The effect of surface modification on the corrosion protection ability of the passive films of sensitized UNS S31803 duplex stainless steel

References

• ASM Handbook, Volume 1: Properties and Selection: Irons, Steels, and High-Performance Alloys,   Product code: 06181G   |   ISBN: 978-0-87170-377-4. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin S, Quayle B, Noble F. Polarization behavior of austenitic and duplex stainless steels in the double loop reactivation test. Corrosion. 1987;43(12):743–747. doi: 10.5006/1.3583863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez N, Cid M, Puiggali M, et al. Application of double loop electrochemical potentiodynamic reactivation test to austenitic and duplex stainless steels. Mater Sci Eng A. 1997;229(1–2):123–128. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(97)00008-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J-S, Kwon H-S. Effects of tungsten on corrosion and kinetics of sigma phase formation of 25% chromium duplex stainless steels. Corrosion. 1999;55(5):512–521. doi: 10.5006/1.3284014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T, Yang J. Effects of solution treatment and continuous cooling on σ-phase precipitation in a 2205 duplex stainless steel. Mater Sci Eng A. 2001;311(1–2):28–41. doi: 10.1016/S0921-5093(01)00911-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arıkan ME, Arıkan R, Doruk M. Determination of susceptibility to intergranular corrosion of UNS 31803 type duplex stainless steel by electrochemical reactivation method: a comparative study. Int J Corros. 2012;2012:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez N, Cid M, Puiggali M. Influence of o-phase on mechanical properties and corrosion resistance of duplex stainless steels. Corros Sci. 1999;41(8):1615–1631. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(99)00009-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morshed-Behbahani K, Pakshir M. Effect of different degrees of sensitization on the EIS response of 316L and 316 SS in transpassive region. J Mater Eng Perform. 2014;23(6):2283–2292. doi: 10.1007/s11665-014-1018-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morshed-Behbahani K, Pakshir M. The effect of solution-annealing on the EIS response of AISI 316 SS with different degrees of sensitization in the transpassive region. Prot Met Phys Chem Surf. 2015;51(6):1027–1033. doi: 10.1134/S2070205115060039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morshed-Behbahani K, Pakshir M, Abbasi Z, et al. Damage mechanism at different transpassive potentials of solution-annealed 316 and 316l stainless steels. Int J Miner Metall Mater. 2015;22(22):45–51. doi: 10.1007/s12613-015-1042-x
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, ASTM G108-92, Standard test method for electrochemical reactivation (EPR) for detecting sensitization of AISI type.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, ASTM A262, Standard practices for detecting susceptibility to intergranular attack in austenitic Stainless steels; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, ASTM A923-03, Standard test methods for detecting detrimental intermetallic phases in duplex austenitic/ferritic stainless steel; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, ASTM G150, Standard test method for electrochemical critical pitting temperature testing of stainless steels. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• ASTM, ASTM G102-89(2015), standard practice for calculation of corrosion rates and related information from electrochemical measurements; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Siow KS, Song T, Qiu J. Pitting corrosion of duplex stainless steels. Anti-Corros Methods Mater. 2001;48(1):31–37. doi: 10.1108/00035590110365309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morshed-Behbahani K, Najafisayar P, Pakshir M. Study of the intergranular corrosion of sensitized UNS S31803 stainless steel in transpassive region. J Mater Eng Perform. 2016;25(8):3418–3429. doi: 10.1007/s11665-016-2176-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun J, Sun L, Dai N, et al. Investigation on ultra-pure ferritic stainless steel 436L susceptibility to intergranular corrosion using optimised double loop electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation method. Corros Eng Sci Technol. 2018: 1–8. doi: 10.1080/1478422X.2018.1512222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabrini M, Cigada A, Rondell G, et al. Effect of different surface finishing and of hydroxyapatite coatings on passive and corrosion current of Ti6Al4V alloy in simulated physiological solution. Biomaterials. 1997;18(11):783–787. doi: 10.1016/S0142-9612(96)00205-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li W, Li D. Influence of surface morphology on corrosion and electronic behavior. Acta Mater. 2006;54(2):445–452. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2005.09.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vafaeian S, Fattah-alhosseini A, Keshavarz MK, et al. Simultaneous investigation of the effect of advanced thermomechanical treatment and repetitive cyclic voltammetry on the electrochemical behavior of AISI 430 ferritic stainless steel. J Mater Eng Perform. 2017;26(2):676–684. doi: 10.1007/s11665-017-2509-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahryari A, Kamal W, Omanovic S. The effect of surface roughness on the efficiency of the cyclic potentiodynamic passivation (CPP) method in the improvement of general and pitting corrosion resistance of 316LVM stainless steel. Mater Lett. 2008;62(23):3906–3909. doi: 10.1016/j.matlet.2008.05.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahryari A, Azari F, Vali H, et al. The positive influence of electrochemical cyclic potentiodynamic passivation (CPP) of a SS316LS surface on its response to fibronectin and pre-osteoblasts. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11(29):6218–6224. doi: 10.1039/b902881a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahryari A, Omanovic S, Szpunar JA. Enhancement of biocompatibility of 316LVM stainless steel by cyclic potentiodynamic passivation. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2009;89A(4):1049–1062. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.32053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimoto S, Tsuchiya H. Semiconductor properties and protective role of passive films of iron base alloys. Corros Sci. 2007;49(1):195–202. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2006.05.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng Z, Cheng X, Dong C, et al. Passivity of 316L stainless steel in borate buffer solution studied by Mott–schottky analysis, atomic absorption spectrometry and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Corros Sci. 2010;52(11):3646–3653. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.07.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taveira LV, Montemor MF, Da Cunha Belo M, et al. Influence of incorporated Mo and Nb on the Mott–schottky behaviour of anodic films formed on AISI 304L. Corros Sci. 2010;52(9):2813–2818. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.04.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montemor M, Simões A, Ferreira M, et al. The role of Mo in the chemical composition and semiconductive behaviour of oxide films formed on stainless steels. Corros Sci. 1999;41(1):17–34. doi: 10.1016/S0010-938X(98)00126-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cottis R., Graham M., Lindsay R., et al. 2010. Shreir's corrosion - vol 3 (corrosion and degradation of engineering materials).
   Google Scholar
• Hakiki N, Boudin S, Rondot B, et al. The electronic structure of passive films formed on stainless steels. Corros Sci. 1995;37(11):1809–1822. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(95)00084-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee E-J, Pyun S-I. Analysis of nonlinear Mott-Schottky plots obtained from anodically passivating amorphous and polycrystalline TiO2 films. J Appl Electrochem. 1992;22(2):156–160. doi: 10.1007/BF01023817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah-alhosseini A, Aghamohamadi H, Safa AB. Electrochemical behavior assessment of Alloy 22 (UNS N06022) in hydrochloric acid solutions by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and Mott– Schottky analyses. Anal Bioanal Electrochem. 2015;7(6):728–738.
   Google Scholar
• Fattah-Alhosseini A. Int J ISSI. 2013;10(2):1–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah-alhosseini A, Vafaeian S. Effect of solution pH on the electrochemical behaviour of AISI 304 austenitic and AISI 430 ferritic stainless steels in concentrated acidic media. Egypt J Petroleum. 2015;24(3):333–341. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpe.2015.07.016
   Google Scholar
• Carmezim M, Simoes A, Montemor M, et al. Capacitance behaviour of passive films on ferritic and austenitic stainless steel. Corros Sci. 2005;47(3):581–591. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2004.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babić R, Metikoš-Huković M. Semiconducting properties of passive films on AISI 304 and 316 stainless steels. J Electroanal Chem. 1993;358(1–2):143–160. doi: 10.1016/0022-0728(93)80435-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah-Alhosseini A, Golozar M, Saatchi A, et al. Effect of solution concentration on semiconducting properties of passive films formed on austenitic stainless steels. Corros Sci. 2010;52(1):205–209. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2009.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amadou T, Sidhom H, Braham C. Double loop electrochemical potentiokinetic reactivation test optimization in checking of duplex stainless steel intergranular corrosion susceptibility. Metall Mater Trans A. 2004;35(11):3499–3513. doi: 10.1007/s11661-004-0187-4
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh CC, Wu W. Overview of Intermetallic Sigma Phase Precipitation in Stainless Steels. ISRN Metallurgy. 2012;2012(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Gow JT, Harder OE. 1942. Balancing the composition of cast 25 per cent chromium-12 per cent nickel type alloys.
   Google Scholar
• Azumi K, Ohtsuka T, Sato N. Mott-Schottky plot of the passive film formed on iron in neutral borate and phosphate solutions. J Electrochem Soc. 1987;134(6):1352–1357. doi: 10.1149/1.2100672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuković M. The formation and growth of hydrous oxide film on stainless steel in alkaline solution by potential cycling. Corros Sci. 1995;37(1):111–120. doi: 10.1016/0010-938X(94)00119-Q
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakiki N, Belo MDC, Simoes A, et al. Semiconducting properties of passive films formed on stainless steels. J Electrochem Soc. 1998;145(11):3821–3829. doi: 10.1149/1.1838880
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha H-Y, Lee T-H. Determining factors for the protectiveness of the passive film of FeCrN stainless steel formed in sulfuric acid solutions. Corros Sci Technol. 2013;12(4):163–170. doi: 10.14773/cst.2013.12.4.163
   Google Scholar
• Mansfeld F, Huet F, Mattos O. New trends in electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and electrochemical noise analysis (ENA): proceedings of the international symposium. Electrochem Soc. 2001;1:86–87.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya H, Fujimoto S, Chihara O, et al. Semiconductive behavior of passive films formed on pure Cr and Fe–Cr alloys in sulfuric acid solution. Electrochim Acta. 2002;47(27):4357–4366. doi: 10.1016/S0013-4686(02)00508-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Wu X, Han E-H. Electrochemical properties and growth mechanism of passive films on alloy 690 in high-temperature alkaline environments. Corros Sci. 2010;52(10):3444–3452. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2010.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JJ, Young YM. Study on the passive film of type 316 stainless steel. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2013;8(10):11847–11859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morshed-Behbahani K, Najafisayar P, Pakshir M, et al. An electrochemical study on the effect of stabilization and sensitization heat treatments on the intergranular corrosion behaviour of AISI 321H austenitic stainless steel. Corros Sci. 2018;138:28–41. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2018.03.043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li B, Zhang W. Electrochemical and corrosion behavior of 2205 duplex stainless steel in simulated concrete pore solution. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2017;12:8432–8446. doi: 10.20964/2017.09.43
   Google Scholar
• Feng H, Li H, Zhang S, et al. Corrosion Behavior of Super Duplex Stainless Steel S32750 in White Liquor. Int J Electrochem Sci. 2015;10:4116–4128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao J, Dong C, Man C, et al. The electrochemical behavior and characteristics of passive film on 2205 duplex stainless steel under various hydrogen charging conditions. Corrosion. 2015;72(1):42–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo H, Dong C, Xiao K, et al. Characterization of passive film on 2205 duplex stainless steel in sodium thiosulphate solution. Appl Surf Sci. 2011;258(1):631–639. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.06.077
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fattah-Alhosseini A. Passivity of AISI 321 stainless steel in 0.5M H2SO4 solution studied by Mott–Schottky analysis in conjunction with the point defect model. Arab J Chem. 2016;9:S1342–S1348. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2012.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L. Techniques for corrosion monitoring. -: Elsevier; 2008. p. 396–397.
   Google Scholar
• McCafferty E. Validation of corrosion rates measured by the Tafel extrapolation method. Corros Sci. 2005;47(12):3202–3215. doi: 10.1016/j.corsci.2005.05.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty E, McArdle JV. Corrosion inhibition of iron in acid solutions by biological siderophores. J Electrochem Soc. 1995;142(5):1447–1453. doi: 10.1149/1.2048595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCafferty E. Electrochemical behavior of iron within crevices in nearly neutral chloride solutions. J Electrochem Soc. 1974;121(8):1007–1013. doi: 10.1149/1.2401968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar