Designing the airport service with fuzzy QFD based on SERVQUAL integrated with a fuzzy multi-objective decision model

References

• Akao, Y. (1972). New product development and quality assurance: System of QFD, standardization and quality control. Japan Standards Association, 25(4), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Akao, Y. (1990). Quality function deployment: Integrating customer requirements into product design. Cambridge, MA: Productivity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Altuntas, S., Dereli, T., & Yilmaz, M. K. (2012). Multi-criteria decision making methods based weighted SERVQUAL scales to measure perceived service quality in hospitals: A case study from turkey. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(12), 1379–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altuntas, S., & Yener, E. (2012). An approach based on TRIZ methodology and SERVQUAL scale to improve the quality of health-care service: A case study. Ege Academic Review, 12(1), 97–106.
   Google Scholar
• Buyukozkan, G., Feyzioglu, O., & Ruan, D. (2007). Fuzzy group decision-making to multiple preference formats in quality function deployment. Computers in Industry, 58, 392–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calabrese, A., & Scoglio, F. (2012). Reframing the past: A new approach in service quality assessment. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(11–12), 1329–1343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, D., & Youngtaek, K. (2003). A study on the evaluation of incheon international airport’s service quality. Korean Management Review, 32(4), 983–999.
   Google Scholar
• Chatterjee, A., Ghosh, C., & Bandyopadhyay, S. (2009). Assessing students’ rating in higher education: A SERVQUAL approach. Total Quality Management, 20(10), 1095–1109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L.-H., & Ko, W.-C. (2008). A fuzzy nonlinear model for quality function deployment considering Kano’s concept. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 48, 581–593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, L. H., & Weng, M. C. (2006). An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models. European Journal of Operational Research, 172(1), 230–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien-Chang, C. (2012). Evaluating the quality of airport service using the fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method: A case study of Taiwanese airports. Expert Systems, 29(3), 246–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, C. C. (2009). A model for the evaluation of airport service quality. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Transport, 162(4), 207–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dat, Q. D., Phuong, T. T., Kao, H., Chou, S., & Nghia, P. (2015). A new integrated fuzzy QFD approach for market segments evaluation and selection. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39, 3653–3665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erginel, N. (2010). Construction of a fuzzy QFD failure matrix using a fuzzy multiple-objective decision model. Journal of Engineering Design, 21(6), 677–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erol, I., & Ferrell, W. G. (2003). A methodology for selection problems with multiple, conflicting objectives and both qualitative and quantitative criteria. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(3), 187–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodness, D., & Murray, B. (2007). Passengers’ expectations of airport service quality. Journal of Services Marketing, 21(7), 492–506.
   Google Scholar
• Gunasekaran, N., Rathesh, S., Arunachalam, S., & Koh, S. C. L. (2006). Optimizing supply chain management using fuzzy approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(6), 737–749.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, J., & Clausing, D. (1988). The house of quality. Harward Business Review, 66(3), 63–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, I., Francis, G., & Fry, J. (2002). Performance measurement in airports: A critical international comparison. Public Works Management & Policy, 6(4), 264–275.
   Google Scholar
• Juan, Y.-K., Perng, Y.-H., Castro-Lacouture, D., & Lu, K.-S. (2009). Housing refurbishment contractors selection based on a hybrid fuzzy-QFD approach. Automation in Construction, 18, 139–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., & Buyukozkan, G. (2006). A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 171, 390–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak, E. E. (2004). Fuzzy multiple objective programming framework to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47, 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak, E., & Ozogul, C. (2009). An integrated decision making approach for ERP system selection. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(1), 660–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsak, E. E., Sozer, S., & Alptekin, S. E. (2002). Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44(1), 171–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kayapinar, S., & Erginel, N. (2013). Ranking the technical requirements of the airport for maximum passenger satisfaction. LISS, 1(2012), 563–568.
   Google Scholar
• Kuo, T.-C., Wu, H.-H., & Shieh, J.-I. (2009). Integration of environmental considerations in quality function deployment by using fuzzy logic. Expert Systems with Applications, 36, 7148–7156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. S., & Li, R. J. (1993). Fuzzy multiple objective programming and compromise programming with Pareto optimum. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 53(3), 275–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubbe, B., Douglas, A., & Zambellis, J. (2011). An application of the airport service quality model in South Africa. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17, 224–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrjerdi, Y. Z. (2009). Quality function deployment and its extensions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(6), 616–640.
   Google Scholar
• Pabedinskaite, A., & Akstanaite, V. (2014). Evaluation of the airport service quality. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 398–409.
   Google Scholar
• Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multi-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of the service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, J. W., & Jung, S. Y. (2011). Transfer passengers’ perceptions of airport service quality: A case study of incheon international airport. International Business Research, 4(3), 75–82.
   Google Scholar
• Singgih, L. M., & Pamungkas, I. A. (2009). Implementing grey model and value analysis in QFD process to increase customer satisfaction. International conference on operations and supply chain management, Bujang Valley, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Sohail, M. S., & Al-Gahtani, A. S. (2005). Measuring service quality at King Fahd International Airport. International Journal of Services and Standards, 1(4), 482–493.
   Google Scholar
• Tolga, E., & Alptekin, S. E. (2008). Product evaluation and development process using a fuzzy compromise-based goal programming approach. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 19(4), 285–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, Z., & Chen, Y. (2014). Fuzzy optimization modeling approach for QFD-based new product design. Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2014, 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, Y., Liu, H., Zhang, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2010). A fuzzy- QFD approach to design decision support system for emergency response of hazardous materials road transportation accidents. International conference on automation and logistics (ICAL), 506–510.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, C. H., & Kuo, Y. (2003). Evaluating passenger services of Asia-pacific international airports. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39, 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaim, S., Sevkli, M., Camgöz- Akdag, H., Demirel, O., & Yayla, A. (2014). Use of ANP weighted crisp and fuzzy QFD for product development. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 4464–4474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, H. J. (1978). Fuzzy programming and linear programming with several objective functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1(1), 45–55. http://www.icao.int/Meetings/wrdss2011/Documents/JointWorkshop2005/ATAG_SocialBenefitsAirTransport.pdf
   Google Scholar