Crime continuity from mid- to late adolescence: the mediating roles of perceived peer delinquency, moral neutralization, and victimization

References

• Akers, R.L. (2009). Social learning and social structure: A general theory of crime and deviance. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-0245-0_6
   Google Scholar
• Allison, P.D. (2002). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412985079
   Google Scholar
• Bahr, S.J., Hoffmann, J.P., & Yang, X. (2005). Parental and peer influence on the risk of adolescent drug use. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26(6), 529–551. doi:10.1007/s10935-005-0014-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berg, M.T., & Schreck, C.J. (2022). The meaning of the victim–offender overlap for criminological theory and crime prevention policy. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 277–297. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-120724
   Google Scholar
• Blokland, A.A.J., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2010). Considering criminal continuity: Testing for heterogeneity and state dependence in the association of past and future offending. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 526–556. doi:10.1375/acri.43.3.526
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvin, G.J., Griffin, K.W., & Diaz-Nichols, T. (2006). Preventing youth violence and delinquency through a universal school-based prevention approach. Prevention Science, 7(4), 403–408. doi:10.1007/s11121-006-0057-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvin, G.J., Griffin, K.W., Diaz, T., Schieier, L.M., Williams, C., & Epstein, J.A. (2000). Preventing illicit drug use in adolescents: Long-term follow-up data from a randomized control trial of a school population. Addictive Behaviors, 25(5), 769–774. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(99)00050-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brame, R., Bushway, S.D., Paternoster, R., & Thornberry, T.P. (2005). Temporal linkages in violent and nonviolent criminal activity. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 21(2), 149–174. doi:10.1007/s10940-005-2490-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, A.-J., Saunders, R., Fearo, P., Fonagy, P., Cottrell, D. … Butler, S. (2020). Antisocial cognition as a mediator of the peer influence effect and peer selection effect in antisocial adolescents. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 31(1), 177–187. doi:10.1007/s00787-020-01695-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, D., Drabick, D.A.G., & Burgers, D.E. (2015). A developmental perspective on peer rejection, deviant peer affiliation, and conduct problems among youth. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 46(6), 823–838. doi:10.1007/s10578-014-0522-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks, M.A., Dunfield, K.A., & Recchia, H.E. (2018). Prosocial behavior with peers: Intentions, outcomes, and interpersonal adjustment. In W.M. Bukowski, B. Laursen, & K.H. Rubin (Eds.), Handbook of peer interactions, relationships, and groups (pp. 243–264). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donaldson, S.I., Graham, J.W., & Hansen, W.B. (1994). Testing the generalizability of intervening mechanism theories: Understanding the effects of adolescent drug use prevention interventions. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 17(2), 195–216. doi:10.1007/BF01858105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, D. (1976-1980). National youth Survey (United States): Waves 1-5, 1976-1980. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-University Consortium for Political and Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Elwert, F., & Winship, C. (2014). Endogenous selection bias: The problem of conditioning on a collider variable. Annual Review of Sociology, 40(1), 31–53. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-071913-043455
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallupe, O., McLevey, J., & Brown, S. (2019). Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35(2), 313–335. doi:10.1007/s10940-018-9384-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gifford-Smith, M., Dodge, K.A., Dishion, T.J., & McCord, J. (2005). Peer influence in children and adolescents: Crossing the bridge from developmental to intervention science. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33(3), 255–265. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3563-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfredson, M.R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R.D. (2003). The Hare psychopathy checklist-revised (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, K.L. (2008). Low prosocial attachment, involvement with drug-using peers, and adolescent drug use: A longitudinal examination of mediational mechanisms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 22(2), 302–308. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.22.2.302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics for windows, version 26.0. Armonk, NY: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, W.G., Piquero, A.R., & Reingle, J.M. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17(1), 16–26. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2011.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D.A. (2013). Mediation: Sensitivity Analysis [webinar] http://davidakenny.net/webinars/Mediation/Sensitivity/Sensitivity.html
   Google Scholar
• Kiesner, J., Poulin, F., & Nicotra, E. (2003). Peer relations across contexts: Individual-network homophily and network inclusion in and after school. Child Development, 74(5), 1328–1343. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauritsen, J.L., & Laub, J.H. (2007). Understanding the link between victimization and offending: New reflections on an old idea. In M. Hough & M. Maxfield (Eds.), Surveying crime in the 21^st century (pp. 55–75). Mansey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loeber, R., & Farrington, D.P. (Eds.). (2012). From juvenile delinquency to adult crime: Criminal careers, justice policy and prevention. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGloin, J.M., & Thomas, K.J. (2019). Peer influence and delinquency. Annual Review of Criminology, 2(1), 241–264. doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-011518-024551
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meehl, P.E. (1989). Law and the fireside inductions (with postscript): Some reflections of a clinical psychologist. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 7(4), 521–550. doi:10.1002/bsl.2370070408
   Google Scholar
• Meldrum, R.C., & Boman, J.H. (2013). Similarities and differences between perceptions of peer delinquency, peer self-reported delinquency, and respondent delinquency: An analysis of friendship dyads. Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(6), 395–406. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2013.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, J., & Farrington, D.P. (2010). Risk factors for conduct disorder and delinquency: Key findings from longitudinal studies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 55(10), 633–642. doi:10.1177/070674371005501003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muthén, B., & Muthén, L. (1998-2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén and Muthén.
   Google Scholar
• Nagin, D., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Population heterogeneity and state dependence: State of the evidence and directions for future research. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 16(2), 117–144. doi:10.1023/A:1007502804941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osgood, D.W., Wilson, J.K., O’Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., & Johnston, L.D. (1996). Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 635–655. doi:10.2307/2096397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oudekerk, B.A., Burgers, D.E., & Reppucci, N.D. (2014). Romantic partner deviance and the continuity of violence from adolescence to adulthood among offending girls. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 24(1), 27–39. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00823.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perkins, H.W. (2012). Commentary: Misperceptions of peer substance use among youth are real. Addiction, 107(5), 888–889. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2012.03782.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebellon, C.J. (2012). Differential association and substance use: Assessing the roles of discriminant validity, socialization, and selection in traditional empirical tests. European Journal of Criminology, 9(1), 73–96. doi:10.1177/1477370811421647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R.J., & Laub, J.H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sreenivasan, S., DiCiro, M., Rokop, J., & Weinberger, L.E. (2022). Addressing systemic bias in violence risk assessment. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 50(4), 626–635. Online first. 10.29158/JAAPL.220031-21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhls, Y.T., Ellison, N.B., & Subrahmanyam, K. (2017). Benefits and costs of social media in adolescence. Pediatrics, 140(S2), S67–S70. doi:10.1542/peds.2016-1758E
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2015). Proactive criminal thinking and the transmission of differential association: A cross-lagged multi-wave path analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(11), 1128–1144. doi:10.1177/0093854815582042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2016a). Crime continuity and psychological inertia: Testing the cognitive mediation and additive postulates with male adjudicated delinquents. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 32(2), 237–252. doi:10.1007/s10940-015-9262-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2016b). Friends, cognition, and delinquency: Proactive and reactive criminal thinking as mediators of the peer influence and peer selection effects among male delinquents. Justice Quarterly, 33(6), 1055–1079. doi:10.1080/07418825.2015.1039048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2016c). Proactive and reactive criminal thinking, psychological inertia, and the crime continuity conundrum. Journal of Criminal Justice, 46, 45–51. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2019a). Peer influence or projection bias? Predicting respondent delinquency with perceptual measures of peer delinquency in 22 samples. Journal of Adolescence, 70(1), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.11.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2019b). Psychological inertia revisited: Replicating and extending the differential effect of proactive and reactive criminal thinking on crime continuity. Deviant Behavior, 40(2), 156–170. doi:10.1080/01639625.2017.1419684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2021). Explaining the drug-crime connection with peers, proactive criminal thinking, and victimization: Systemic, cognitive social learning, and person proximity mechanisms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 35(3), 366–376. doi:10.1037/adb0000606
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2022a). Managing the offender-to-victim transition with parental support, low neighborhood disorder, positive school culture, and moral cognition: Protective and promotive factors and the person proximity effect. Criminal Justice Studies, 35(3), 235–254. doi:10.1080/1478601X.2022.2083615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D. (2022b). Merging the peer selection and peer influence effects: Can neutralization beliefs and cognitive impulsivity serve as links in the chain? Criminology and Criminal Justice, 174889582211051. Online first doi:10.1177/17488958221105150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D., & Espelage, D.L. (2018). Cognitive insensitivity and cognitive impulsivity as mediators of bullying continuity: Extending the psychological inertia construct to bullying behavior. School Psychology Quarterly, 33(4), 527–536. doi:10.1037/spq0000240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D., & Espelage, D.L. (2023). Mediating the pathway from bullying victimization to bullying perpetration with hostility, peer delinquency, and pro-bullying attitudes: Transforming victims into aggressors. Psychology of Violence, 13(3), 194–204. doi:10.1037/vio0000435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yau, J.C., & Reich, S.M. (2018). Are the qualities of adolescents’ offline friendships present in digital interactions. Adolescent Research Review, 3(3), 339–355. doi:10.1007/s40894-017-0059-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J.T.N., Rebellon, C.J., Barnes, J.C., & Weerman, F.M. (2014). Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanism linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology, 52(1), 60–86. doi:10.1111/1745-9125.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar