The Hubbard model: exact constraints on spectral moments in the strong coupling limit

References

• J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A276 (1963), pp. 238–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Hubbard, Electron correlations in narrow energy bands III. An improved solution. Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A281 (1964), pp. 401–419.
   Google Scholar
• M. Cyrot, The Hubbard Hamiltonian. Phys. B&C (1977), pp. 141–150. doi:10.1016/0378-4363(77)90177-2
   Google Scholar
• M. Imada, A. Fujimori and Y. Tokura, Metal-insulator transitions. Rev. Modern Phys 70 (1998), pp. 1039–1263. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.70.1039
   Google Scholar
• J.P.F. LeBlanc, et al., Solutions of the Two-dimensional hubbard model: Benchmarks and results from a wide range of numerical algorithms. Phys. Rev 5 (2015), pp. 041041. doi:10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O. Gunnarsson, J. Merino, T. Schafer, G. Sangiovanni, G. Rohringer and A. Toschi, Complementary views on electron spectra: From fluctuation diagnostics to real-space correlations. Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018), pp. 125134. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.97.125134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth and M.J. Rozenberg, Dynamical mean-field theory of strongly correlated fermion systems and the limit of infinite dimensions. Rev. Modern Phys 68 (1996), pp. 13–125. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.68.13
   Google Scholar
• A. Georges, Strongly correlated electron materials. arXiv:cond-mat/0403123v1 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• G. Knizia and G.K. Chan, Density matrix embedding: A simple alternative to dynamical mean-field theory. Phys. Rev. Lett 109 (2012), pp. 186401. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.186404
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.A. Maier, M. Jarrell, T. Prushke and M. Hettler, Quantum cluster theories. Rev. Modern Phys 77 (2005), pp. 1027–1080. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.77.1027
   Google Scholar
• D.M. Esterling, Hubbard model near the atomic limit. Phys. Rev. B 2 (1970), pp. 4686–4688. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.2.4686
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.B. Harris and R.V. Lange, Single-Particle excitations in narrow energy bands. Phys. Rev 157 (1967), pp. 295–314. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.157.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• W. Metzner, Linked-cluster expansion around the atomic limit of the Hubbard model. Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991), pp. 8549–8563. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.43.8549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Pairault, D. Senechal and A.-M.S. Tremblay, Strong-coupling perturbation theory of the Hubbard model. Eur. Phys. J. B 16 (2000), pp. 85–105. doi:10.1007/s100510070253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A.M. Shvaika, Strong-coupling approach for strongly correlated electron systems. Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000), pp. 2358–2371. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.2358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T.D. Stanescu and G. Kotliar, Strong coupling theory for interacting lattice models. Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004), pp. 205112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.70.205112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• X. Dai, K. Haule and G. Kotliar, Strong-coupling solver for the quantum impurity model. Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005), pp. 045111. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.-N. Zhuang, Q.-M. Lin, Z. Fang and X. Dai, Fast impurity solver for dynamical mean field theory based on second order perturbation around the atomic limit. Chin. Phys. B 19 (2010), pp. 087104. doi:10.1088/1674-1056/19/8/087104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A. Sherman, The Hubbard model in the strong coupling theory at arbitrary filling. Phys. Stat. Sol. B 252 (2015), pp. 2006–2012. doi:10.1002/pssb.201552026
   Google Scholar
• H. Tasaki, The Hubbard model - an introduction and selected rigorous results. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 10 (1998), pp. 4353–4378. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/10/20/004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S. Di Matteo and Y. Claveau, An exact sum-rule for the Hubbard model: An historical/pedagogical approach. Eur. J. Phys 38 (2017), pp. 045501. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/aa6900
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Esterling and H.C. Dubin, Moment-Generated solution to the hubbard narrow-energy-band model. Phys. Rev. B 6 (1972), pp. 4276–4283. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.6.4276
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J.G. Wright and B.S. Shastry. DiracQ: A quantum many body physics package, arXiv:1301.4494 [cond-mat.str-el] (2013).
   Google Scholar
• R. Tahir-Kheli and H. Jarrett, Moment-conserving decoupling procedure for many-body problems. Phys. Rev 180 (1969), pp. 544–546. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.180.544
   Google Scholar
• W. Nolting, Methode der Spektralmomente für das Hubbard-Modell eines schmalenS-Bandes. Z. Phys 255 (1972), pp. 25–39. doi:10.1007/BF01391669
   Google Scholar
• M. Potthoff and W. Nolting, The large-U Hubbard model for a semi-infinite crystal: A moment approach and an energy-dependent recursion method. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8 (1996), pp. 4937–4958. doi:10.1088/0953-8984/8/27/006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Potthoff, T. Herrmann, T. Wegner and W. Nolting, The moment Sum rule and Its consequences for ferromagnetism in the hubbard model. Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 210 (1998), pp. 199–228. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3951(199811)210:1<199::AID-PSSB199>3.0.CO;2-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Barman, Local moment approach as a quantum impurity solver for the Hubbard model. Phys. Rev 94 (2016), pp. 045106. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.94.045106
   Google Scholar
• E. Koch, G. Sangiovanni and O. Gunnarsson, Sum rules and bath parametrization for quantum cluster theories. Phys. Rev. B 78 (2008), pp. 115102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O.J. Backhouse and G.H. Booth. Constructing ‘full frequency’ spectra via moment constraints for coupled cluster Green’s functions, arXiv:/2206.13198 [physics.chem-ph] (2022).
   Google Scholar
• P.V. Sriluckshmy, M. Nusspickel, E. Fertitta and G.H. Booth, Fully algebraic and self-consistent effective dynamics in a static quantum embedding. Phys. Rev. B 103 (2021), pp. 085131. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.103.085131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M. Nusspickel and G.H. Booth, Systematic improvability in quantum embedding for real materials. Phys. Rev. X12 (2022), pp. 011046.
   Google Scholar
• K.A. Chao, J. Spalek and A.M. Oles, Kinetic exchange interaction in a narrow s-band. J. of Phys. C: Solid State Physics 10 (1977), pp. L271–L276. doi:10.1088/0022-3719/10/10/002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• F. Kammler and K. Elk, Numerical results of the hubbard III approximation for arbitrary values of the correlation energy and the electron density (with application to disordered alloys). Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 81 (1977), pp. 179–184. doi:10.1002/pssb.2220810117
   Google Scholar
• F. Mancini and A. Avella, The Hubbard model within the equations of motion approach. Adv. In Phys 53 (2004), pp. 537–768. doi:10.1080/00018730412331303722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H.O. Jeschke and G. Kotliar, Decoupling method for dynamical mean-field theory calculations. Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005), pp. 085103. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.71.085103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Q. Feng, Y.Z. Zhang and H.O. Jeschke, Fast impurity solver based on equations of motion and decoupling. Phys. Rev. B 79 (2009), pp. 235112. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.79.235112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D. Hou, R. Wang, X. Zheng, N.H. Tong, J.H. Wei and Y.J. Yan, Hierarchical equations of motion for an impurity solver in dynamical mean-field theory. Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014), pp. 045141. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.045141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D.M. Edwards and A.C. Hewson, Comment on hubbard's theory of the mott transition. Rev. Modern Phys 40 (1968), pp. 810–811. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.40.810
   Google Scholar
• W. Metzner and D. Vollhardt, Correlated lattice fermions in D=infinity dimensions. Phys. Rev. Letters 62 (1989), pp. 324–327. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.62.324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E. Müller-Hartmann, Correlated fermions on a lattice in high dimensions. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 74 (1989), pp. 507–512. doi:10.1007/BF01311397
   Google Scholar
• M. Bumgartel, K. Ghanem, A. Kiani, E. Koch, E. Pavarini, H. Sims and G. Zhang, Massively parallel simulations of strong electronic correlations: Realistic Coulomb vertex and multiplet effects. Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics 226 (2017), pp. 2525–2547. doi:10.1140/epjst/e2016-60311-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L.F. Arsenault, A. Lopez-Bezanilla, O.A. von Lilienfeld and A.J. Millis, Machine learning for many-body physics: The case of the Anderson impurity model. Phys. Rev. B 90 (2014), pp. 155136. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.90.155136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• T. Mertz, K. Zantout and R. Valenti, Self-energy dispersion in the Hubbard model. Phys Rev. B 98 (2018), pp. 235105. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.98.235105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H. Park, K. Haule, C.A. Marianetti and G. Kotliar, Dynamical mean-field theory study of Nagaoka ferromagnetism. Phys. Rev. B 77 (2008), pp. 035107. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.77.035107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar