Allurin and egg jelly coat impact on in-vitro fertilization success of endangered Albanian water frog, Pelophylax shqipericus

References

• Al-Anzi B, Chandler DE. 1998. A sperm chemoattractant is released from Xenopus egg jelly during spawning. Dev Biol. 198(2):366–375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi SMH, Cosson J. 2006. Sperm motility in fishes. (II) Effects of ions and osmolality: a review. Cell Biol Int. 30(1):1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alavi SMH, Marek R, Cosson J, Psenicka M, Linhart O. 2008. Roles of extracellular Ca2+ and pH on motility and flagellar waveform parameters in sturgeon spermatozoa. Cybium. 32:124–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alroy J. 2015. Current extinction rates of reptiles and amphibians. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 112(42):13003–13008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balshine S, Leach BJ, Neat F, Werner NY, Montgomerie R. 2001. Sperm size of African cichlids in relation to sperm competition. Behav Ecol. 12(6):726–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakos MA, Kurosky A, Hedrick JL. 1990. Physicochemical characterization of progressive changes in the Xenopus laevis egg envelope following oviductal transport and fertilization. Biochemistry. 29:609–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbieri FD. 1976. Diffusible factors in anuran fertilization. Acta Physiol Lat Am. 26(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Billard R, Cosson MP. 1992. Some problems related to the assessment of sperm motility in freshwater fish. J Exp Zool. 261(2):122–131.
   Google Scholar
• Browne RK, Figiel CR. 2011. Cryopreservation of amphibian sperm, cells and tissues. In: Tiersch TR, Green CC, editors. Cryopreservation in aquatic species. 2nd ed. Baton Rouge (LA): World Aquaculture Society; p. 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Browne RK, Li H, Robinson H, Uteshev VK, Shishova NR, McGinnity D. 2011. Reptile and amphibian conservation through gene banking and other reproduction technologies. Russ J Herpetol. 18:165–174.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne PG, Roberts JD, Simmons LW. 2003. Sperm competition and the evolution of gamete morphology in frogs. Proc Biol Sci. 270(1528):2079–2086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark AK. 1997. The effects of ionicity in diluents on the motility of cane toad (Bufo marinus) sperm [B.Sc. (Hons) thesis]. Callaghan, Australia: University of Newcastle.
   Google Scholar
• Dziminski MA, Roberts JD, Beveridge M, Simmons LW. 2009. Sperm competitiveness in frogs: slow and steady wins the race. Proc Biol Sci. 276(1675):3955–3961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziminski MA, Roberts JD, Simmons LW. 2008. Fitness consequences of parental compatibility in the frog Crinia georgiana. Evolution. 62(4):879–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dziminski MA, Roberts JD, Simmons LW. 2010. Sperm morphology, motility and fertilization capacity in the myobatrachid frog Crinia georgiana. Reprod Fertil Dev. 22(3):516–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DL, Mahony MJ, Clulow J. 2004. Effect of sperm concentration, medium osmolality and oocyte storage on artificial fertilization success in a myobatrachid frog (Limnodynastes tasmaniensis). Reprod Fertil Dev. 16:347–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elinson PR. 1973. Fertilization of frog body-cavity eggs: Rana pipiens eggs and Rana clamitans Sperm. J Exp Zool. 183(3):291–301.
   Google Scholar
• Evans JP, Marshall DJ. 2005. Male-by-female interactions influence fertilization success and mediates the benefits of polyandry in the sea urchin Heliocidaris erythrogramma. Evolution. 59(1):106–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farley GS, Levitan DR. 2001. The role of jelly coats in sperm–egg encounters, fertilization success, and selection on egg size in broadcast spawners. Am Nat. 157:626–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzsimmons C, McLaughlin EA, Mahony MJ, Clulow J. 2007. Optimization of handling, activation and assessment procedures for Bufo marinus spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev. 19(4):594–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gage MJG, Macfarlane CP, Yeates S, Ward RG, Searle JB, Parker GA. 2004. Spermatozoid traits and sperm competition in Atlantic salmon: relative sperm velocity is the primary determinant of fertilization success. Curr Biol. 14(1):44–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosner KL. 1960. A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica. 16:183–190.
   Google Scholar
• Hedrick JL, Nishihara T. 1991. Structure and function of the extracellular matrix of anuran eggs. J Electron Microsc Tech. 17(3):319–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hettyey A, Roberts JD. 2006. Sperm traits of the quacking frog, Crinia georgiana: intra- and interpopulation variation in a species with a high risk of sperm competition. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 59(3):389–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirohashi N, Kamei N, Kubo H, Sawada H, Matsumoto M, Hoshi M. 2008. Egg and sperm recognition systems during fertilization. Develop. Growth Differ. 50:S221–S238.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inaba K, Dréanno C, Cosson J. 2003. Control of flatfish sperm motility by CO2 and carbonic anhydrase. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 55(3):174–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inoda T, Morisawa M. 1987. Effect of osmolality on the initiation of sperm motility in Xenopus laevis. Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 88(3):539–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IUCN. 2011. Red List of threatened species. Version 2011 [accessed 2012 April 16]. http://www.iucnredlist.org
   Google Scholar
• Kilgallon SJ, Simmons LW. 2005. Image content influences men’s semen quality. Biol Lett. 1(3):253–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krapf D, Visconti PE, Arranz SE, Cabada MO. 2007. Egg water from the amphibian Bufo arenarum induces capacitation-like changes in homologous spermatozoa. Dev Biol. 306(2):516–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linhart O, Cosson J, Mims SD, Shelton WL, Rodina M. 2002. Effects of ions on the motility of fresh and demembranated paddlefish (Polyodon spathula) spermatozoa. Reproduction. 124(5):713–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malo AF, Garde JJ, Soler AJ, García AJ, Gomendio M, Roldan ERS. 2005. Male fertility in natural populations of red deer is determined by sperm velocity and the proportion of normal spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 72(4):822–829.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall DJ, Evans JP. 2005. The benefits of polyandry in the free-spawning polychaete Galeolaria caespitosa. J Evol Biol. 18(3):735–740.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morisawa M, Suzuki KH, Shimizu H, Morisawa S, Yasuda K. 1983. Effects of osmolality and potassium on motility of spermatozoa from freshwater cyprinid fishes. J Exp Biol. 107:95–103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagarsenker PB. 1984. On Bartlett’s test for homogeneity of variances. Biometrika. 71(2):405–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson JH, Chandler DE. 1999. Xenopus laevis egg jelly contains small proteins that are essential to fertilization. Dev Biol. 210(2):401–410.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson JH, Xiang X, Ziegert T, Kittelson A, Rawls A, Bieber AL, Chandler DE. 2001. Allurin, a 21-kDa sperm chemoattractant from Xenopus egg jelly, is related to mammalian sperm-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 98(20):11205–11210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolsky RD. 2001. Evolution of egg target size: an analysis of selection on correlated characters. Evolution. 55(12):2470–2478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podolsky RD. 2002. Fertilization ecology of egg coats: physical versus chemical contributions to fertilization success of free-spawned eggs. J Exp Biol. 205:1657–1668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. 1965. Distributional fitting, assumption testing. Biometrika. 52(3/4):591–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons LW, Roberts JD, Dziminski MA. 2009. Egg jelly influences sperm motility in the externally fertilizing frog, Crinia georgiana L. Evol. Biol. 22(1):225–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snook RR. 2005. Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers. Trends Ecol Evol (Amst). 20(1):46–53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabolcs M, Mizsei E, Jablonski D, Vági B, Mester B, Végvári Z, Lengyel S. 2017. Distribution and diversity of amphibians in Albania: new data and foundations of a comprehensive database. Amphibia Reptilia. 38(4):435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takai H, Morisawa M. 1995. Change in intracellular K+ concentration caused by external osmolality change regulates sperm motility of marine and freshwater teleost’s. J Cell Sci. 108:1175–1181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas FIM, Bolton TF. 1999. Shear stress experienced by echinoderm eggs in the oviduct during spawning: potential role in the evolution of egg properties. J Exp Biol. 202:3111–3119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toro E, Michael FS. 2004. In vitro fertilization and artificial activation of eggs of the direct-developing anuran Eleutherodactylus coqui. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2:60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turani B, Aliko V. 2015. In vitro fertilization and maturation of Balkan water frog (Pelophylax kurtmuelleri, Gayda, 1940) – a case study in reproductive amphibian biotechnology. Int J Ecosyst Ecol Sci. 5(4):557–560.
   Google Scholar
• Vladic TV, Jarvi T. 2001. Sperm quality in the alternative reproductive tactics of Atlantic salmon: the importance of the loaded raffle mechanism. Proc R Soc Lond B. 268(1483):2375–2381.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker BR. 2001. Reproduction. In: Wright KM, Whitaker BR, editors. Amphibian medicine and captive husbandry. Malabar (FL): Krieger Publishing Company; p. 285–307.
   Google Scholar