Imprisonment pains, reentry strains, and perceived likelihood of reoffending

References

• Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30, 47–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, R. (2001). Building on the foundation of general strain theory: Specifying the types of strain most likely to lead to crime and delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38, 319–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Akers, R.L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, H.S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, K., Listwan, S.J., Jonson, C.L., & Cullen, F.T. (2010). A general strain theory of prison violence and misconduct: An integrated model of inmate behavior. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26, 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• Bouffard, J.A. (2002). Methodological and theoretical implications of using subject generated consequences in tests of rational choice theory. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 747–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, shame, and reintegration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cid, J. (2009). Is imprisonment criminogenic? A comparative study of recidivism rates between prison and suspended prison sanctions. European Journal of Criminology, 6, 459–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, A.P. (2016). Capital and punishment: A novel model of reoffending. Corrections: Policy, Practice, and Research, 2(1), 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F.T., & Cullen, J.B. (1978). Toward a paradigm of labeling theory. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Studies, University of Lincoln.
   Google Scholar
• Cullen, F.T., Jonson, C.L., & Nagin, D.S. (2011). Prisons do not reduce recidivism: The high cost of ignoring science. The Prison Journal Supplement To, 91(3), 485–655.
   Google Scholar
• DeJong, C. (1997). Specific deterrence and survival analysis: Integrating theoretical and empirical models of recidivism. Criminology, 35, 561–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, A., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitudes, intentions and behavior. New York: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Franklin, T.W., Franklin, C.A., & Pratt, T.C. (2006). Examining the empirical relationship between prison crowding and inmate misconduct: A meta-analysis of conflicting research results. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 401–412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendreau, P., Goggin, C.E., & Law, M.A. (1997). Predicting prison misconducts. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 414–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other Inmates. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goodstein, L., MacKenzie, D.L., & Shotland, R.L. (1984). Personal control and inmate adjustment to prison. Criminology, 22, 343–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H.G., & Bursik, R.J. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review, 24(3), 837–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grasmick, H.G., Finley, N., & Glaser, D. (1984). Labor force participation, sex role attitudes, and female crime. Social Science Quarterly, 65(3), 703–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, J.L. (1973). Labeling and deviance: A case study in the “sociology of the interesting.”. Social Problems, 20(4), 447–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holzer, H.J. (1996). What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, H.J., Raphael, S., & Stoll, M.A. (2006). Perceived criminality, criminal background checks, and the racial hiring practices of employers. The Journal of Law & Economics, 49, 451–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonson, C.L. (2010). The impact of imprisonment on reoffending: A meta-analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cincinnati.
   Google Scholar
• Kassebaum, G.G., Ward, D., & Wilner, D. (1971). Prison treatment and parole survival: An empirical assessment. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, L., Levitt, S.D., & Shustorovich, E. (2003). Prison conditions, capital punishment, and deterrence. American Law and Economics Review, 5(2), 318–343.
   Google Scholar
• Klepper, S., & Nagin, D. (1989). The deterrent effect of perceived certainty and severity of punishment revisited. Criminology, 27(4), 721–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemert, E.M. (1951). Social pathology: A systematic approach to the theory of sociopathic behavior. New York: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Listwan, S.J., Sullivan, C.J., Agnew, R., Cullen, F.T., & Colvin, M. (2013). The pains of imprisonment revisited: The impact of strain on inmate recidivism. Justice Quarterly, 30(1), 144–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, D. (1980). Prison sexual violence. New York: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• May, D.C., & Wood, P.B. (2010). Ranking correctional punishments: Views from offenders, practitioners, and the public. Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, G., & Erickson, P. (1987). Cross-sectional versus longitudinal research: An empirical comparison of projected and subsequent criminality. Social Science Research, 16(2), 107–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwbeerta, P., Nagin, D.S., & Blokland, A.A. (2009). The relationship between first imprisonment and criminal career development: A matched samples comparison. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 25, 227–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime, and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: A field experiment. American Sociological Review, 74, 777–799.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home: Parole and prisoner reentry. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruback, R.B., Carr, T., & Hopper, C. (1986). Perceived control in prison: Its relation to reported crowding, stress, and symptoms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 375–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sherman, L.W. (1993). Defiance, deterrence, and irrelevance: A theory of criminal sanction. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30, 445–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spohn, C., & Holleran, D. (2002). Recidivism rates of felony offenders: A focus on drug offenders. Criminology, 40(2), 329–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutherland, E.H., Cressey, D.R., & Luckenbill, D.F. (1992). Principles of criminology. Lanham, MD: Alta Mira Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G.M. (1958). The society of captives: A study of a maximum security prison. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tittle, C. (1980). Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Toch, H. (1977). Living in prison: The ecology of survival. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Toch, H., & Adams, K. (1986). Pathology and disruptiveness among prison inmates. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 23, 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Travis, J. (2002). Invisible punishment: An instrument of social exclusion. In M. Mauer & M. Chesney-Lind (Eds.), Invisible punishment: The collateral consequences of mass imprisonment (pp. 15–36). New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Villettaz, P., Killias, M., & Zoder, I. (2006). The effects of custodial vs. noncustodial sentences on re-offending: A systematic review of the state of knowledge. Philadelphia, PA: Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, S. (1961). Socialization in correctional communities. American Sociological Review, 26, 697–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, P.B. (2007). Exploring the positive punishment effect among incarcerated adult offenders. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 31, 8–22.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldredge, J. (1999). Inmate experiences and psychological well-being. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26, 235–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldredge, J., Griffin, T., & Pratt, T. (2001). Considering hierarchical models for research on inmate behavior: Predicting misconduct with multilevel data. Justice Quarterly, 18, 203–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, K.N. (1991). The violent and victimized in the male prison. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 16(3/4), 1–25.
   Google Scholar