Exploring emotional regulation and team politics in teams: team learning and educational practices

References

• Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 837–853. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awuor, N. O., Weng, C., & Militar, R. (2022). Teamwork competency and satisfaction in online group project-based engineering course: The cross-level moderating effect of collective efficacy and flipped instruction. Computers & Education, 176, 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagci, S. C., & Canpolat, E. (2020). Group efficacy as a moderator on the associations between perceived discrimination, acculturation orientations, and psychological well-being. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 30(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruch, Y., & Lin, C. P. (2012). All for one, one for all: Coopetition and virtual team performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1155–1168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettinelli, C., Mismetti, M., De Massis, A., & Del Bosco, B. (2022). A review of conflict and cohesion in social relationships in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 46(3), 539–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587211000339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. (1995). Managing diversity: The role of social identities. In S. E. Jackson, & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace (pp. 47–68). American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, K., & Taghehchian, R. (2016). Bottled Up: An experiential intervention for emotional suppression. Journal of Family Psychotherapy, 27(4), 302–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/08975353.2016.1235435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carless, S. A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, A., & Bordia, P. (2001). A multidimensional approach to the group cohesion-group performance relationship. Small Group Research, 32(4), 379–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., Hahn, M., Abrutyn, S., & McCaffree, K. (Eds.). (2021). Social exchange theory: Current status and future directions. In Theoretical sociology: The future of a disciplinary foundation (pp. 179–205). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cramm, J. M., & Nieboer, A. P. (2015). Social cohesion and belonging predict the well-being of community-dwelling older people. BMC Geriatrics, 15(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-015-0027-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Dreu, C. K., Nijstad, B. A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey, C., & Ganesh, M. P. (2020). Impact of team design and technical factors on team cohesion. Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 26(7/8), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-03-2020-0022
   Google Scholar
• Eckland, N. S., & English, T. (2019). Trait-level emotion regulation and emotional awareness predictors of empathic accuracy. Motivation and Emotion, 43(3), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-018-9741-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K. M., & Bourgeois III, L. J. (1988). Politics of strategic decision making In high-velocity environments: Toward a midrange theory. Academy of Management Journal, 31(4), 737–770. https://doi.org/10.2307/256337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, X., Li, J., Mao, Z. E., & Lu, Z. (2021). Can ethical leadership inspire employee loyalty in hotels in China? -from the perspective of the social exchange theory. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 49, 538–547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2021.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferris, G. R., & Kacmar, K. M. (1992). Perceptions of organizational politics. Journal of Management, 18(1), 93–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639201800107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fotopoulou, E., Zafeiropoulos, A., Cassà, ÈL, Guiu, I. M., & Papavassiliou, S. (2022). Collective emotional intelligence and group dynamics interplay: Can it be tangible and measurable? IEEE Access, 10, 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3137051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, R. D., Hoy, W. K., & Hoy, A. W. (2004). Collective efficacy beliefs:Theoretical developments, empirical evidence, and future directions. Educational Researcher, 33(3), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033003003
   Google Scholar
• Goffnett, S. P. (2020). Leadership, goal acceptance, and QMS conformance readiness: Exploring the mediating effects of audit team cohesion. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(1-2), 43–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1412255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goncalo, J. A., Polman, E., & Maslach, C. (2010). Can confidence come too soon? Collective efficacy, conflict and group performance over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 113(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, R. V. D., & de Melo, T. M. (2021). How do autonomy, cohesion and integration of teamwork impact the dynamic capability? Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 32(7-8), 794–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2019.1636640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, R., Nolan, K., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2022). The team cohesion-performance relationship: A meta-analysis exploring measurement approaches and the changing team landscape. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(2), 181–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211041157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrynchak, P., & Batty, H. (2012). The educational theory basis of team-based learning. Medical Teacher, 34(10), 796–801. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.687120
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, M., & Baki, N. U. (2017). Organizational factors of justice and culture leading to organizational identification in merger and acquisition. European Journal of Training and Development, 41(8), 687–704. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-04-2017-0030
   Google Scholar
• James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.2.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jex, S. M., & Bliese, P. D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: A multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 349–361. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, Y., Jackson, S. E., & Colakoglu, S. (2016). An empirical examination of personal learning within the context of teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(5), 654–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, A. M., Turrell, G., & Subramanian, S. V. (2006). Does area-based social capital matter for the health of Australians? A multilevel analysis of self-rated health in Tasmania. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(3), 607–613. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyl010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilcullen, M. P., Bisbey, T. M., Ottosen, M. J., Tsao, K., Salas, E., & Thomas, E. J. (2022). The safer culture framework: An application to healthcare based on a multi-industry review of safety culture literature. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 64(1), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211060891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovoor-Misra, S., & Mitroff, I. (1996). The effects of emotion and politics on field research on organizational crises. Industrial & Environmental Crisis Quarterly, 9(4), 543–563. https://doi.org/10.1177/108602669600900405
   Google Scholar
• Li, Y., Fu, F., & Ma, L. (2022). Fostering team-level idea implementation: Leader's upward exchange relationship as a key facilitator. British Journal of Management, 33(1), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P. (2015). Predicating team performance in technology industry: Theoretical aspects of social identity and self-regulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 98, 13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Baruch, Y., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and team performance: The mediating role of team efficacy and team self-esteem. Journal of Business Ethics, 108(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1068-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Chen, K. J., Liu, C. M., & Liao, C. H. (2019). Assessing decision quality and team performance: Perspectives of knowledge internalization and resource adequacy. Review of Managerial Science, 13(2), 377–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-017-0253-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Liu, C. M., & Hsiao, C. Y. (2022). Assessing transactive memory system and team performance: The moderating role of leadership efficacy. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(5–6), 683–699.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Liu, C. M., Joe, S. W., Chen, K. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2022). Modelling leadership and team performance: The moderation of politics and leadership self-efficacy. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 33(1-2), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2020.1794804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C. P., Liu, C. M., Liu, N. T., & Huang, H. T. (2020). Being excellent teams: Managing innovative climate, politics, and team performance. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 31(3-4), 353–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1427503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, M. L., Hsieh, M. W., Hsiao, C., Lin, C. P., & Yang, C. (2020). Modeling knowledge sharing and team performance in technology industry: The main and moderating effects of happiness. Review of Managerial Science, 14(3), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-018-0301-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, L. J., Carron, A. V., Eys, M. A., & Loughead, T. M. (2012). Development of a cohesion inventory for children's sport teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 16(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meisler, G. (2014). Exploring emotional intelligence, political skill, and job satisfaction. Employee Relations, 36(3), 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-02-2013-0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memili, E., Chang, E. P., Kellermanns, F. W., & Welsh, D. H. (2015). Role conflicts of family members in family firms. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(1), 143–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2013.839549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monnickendam, M., & Berman, Y. (2008). An empirical analysis of the interrelationship between components of the social quality theoretical construct. Social Indicators Research, 86(3), 525–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9189-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994). The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210–227. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pacewicz, C. E., Smith, A. L., & Raedeke, T. D. (2020). Group cohesion and relatedness as predictors of self-determined motivation and burnout in adolescent female athletes. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 50, 101709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2020.101709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paunova, M. M., & Blasco, M. (2021). Social exchange and reciprocal integration between migrants and locals at work. In academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2021, No. 1, p. 10892). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, S., & Fallon, B. (2011). Retention of volunteers in the emergency services: Exploring interpersonal and group cohesion factors. Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 26(1), 18–23. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/informit.805876988065509
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J., & Sturman, M. C. (2009). A tale of three perspectives. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 762–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428109332834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Sánchez, A. M., Devloo, T., Rico, R., Salanova, M., & Anseel, F. (2017). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group & Organization Management, 42(4), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116636476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovio, E., Eskola, J., Kozub, S. A., Duda, J. L., & Lintunen, T. (2009). Can high group cohesion Be harmful? Small Group Research, 40(4), 421–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409334359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Cha, S. E. (2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020–1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrabski, Á, Kopp, M., & Kawachi, I. (2004). Social capital and collective efficacy in Hungary: Cross sectional associations with middle aged female and Male mortality rates. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 58(4), 340–345. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.010017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svinicki, M. D. (2004). Learning and motivation in the postsecondary classroom. Anker Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Tao, X., Wang, C. L., Robson, P. J. A., & Hughes, M. (2021). Learning from failure, collective efficacy and new product performance. In academy of management proceedings (Vol. 2021, No. 1, p. 11487). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. H., Joe, S. W., Chen, M. L., Lin, C. P., Ma, H. C., & Du, J. W. (2016). Assessing team performance: Moderating roles of transactive memory, hypercompetition, and emotional regulation. Human Performance, 29(2), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959285.2016.1154059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, Y. H., Joe, S. W., Lin, C. P., Huang, C. C., & Ma, H. C. (2017). Being excellent: Predicting team performance, proactivity, and proficiency in technology industries. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 28(7-8), 801–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1125288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vianen, A. E., & De Dreu, C. K. (2001). Personality in teams: Its relationship to social cohesion, task cohesion, and team performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 10(2), 97–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000573
   Google Scholar
• Velasco, C., Fernández, I., Páez, D., & Campos, M. (2006). Perceived emotional intelligence, alexithymia, coping and emotional regulation. Psicothema, 18(Suppl.), 89–94. https://reunido.uniovi.es/index.php/PST/article/view/8425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vince, R. (2010). Anxiety, politics and critical management education. British Journal of Management, 21, S26–S39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00678.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., Cote, J. A., & Buckley, M. R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(3), 462–468. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.74.3.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, L. J., Gavin, M. B., & Williams, M. L. (1996). Measurement and nonmeasurement processes with negative affectivity and employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.81.1.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, L. A., Hilton, T. F., & Hochwarter, W. A. (2001). Addressing politics in matrix teams. Group & Organization Management, 26(2), 230–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601101262006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadama, G. N., & Pandey, S. (1995). Effect of sample size on goodness-fit of-fit indices in structural equation models. Journal of Social Service Research, 20(3-4), 49–70. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v20n03_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon, J., Thye, S. R., & Lawler, E. J. (2013). Exchange and cohesion in dyads and triads: A test of simmel’s hypothesis. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1457–1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaccaro, S., & Lowe, C. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 128(4), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1988.9713774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar