Extreme institutional complexity and corporate combative strategy

References

• Adinolfi, P. (2003). Total quality management in public health care: A study of Italian and Irish hospitals. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336032000051322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adler, P. S., & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. The Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/4134367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some outside directors play a political role? The Journal of Law and Economics, 44(1), 179–198. https://doi.org/10.1086/320271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmed, P. K., & Machold, S. (2004). The quality and ethics connection: Toward virtuous organizations. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 15(4), 527–545. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336042000183604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arogyaswamy, K., Barker, V. L., & Yasai-Ardekani, M. (1995). Firm turnarounds: An integrative two-stage model. Journal of Management Studies, 32(4), 493–525. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1995.tb00786.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker III, V. L., & Duhaime, I. M. (1997). Strategic change in the turnaround process: Theory and empirical evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 18(1), 13–38. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199701)18:1<13::AID-SMJ843>3.0.CO;2-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, A. (2007). For love and money: Organizations’ creative responses to multiple environmental logics. Theory and Society, 36(6), 547–571. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitzer, V., & Glasbergen, P. (2010). Partnerships for sustainable change in cotton: An institutional analysis of African cases. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(S2), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0562-6
   Google Scholar
• Boxenbaum, E., & Jonsson, S. (2017). Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling: Concept evolution and theoretical challenges. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2, 79–104. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5018766
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, P., & Powell, W. W. (2012). From smoke and mirrors to walking the talk: Decoupling in the contemporary world. Academy of Management Annals, 6(1), 483–530. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2012.684462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunsson, K. H. (2002). Management or politics–or both? How management by objectives may be managed: A Swedish example. Financial Accountability & Management, 18(2), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0408.00150
   Google Scholar
• Canales, R. (2014). Weaving straw into gold: Managing organizational tensions between standardization and flexibility in microfinance. Organization Science, 25(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, J. X., Ding, Y., & Zhang, H. (2016). Social capital, informal governance, and post-IPO firm performance: A study of Chinese entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 134(4), 529–551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2383-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, K. K., & O'mahony, S. I. O. B. H. A. N. (2006). The selective synthesis of competing logics. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2006, L1–L6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2006.27176323
   Google Scholar
• Colyvas, J. A., & Powell, W. W. (2006). Roads to institutionalization: The remaking of boundaries between public and private science. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 305–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27008-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Aunno, T., Sutton, R. I., & Price, R. H. (1991). Isomorphism and external support in conflicting institutional environments: A study of drug abuse treatment units. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 636–661. https://doi.org/10.2307/256409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dervitsiotis, K. N. (2003). Beyond stakeholder satisfaction: Aiming for a new frontier of sustainable stakeholder trust. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 14(5), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478336032000053555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiBenigno, J., & Kellogg, K. C. (2014). Beyond occupational differences: The importanceof cross-cutting demographics and dyadic toolkits for collaboration in a US hospital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 375–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214538262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
   Google Scholar
• Faccio, M. (2006). Politically connected firms. American Economic Review, 96(1), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, J. P., Wong, T. J., & Zhang, T. (2007). Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and post-IPO performance of China's newly partially privatized firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(2), 330–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filatotchev, I., & Toms, S. (2003). Corporate governance, strategy and survival in a declining industry: A study of UK cotton textile companies. Journal of Management Studies, 40(4), 895–920. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiss, P. C., & Zajac, E. J. (2006). The symbolic management of strategic change: Sensegiving Via framing and decoupling. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1173–1193. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478255
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitma-n. https://books.google.be/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=NpmA_qEiOpkC&oi=fnd&pg=PR5&dq=Strategic+management:+A+stakeholder+approach&ots=61ijL1S6SK&sig=8v7CzytcifAwqdYwTU-VUghkXfQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Strategic%20management%3A%20A%20stakeholder%20approach&f=false.
   Google Scholar
• Gao, Y. (2011). Government intervention, perceived benefit, and bribery of firms in transitional China. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(2), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0896-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvare, R., & Johansson, P. (2010). Management for sustainability – A stakeholder theory. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 21(7), 737–744. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2010.483095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle, K., & Rao, H. (1997). Breaches in the boardroom: Organizational identity and conflicts of commitment in a nonprofit organization. Organization Science, 8(6), 593–611. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.8.6.593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1996). Understanding radical organizational change: Bringing together the old and the new institutionalism. The Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1022–1054. https://doi.org/10.2307/259163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Briscoe, F., & Hambrick, D. C. (2017). Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 38(5), 1018–1040. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. (2010). Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (1999). Stakeholders, social responsibility, and performance: Empirical evidence and theoretical perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 479–485. https://doi.org/10.2307/256971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herold, D. M., Farr-Wharton, B., Lee, K. H., & Groschopf, W. (2019). The interaction between institutional and stakeholder pressures: Advancing a framework for categorising carbon disclosure strategies. Business Strategy & Development, 2(2), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.44
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What's the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J. (1999). Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the US chemical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 42(4), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.2307/257008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, A. J., & Ocasio, W. (2001). Not all events are attended equally: Toward a middle-range theory of industry attention to external events. Organization Science, 12(4), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.12.4.414.10639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, G. (2017). Reflections on the 2016 decade award: Incorporating context in organizational research. Academy of Management Review, 42(4), 577–595. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joyner, B. E., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41(4), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021237420663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanji, G. K. (2005). Sustainable growth and business excellence. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(8–9), 1069–1078. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783360500163292
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khwaja, A. I., & Mian, A. (2005). Do lenders favor politically connected firms? Rent provision in an emerging financial market. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(4), 1371–1411. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knack, S., & Keefer, P. (1997). Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(4), 1251–1288. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355300555475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraatz, M., & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. In C. O. R. Greenwood, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin-Andersson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 243–275). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://books.google.be/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=2CIlCwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA243&dq=Organizational+Implications+of+Institutional+Pluralism.&ots=5pzkW7__3B&sig=K3uA1uGNvDhUIdpJOAQ_hZ-3uuk&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Organizational%20Implications%20of%20Institutional%20Pluralism.&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Kuei, C. H., & Lu, M. H. (2013). Integrating quality management principles into sustainability management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(1–2), 62–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2012.669536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). Legal determinants of external finance. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02727.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L. A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Song, X., & Wu, H. (2015). Political connection, ownership structure, and corporate philanthropy in China: A strategic-political perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(2), 399–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2167-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, W. M., Ciasullo, M. V., Douglas, A., & Kumar, S. (2022). Environmental social governance (ESG) and total quality management (TQM): A multi-study meta-systematic review. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2022.2048952
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins, K. V., Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2017). Social capital, trust, and firm performance: The value of corporate social responsibility during the financial crisis. The Journal of Finance, 72(4), 1785–1824. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lok, J. (2010). Institutional logics as identity projects. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1305–1335. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57317866
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, X. R., Wang, D., & Zhang, J. (2017). Whose call to answer: Institutional complexity and firms’ CSR reporting. Academy of Management Journal, 60(1), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2014.0847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquis, C., & Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2008.31193458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. W. Meyer, & W. R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environments (pp. 199–215). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., & Hammerschmid, G. (2006). Changing institutional logics and executive identities: A managerial challenge to public administration in Austria. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 1000–1014. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764205285182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. E., & Höllerer, M. A. (2010). Meaning structures in a contested issue field: A topographic map of shareholder value in Austria. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1241–1262. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57317829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.2307/259247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgeson, F. P., Mitchell, T. R., & Liu, D. (2015). Event system theory: An event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 515–537. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2012.0099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of inter-organizational relationships: Integration and future directions. The Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 241–265. https://doi.org/10.2307/258156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.2307/258610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orts, E. W., & Strudler, A. (2009). Putting a stake in stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(4), 605–615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0310-y
   Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajunen, K. (2006). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43(6), 1261–1288. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00624.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng, M. W., & Luo, Y. (2000). Managerial ties and firm performance in a transition economy: The nature of a micro-macro link. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers, A. G., Vermeulen, P. A., Meeus, M. T., & Zietsma, C. (2015). I need time! Exploring pathways to compliance under institutional complexity. Academy of Management Journal, 58(1), 85–110. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, H. (1994). The social construction of reputation: Certification contests, legitimation, and the survival of organizations in the American automobile industry: 1895–1912. Strategic Management Journal, 15(S1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250150904
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rao, H., & Kenney, M. (2008). New forms as settlements. The Sage handbook of organiza-tional institutionalism (pp. 352–370). https://books.google.be/books?hl=zh-CN&lr=&id=ZPhlVSwXIRQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA352&dq=New+forms+as+settlements&ots=0apUo4xaYC&sig=1shN-Kzq_NTG_b6HkyTV9EwkpPg&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=New%20forms%20as%20settlements&f=false
   Google Scholar
• Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2012). A trust crisis. International Review of Finance, 12(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2443.2012.01152.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., Bullinger, B., & Brandl, J. (2021). Resourcing under tensions: How frontline employees create resources to balance paradoxical tensions. Organization Studies, 42(8), 1291–1317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620926825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2008). Lords of the dance: Professionals as institutional agents. Organization Studies, 29(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shubham, C. P., & Murty, L. S. (2018). Organizational adoption of sustainable manufacturing practices in India: Integrating institutional theory and corporate environmental responsibility. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2016.1258373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 20–24. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160882
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simons, T., & Ingram, P. (1997). Organization and ideology: Kibbutzim and hired labor, 1951–1965. Administrative Science Quarterly, 784–813. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.2307/258788
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tashman, P., Marano, V., & Kostova, T. (2019). Walking the walk or talking the talk? Corporate social responsibility decoupling in emerging market multinationals. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(2), 153–171. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-018-0171-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, F., Boiral, O., & Iraldo, F. (2018). Internalization of environmental practices and institutional complexity: Can stakeholders pressures encourage greenwashing? Journal of Business Ethics, 147(2), 287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2960-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843. https://doi.org/10.1086/210361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilcsik, A. (2010). From ritual to reality: Demography, ideology, and decoupling in a post-communist government agency. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1474–1498. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tost, L. P. (2011). An integrative model of legitimacy judgments. Academy of Management Review, 36(4), 686–710. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.0227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Jarvis, O. (2011). Bridging institutional entrepreneurship and the creation of new organizational forms: A multilevel model. Organization Science, 22(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, P. C. F., Yeh, C. R., & Wu, S. L. (2016). The conditioning effect of institutional legitimacy on stakeholder influence strategy: Evidence from labour unions’ reaction to corporate downsizing in Taiwan. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 27(3-4), 279–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2014.976940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2391875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar