A learning alliance for robust design in product development: the case of Volvo 3P and Chalmers University of Technology

References

• Alänge, S., & Frischer, J. (1998). Standardization of the doctoral learning process. CIM Working Papers, No. WP 1998:01.
   Google Scholar
• Alänge, S., & Scheinberg, S. (2012, November 9–11). Building teams and organizational learning in China. 10th Globelics International Conference, Hangzhou, China.
   Google Scholar
• Alänge, S., & Steiber, A. (2011). Diffusion of organizational innovations: An empirical test of an analytical framework. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(8), 881–897. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2011.611412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemán, F., Medrano, H., Norgren, A., Reyes, A., & Scheinberg, S. (Eds.). (2010). Innovaciones en las Universidades Nicaraguenses, Managua: UNA.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method, and practice, Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, M. (2003). Why total quality management programs do not persist: The role of management quality and implications for leading a TQM transformation. Decision Science, 34(4), 623–642. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02640.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Book, S. (2006). Naturalizing quality management (PhD thesis). Department of Technology Management and Economics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg.
   Google Scholar
• Bordin, E. (1979). The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 16, 252–260. doi: 10.1037/h0085885
   Google Scholar
• Burnes, B. (2004). Kurt Lewin and the planned approach to change: A re-appraisal. Journal of Management Studies, 4, 977–1002. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00463.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2001). Doing action research in your own organization, London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlgaard, J. J., Pettersen, J., & Dahlgaard-Park, S. M. (2011). Quality and lean health care: A system for assessing and improving the health of healthcare organizations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 22(6), 673–689. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2011.580651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazl Mashhadi, A., Alänge, S., & Roos, L. U. (2012). Introducing Robust Design in Product Development: Learning from an initiative at Volvo. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(9–10), 1191–1205. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2012.728847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiol, M., & Lyles, M. (1985). Organizational learning. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fonseca, J. (2002). Complexity & innovation in organizations, Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Frischer, J. (2006). The learning alliance – relational aspects of learning (PhD Thesis). Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University, Aalborg.
   Google Scholar
• Frischer, J., Alänge, S., & Scheinberg, S. (2000). The learning alliance: Relational aspects to the development of competence. Proceedings of the 7th bi-annual conference of ISSWOV, June 25–28, Jerusalem.
   Google Scholar
• de Guerre, D. (2002). Doing Action Research in One's Own Organization: An Ongoing Conversation Over Time. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 15(4), 331–349. doi: 10.1023/A:1016348421584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasenkamp, T., Arvidsson, M., & Gremyr, I. (2009). A review of practices for robust design methodology. Journal of Engineering Design, 20(6), 645–657. doi: 10.1080/09544820802275557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2005). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R.M. (1967). Utopia: A study in comparative organization (PhD thesis). University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social sciences; selected theoretical paper. (D. Cartwright, ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Moosa, K., & Sajid, A. (2010). Critical analysis of Six Sigma implementation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(7), 745–759. doi: 10.1080/14783363.2010.483100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schein, E. (1996). Kurt Lewin's change theory in the field and in the classroom: Notes toward a model of managed learning. Systems Practice, 9(1), 27–47. doi: 10.1007/BF02173417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheinberg, S., & Alänge, S. (1997). The cycle of experience revised, Gothenburg: Department of Industrial Dynamics, Chalmers University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Scheinberg, S., & Frischer, J. (2004). Relationship-based learning: A new model for doctor development. Proceedings from the 9th ISSWOV conference, August 3–6, New Orleans.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner – how professionals think in action, New York: Basic Book.
   Google Scholar
• Shiba, S., Graham, A., & Walden, D. (1993). A new American TQM: Four practical revolutions in management, Portland, OR: Productivity Press and Center for Quality Management.
   Google Scholar