Regional evaluation of renewable energy sources in Turkey by new integrated AHP-MARCOS methodology: a real application

References

• Adar, T., and E.K. Delice. 2019. “New Integrated Approaches Based on MC-HFLTS for Healthcare Waste Treatment Technology Selection.” Journal of Enterprise Information Management 32 (4): 688–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adar, T., Y. Ok, and E. Delice Kılıç. 2017. “Selection of On-site Energy Generation Technology With a New MCDM Approach Using MABAC&AHP.” International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Technology Management, Dallas, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Alizadeh, R., L. Soltanisehat, P.D. Lund, and H. Zamanisabzi. 2019. “Improving Renewable Energy Policy Planning and Decision-Making Through a Hybrid MCDM Method.” Energy Policy 111174: 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ayağ, Z., and F. Samanlioglu. 2019. “Fuzzy AHP-GRA Approach to Evaluating Energy Sources: A Case of Turkey.” International Journal of Energy Sector Management 14(1): 40–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayan, T., and H. Pabuçcu. 2013. “Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynakları Yatırım Projelerinin Analitik Hiyerarşi Süreci Yöntemi ile Değerlendirilmesi.” Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi 18(3): 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Badi, I., and D. Pamucar. 2020. “Supplier Selection for Steelmaking Company by Using Combined Grey-MARCOS Methods.” Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering 3 (2): 37–48.
   Google Scholar
• Bamati, N., and A. Raoofi. 2019. “Development Level and the Impact of Technological Factor on Renewable Energy Production.” Renewable Energy 151: 946–955.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlas, S.S. 2019. Türkiye Hâkim Rüzgâr ve Ortalama Rüzgâr Vektörel Haritası ile Türkiye Rüzgâr Enerji Potansiyelinin Değerlendirilmesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Namık Kemal Üniversitesi, Tekirdağ.
   Google Scholar
• BEPA (Biyokütle Enerji Potansiyel Haritası). 2020. Accessed March 13 2020. https://bepa.enerji.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• Boran, F.E., K. Boran, and T. Menlik. 2012. “The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies for Electricity Generation in Turkey Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS.” Economics, Planning and Policy 7(1): 81–90.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., and S. Güleryüz. 2016. “An Integrated DEMATEL-ANP Approach for Renewable Energy Resources Selection in Turkey.” International Journal of Production Economics 182: 435–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., and S. Güleryüz. 2017. “Evaluation of Renewable Energy Resources in Turkey Using an Integrated MCDM Approach with Linguistic Interval Fuzzy Preference Relations.” Energy 123: 149–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büyüközkan, G., Y. Karabulut, and E. Mukul. 2018. “A Novel Renewable Energy Selection Model for United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.” Energy 165: 290–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çelikbilek, Y., and F. Tüysüz. 2016. “An Integrated Grey Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach for the Evaluation of Renewable Energy Sources.” Energy 115(Part 1): 1246–1258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çolak, M., and İ Kaya. 2017. “Prioritization of Renewable Energy Alternatives by Using an Integrated Fuzzy MCDM Model: A Real Case Application for Turkey.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 80: 840–853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dağdeviren, M., S. Yavuz, and N. Kılınç. 2009. “Weapon Selection Using the AHP and TOPSIS Methods Under Fuzzy Environment.” Expert Systems with Applications 36 (4): 8143–8151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, M.C., B. Sarkar, and S. Ray. 2012. “Decision Making Under Conflicting Environment: a new MCDM Method.” International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences 5 (2): 142–162.
   Google Scholar
• Delice, E.K., and Z. Güngör. 2009. “The Usability Analysis with Heuristic Evaluation and Analytic Hierarchy Process.” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39 (6): 934–939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deveci, K., and Ö Güler. 2020. “A CMOPSO Based Multi-Objective Optimization of Renewable Energy Planning: Case of Turkey.” Renewable Energy. In press
   Google Scholar
• Doğan, H., and A. S. Uludağ. 2018. “Yenilenebilir Enerji Alternatiflerinin Değerlendirilmesi ve Uygun Tesis Yeri Seçimi: Türkiye’de Bir Uygulama.” Ekonomik ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi 14 (2): 157–180.
   Google Scholar
• Emeç, Ş, T. Adar, G. Akkaya, and E.K. Delice. 2019. “Measuring the Efficiency of Wind Power Plants Using Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case Study from TURKEY.” Turk J Electrom Energ 4 (2): 19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Enerji Atlası. 2020. Accessed April 4 2020. https://www.enerjiatlasi.com/gunes/.
   Google Scholar
• Enerji Portalı. 2019a. Accessed March 12 2020. https://www.enerjiportali.com/teias-aralik-2019-sonu-kurulu-guc-raporunu-yayimladi/.
   Google Scholar
• Enerji Portalı. 2019b. Accessed March 13 2020. https://www.enerjiportali.com/hidroelektrik-enerjisi-hes-nedir-nasil-elektrik-uretir/.
   Google Scholar
• Enerji ve Tabi Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (ETBKa). Accessed March 6 2020. https://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Elektrik-ETBK-.
   Google Scholar
• Enerji ve Tabi Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (ETBKb). Accessed March 13 2020. https://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Hidrolik.
   Google Scholar
• Enerji ve Tabi Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (ETBKc). Accessed March 13 2020. https://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Jeotermal.
   Google Scholar
• Enerji ve Tabi Kaynaklar Bakanlığı (ETBKd). [Accessed March 27 2020. https://www.enerji.gov.tr/tr-TR/Sayfalar/Elektrik.
   Google Scholar
• Ertay, T., C. Kahraman, and İ Kaya. 2013. “Evaluation of Renewable Energy Alternatıves Using Macbeth and Fuzzy Ahp Multi-Criteria Methods: The Case of Turkey.” Technological and Economic Development of Economy 19(1): 38–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervural, B.C., S. Zaim, and D. Delen. 2018. “A Two-Stage Analytical Approach to Assess Sustainable Energy Efficiency.” Energy 164: 822–836.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, W., and Y. Hao. 2020. “An Empirical Research on the Relationship Amongst Renewable Energy Consumption, Economic Growth and Foreign Direct Investment in China.” Renewable Energy 146: 598–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fobissie, E.N., and F. Inc. 2019. “The Role of Environmental Values and Political Ideology on Public Support for Renewable Energy Policy in Ottawa, Canada.” Energy Policy 134: 110918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose, D., S. Pradhan, and Shabbiruddin. 2019. “Development of Model for Assessment of Renewable Energy Sources: a Case Study on Gujarat, India.” International Journal of Ambient Energy 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GEPA (Güneş Enerji Potansiyeli Atlası). Accessed March 11 2020. http://www.yegm.gov.tr/MyCalculator/Default.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Ike, G.N., O. Usman, A.A. Alola, and S. A. Sarkodie. 2020. “Environmental Quality Effects of Income, Energy Prices and Trade: The Role of Renewable Energy Consumption in G-7 Countries.” Science of The Total Environment 721: 1–10, 137813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Işıklar, G., and G. Büyüközkan. 2007. “Using a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Approach to Evaluate Mobile Phone Alternatives.” Computer Standards & Interfaces 29 (2): 265–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabak, M., and M. Dağdeviren. 2014. “Prioritization of Renewable Energy Sources for Turkey by Using a Hybrid MCDM Methodology.” Energy Conversion and Management 79: 25–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C., İ Kaya, and S. Cebi. 2009. “A Comparative Analysis for Multiattribute Selection among Renewable Energy Alternatives Using Fuzzy Axiomatic Design and Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Energy 34 (10): 1603–1616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaca, Ç, A. Ulutaş, and M. Eşgünoğlu. 2017. “Türkiye’de Optimal Yenilenebilir Enerji Kaynağının COPRAS Yöntemiyle Tespiti ve Yenilenebilir Enerji Yatırımlarının İstihdam Artırıcı Etkisi.” Maliye Dergisi 172: 111–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kaya, T., and C. Kahraman. 2010. “Multicriteria Renewable Energy Planning Using an Integrated Fuzzy VIKOR & AHP Methodology: The Case of Istanbul.” Energy 35(6): 2517–2527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazaz, O. 2018. “Biomass Energy Potential of Turkey.” Master Thesis, Çukurova University, Adana.
   Google Scholar
• Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., E.K. Zavadskas, Z. Turskis, and J. Antucheviciene. 2016. “A New Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making.” Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research 50 (3): 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köne, AÇ, and T. Büke. 2007. “An Analytical Network Process (ANP) Evaluation of Alternative Fuels For Electricity Generation in Turkey.” Energy Policy 35(10): 5220–5228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H.C., and C. T. Chang. 2018. “Comparative Analysis of MCDM Methods for Ranking Renewable Energy Sources in Taiwan.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 92: 883–896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naicker, P., and G. A. Thopil. 2019. “A Framework for Sustainable Utility Scale Renewable Energy Selection in South Africa.” Journal of Cleaner Production 224: 637–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özcan, E.C., S. Ünlüsoy, and T. Eren. 2017. “ANP ve TOPSIS Yöntemleriyle Türkiye'de Yenilenebilir Enerji Yatırım Alternatiflerinin Değerlendirilmesi.” Selçuk Üniversitesi Mühendislik, Bilim Ve Teknoloji Dergisi 5(2): 204–219.
   Google Scholar
• Pamučar, D., and G. Ćirović. 2015. “The Selection of Transport and Handling Resources in Logistics Centers Using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation Area Comparison (MABAC).” Expert Systems with Applications 42: 3016–3028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pamučar, D., L. Vasin, and V. Lukovac. 2014. “Selection of Railway Level Crossings for Investing in Security Equipment Using Hybrid DEMATEL-MARICA Model.” In Proceedings of the XVI International Scientific-expert Conference on Railways, Railcon, Niš, Serbia, 9–10 October, 89–92.
   Google Scholar
• Puška, A., I. Stojanović, A. Maksimović, and N. Osmanović. 2020. “Evaluation Software of Project Management Used Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking According to Compromise Solution (MARCOS) Method.” Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications 3 (1): 89–102.
   Google Scholar
• Rajak, M., and K. Shaw. 2019. “Evaluation and Selection of Mobile Health (MHealth) Applications Using AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS.” Technology in Society 59: 101186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, P., A.R. Mishra, A. Mardani, F. Cavallaro, M. Alrasheedi, and A. Alrashidi. 2020. “A Novel Approach to Extended Fuzzy TOPSIS Based on new Divergence Measures for Renewable Energy Sources Selection.” Journal of Cleaner Production 257: 120352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rani, P., A.R. Mishra, K.R. Pardasani, A. Mardani, H. Liao, and D. Streimikiene. 2019. “A Novel VIKOR Approach Based on Entropy and Divergence Measures of Pythagorean Fuzzy Sets to Evaluate Renewable Energy Technologies in India.” Journal of Cleaner Production 238: 117936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L. 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T.L., and L.T. Tran. 2007. “On the Invalidity of Fuzzifying Numerical Judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process.” Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46 (7-8): 962–975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saracoglu, B.O. 2020. Location Selection Factors of Concentrated Solar Power Plant Investments. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks 22: 100319.
   Google Scholar
• Stanković, M., Ž Stević, D.K. Das, M. Subotić, and D. Pamučar. 2020. “A New Fuzzy MARCOS Method for Road Traffic Risk Analysis.” Mathematics 8 (3): 457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stević, Ž, and N. Brković. 2020a. “A Novel Integrated FUCOM-MARCOS Model for Evaluation of Human Resources in a Transport Company.” Logistics 4 (1): 4.
   Google Scholar
• Stević, Ž, D. Pamučar, A. Puška, and P. Chatterjee. 2020b. “Sustainable Supplier Selection in Healthcare Industries Using a new MCDM Method: Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking According to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS).” Computers & Industrial Engineering 140: 106231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Şengül, Ü, M. Eren, S.E. Shiraz, V. Gezder, and A.B. Şengül. 2015. “Fuzzy TOPSIS Method for Ranking Renewable Energy Supply Systems in Turkey.” Renewable Energy 75: 617–625.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valodka, I., and G. Valodkienė. 2015. “The Impact of Renewable Energy on the Economy of Lithuania.” Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 213: 123–128.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, S., H. Gangammanavar, S. Ekşioğlu, and S. J. Mason. 2019. “Statistical Estimation of Operating Reserve Requirements Using Rolling Horizon Stochastic Optimization.” Annals of Operations Research 292: 371–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., L. Xu, and Y. A. Solangi. 2020. “Strategic Renewable Energy Resources Selection for Pakistan: Based on SWOT-Fuzzy AHP Approach.” Sustainable Cities and Society 52: 101861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J.J., and D. L. Yang. 2007. “Using a Hybrid Multi-Criteria Decision aid Method for Information Systems Outsourcing.” Computers & Operations Research 34 (12): 3691–3700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldırım, H.H. 2019. “Yenilenebilir Enerji Yatırımlarındaki Teşviklerin Yatırım Performansları Üzerine Etkisi.” Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi (FESA 4 (3): 330–345.
   Google Scholar
• Yuan, J., C. Li, W. Li, D. Liu, and X. Li. 2018. “Linguistic Hesitant Fuzzy Multi-Criterion Decision-Making for Renewable Energy: A Case Study in Jilin.” Journal of Cleaner Production 172: 3201–3214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, Y., W. Guo, H. Wang, and F. Zhang. 2020. “A two-Stage Evaluation and Optimization Method for Renewable Energy Development Based on Data Envelopment Analysis.” Applied Energy 262: 114363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeren, F., and H.T. Akkuş. 2020. “The Relationship Between Renewable Energy Consumption and Trade Openness: New Evidence from Emerging Economies.” Renewable Energy 147: 322–329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar