Double two-level games and international negotiations: making sense of migration governance in EU-Africa relations

References

• Adam, I., F. Trauner, L. Jegen, and C. Roos. 2020. “West African Interests in (EU) Migration Policy: Balancing Domestic Priorities with External Incentives.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46 (15): 3101–3118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamson, F. B., and G. Tsourapas. 2019. “Migration Diplomacy in World Politics.” International Studies Perspectives 20 (2): 113–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• African, Caribbean, and Pacific Group of States [ACP Group]. 2018. “ACP Negotiating Mandate for a Post-Cotonou Partnership Agreement with the European Union”. ACP/00/011/18 Final. 107th Session of the ACP Council of Ministers, Lomé, 30 May.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, K. 2005. “Political Dialogue in a ‘New’ Framework.” In The European Union and the Developing Countries: The Cotonou Agreement, edited by O. Babarinde and G. Faber, pp. 155–175. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Badell, D. 2020. “The EU, Migration and Contestation: The UN Global Compact for Migration, from Consensus to Dissensus.” Global Affairs 6 (4–5): 347–362.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, A. 2011. Global Migration Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bisong, A. 2019. “Trans-regional Institutional Cooperation as Multilevel Governance: ECOWAS Migration Policy and the EU.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 45 (8): 1294–1309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boswell, C. 2003. “The ‘External Dimension’ of EU Immigration and Asylum Policy.” International Affairs 79 (3): 619–638.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2013. “Rethinking ACP-EU Relations after Cotonou: Tensions, Contradictions, Prospects.” Journal of International Development 25 (5): 742–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2018. “Caught Between the ACP and the AU: Africa’s Relations with the European Union in a Post-Cotonou Agreement Context.” South African Journal of International Affairs 25 (4): 481–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2020. “The African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) Group of States from the Lomé Convention to the Cotonou Agreement and Beyond.” In The Oxford Encyclopedia of European Union Politics, edited by F. Laursen. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1127.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2021a. “The Rationales behind the EU-OACPS Agreement: Process, Outcome, Contestations.” European Foreign Affairs Review 26 (2): 243–264.
   Google Scholar
• Carbone, M. 2021b. “There Is Life beyond the European Union: Revisiting the Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States.” Third World Quarterly 42 (10): 2451–2468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Concord. 2021. Concord’s Analysis of the Post-Cotonou Agreement. Brussels: Concord.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union [EU]. 2018. “Negotiating Directives for a Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Its Member States of the One Part, and with Countries of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the Other Part”. ST 8094 2018 ADD 1, 21 June.
   Google Scholar
• Crush, J. 2015. “The EU-ACP Migration and Development Relationship.” Migration and Development 4 (1): 39–54.
   Google Scholar
• da Conceição-Heldt, E., and P. A. Mello. 2017. “Two-Level Games in Foreign Policy Analysis.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elgström, O. 2000. “Lomé and post-Lomé: Asymmetric Negotiations and the Impact of Norms.” European Foreign Affairs Review 5 (2): 175–195.
   Google Scholar
• Elgström, O., and C. Jönsson. 2000. “Negotiation in the European Union: Bargaining or problem-solving?” Journal of European Public Policy 7 (5): 684–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgström, O., and M. Strömvik. 2005. “The European Union as an Actor in International Negotiations.” In European Union Negotiations: Processes, Networks and Institutions, edited by O. Elgström and C. Jönsson, pp. 117–129. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission [EC]. 2017. “Recommendation for a Council Decision Authorising the Opening of Negotiations on a Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Countries of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States”. COM (2017) 763, 12 December.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC) and OACPS. 2021. Negotiated Agreement Text Initialled by the EU and OACPS Chief Negotiators on 15th April 2021, 15 April.
   Google Scholar
• European Union [EU]. 2000. “Partnership Agreement between the Members of the African, Caribbean and Pacific Group of States of the One Part, and the European Community and Its Member States, of the Other Part, Signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000”. OJ L 317, 15 December.
   Google Scholar
• Flahaux, M. L., and H. De Haas. 2006. “African Migration: Trends, Patterns, Drivers.” Comparative Migration Studies 4 (1). doi:10.1186/s40878-015-0015-6
   Google Scholar
• Forwood, G. 2001. “The Road to Cotonou: Negotiating a Successor to Lomé.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 39 (3): 423–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frennhoff Larsén, M. 2007. “Trade Negotiations between the EU and South Africa: A three-level Game.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45 (4): 857–881.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., L. Hadj-Abdou, and L. Brumat. 2021. Migration and Mobility in the European Union. 2nd. A. Geddes, L. Hadj-Abdou, and L. Brumat. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, A., and M. T. Maru. 2020. “Localising Migration Diplomacy in Africa? Ethiopia in Its Regional and International Setting”. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. RSCAS 2020/50.
   Google Scholar
• Gstöhl, S. 2021. “The EU in International Negotiations: Three-level Game and Principal-Agent Approaches.” In The External Action of the European Union: Concepts, Approaches, Theories, edited by S. Gstöhl and S. Schunz, 102–116. London: Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hampshire, J. 2016. “Speaking with One Voice? the European Union’s Global Approach to Migration and Mobility and the Limits of International Migration Cooperation.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 42 (4): 571–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İçduygu, A., and D. B. Aksel. 2014. “Two-to-tango in Migration Diplomacy: Negotiating Readmission Agreement between the EU and Turkey.” European Journal of Migration and Law 16 (3): 337–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keijzer, N. 2016. “Feigned Ambition. Analysing the Emergence, Evolution and Performance of the ACP Group of States.” Third World Thematics 1 (4): 508–525.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, A. 2017. “ACP-EU Migration Policy.” In The ACP Group and the EU Development Partnership: Beyond the North-South Debate, edited by A. Montoute and K. Virk, 235–261. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knoll, A. 2020. “The EU’s Approach to African Migration during Crisis: Reinforcement and Changes.” In Migration Conundrums, Regional Integration and Development. Africa’s Global Engagement: Perspectives from Emerging Countries, edited by I. Moyo, C. Nshimbi, and J. Laine. Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan. 65-92.
   Google Scholar
• Lavenex, S. 2006. “Shifting up and Out: The Foreign Policy of European Immigration Control.” West European Politics 29 (2): 329–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiyegun, O. 2019. “Role of Regional Consultative Processes in the Lead up to the Negotiations of Global Compact on Migration: The Case of Africa.” International Migration 57 (6): 258–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maru, M. T. 2021. “Migration Policy-Making in Africa: Determinants and Implications for Cooperation with Europe.” Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Research Paper No. 2021/54.
   Google Scholar
• Mouthaan, M. 2019. “Unpacking Domestic Preferences in the Policy-‘receiving’ State: The EU’s Migration Cooperation with Senegal and Ghana.” Comparative Migration Studies 7 (35). doi: 10.1186/s40878-019-0141-7
   Google Scholar
• Mouthaan, M. 2021. “Old Wine in New Bottles? The European Union’s Organizational Response to Reforming EU-African Migration Cooperation.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 59 (5): 1177–1194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunz, R., S. Lavenex, and M. Panizzon, Eds. 2011. Multilayered Migration Governance: The Promise of Partnership. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, J. S. 2010. “Three Islands of Knowledge about Negotiation in International Organisations.” Journal of European Public Policy 17 (5): 619–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pécoud, A. 2021. “Philosophies of Migration Governance in a Globalizing World.” Globalizations 18 (1): 103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 1988. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games.” International Organization 42 (3): 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenhill, J. 1985. Collective Clientelism: The Lomé Conventions and North–South Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reslow, N., and M. Vink. 2015. “Three-level Games in EU External Migration Policy: Negotiating Mobility Partnerships in West Africa.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 53 (4): 857–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schöfberger, I. 2019. “The EU’s Negotiation of Narratives and Policies on African Migration, 1999–2019.” European Foreign Affairs Review 24 (4): 513–532.
   Google Scholar
• Slominski, P., and F. Trauner. 2022. “How Do Member States Return Unwanted Migrants? The Strategic (Non-)use of ‘Europe’ during the Migration Crisis.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (1): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Stutz, P., and F. Trauner. 2022. “The EU’s ‘Return Rate’ with Third Countries: Why EU Readmission Agreements Do Not Make Much Difference.” International Migration.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsourapas, G. 2017. “Migration Diplomacy in the Global South: Cooperation, Coercion and Issue Linkage in Gaddafi’s Libya.” Third World Quarterly 38 (10): 2367–2385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinhardt, C., and A. Moerland. 2018. “(Mis) Perceptions in Two‐and Three‐Level Games: Detachment in Economic Partnership Agreement Negotiations.” JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56 (3): 576–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, S. 2014. “The Politics of Negotiating EU Readmission Agreements: Insights from Morocco and Turkey.” European Journal of Migration and Law 16 (1): 69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunderlich, D. 2012. “The Limits of External Governance: Implementing EU External Migration Policy.” Journal of European Public Policy 19 (9): 1414–1433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, A. R. 2003. “What Game? by Which Rules? Adaptation and Flexibility in the EC’s Foreign Economic Policy.” In Understanding the European Union’s External Relations, edited by M. Knodt and S. Princen, 53–71. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zanker, F. 2019. “Managing or Restricting Movement? Diverging Approaches of African and European Migration Governance.” Comparative Migration Studies 7 (17).
   Google Scholar
• Zaun, N., and O. Nantermoz. 2022. “The Use of pseudo-causal Narratives in EU Policies: The Case of the European Union Emergency Trust Fund for Africa.” Journal of European Public Policy 29 (4): 510–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar