China’s discourse on the belt and road initiative: a hidden threat to European security logic?

References

• Abdelal, R., M. Blyth, and C. Parsons, eds. 2010. Constructing the International Political Economy. Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arežina, S. 2020. Reflections of the “Belt and Road” Initiative and China- CEEC Cooperation on the Perceptions of China Pervading the Public Discourse in Albania. China-CEE Institution. Budapest: China-CEE Institute). July 6.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. L. 1975. “How to Do Things with Words.” In James Lectures. edited by J. O. Urmson and W. Marina Sbisà, 2nd ed, Vol.1955, pp. 168. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baiyi, W. 2001. “The Chinese Security Concept and Its Historical Evolution.” Journal of Contemporary China 10 (27): 275–283. doi:10.1080/10670560124748.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., ed. 2011. Securitization Theory, How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Balzacq, T., S. Léonard, and J. Ruzicka. 2016. “‘Securitization’ Revisited: Theory and Cases.” International Relations 30 (4): 494–531. doi:10.1177/0047117815596590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beland, D. 2019. How Ideas and Institutions Shape the Politics of Public Policy.Cambridge Elements, Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beland, D., and R. Henry Cox. 2016. “Ideas as Coalition Magnets: Coalition Building, Policy Entrepreneurs, and Power Relations.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 428–445. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1115533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beland, D., and Y. Ka Man. 2004. “A Long Financial March: Pension Reform in China.” Journal of Social Policy 33 (2): 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727940300744X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benabdallah, L. 2019. “Contesting the International Order by Integrating It: The Case of China’s Belt and Road Initiative.” Third World Quarterly 40 (1): 92–108. doi:10.1080/01436597.2018.1529539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biba, S. 2014. “Desecuritization in China’s Behavior Towards Its Transboundary Rivers: The Mekong River, the Brahmaputra River, and the Irtysh and Ili Rivers.” Journal of Contemporary China 23 (85): 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2013.809975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, M. . 2018. “When Is It Rational to Learn the Wrong Lessons? Technocratic Authority, Social Learning, and Euro Fragility”. Perspectives on Politics 16 (1): 110–126. doi:10.1017/S1537592717002171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boboc, G. 2017. “The Belt and Road Initiative: China’s Soft Power Strategy.”
   Google Scholar
• Borić, F. 2020. “Five Connectivities” of the Belt and Road Initiative: Results and Recommendations for the Future Cooperation. China-CEE Institute. Budapest: China-CEE Institute). June 26.
   Google Scholar
• Bourbeau, Philippe, Vuori, Juha. 2015. “Security, resilience and desecuritization: multidirectional moves and dynamics.“ Critical Studies on Security 3 (3): 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1111095.
   Google Scholar
• Bräutigam, D., and T. Xiaoyang. 2012. “Economic Statecraft in China’s New Overseas Special Economic Zones: Soft Power, Business or Resource Security?” International Affairs 88 (4): 799–816. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2012.01102.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. 2007. China and the Global Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillian.
   Google Scholar
• Breslin, S. 2020. “China’s Global Cultural Interactions.” In China & the World, edited by D. Shambaugh, 137155. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, T., and Tobias. 2013. Chinas Kapitalismus: Entstehung, Verlauf, Paradoxien. Frankfurt am Main/New York: Campus Verlag GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. 2016. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B. 2016. People, States, and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-cold War Era, 25th Anniversary. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buzan, B., O. Wæver, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
   Google Scholar
• Callahan, W. A. 2020. Sensible Politics: Visualizing International Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. 2004. Institutional Change and Globalization. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., and V. A. Schmidt. 2020. “Between Power and Powerlessness in the Euro Zone Crisis and Thereafter.” Journal of European Public Policy 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2020.1751679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavelty, D., Myriam, and T. Balzacq, eds. 2017. Routledge Handbook of Security Studies (2nd ed). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Commission of the European Communities. 2008. “In Eastern Partnership. Edited by Commission of the European Communities. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. 2021. Joint Declaration of the Eastern Partnership Summit. edited by. Council of the European Union. Brussels European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, B., M. B. Carstensen, and L. Seabrooke. 2015. “Ideas, Political Power, and Public Policy”. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 315–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ergunsü, U. 2018. European Union and the “16+1 Cooperation” Is Cooperation under the “Belt and Road” Initiative Feasible? . China-CEE Institut. Budapest: China-CEE Institut).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2020. Joint Communication: Eastern Partnership Policy beyond 2020: Reinforcing Resilience – An Eastern Partnership that Delivers for All. ,edited by.Brussels: HIGH REPRESENTATIVE OF THE UNION FOR FOREIGN AFFAIRS AND SECURITY POLICY. Brussels European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Eastern Partnership: A Renewed Agenda for Recovery, Resilience and Reform Underpinned by an Economic and Investment Plan. European Commission. Brussels European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2019. JOINT COMMUNICATION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL AND THE COUNCIL, EU-China – A Strategic Outlook. edited by European Commission Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Union External Action Service. 2021. Disinformation Narratives about the Eastern Partnership. Brussels: EEASS (European Union External Action Service.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1969. L’archéologie du savoir. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Friedberg, A. L. 2011. A Contest for Supremacy; China, America, and the Struggle for Mastery in Asia. NewYork: W. W. Norton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gofas, A., and C. Hay, eds. 2010. The Role of Ideas in Political Analysis. London & New York Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25 (3): 275–296. doi:10.2307/422246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2017. “The Interdependence of Intra- and Inter-Subjectivity in Constructivist Institutionalism.” Critical Review 29 (2): 235–247. doi:10.1080/08913811.2017.1366667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilmann, S., ed. 2017. China’s Political System. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J., and R. Hasmath, eds. 2013. The Chinese Corporatist State - Adaption, Survival and Resistance. Oxon & NewYork: Routledge Contemporary China Studies, Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. 2014. Security Unbound: Enacting Democratic Limits (1st Ed.). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Immergut, E. 1998. “The Theoretical Core of the New Institutionalism.” Politics & Society 26 (1): 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329298026001002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanić, M., and A. Savović. 2020. Belt and Road Initiative and Bosnia and Herzegovina. Budapest: China-CEE Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. T. 2015. “Process Tracing the Effects of Ideas.” In Process Tracing to Analytic Tool, edited by A. Bennett and J. T. Checkel. 41–73. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jakimów, M. 2019. “Desecuritisation as a Soft Power Strategy: The Belt and Road Initiative, European Fragmentation and China’s Normative Influence in Central-Eastern Europe.” Asia Europe Journal 17: 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10308-019-00561-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jervis, R. 2017. How Statesmen Think: The Psychology of International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jinping, X. 2014. The Governance of China. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jinping, X. 2017a. The Governance of China II. Beijing: Foreign Languages Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jinping, X. 2017b. “Keynote Speech by H.E. Xi Jinping, President of the People’s Republic of China, at the Opening Session of the World Economic Forum Annual Meeting 2017.” Xinhuanet, Accessed 10 July 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jinping, X. 2017c. President Xi’s Speech at Opening of Belt and Road Forum. Edited by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. Beijing Xinhua.
   Google Scholar
• Jinping, X. 2017d. “Work Together to Build the Silk Road Economic Belt and the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road, Keynote Speech at the Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation”. Xinhuanet Accessed 8. July.
   Google Scholar
• Jinping, X. 2018. ““习近平出席全国宣传思想工作会议并发表重要讲话”. The State Council of the People’s Republic of China.” Accessed 13 (March).
   Google Scholar
• John, C., and O. K. Pedersen. 2011. “Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy”. In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, edited by D. Beland. 167–190. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jojić, S. 2017a. How Serbia Perceives “The Belt and the Road” Initiative and 16+1 Cooperation. Budapest: China-CEE Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Jojić, S. 2017b. How Serbia Perceives “The Belt and the Road” Initiative and 16+1 Cooperation. China-CEE Institution. Budapest: China-CEE Institution).
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. J., ed. 1996. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaunert, C., and S. Léonard. 2019. “The Collective Securitisation of Terrorism in the European Union.” West European Politics 42 (2): 261–277. doi:10.1080/01402382.2018.1510194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, S., ed. 2017. Global Governance and China: The Dragon’s Learning Curve (Global Institutions). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kent, A. 2007. Beyond Compliance, China, International Organizations and Global Security. Standford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. O., and J. S. Nye. 1989. Power and Interdependence. Glenview, Illinois and Boston: Scott, Foresman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Kusai, S. Z. 2017. Some Lessons, Prospects and International Aspects of the CEEC–China Cooperation and the Belt & Road Initiative. China-CEE Institute. Budapest: China-CEE Institute). DECEMBER 11.
   Google Scholar
• Léonard, S., and C. Kaunert. 2011. “Reconceptualizing the Audience in Securitization Theory.” In Securitization Theory, How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve, edited by T. Balzacq, 57–76. London and New York: Routledege.
   Google Scholar
• Léonard, S., and C. Kaunert. 2021a. “De-centring the Securitisation of Asylum and Migration in the European Union: Securitisation, Vulnerability and the Role of Turkey.“ Geopolitics. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2021.1929183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Léonard, S., and C. Kaunert. 2021b. “Refugee Flows and Terrorism in the European Union: Securitization through Association.” International Politics, . https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00359-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longhurst, K., and C. Thomson. 2021. Eastern Partnership Index 2020-21, Charting Performance in the Eastern Partnership: Democracy and Good Governance, Policy Convergence and Sustainable Development. Brussels: Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Lukács, E., and K. Völgyi. 2018. China-Hungary Economic Relations under OBOR. China-CEE Institut. Budapest: China-CEE Institute).
   Google Scholar
• McNally, C. 2011. “China’s Changing Guanxi Capitalism: Private Entrepreneurs between Leninist Control and Relentless Accumulation.” Business and Politics. 2): Article 5 13 2: 1–29. 10.2202/1469-3569.1339.
   Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 2010. “The Gathering Storm: China’s Challenge to US Power in Asia.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 3 (4): 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poq016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mearsheimer, J. J. 2014. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York W.W: Norton & Company, .
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China. 2017. Ministry of Foreign Affairs Holds Briefing for Chinese and Foreign Media on President Xi Jinping’s Attendance and Chairing of Related Events of the BRF. Beijing: Xinhuanet.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China 2018. China's Policy Paper on the European Union. Edited by Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. Beijing Xinhuanet
   Google Scholar
• Moldicz, C. I., and T. Novak. 2017. China’s Effort to Boost Globalization in a Hungarian Perspective: How Hungary Perceives the Belt and Road Initiative and the 16+1 Cooperation. China-CEE Institut. Budapest: China-CEE Institute).
   Google Scholar
• National Development and Reform Commission. 2015. Vision and Actions on Jointly Building Silk Road Economic Belt and 21st-Century Maritime Silk Road. Beijing: Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Commerce of the People’s Republic of China.
   Google Scholar
• Naughton, B. 2020. “China’s Global Economic Interaction.” In China and the World, edited by D. Shambaugh, 113–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S. 2004. “Soft Power and American Foreign Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 119 (2): 255–270. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.2307/20202345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2018. China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Global Trade, Investment and Finance Landscape. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development).
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Z. 2012. Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations - Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. 2007. How to Map Arguments in Political Science. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Philippe, B., and J. A. Vuori. 2015. “Security, Resilience and Desecuritization: Multidirectional Moves and Dynamics.” Critical Studies on Security 3 (3): 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2015.1111095.
   Google Scholar
• Rogelja, I., and K. Tsimonis. 2020. “Narrating the China Threat: Securitising Chinese Economic Presence in Europe.” The Chinese Journal of International Politics 13 (1): 103–133. doi:10.1093/cjip/poz019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahar, A., and C. Kaunert.2021.“Desecuritisation, Deradicalisation, and National Identity in Afghanistan: Higher Education and Desecuritisation Processes.”European Journal of International Security1-18:https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2021.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V., and M. Carstensen. 2015. “Power Through, over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism.” Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 318–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuo, W. 2018. The Openness of the Belt and Road and China-EU Cooperation. China-CEE Institute. Budapest: China-CEE Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Simović, V., and A. Mudrenović. 2020. BiH Diplomatic Perception on Cooperation with China: From 1995 to the BRI. China-CEE Institute. Budapest: China-CEE Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Šolaja, M. 2020. Chinese Foreign Policies in BiH: From the Stereotyped past to Changing Present under the BRI. Budapest: China-CEE Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Stevic, L. 2020. The Evolution of Chinese Cultural Diplomacy and Its Impact on the BiH Perception of the Belt and Road Initiative and China CEE Cooperation. China-CEE Institution. Budapest: China-CEE Institution). June 3.
   Google Scholar
• Szunomar, A. 2017. Hungarian and Chinese Economic Relations and Opportunities under the Belt and Road Initiative. Budapest: China-CEE Institute).
   Google Scholar
• Unger, J., ed. 2008. Associations and the Chinese State. New York & London: M.E. Sharpe, .
   Google Scholar
• Vetrovcova, M. 2018. The Power of Perceptions in International Relations: CEE and China in a New Era. Budapest: China-CEE Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, J. A. 2008. “Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization: Applying the Theory of Securitization to the Study of Non-Democratic Political Orders.” European Journal of International Relations 14 (1): 65–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuori, J. A. 2011. How to Do Security with Words: A Grammar of Securitisation in the People’s Republic of China. Turku: University of Turku.
   Google Scholar
• Vuori, J. A. 2018. “Let’s Just Say We’d like to Avoid Any Great Power Entanglements: Desecuritization in post-Mao Chinese Foreign Policy Towards Major Powers.” Global Discourse 8 (1): 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2017.1408279.
   Google Scholar
• Wæver, O. 1995b. “Securitization and Desecuritization.” In On Security, edited by R. Lipschutz, 46–86. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, S. D. 2012. “‘Framing’ the Copenhagen School: Integrating the Literature on Threat Construction.” Millennium 40 (2): 279–301. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0305829811425889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1904. “Die Objektivitaet sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis.” Archiv fuer Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 19 (1): 22–87.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, S., and Y. Jing. 2012. “The EU and China’s Perceptions of Democracy and Their Impacts on China-EU Relations.” In Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations - Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships, edited by Z. Pan. 113–127. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Weil, S., and D. Munteanu. 2020. “The Belt and Road Initiative: A Pathway to World Leadership?”. In The Belt and Road Initiative, Opportunities and Challenges of a Chinese Economic Ambition, edited by D. D. Cremer, B. McKern, and J. McGuire. 60–91. Los Angeles & London: Sage Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wen, W., and L. Dian. 2018. The 5th Anniversary of the Belt and Road Initiative: Review and Outlook from Policy Perspective. Beijing: Renmin University of China (RDCY) (Beijing).
   Google Scholar
• Wen, W., J. Jinjing, X. Junyong, and L. Ying. 2016. “Adhering to the Planning, Orderly and Pragmatically Build the “Belt and Road” the Belt and Road Progress Report.” Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies, Renmin University of China (RDCY) (Shanghai).
   Google Scholar
• Wen, W., J. Jinjing, C. Xiaochen, and Q. Fuquan. 2018. General Landscape of China’s Purchase Power- “The Belt and Road Initiative” and Global Market Transformation. Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China (RDCY). Beijing: Chongyang Institute for Financial Studies at Renmin University of China (RDCY)). November.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. 1995. “Constructing International Politics.” International Security 20 (1): 71–81. doi:10.2307/2539217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmaier, W. W. 2015. “The Power of Economic Ideas - Through, over and in - Political Time: The Construction, Conversion and Crisis of the Neoliberal Order in the US and the UK”. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (3): 338–356. doi:10.1080/13501763.2015.1115890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmaier, W. W. 2016. Economic Ideas in Political Time, the Rise and the Fall of Economic Orders from the Progressive Era to the Global Financial Crisis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaman, G., and I. Monica Oehler-Sincai. 2020. ESTG BRI: Principles for a Sustainable Belt and Road Initiative. China-CEE Institution. Budapest: China-CEE Institute).
   Google Scholar