The views of victim/survivors of sexual violence about perpetrator post-release measures

References

• Allen, M. (2011). Violence and voice: Using a feminist constructivist grounded theory to explore women’s resistance to abuse. Qualiative Research, 11(1), 23–45. doi:10.1177/1468794110384452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alriksson-Schmidt, A., Armour, B., & Thibadeau, J. (2010). Are adolescent girls with a physical disability at increased risk for sexual violence? The Journal of School Health, 80(7), 361–367. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00514.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2017). Personal safety, Australia, 2016. ABS cat. no. 4906.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Prisoners in Australia 2020-21. Cat. no. 4517.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Babbie, E. (2015). The practice of social research (14th edition ed.). Boston: Cengage Learning US.
   Google Scholar
• Bandy, R. (2015). The impact of sex offender policies on victims. In R. Wright (Ed.), Sex offender laws, second edition : Failed policies, new directions (pp. 358–380). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, L., Walvisch, J., & Richards, K. (2019). More, longer, tougher … or is it finally time for a different approach to the post-sentence management of sex offenders in Australia? Criminal Law Journal, 43(1), 41–57. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3394599
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor, D. (2023). Talking punishment: How victim perceptions of punishment change when they communicate with offenders. Punishment & Society, 25(2), 519–536. doi:10.1177/14624745211054748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazemore, G. (1998). Restorative justice and earned redemption: Communities, victims, and offender reintegration. The American Behavioral Scientist, 41(6), 768–813. doi:10.1177/0002764298041006003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutilier, S., & Wells, L. (2018). The case for reparative and transformative justice approaches to sexual violence in Canada: A proposal to pilot and test new approaches. Calgary: University of Calgary.
   Google Scholar
• Bowdler, M. (2020). Is Rape a Crime? A Memoir, an Investigation, and a Manifesto. Flatiron Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, K., & Rogers, K. (2020). Beyond the rape ”victim - ”survivor” binary: How race, gender, and identity processes interact to shape distress. Sociological Forum, 35(2), 323–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Burke, M., Ferrari, M., & Mann, B. (2023). Toward a feminist phenomenology of temporal harm. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture & Society, 48(2), 269–290. doi:10.1086/722314
   Google Scholar
• Center for Sex Offender Management. (2000). Engaging advocates and other victim service providers in the community management of sex offenders. Silver Spring: Center for Sex Offender Management. http://www.csom.org/train/supervision/short/section2/advocacy.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Center for Sex Offender Management. (2016). Promoting collaboration between victim advocates and sex offender management professionals: A resource package. Silver Spring: Center for Sex Offender Management. http://www.csom.org/pubs/OVW-Collaboration-Resource-Package-Sept-2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Center for Sex Offender Management. (2018). Advancing a victim-centered approach to supervising sex offenders: A toolkit for practitioners. Silver Spring: Center for Sex Offender Management. http://csom.org/pubs/Probation_toolkit_web.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chan, Z., Fung, Y., & Chien, W. (2018). Bracketing in phenomenology: Only undertaken in the data collection and analysis process? The Qualitative Report, 18, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. (2015). A fair way to go: Justice for victim-survivors of sexual violence. In A. Powell, N. Henry, & A. Flynn (Eds.), Rape Justice - beyond the criminal law (pp. 18–35). Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, D., & Tewksbury, R. (2017). Public and professional views of sex offender registration and notification. Criminology, Criminal Justice, Law & Society, 18(1), 1–27.
   Google Scholar
• Craun, S., Kernsmith, P., & Butler, N. (2011). Anything that can be a danger to the public: Desire to extend registries beyond sex offenses. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 22(3), 375–391. doi:10.1177/0887403410378734
   Google Scholar
• Craun, S., & Simmons, C. (2012). Taking a seat at the table: Sexual assault survivors’ views of sex offender registries. Victims & Offenders, 7(3), 312–326. doi:10.1080/15564886.2012.685217
   Google Scholar
• Dancig-Rosenberg, H., & Dagan, N. (2019). Retributarianism: A new individualization of punishment. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 13(1), 129–137. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11572-018-9460-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, A., Carson, E., Newton, D., & Hobbs, G. (2014). Professional views on the management of sex offenders in the community. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 53(3), 171–189. doi:10.1080/10509674.2014.887605
   Google Scholar
• Deogaonkar Anant, R. (2021). Retributivism: Punishment and justification. International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 16(1), 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vel-Palumbo, M., Wenzel, M., & Woodyatt, L. (2019). Self-punishment promotes reconciliation with third parties by addressing the symbolic implications of wrongdoing. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(5), 1070–1086. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd, S. (2018). The punitive woman? Gender differences in public attitudes toward parole among an Australian sample. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(10), 3006–3022. doi:10.1177/0306624X17739560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duff, A. (2003). Punishment, communication, and community. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K., & Ireland, C. (2006). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the influence of offence type: A comparison of staff working in a forensic setting and students. British Journal of Forensic Practice, 8(2), 10–19. doi:10.1108/14636646200600009
   Google Scholar
• Fitz-Gibbon, K., & Walklate, S. (2018). Gender, crime and criminal justice (3rd ed.). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315621906
   Google Scholar
• Floersch, J., Longhofer, J., Kranke, D., & Townsend, L. (2010). Integrating thematic, grounded theory and narrative analysis: A case study of adolescent psychotropic treatment. Qualitative Social Work, 9(3), 407–425. doi:10.1177/1473325010362330
   Google Scholar
• Funk, F., McGeer, V., & Gollwitzer, M. (2014). Get the message: Punishment is satisfying if the transgressor responds to its communicative intent. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(8), 986–997. doi:10.1177/0146167214533130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gault, B., & Sabini, J. (2000). The roles of empathy, anger, and gender in predicting attitudes toward punitive, reparative, and preventative public policies. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 495–520. doi:10.1080/026999300402772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelb, K., Stobbs, N., & Hogg, R. (2019). COMMUNITY-BASED SENTENCING ORDERS and PAROLE: A review of literature and evaluations across jurisdictions. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Grbich, C. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: An introduction. Sage. doi:10.4135/9781529799606
   Google Scholar
• Grove, L., Farrell, G., Farrington, D., & Johnson, S. (2012). Preventing repeat victimization: A systematic review. Stockholm : Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Guerette, S., & Caron, S. (2007). Assessing the Impact of Acquaintance Rape. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 22(2), 31–50. doi:10.1300/_J035v22n02_04
   Google Scholar
• Harper, C., Hogue, T., & Bartels, R. (2017). Attitudes towards sexual offenders: What do we know, and why are they important? Aggression & Violent Behavior, 34, 201–213. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2017.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herman, J. (2005). Justice from the victim’s perspective. Violence Against Women, 11(5), 571–602. doi:10.1177/1077801205274450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hockett, J., McGraw, L., & Saucier, D. (2014). A ”rape victim” by any other name: The effects of labels on individuals' rape-related perceptions In H. In P. & R. Schulze (Eds.), The Expression of Inequality in Interaction: Power, dominance, and status (pp. 81–104). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hockett, J., & Saucier, D. (2015). A systematic literature review of “rape victims” versus “rape survivors”: Implications for theory, research, and practice. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 25(Part A), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jülich, S. (2006). Views of justice among survivors of historical child sexual abuse: Implications for restorative justice in New Zealand. Theoretical Criminology, 10(1), 125–138. doi:10.1177/1362480606059988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jülich, S., & Landon, F. (2017). Achieving justice outcomes: Participants of project restore’s restorative processes. In E. Zinsstag & M. Keenan (Eds.), Restorative responses to sexual violence: Legal, social and therapeutic dimensions (pp. 192–211). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, L., Lovett, J., & Regan, L. (2005). A gap or a chasm? Attrition in reported rape cases. London: Home Office. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gap-or-chasm-attrition-reported-rape-cases
   Google Scholar
• Kemshall, H., & McCartan, K. (Eds.). (2017). Contemporary sex offender risk management, volume II: Responses. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63573-6
   Google Scholar
• Koon-Magnin, S. (2015). Perceptions of and support for sex offender policies: Testing Levenson, Brannon, Fortney, and baker’s findings. Journal of Criminal Justice, 43(1), 80–88. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss, M. (2014). The RESTORE program of restorative justice for sex crimes: Vision, process, and outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(9), 1623–1660. doi:10.1177/0886260513511537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., Brannon, Y., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2007). Public perceptions about sex offenders and community protection policies. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 7(1), 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., & Cotter, L. (2005). The impact of sex offender residence restrictions: 1,000 feet from danger or one step from absurd? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49(2), 168–178. doi:10.1177/0306624X04271304
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levenson, J., Fortney, T., & Baker, J. (2010). Views of sexual abuse professionals about sex offender notification policies. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(2), 150–168. doi:10.1177/0306624X08327785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mace, G., Powell, M., & Benson, M. (2015). Evaluation of operation RESET: An initiative for addressing child sexual abuse in Aboriginal communities. Journal of Crminology, 48(1), 82–103. doi:10.1177/0004865814524217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majeed-Ariss, R., Rodriguez, P., & White, C. (2020). The disproportionately high prevalence of learning disabilities amongst adults attending Saint Marys sexual assault referral centre. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 33(3), 595–603. doi:10.1111/jar.12703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, C., Shields, R., Mears, D., & Beaver, K. (2010). Sex offender residence restriction laws: Parental perceptions and public policy. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38(5), 1022–1030. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, F., & Wager, N. (2015). Restorative justice in cases of sexual violence: Exploring the views of the public and survivors. Probation Journal, 62(4), 336–356. doi:10.1177/0264550515619571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruna, S., Le Bel, T., Mitchell, N., & Naples, M. (2004). Pygmalion in the reintegration process: Desistance from crime through the looking glass. Psychology Crime & Law, 10(3), 271–281. doi:10.1080/10683160410001662762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2018). Qualitative researching (Third edition ed.). Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/qualitative-researching/book244365
   Google Scholar
• McGinn, T., Taylor, B., McColgan, M., & Lagdon, S. (2016). Survivor perspectives on IPV perpetrator interventions: A systematic narrative review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 17(3), 239–255. doi:10.1177/1524838015584358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlade, H. (2012). Our greatest challenge: Aboriginal children and human rights. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C., & Westmarland, N. (2019). Kaleidoscopic justice: Sexual violence and victim-survivors’ perceptions of justice. Social & Legal Studies, 28(2), 179–201. doi:10.1177/0964663918761200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn, C., Westmarland, N., & Godden, N. (2012). ‘I Just Wanted Him to Hear Me’: Sexual violence and the possibilities of restorative justice. Journal of Law & Society, 39, 39(213–240. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00579.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meloy, M., Boatwright, J., & Curtis, K. (2013). Views from the top and bottom: Lawmakers and practitioners discuss sex offender laws. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 616–638. doi:10.1007/s12103-012-9189-8
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K.-L. (2014). Relational caring: The use of the victim impact statement by sexually assaulted women. Violence & Victims, 29(5), 797–813. doi:10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molnar, A., Chaudhry, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2021). “It’s not about the money. It’s about sending a message!” Unpacking the components of revenge. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.3524910
   Google Scholar
• Napier, S., Dowling, C., Morgan, A., & Talbot, D. (2018). What impact do public sex offender registries have on community safety? Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Victims of Crime. (2005). Bringing victims and victim service providers into reentry planning in new jersey. Washington DC: National Center for Victims of Crime.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, M., Herlihy, B., & Oescher, J. (2002). A survey of counselor attitudes towards sex offenders. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 24(1), 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• O'Connell, M., & Fletcher, S. (2018). Giving victims a voice in parole hearings: South Australia’s experience. Journal of Victimology and Victim Justice, 1(1), 42–62.
   Google Scholar
• Papendick, M., & Bohner, G. (2017). ”Passive victim – strong survivor”? Perceived meaning of labels applied to women who were raped. PLos One, 12(5), e0177550. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potts, A., Kolli, H., & Fattal, L. (2022). Whose voices matter? Using participatory, feminist and anthropological approaches to centre power and positionality in research on gender-based violence in emergencies. Global Public Health, 17(10), 2530–2546. doi:10.1080/17441692.2022.2062026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. (1992). Feminist methods in social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K., Death, J., & McCartan, K. (2020). Community-based approaches to sexual offender reintegration. Australia’s National Research Organisation for Women’s Safety. https://www.anrows.org.au/project/community-based-approaches-to-sexual-offender-reintegration/
   Google Scholar
• Richards, K., Death, J., & Ronken, C. (2021). What do victim/survivors of sexual violence think about circles of support and accountability? Victims & Offenders, 16(6), 893–911. doi:10.1080/15564886.2020.1850578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2009). Listening to the crime victim: Evaluating victim input at sentencing and parole. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 347–412. doi:10.1086/599203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiavone, S., & Jeglic, E. (2009). Public perception of sex offender social policies and the impact on sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(6), 679–695. doi:10.1177/0306624X08323454
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settles, T. (2009). Restorative reentry: A strategy to improve reentry outcomes by enhancing social capital. Victims & Offenders, 4(3), 285–302. doi:10.1080/15564880903048560
   Google Scholar
• Simms, E.-M., & Stawarska, B. (2013). Concepts and methods in interdisciplinary feminist phenomenology. Janus Head, 13(1), 6–16. doi:10.5840/jh20141311
   Google Scholar
• Simon, J. (1998). MANAGING the MONSTROUS: Sex offenders and the new penology. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 4(1/2), 452–467. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.4.1-2.452
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Socia, K., Grady, M., Bolder, T., Cronin, K., Hurt, C., & Vidrine, S. (2020). How background relates to perceptions of child sexual abuse prevention and policies related to individuals convicted of sex crimes. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 31(7), 1059–1094. doi:10.1177/0887403419873126
   Google Scholar
• Spoo, S., Kaylor, L., Schaaf, S., Rosselli, M., Laake, A., Johnson, C., & Jeglic, E. (2018). Victims’ attitudes toward sex offenders and sex offender legislation. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 62(11), 3385–3407. doi:10.1177/0306624X17740537
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strang, H. (2001). The crime victim movement as a force in civil society. In H. Strang & J. Braithwaite (Eds.), Restorative justice and civil society (pp. 69–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C., & Gassner, L. (2010). Stemming the flow: Challenges for policing adult sexual assault with regard to attrition rates and under‐reporting of sexual offences. Police Practice and Research: An International Journal, 11(3), 240–255. doi:10.1080/15614260902830153
   Google Scholar
• Terry, K. (2011). What is smart sex offender policy? Criminology & Public Policy, 10(2), 275–282. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00707.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewkesbury, R. (2006). Sex offender registries as a tool for public safety: Views from registered offenders. Western Criminology Review, 7(1), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405. doi:10.1111/nhs.12048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victoria Sentencing Advisory Council. (2021). Sex offences in Victoria: 2010-2019. Victoria Sentencing Advisory Council. https://www.sentencingcouncil.vic.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-06/Sex_Offences_in_Victoria_2010_2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• von Hirsch, A. (2017). Deserved criminal sentences: An overview. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wacquant, L., & Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Duke University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv11smrv3
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, G. (2021). Feminist phenomenology. In Asta & K. Hall (Eds.), The oxford handbook of feminist philosophy (pp. 63–71). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weller, S., Vickers, B., Bernard, R., Blackburn, A., Borgatti, S. … Soundy, A. (2018). Open-ended interview questions and saturation. PLos One, 13(6), 1–18. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0198606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yankah, E. (2020). The right to reintegration. New Criminal Law Review, 23(1), 74–112. doi:10.1525/nclr.2020.23.1.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zgoba, K., & Mitchell, M. (2023). The effectiveness of sex offender registration and notification: A meta-analysis of 25 years of findings. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19(1), 71–96. doi:10.1007/s11292-021-09480-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar