Key performance measurement capabilities for managing distributed teams

References

• Algesheimer, R., Dholakia, U. M., & Gurău, C. (2011). Virtual team performance in a highly competitive environment. Group & Organization Management, 36(2), 161–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110391251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argote, L. (2005). Reflections on two views of managing learning and knowledge in organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 43–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492604273179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, D., Gosling, A., Weinman, J., & Marteau, T. (1997). The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study. Sociology, 31(3), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038597031003015
   Google Scholar
• Bosch-Sijtsema, P. M., Fruchter, R., Vartiainen, M., & Ruohomäki, V. (2011). A framework to analyze knowledge work in distributed teams. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 275–307. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111403625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camarinha-Matos, L. M., & Afsarmanesh, H. (2003). Elements of a base VE infrastructure. Computers in Industry, 51(2), 139–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(03)00033-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H., Chuang, S. S., & Chao, S. H. (2011). Determinants of cultural adaptation, communication quality, and trust in virtual teams’ performance. Total Quality Management, 22(3), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.532319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. H., Hung, C. J., & Hsieh, H. W. (2014). Virtual teams: Cultural adaptation, communication quality, and interpersonal trust. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(11-12), 1318–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.704274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D. V. (1976). Assessing inter-rater reliability for rating scales: Resolving some fundamental issues. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 129(5), 452–456. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.129.5.452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connaughton, S., Shuffler, M., & Goodwin, G. F. (2011). Leading distributed teams: The communicative constitution of leadership. Military Psychology, 23(5), 502–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2011.600147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramton, C. D., & Hinds, P. J. (2004). Subgroup dynamics in internationally distributed teams: Ethnocentrism or cross-national learning? Research in Organizational Behavior, 26, 231–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(04)26006-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degbey, W. Y., & Einola, K. (2020). Resilience in virtual teams. Applied Psychology, 69(4), 1301–1337. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duarte, D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2006). Mastering virtual teams: Strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, A., & Wilson, J. R. (2004). Implementing virtual teams: A guide to organizational and human factors. Gower Publishing, Ltda.
   Google Scholar
• Elg, M., & Kollberg, B. (2009). Alternative arguments and directions for studying performance measurement. Total Quality Management, 20(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360902781899
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elg, M., & Kollberg, B. (2012). Conditions for reporting performance measurement. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 23(1), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2011.637782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Tayeh, A., Gil, N., & Freeman, J. (2008). A methodology to evaluate the usability of digital socialization in ‘‘virtual engineering design. Research in Engineering Design, 19(1), 29–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-007-0037-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feitosa, J., & Salas, E. (2021). Today’s virtual teams: Adapting lessons learned to the pandemic context. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 100777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, P. G. S., de Lima, E. P., & da Costa, S. E. G. (2012). Perception of virtual team’s performance: A multinational exercise. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.06.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, P. G. S., Lima, E. P. D., & Costa, S. E. (2012). Developing a methodology for assessing virtual teams’ performance perception. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(7), 710–729. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410401211263827
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, B. B., Sakakibara, S., Schroeder, R. G., Bates, K. A., & Flynn, E. J. (1990). Empirical research methods in operations management. Journal of Operations Management, 9(2), 250–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-6963(90)90098-X
   Google Scholar
• Ford, R. C., Piccolo, R. F., & Ford, L. R. (2017). Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is essential. Business Horizons, 60(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2016.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, G., Lakhani, K. R., & Puranam, P. (2020). What has changed? The impact of Covid pandemic on the technology and innovation management research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1754–1758. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gokpinar, B., Hopp, W. J., & Iravani, S. M. (2013). In-house globalization: The role of globally distributed design and product architecture on product development performance. Production and Operations Management, 22(6), 1509–1523. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12079
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (1982). The content of a college-level outdoor leadership course.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, U. G., & Clarke, R. E. (1996). Theory and applications of the Delphi technique: A bibliography (1975–1994). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00094-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadaya, P., Cassivi, L., & Chalabi, C. (2012). IT project management resources and capabilities: A Delphi study. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(2), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211214914
   Google Scholar
• Herbsleb, J. D., & Moitra, D. (2001). Global software development. IEEE Software, 18(2), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1109/52.914732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.6.615.24872
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). An application of hierarchical kappa-type statistics in the assessment of majority agreement among multiple observers. Biometrics, 33(2), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529786
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, G., Rubenstein, A. L., Lin, W., Wang, M., & Chen, X. (2018). The curvilinear effect of benevolent leadership on team performance: The mediating role of team action processes and the moderating role of team commitment. Personnel Psychology, 71(3), 369–397. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.12.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Wang, Y. J., Tsai, Y. H., & Hsu, Y. F. (2010). Perceived job effectiveness in coopetition: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 1598–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (2002). The Delphi method-techniques and applications.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, M. L., Liu, N. T., Ding, C. G., & Lin, C. P. (2015, February). Exploring team performance in high-tech industries: Future trends of building up teamwork. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 91, 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenna, H. P. (1994). The Delphi technique: A worthwhile research approach for nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19(6), 1221–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01207.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk, S. A., Bititci, U., Platts, K., Tobias, J., & Andersen, B. (2014). Is performance measurement and management fit for the future? Management Accounting Research, 25(2), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melnyk, S. A., Page, T. J., Wu, S. J., & Burns, L. A. (2012). Would you mind completing this survey: Assessing the state of survey research in supply chain management. Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 18(1), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2011.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, M. (2006). Robust composition: Towards a Uni ed approach to access control and concurrency control. Johns Hopkins University.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, D. C., & Runger, G. C. (2013). Applied statistics and probability for engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Montoya, M. M., Massey, A. P., & Lockwood, S. N. (2011). 3D collaborative virtual environments: Exploring the link between collaborative behaviors and team performance. Decision Sciences, 42(2), 451–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2011.00318.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee, D., Lahiri, S., Mukherjee, D., & Billing, T. K. (2012). Leading virtual teams: How do social, cognitive, and behavioral capabilities matter? Management Decision, 50(2), 274–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741211203560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noori, R., Abdoli, M. A., Farokhnia, A., & Abbasi, M. (2009). RETRACTED: Results uncertainty of solid waste generation forecasting by hybrid of wavelet transform-ANFIS and wavelet transform-neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 36(6), 9991–9999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oprean, D., Simpson, M., & Klippel, A. (2018). Collaborating remotely: An evaluation of immersive capabilities on spatial experiences and team membership. International Journal of Digital Earth, 11(4), 420–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2017.1381191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasad, K., & Akhilesh, K. B. (2002). Global virtual teams: What impacts their design and performance? Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 8(5/6), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1108/13527590210442212
   Google Scholar
• Reyes, D. L., Luna, M., & Salas, E. (2020). Challenges for team leaders transitioning from face-to-face to virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 50(2),100785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2020.100785
   Google Scholar
• Rigotti, T., De Cuyper, N., & Sekiguchi, T. (2020). The corona crisis: What can we learn from earlier studies in applied psychology? Applied Psychology = Psychologie Appliquee, 69(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosengren, K. E. (1981). Advances in content analysis (Vol. 9). SAGE Publications, Incorporated.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J., Mauthner, N., Sharpe, S., & Tidswell, T. (1991). The ‘windows task’ as a measure of strategic deception in preschoolers and autistic subjects. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(2), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1991.tb00881.x
   Google Scholar
• Scheibe, M., Skutsch, M., & Schofer, J. (2002). Experiments in Delphi methodology. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (pp. 257–281). Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, L., & Duxbury, L. (2010). We are conceptualizing and measuring the virtuality of teams. Information Systems Journal, 20(3), 267–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2009.00326.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengupta, B., Chandra, S., & Sinha, V. (2006, May). A research agenda for distributed software development. Proceedings of the 28th international conference on software engineering, (pp. 731–740). https://doi.org/10.1145/1134285.1134402
   Google Scholar
• Shrivastava, S. V. (2010). Distributed agile software development: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1006.1955.
   Google Scholar
• Sidhu, J. S., & Volberda, H. W. (2011). Coordination of globally distributed teams: A co-evolution perspective on offshoring. International Business Review, 20(3), 278–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, S., & Aspinwall, E. (2010). Development of a performance measurement framework for SMEs. Total Quality Management, 21(5), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.481510
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulschak, F. L. (1983). Human resource development: The theory and practice of need assessment. Reston Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Verma, S., & Gustafsson, A. (2020). Investigating the emerging COVID-19 research trends in business and management: A bibliometric analysis approach. Journal of Business Research, 118(2020), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.06.057
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walter, J., Kreutzer, M., & Kreutzer, K. (2021). Setting the tone for the team: A multi-level analysis of managerial control, peer control, and their consequences for job satisfaction and team performance. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 849–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R. P. (1990). Fundamental content analysis (No. 49). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, S. I., & Berntzen, M. N. (2019, March). Transformational leadership and leader–member exchange in distributed teams: The roles of electronic dependence and team task interdependence. Computers in Human Behavior, 92, 381–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.11.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar