From seduction to registration: case studies of women in the sex industry

References

• Ackerman, A. R., Sacks, M., & Osier, L. N. (2013). The experiences of registered sex offenders with internet offender registries in three states. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 52(1), 29–45.
   Google Scholar
• Bensel, T.T., Gibbs, B., & Rush Burkey, C. (2019). Female sex offenders: Is there a difference between solo and co-offenders? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 34(19), 4061–4084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, B.S., Holleran, D., & Finn, M.A. (2008). The impact of the pennsylvania sentencing guidelines on sex differences in sentencing. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 24(4), 399–418.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, K., Bierie, D., & Williams, K. (2017). Deconstructing incidents of female perpetrated sex crimes. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 29(3), 267–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunting, L. (2006). Females who sexually offend against children: responses of the child protection and criminal justice systems. London, England: National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cortoni, F., Babchishin, K.M., & Rat, C. (2017). The proportion of sexual offenders who are female is higher than thought: A meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 44(4), 145–162.
   Google Scholar
• Dank, M., Bilal Khan, L. P., Downey, M., Kotonias, C., Mayer, D., Owens, C., … Lilly, Y. (2014). Estimating the size and structure of the underground commercial sex economy in eight major US cities. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, A.J., & Hackett, S. (2020). Situational factor in female-perpetuated child sexual abuse in organizations: Implications for prevention. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 26(1), 5–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, C.J., & Meehan, D.C. (2005). An analysis of females convicted of sex crimes in the state of Florida. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 14(1), 75–89.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, T., Rose, M. R., & Ward, T. (2010). Pathways to female sexual offending: Approach or Avoidance. Psychology, Crime & Law, 16(5), 359–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillespie, S.M., Williams, R., Beech, A.R., Elliott, I.A., Eldridge, H.J., & Ashfield, S. (2015). Characteristics of females who sexually offend: A comparison of solo and co-offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 27(3), 284–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graystone, A. D. & De Luca, R. V. (1999). Female Perpetrators of Child Sexual Abuse: A Review of the Clinical and Empirical Literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 4(1), 93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan, F.E. (2007). Essentials of research methods in criminal justice and criminology (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Holsopple, K. (1998). Strip club testimony. Minneapolis, MN: Freedom and Justice Center for Prostitution Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Holt, T., & Blevins, K. (2007). Examining sex work from the client’s perspective: Assessing johns using online. Deviant Behavior, 28(4), 333–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horning, A., Thomas, C., & Jordenö, S. (2019). Harlem pimps accounts of their economic pathways and feelings of insiderness and outsiderness. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice and Criminology, 7(3), 69–94.
   Google Scholar
• Horning, A., Thomas, C., Marcus, A., & Sriken, J. (2020). Risky business: Harlem pimps’ work decisions and economic returns. Deviant Behavior, 41(2), 160–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koegler, E., Preble, K.M., Cimino, A.N., Stevens, J.E., & Diehl, S. (2020). Examining recidivism in a prostitution diversion program. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(2–3), 232–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, E.G, Worley, R.M., Worley, V.B., & B, V. (2018). The effects of perceptions of staff-inmate boundary violations and willingness to follow rules on work stress. Security Journal, 31(2), 618–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J. S., D'Amora, D. A., & Hern, A. L. (2007). Megan's law and its impact on community re‐entry for sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 25(4), 587–602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J.S., Willis, G.M., & Prescott, D.S. (2015). Adverse childhood experiences in the lives of female sex offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 27(3), 258–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddan, S., & Pazzani, L. (2017). Sex offenders: Crimes and processing in the criminal justice system. Frederick, MD: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Makin, D. A., Walker, A. M., & Story, S. C. (2018). Are we interested? A trend analysis of sex offender internet registries. Criminal Justice Studies, 31(3), 297–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, E.A., & Miller, H.A. (2019). Examining gender-specific and gender-neutral risk factors in women who sexually offend. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(4), 511–527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, J. K., Mathews, R., & Speltz, K. (1991). Female sex offenders: A typology. In M. Q. Patton (Ed.), Family sexual abuse: Frontline research and evaluation (pp. 199–219). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mathews, R., Matthews, J. K., & Speltz, K. (1989). Female sexual offenders: An exploratory study. Orwell, VT: Safer Society Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarty, L.M. (1986). Mother-child incest: Characteristics of the offender. Child Welfare, 65(5), 447–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miccio-Fonseca, L.C. (2000). Adult and adolescent female sex offenders: experiences compared to other female and male sex offenders. Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 11(3), 75–88.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, H.A., & Marshall, E.A. (2019). Comparing solo and co-offending female sex offenders on variables of pathology, offense characteristics, and recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 31(8), 972–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan, P. & Ward, T. (2001). Females who sexually abused children: Assessment and treatment issues. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 8(1), 44–55.
   Google Scholar
• Nathan, P., & Ward, T. (2002). Female sex offenders: clinical and demographic features. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8(1), 5–21.
   Google Scholar
• Potterat, J.J., Woodhouse, D.E., Muth, J.B., & Muth, S.Q. (1990). Estimating the prevalence and career longevity of prostitute women. Journal of Sex Research, 27(2), 233–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ragin, C.C. (1992). Casing and the process of social inquiry. In C.C. Ragin & H.S. Becker (Eds.), What is a case? Exploring the foundations of social inquiry (pp. 217–226). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1995). Crime in the making: pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sparks, E.P., Marcum, C.D., Clevenger, S.L., & Sedlacek, J. (2020). Comparison of financial lucrativeness and safety in the world of online and offline prostitution: An exploratory study of perceptions and experiences of law enforcement. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(2), 332–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalans, L.J., & Finn, M.A. (2019). Self-narratives of persistent pimps and those anticipating desistance: Emotions, conventional work, and moral profitability calculus. Victims & Offenders, 14(5), 647–669.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickland, S.M. (2008). Female sex offenders: Exploring issues of personality, trauma, and cognitive distortions. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(4), 474–489.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed, F. & Williams, S. (1996). Case studies of female sex offenders. Ottawa: Correctional Service of Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Sykes, G. (1958). The society of captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tewksbury, R., & Levenson, J. (2009). stress experiences of family members of registered sex offenders. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 27(4), 611–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D. (2006). Female sex offenders: A comparison of solo and co-offenders. Violence and Victims, 21(3), 339–354.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vandiver, D.M., Cheeseman Dial, K., & Worley, R.M. (2008). A qualitative assessment of registered female sex offenders judicial processing experiences and perceived effects of a public registry. Criminal Justice Review, 33(2), 177–198.
   Google Scholar
• Vandiver, D.M., & Kercher, G. (2004). Offender and victim characteristics of registered female sexual offenders in Texas: A proposed typology of female sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 16(2), 121–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, M. (1949). The methodology of social sciences. E.A. Shils & H.A. Finch, Translated by New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wijkman, M., Bijleveld, C., & Hendriks, J. (2011). Females who sexually offend: Specialists, generalists and once-only offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17, 34–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K.S, & Bierie, D.M. (2015). An incident-based comparison of female andmale sexual offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research & Treatment, 27(3), 235–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, R.M. (2016). Memoirs of a guard-researcher: Deconstructing the games inmates play behind the prison walls. Deviant Behavior, 37(11), 1215–1226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, R.M., Lambert, E.G. G, E., Worley, V.B., & B, V. (2019). I can’t get no satisfaction! An examination of correctional officers’ perceptions of staff-inmate boundary violations and willingness to follow institutional rules within the prison workplace. Deviant Behavior, 40(8), 1007–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, R. M. & Worley, V. B. (2013). The sex offender next door: Deconstructing the United States’ obsession with sex offenders in an age of Neoliberalism. International Review of Law, Computers, and Technology, 27(3), 335–344.
   Google Scholar
• Worley, R.M., & Worley, V.B. (2016). the economics of crossing over: examining the link between correctional-officer pay and guard-inmate boundary violations. Deviant Behavior, 37(1), 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley, R.M., Worley, V.B., & Hsu, H. (2018). Can I trust my coworker?: Examining correctional officers’ perceptions of staff-inmate inappropriate relationships within a southern penitentiary system. Deviant Behavior, 39(3), 332–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar