Digital image correlation to reveal mechanical anisotropy in 3D printing of polymers

References

• I. Gibson, D.W. Rosen and B. Stucker, Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Springer, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• D.T. Pham and R.S. Gault, A comparison of rapid prototyping technologies. Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu 38(10–11) (1998), pp. 1257–1287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Yan and P. Gu, A review of rapid prototyping technologies and systems. Comput. Aided Design 28(4) (1996), pp. 307–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Kulkarni, A. Marsan and D. Dutta, A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid. Prototyp. J. 6(1) (2000), pp. 18–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Kruth, Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Ann. – Manuf. Technol. 40(2) (1991), pp. 603–614.
   Google Scholar
• S.S. Dimov and D.T. Pham, Rapid prototyping and rapid tooling – the key enablers for rapid manufacturing. Proceedings of the institution of mechanical engineers. Part C J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 217(1) (2003), pp. 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.A. Mousa and M.O. Bashir, Additive manufacturing: a new industrial revolution – a review. J. Sci. Achiev. 3(2) (2017), pp. 19–31.
   Google Scholar
• M. Greul, T. Pintat and M. Greulich, Rapid prototyping of functional metallic parts. Comput. Ind. 28(1) (1995), pp. 23–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.S. Crump. Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. In: Patent US, editor, USA: Stratasys, Inc.; 1989. p. 15.
   Google Scholar
• C.W. Hull. Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. B29D 11/00. G03C 00/00 ed, vol. 4,575,330 USA: UVP Inc. San Gabriel California; 1986. p. 16.
   Google Scholar
• N. Beltrán, F. Carriles, B.J. Álvarez, D. Blanco and J.C. Rico, Characterization of factors influencing dimensional and geometric errors in PolyJet manufacturing of cylindrical features. Procedia. Eng. 132 (2015), pp. 62–69.
   Google Scholar
• D. Ibrahim, T.L. Broilo, C. Heitz, M.G. de Oliveira, H.W. de Oliveira, S.M.W. Nobre, et al., Dimensional error of selective laser sintering, three-dimensional printing and PolyJet™ models in the reproduction of mandibular anatomy. J. Cranio Maxillofac Surg. 37(3) (2009), pp. 167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• B. Mueller and D. Kochan, Laminated object manufacturing for rapid tooling and patternmaking in foundry industry. Comput. Ind. 39(1) (1999), pp. 47–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.P. Kruth, P. Mercelis, J. Van Vaerenbergh, L. Froyen and M. Rombouts, Binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering and selective laser melting. Rapid. Prototyp. J. 11(1) (2005), pp. 26–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X.P. Tan, Y.J. Tan, C.S.L. Chow, S.B. Tor and W.Y. Yeong, Metallic powder-bed based 3D printing of cellular scaffolds for orthopaedic implants: a state-of-the-art review on manufacturing, topological design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 76 (2017), pp. 1328–1343. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. Zhang, W. Liu and X. Shang, Research on the processing experiments of laser metal deposition shaping. Opt. Laser Technol. 39(3) (2007), pp. 549–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.W. Zhai, D.A. Lados and J.L. Lagoy, Additive manufacturing: making imagination the major limitation. Jom-Us 66(5) (2014), pp. 808–816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Dimitrov, K. Schreve and N. de Beer, Advances in three dimensional printing – state of the art and future perspectives. Rapid. Prototyp. J. 12(3) (2006), pp. 136–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S.M. Peltola, F.P.W. Melchels, D.W. Grijpma and M. Kellomäki, A review of rapid prototyping techniques for tissue engineering purposes. Ann. Med. 40(4) (2009), pp. 268–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Y.-a. Jin, J. Plott, R. Chen, J. Wensman and A. Shih, Additive manufacturing of custom orthoses and prostheses – a review. Procedia CIRP 36 (2015), pp. 199–204.
   Google Scholar
• C.A. Giffi, B. Gangula and P. Illinda, 3D Opportunity in the Automotive Industry, Additive Manufacturing Hits the Road, Delotte University Press, 2014.
   Google Scholar
• S.C. Joshi and A.A. Sheikh, 3D printing in aerospace and its long-term sustainability. Virtual. Phys. Prototyp. 10(4) (2015), pp. 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• V.K. Vashishtha, R. Makade and N. Mehla, Advancement of rapid prototyping in aerospace industry – a review. Int. J. Eng. Sci. Technol. 3(3) (2011), pp. 2486–2493.
   Google Scholar
• A. Bagsik. Mechanical properties of fused deposition modelling parts manufactured with Ultem*9085. Antec, Boston, USA2011. p. 5.
   Google Scholar
• S. Guessasma, S. Belhabib and H. Nouri, Significance of pore percolation to drive anisotropic effects of 3D printed polymers revealed with X-ray μ-tomography and finite element computation. Polymer 81 (2015), pp. 29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Ben Hassana, S. Guessasma, S. Belhabib and H. Nouri, Explaining the difference between real part and virtual design of 3D printed porous polymer at the microstructural level. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 301 (2016), pp. 566–576. doi:10.1002/mame.201500360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Abid, R. Messadi, T. Hassine, H. ben Daly, J. Soulestin and M.F. Lacrampe, Optimization of mechanical properties of printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene using RSM design. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 100(5–8) (Feb. 2019), pp. 1363–1372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Dawoud, I. Taha and S.J. Ebeid, Mechanical behaviour of ABS: An experimental study using FDM and injection moulding techniques. J. Manuf. Process. 21 (2016), pp. 39–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar and S.S. Mahapatra, Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts. Mater Design 31(1) (2010), pp. 287–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• P. Shubham, A. Sikidar and T. Chand, The influence of layer thickness on mechanical properties of the 3D printed ABS polymer by fused deposition modeling. Key Eng. Mater. 706 (2016), pp. 63–67.
   Google Scholar
• S.H. Ahn, M. Montero, D. Odell, S. Roundy and P.K. Wright, Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS. Rapid. Prototyp. J. 8(4) (2002), pp. 248–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W.C. Smith and R.W. Dean, Structural characteristics of fused deposition modeling polycarbonate material. Polym. Test. 32(8) (2013), pp. 1306–1312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Sun, G.M. Rizvi, C.T. Bellehumeur and P. Gu, Effect of processing conditions on the bonding quality of FDM polymer filaments. Rapid. Prototyp. J. 14(2) (2008), pp. 72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Gajdos and J. Slota, Influence of printing conditions on structure in FDM prototypes. Teh. Vjesn. 20(2) (2013), pp. 231–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Ayadi, H. Nouri, S. Guessasma and F. Roger, Determination of orthotropic properties of glass fibre reinforced thermoplastics using X-ray tomography and multiscale finite element computation. Compos. Struct. 136 (2016), pp. 635–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Yaofeng and J.H.L. Pang, Study of optimal subset size in digital image correlation of speckle pattern images. Opt. Lasers Eng. 45(9) (2007), pp. 967–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• K. R. Hart and E. D. Wetzel, Fracture behavior of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) materials, Eng. Fract. Mech., vol. 177, pp. 1–13, May 2017, doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar