Fracking and labquakes

References

• Shale gas extraction in the UK: A review of hydraulic fracturing, Issued: June 2012 DES2597, The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• S. Perkins, Fracking fundamentals, Nature 507 (2014), pp. 263–264.10.1038/nj7491-263a
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• D.L. Turcotte, E.M. Moores, and J.B. Rundle, Super fracking, Phys. Today 67(8) (2014), pp. 34–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.L. Ellsworth, Injection-induced earthquakes, Science 341 (2013), 1225942 (7 p).10.1126/science.1225942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.T. Rutledge and W.S. Phillips, Hydraulic stimulation of natural fractures as revealed by induced microearthquakes, Carthage Cotton Valley gas field, east Texas, Geophysics 68(2) (2003), pp. 441–452.10.1190/1.1567214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Maxwell, Microseismic hydraulic fracture imaging: The path toward optimizing shale gas production, The Leading Edge 30(3) (2011), pp. 340–346.10.1190/1.3567266
   Google Scholar
• A.A. Holland, Earthquakes triggered by hydraulic fracturing in south-central Oklahoma, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 103(3) (2013), pp. 1784–1792.10.1785/0120120109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• N.R. Warpinski, Understanding hydraulic fracture growth, effectiveness, and safety through microseismic monitoring, in Effective and Sustainable Hydraulic Fracturing, A.P. Bunger, J. McLennan, R. Jeffrey, eds., chap. 6. InTech, 2013, pp. 123–135.
   Google Scholar
• S. Busetti, W. Jiao, and Z. Reches, Geomechanics of hydraulic fracturing microseismicity: Part 1. Shear, hybrid, and tensile events, AAPG Bull. 98 (2014), pp. 2439–2457.10.1306/05141413123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Weingarten, S. Ge, J.W. Godt, B.A. Bekins, and J.L. Rubinstein, High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity, Science 348 (2015), pp. 1336–1340.10.1126/science.aab1345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Baró, A. Corral, X. Illa, A. Planes, E.K.H. Salje, and E. Vives, Statistical similarity between the compression of a porous material and earthquakes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013), pp. 088702.10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.088702
   Google Scholar
• T. Anaknos and A.S. Kiremidjion, A review on earthquake occurence models for seismic hazard analysis, Prob. Eng. Mech. 3 (1988), pp. 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• E.K.H. Salje, D.E. Soto-Parra, A. Planes, E. Vives, M. Reinecker, and W. Schranz, Failure mechanism in porous materials under compression: Crackling noise in mesoporous SiO2, Philos. Mag. Lett. 91 (2011), pp. 554–560.10.1080/09500839.2011.596491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.K.H. Salje, G.I. Lampronti, D.E. Soto-Parra, J. Baró, A. Planes, and E. Vives, Noise of collapsing minerals: Predictability of the compressional failure in goethite mines, Am. Mineral. 98 (2013), pp. 609–615.10.2138/am.2013.4319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P.O. Castillo-Villa, J. Baró, A. Planes, E.K.H. Salje, P. Sellappan, W.M. Kriven, and E. Vives, Crackling noise during failure of alumina under compression: The effect of porosity, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25 (2013), 292202 (9 p).10.1088/0953-8984/25/29/292202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• G.F. Nataf, P.O. Castillo-Villa, P. Sellappan, W.M. Kriven, E. Vives, A. Planes, and E.K.H. Salje, Predicting failure: Acoustic emission of berlinite under compression, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26 (2014), 275401 (9 p).10.1088/0953-8984/26/27/275401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Blatt and R.J. Tracy, Petrology: Igneous, Sedimentary and Metamorphic, 2nd ed., Freeman, New York, 1995. ISBN-10: 0716724383.
   Google Scholar
• J.F.W. Gale, S.E. Laubach, J.E. Olson, P. Eichhubl, and A. Fall, Natural fractures in shale: A review and new observations, AAPG Bull. 98(11) (2014), pp. 2165–2216.10.1306/08121413151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.L. Rubinstein and A.B. Mahani, Myths and facts on wastewater injection, hydraulic fracturing, enhanced oil recovery, and induced seismicity, Seismol. Res. Lett. 86(4) (2015), pp. 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R.A. Kerr, Learning how to not make your own earthquake, Science 135 (2012), pp. 1436–1437.10.1126/science.335.6075.1436
   Google Scholar
• Fracking tests near Blackpool ‘likely cause’ of tremors. BBC News. 2 November 2011.
   Google Scholar
• N. Jones, Wastewater injection cracks open quake concerns, Nat. Geosci. 6 (2013), p. 329.10.1038/ngeo1816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K.M. Keranen, H.M. Savage, G.A. Abers, and E.S. Cochran, Potentially induced earthquakes in Oklahoma, USA: Links between wastewater injection and the 2011 Mw 5.7 earthquake sequence, Geology 41 (2013), pp. 699–702.10.1130/G34045.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A large number of papers dealing with AE and experiments simulating fracking in the lab can be found, for instance, in the Acoustic Emission section of the Proceedings of the 48th Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, American Rock Mechanics Association, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• R.E. Mckernan, E.H. Rutter, J. Mecklenburgh, K.G. Taylor, and S.J. Covey-Crump, Influence of effective pressure on mudstone matrix permeability: Implications for shale gas production, University of Manchester SPE 14UNCV-167762-MS.
   Google Scholar
• G. Nataf, P.O. Castillo-Villa, J. Baró, X. Illa, E. Vives, A. Planes, and E.K.H. Salje, Avalanches in compressed porous SiO2-based materials, Phys. Rev. E 90 (2014), 22405 (9 p).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Gutenberg and C.F. Richter, Magnitude and energy of earthquakes, Science 83 (1936), pp. 183–185.10.1126/science.83.2147.183
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• R. Westaway and P.L. Younger, Quantification of potential macroseismic effects of the induced seismicity that might result from hydraulic fracturing for shale gas exploitation in the UK, Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 47 (2014), pp. 333–350.10.1144/qjegh2014-011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.Y. Kagan, Earthquake size distribution: Power-law with exponent ® =1/2, Tectonophysics 490 (2010), pp. 103–114.10.1016/j.tecto.2010.04.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Utsu, Representation and analysis of the earthquake size distribution: A historical review and some new approaches, Pure Appl. Geophys. 155 (1999), pp. 509–535.10.1007/s000240050276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Clauset, C. Rohilla-Shalizi, and M.E.J. Newman, Power-law distributions in empirical data, SIAM Rev. 51 (2009), pp. 661–703.10.1137/070710111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Baró and E. Vives, Analysis of power-law exponents by maximum-likelihood maps, Phys. Rev. E 85 (2012), pp. 066121.10.1103/PhysRevE.85.066121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Vermylen and M. D. Zoback, Hydraulic Fracturing, Microseismic Magnitudes, and Stress Evolution in the Barnett Shale, Texas, USA, SPE Hydraulic Fracturing Technology Conference, The Woodlands, TX, USA, 24–26 January 2011. SPE-140507-MS.
   Google Scholar
• Z.H. El-Isa and D.W. Eaton, Spatiotemporal variations in the b-value of earthquake magnitude frequency distributions: Classification and causes, Tectonophysics 615–616 (2014), pp. 1–11.10.1016/j.tecto.2013.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Utsu, Y. Ogata, and R.S. Matsuura, The centenary of the Omori formula for a decay law of aftershocks activity, J. Phys. Earth 43 (1995), pp. 1–33.10.4294/jpe1952.43.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Helmstetter, Is earthquake triggering driven by small earthquakes? Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003), pp. 058501.10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.058501
   Google Scholar
• H. Bi, G. Börner, and Y. Chu, Correlations in the absorption lines of the quasar Q 0420-388, Astron. Astrophys. 218 (1989), pp. 19–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Baró, J.M. Martín-Olalla, F.J. Romero, M.C. Gallardo, E.K.H. Salje, E. Vives, and A. Planes, Avalanche correlations in the martensitic c transition of a Cu–Zn–Al shape memory alloy: Analysis of acoustic emission and calorimetry, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26 (2014), 125401 (7 p).10.1088/0953-8984/26/12/125401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar