Investigating the strategic interaction between QMS, organisational agility and innovative performance

References

• Abdelilah, B., El Korchi, A., & Balambo, M. A. (2018). Flexibility and agility: Evolution and relationship. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 29(7), 1138–1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-03-2018-0090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmady, G. A., Mehrpour, M., & Nikooravesh, A. (2016). Organizational structure. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230, 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.09.057
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, W., Najmi, A., & Ikram, M. (2020). Steering firm performance through innovative capabilities: A contingency approach to innovation management. Technology in Society, 63, 101385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2020.101385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhtar, M., & Sushil, S. (2018). Strategic performance management system in an uncertain business environment. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0102
   Google Scholar
• Alblooshi, M., Shamsuzzaman, M., & Haridy, S. (2021). The relationship between leadership styles and organisational innovation: A systematic literature review and narrative synthesis. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 338–370. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-11-2019-0339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anser, M. K., Yousaf, Z., Khan, A., & Usman, M. (2021). Towards innovative work behavior through knowledge management infrastructure capabilities: Mediating role of functional flexibility and knowledge sharing. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(2), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azar, G., & Ciabuschi, F. Humanistisk-samhällsvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Uppsala universitet, Företagsekonomiska institutionen, & Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten (2017). Organizational innovation, technological innovation, and export performance: The effects of innovation radicalness and extensiveness. International Business Review, 26(2), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baninam, J., & Amirnejad, Q. (2017). The effects of organizational agility on the organizational performance: Mediating role of knowledge management. International Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(1), 1227–1240.
   Google Scholar
• Baškarada, S., & Koronios, A. (2018). The 5S organizational agility framework: A dynamic capabilities perspective. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 26(2), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-05-2017-1163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatia, M., & Awasthi, A. (2018). Assessing relationship between quality management systems and business performance and its mediators: SEM approach. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(8), 1490–1507. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-05-2017-0091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke, J., & Roper, S. (2017). Innovation, quality management and learning: Short-term and longer-term effects. Research Policy, 46(8), 1505–1518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Combe, I. A., Rudd, J. M., Leeflang, P. S. H., & Greenley, G. E. (2012). Antecedents to strategic flexibility: Management cognition, firm resources and strategic options. European Journal of Marketing, 46(10), 1320–1339. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561211248053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Manzani, Y., Sidmou, M. L., & Cegarra, J. (2019). Does IS0 9001 quality management system support product innovation? An analysis from the sociotechnical systems theory. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 36(6), 951–982. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-09-2017-0174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Escrig-Tena, A. B., Segarra-Ciprés, M., García-Juan, B., & Beltrán-Martín, I. (2018). The Impact of Hard and Soft Quality Management and Proactive Behaviour in Determining Innovation Performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 200, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.03.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felipe, C. M., Roldán, J. L., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Leal-Rodríguez, A., Roldán, J., & Felipe, C. (2017). Impact of organizational culture values on organizational agility. Sustainability, 9(12), 2354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9122354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferdousi, F., Baird, K., Munir, R., & Su, S. (2018). Associations between organisational factors, TQM and competitive advantage: Evidence from an emerging economy. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(3), 854–873. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-05-2017-0110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, H., & Cao, Z. (2014). Strategic flexibility and SME performance in an emerging economy: A contingency perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 27(2), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-11-2012-0177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyemang, M. D., & Emeagwali, O. L. (2020). The roles of dynamic capabilities, innovation, organizational agility and knowledge management on competitive performance in telecommunication industry. Management Science Letters, 10(7), 1533–1542. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.12.013
   Google Scholar
• Harraf, A., Wanasika, I., Tate, K., & Talbott, K. (2015). Organizational agility. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(2), 675. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v31i2.9160
   Google Scholar
• Holsapple, C. W., & Li, X. (2008). Understanding organizational agility: A work-design perspective. Kentucky Univ Lexington School of Management. Retrieved from https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA486893
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization. (2015). Quality Management Systems - Requirements (ISO standard no. 9001:2015). https://www.iso.org/standard/62085.html
   Google Scholar
• Karrbom Gustavsson, T., Hallin, A., Fastigheter och byggande, K. T. H., & Skolan för arkitektur och samhällsbyggnad (ABE) (2014). Rethinking dichotomization: A critical perspective on the use of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ in project management research. International Journal of Project Management, 32(4), 568–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaziliunas, A., & Vysniauskiene, L. (2014). Impact of different quality management system implementation patterns on performance outcomes. Intelektine Ekonomika, 8(1).
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, S. R., Nixon, A. E., & Nord, W. R. (2017). Examining organic and mechanistic structures: Do we know as much as we thought? International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(4), 531–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, B. A., & Naeem, H. (2018). The impact of strategic quality orientation on innovation capabilities and sustainable business growth: Empirical evidence from the se. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(8), 1568–1598. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-07-2017-0126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, T. C., & Miller, D. P. (2018). Should agile be part of your quality management system? Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 27(1), 2–28.
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, P., Maiti, J., & Gunasekaran, A. (2018). Impact of quality management systems on firm performance. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(5), 1034–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2017-0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liem, T., Khuong, V., & Khanh, T. (2019). Firm constraints on the link between proactive innovation, open innovation and firm performance. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(4), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5040088
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Costa, M., Choi, T. Y., Martínez, J. A., & Martínez-Lorente, A. R. (2009). ISO 9000/1994, ISO 9001/2000 and TQM: The performance debate revisited. Journal of Operations Management, 27(6), 495–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoomzadeh, A., Zakaria, N. W. W., Masrom, M., Streimikiene, D., & Tavakoli, R. (2019). Organizational innovation factors, capabilities and organizational performance in automotive industry. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 15(3), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2019.15-3.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAdam, R., Miller, K., & McSorley, C. (2019). Towards a contingency theory perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Menon, S., & Suresh, M. (2021;2020). Factors influencing organizational agility in higher education. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(1), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-04-2020-0151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metaxas, I. N., & Koulouriotis, D. E. (2019). Business excellence measurement: A literature analysis (1990-2016). Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(11-12), 1189–1218. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1356201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasim, K. (2018). Role of internal and external organizational factors in TQM implementation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(5), 1014–1033. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-10-2016-0180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejatian, M., Zarei, M. H., Nejati, M., & Zanjirchi, S. M. (2018). A hybrid approach to achieve organizational agility: An empirical study of a food company. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 25(1), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-09-2016-0147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nejatian, M., Zarei, M. H., Rajabzadeh, A., Azar, A., & Khadivar, A. (2019). Paving the path toward strategic agility. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 32(4), 538–562. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-10-2018-0233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD/Eurostat. (2018). Oslo manual 2018: Guidelines for collecting, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.). The Measurement of Scientific, Technological and Innovation Activities, OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304604-en
   Google Scholar
• Piskar, F., & Dolinsek, S. (2006). Implementation of the ISO 9001: From QMS to business model. Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/02635570610712609
   Google Scholar
• Ragas, M., & Ragas, T. (2021). Understanding agile for strategic communicators: Foundations, implementations, and implications. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(2), 80–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1898147
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Silva, R., Santos, J., & Hurtado, M. (2018). A note on defining organisational systems for contingency theory in OM. Production Planning & Control, 29(16), 1343–1348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2018.1535146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbusch, N., Brinckmann, J., & Bausch, A. (2011). Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(4), 441–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampaio, P., Saraiva, P., & Guimarães Rodrigues, A. (2009). ISO 9001 certification research: Questions, answers and approaches. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 26(1), 38–58. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710910924161
   Google Scholar
• Shin, H., Lee, J., Kim, D., & Rhim, H. (2015). Strategic agility of Korean small and medium enterprises and its influence on operational and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 168, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souto, J. E. (2015). Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation. Tourism Management, 51, 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2015.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez, E., Calvo-Mora, A., & Roldán, J. L. (2016). The role of strategic planning in excellence management systems. Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.008
   Google Scholar
• Susnienė, D., & Sargūnas, G. (2018). ISO 9001 in organizations: Influencing factors and benefits. Taikomieji Tyrimai Studijose Ir Praktikoje, 14(1), 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, M., & Wang, C. (2017). Linking service innovation to firm performance the roles of ambidextrous innovation and market orientation capability. Chinese Management Studies, 11(4), 730–750. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-03-2017-0045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vargas-Hernández, J. G., Campos, P. C., Salceda, F. P., & Jiménez, R. A. (2017). New perspective in the design of quality management systems. Independent Journal of Management & Production, 8(3), 1059. https://doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v8i3.620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walter, A. (2020;2021). Organizational agility: Ill-defined and somewhat confusing? A systematic literature review and conceptualization. Management Review Quarterly, 71(2), 343–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-020-00186-6
   Google Scholar
• Widjajani, & Nurjaman, R. (2020). The framework of strategic agility in small and medium enterprise. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1477(5), 052034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1477/5/052034
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, A. (1992). The other side of quality: ‘Soft’ issues and the human resource dimension. Total Quality Management., 3(3), 323–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544129200000038
   Google Scholar
• Youssef, M. A., & Youssef, E. M. (2018). The synergistic impact of ISO 9000 and TQM on operational performance and competitiveness. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35(3), 614–634. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-02-2016-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, J., Zhang, W., Matsui, Y., & Zhao, X. (2017). The impact of organizational context on hard and soft quality management and innovation performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 185, 240–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zitkiene, R., & Deksnys, M. (2018). Organizational agility conceptual model. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 14(2), 115–129. doi:10.14254/1800-5845/2018.14-2.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar