Parliament.” Annual Review of Political Science 16: 171–189. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-032311-110735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2001. Multilevel Governance and European Integration. Boston: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, L., and G. Marks. 2009. “A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., E. Grande, and H. Kriesi. 2016. Politicising Europe. Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hutter, S., and H. Kriesi. 2019. “Politicizing Europe in Times of Crisis.” Journal of European Public Policy 26 (7): 996–1017. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1619801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, D., and C. Leston-Bandeira. 2018. “The Institutional Representation of Parliament.” Political Studies 66 (1): 154–172. doi:10.1177/0032321717706901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopecký, P., and C. Mudde. 2002. “The Two Sides of Euroscepticism: Party Positions on European Integration in East Central Europe.” European Union Politics 3 (3): 297–326. doi:10.1177/1465116502003003002.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., E. Grande, R. Lachat, M. Dolezal, S. Bornschier and T. Frey. 2008. West European politics in the age of globalization. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, S., and D. Friederich. 2012. “Transformation as Differentiation: The Diversity of Representation in the European Union.” In The Challenge of Democratic Representation in the EU, edited by S. Kröger and D. Friederich, 259–274. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kröger, S. 2015. “Democratic Representation as the Normative and Organizing Principle of the European Union.” In The European Union. Democratic Principles and Institutional Architectures in Times of Crisis, edited by S. Piattoni, 112–136. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leconte, C. 2015. “From Pathology to Mainstream Phenomenon: Reviewing the Euroscepticism Debate in Research and Theory.” International Political Science Review 36 (3): 250–263. doi:10.1177/0192512115576236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Z., and A. Katsanidou. 2014. “Multilevel Representation in the European Parliament.” European Union Politics 15 (1): 108–131. doi:10.1177/1465116513501907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, P. 2013. Ruling the Void. The Hollowing of Western Democracies. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, G. 1996. Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mamadouh, V., and T. Raunio. 2003. “The Committee System: Powers, Appointments and Report Allocation.” Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (2): 333–351. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marié, A. 2019. “European Parliament: Is the Grand Coalition Really a Thing of the Past?.” Bruges Political Research Papers 75/2019.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, M. J. 2017. “Contagious Euroscepticism: The Impact of Eurosceptic Support on Mainstream Party Positions on European Integration.” Party Politics 23 (4): 413–423. doi:10.1177/1354068815601787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, S., and H. Van Der Veer. 2016. “The Eurozone Crisis and the European Parliament’s Changing Lines of Conflict.” European Union Politics 17 (2): 242–261. doi:10.1177/1465116515622567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2010. “Accountability and Multi-level Governance: More Accountability, Less Democracy?” West European Politics 33 (5): 1030–1049. doi:10.1080/01402382.2010.486126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y. 2017. “Multilevel Governance and Depoliticization.” In Anti-politics, Depoliticization, and Governance, edited by P. Fawcett, M. V. Flinders, C. Hay, and M. Wood, 134–166. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Solorzano Borragan, N., and S. Smismans. 2012. “Representativeness: A Tool to Structure Interest Intermediation in the European Union.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50 (3): 403–421. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5965.2011.02236.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piattoni, S. 2015. “Is the EU a Representative Democracy? The Normative Debate and the Impact of Euro Crisis.” In What Form of Government for the European Union and the Eurozone?, edited by F. Fabbrini, E. H. Ballin, and H. Somsen, 133–150. Oxford-Portland: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Pitkin, H. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, J. 2014. “Compounded Representation in the EU. No Country for Old Parliaments?” In Political Representation in the European Union: Still Democratic in Times of Crisis?, edited by S. Kröger, 19–35. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rehfeld, A. 2006. “Towards a General Theory of Political Representation.” The Journal of Politics 68 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00365.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A., and L. Panning. 2019. “Eurosceptics in Trilogue Settings: Interest Formation and Contestation in the European Parliament.” West European Politics 42 (4): 755–775. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1575639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll Servent, A. R. 2017. The European Parliament. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. 2005. Building Europe’s Parliament: Democratic Representation beyond the Nation State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz‐Rufino, R., and S. Alonso. 2017. “Democracy without Choice: Citizens’ Perceptions of Government Autonomy during the Eurozone Crisis.” European Journal of Political Research 56 (2): 320–345. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvati, E. 2021. “Opposition Parties in the European Parliament: The Cases of Syriza, Podemos and the Five Star Movement.” The International Spectator 56 (1): 126–142. doi:10.1080/03932729.2020.1804237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salvati, E., and M. Vercesi. 2019. “Party Euroscepticism and the Conditions for Its Success: Conceptualization and Explanation.” Quaderni Di Scienza Politica 26 (2): 299–328.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2006. “The representative claim”. Contemporary Political Theory, 53 (3): 297–318.
   Google Scholar
• Saward, M. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schäfer, C., S. A. Popa, D. Braun, and H. Schmitt. 2021. “The Reshaping of Political Conflict over Europe: From pre-Maastricht to post-Euro Crisis.” In West European Politics, 44 (3): 531–5571–27
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. 1999. Governing in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2010. “Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth ‘New Institutionalism.” European Political Science Review 2 (1): 1–25. doi:10.1017/S175577390999021X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. 2020. Europe’s Crisis of Legitimacy: Governing by Rules and Ruling by Numbers in the Eurozone. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Settembri, P., and C. Neuhold. 2009. “Achieving Consensus through Committees: Does the European Parliament Manage?” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 47 (1): 127–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statham, P., and H. J. Trenz. 2013. “How European Union Politicization Can Emerge through Contestation: The Constitution Case.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 51 (5): 965–980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taggart, P., and A. Szczerbiak. 2008. Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treib, O. 2014. “The Voter Says No, but Nobody Listens: Causes and Consequences of the Eurosceptic Vote in the 2014 European Elections.” Journal of European Public Policy 21 (10): 1541–1554. doi:10.1080/13501763.2014.941534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treib, O. 2021. “Euroscepticism Is Here to Stay: What Cleavage Theory Can Teach Us about the 2019 European Parliament Elections.” Journal of European Public Policy 28 (2): 174–189.
   Google Scholar
• Turnbull-Dugarte, S. J. 2020. “The Impact of EU Intervention on Political Parties’ Politicisation of Europe following the Financial Crisis.” West European Politics 43 (4): 894–918. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1641779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N., and M. E. Warren. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11 (1): 387–412. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, T. 2012. “National parliamentary control of European Union affairs: A cross national and longitudinal comparison”. West European Politics, 35 (3): 657–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, M., and M. Flinders. 2014. “Rethinking Depoliticisation: Beyond the Governmental.” Policy and Politics 42 (2): 151–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yordanova, N. 2011. “The European Parliament: In Need of a Theory.” European Union Politics 12 (4): 597–617. doi:10.1177/1465116511417188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar