Safe, clean, proliferation resistant and cost-effective Thorium-based Molten Salt Reactors for sustainable development

References

• Ade, B., A. Worrall, J. Powers, S. Bowman, G. Flanagan, and J. Gehin. 2014. Safety and Regulatory Issues of the Thorium Fuel Cycle. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Allibert, M., M. Aufiero, M. Brovchenko, S. Delpech, V. Ghetta, D. Heuer, A. Laureau, and E. Merle-Lucotte. 2016. “Molten Salt Fast Reactors.” In Handbook of Generation IV Nuclear Reactors, edited by I. L. Pioro, 157–188. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• ANL. 2018. Pyroprocessing Technologies: Recycling Used Nuclear Fuel for a Sustainable Energy Future. Lemont, IL: US Department of Energy, Argonne National Laboratory (ANL). https://www.anl.gov/sites/www/files/2018-2010/Pyroprocessing_brochure_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Arnott, R. D. 2003. “Dividends and the Three Dwarfs.” Financial Analysts Journal 59 (2): 4–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ault, T., B. van Gosen, S. Krahn, and A. Croff. 2016. “Natural Thorium Resources and Recovery: Options and Impacts.” Nuclear Technology 194 (May): 136–151.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, S. 2018. Seawater Yields First Grams of Yellowcake. Seqium, WA: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, P. L. 1976. “The Time of Your Life.” The Journal of Portfolio Management 2 (4): 4.
   Google Scholar
• Berthélemy, M., and L. Escobar Rangel. 2015. “Nuclear Reactors’ Construction Costs: The Role of Lead-Time, Standardization and Technological Progress.” Energy Policy 82 (July): 118–130.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, K. 2002. “Alvin Radkowsky, 86, Developer of a Safer Nuclear Reactor Fuel.” The New York Times. March 5th, Section C.
   Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., A. E. Carey, E. R. Sholkovitz, and L. D. Surprenant. 1986. “The Geochemistry of Uranium and Thorium in Coastal Marine Sediments and Sediment Pore Waters.” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 50: 663–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. L. 1983. “Breeder Reactors: A Renewable Energy Source.” American Journal of Physics 51 (1): 75–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conca, J. 2016. Uranium Seawater Extraction Makes Nuclear Power Completely Renewable Forbes. Jersey City, NJ. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2016/2007/2001/uranium-seawater-extraction-makes-nuclear-power-completely-renewable/.
   Google Scholar
• Darling, S. B., F. You, T. Veselkad, and A. Velos. 2011. “Assumptions and the Levelized Cost of Energy for Photovoltaics.” Energy & Environmmental Science 4 (9): 3077–3704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David, S., E. Huffer, and H. Nifenecker. 2007. “Revisiting the Thorium-Uranium Nuclear Fuel Cycle.” EuroPhysicsNews 38 (2): 24–27.
   Google Scholar
• Delene, J. G. 1994. “Advanced Fission and Fossil Plant Economics-implications for Fusion.” Fusion Technology 26 (3, Part II): 1105–1110.
   Google Scholar
• Delene, J. G., J. Sheffield, K. A. Williams, R. L. Reid, and S. W. Hadley. 1999. An Assessment of the Economics of Future Electric Power Generation Options and the Implications for Fusion. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
   Google Scholar
• Delpech, S., E. Merle-Lucotte, D. Heuer, M. A. Allibert, V. Ghetta, C. Le-Brun, X. Doligez, and G. S. Picard. 2009. “Reactor Physic and Reprocessing Scheme for Innovative Molten Salt Reactor System.” Journal of Fluorine Chemistry 130 (1): 11–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimson, E., P. Marsh, and M. Staunton. 2008. “Chapter 11 – The Worldwide Equity Premium: A Smaller Puzzle.” In Handbook of the Equity Risk Premium, edited by R. Mehra, 467–514. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Doemeland, D., and J. Trevino. 2014. Which World Bank Reports Are Widely Read? Policy Research Working Paper. Washington, DC: World Bank, Development Economics Vice Presidency, Operations and Strategy Unit, Group no. WPS6851.
   Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J. 2003. Life-cycle Costing: Using Activity-based Costing and Monte Carlo Methods to Manage Future Costs and Risks. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J. 2020. “On the Levelised Cost of Energy of Windfarms.” International Journal of Sustainable Energy 39 (7): 700–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J. 2021a. “On the Levelized Cost of Energy of Solar Photovoltaics.” International Journal of Sustainable Energy 40. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1867139.
   Google Scholar
• Emblemsvåg, J. 2021b. “How Thorium-based Molten Salt Reactors Can Provide Clean, Safe, and Cost-effective Technology for Deep-sea Shipping.” Marine Technology Society Journal 55 (1): 56–72.
   Google Scholar
• EMWG. 2007. Cost Estimating Guidelines for Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems (GIF/EMWG/2007/004). Geneva, Generation IV International Forum, Economic Modeling Working Group (EMWG).
   Google Scholar
• Engel, J. R., H. F. Bauman, J. F. Dearing, W. R. Grimes, E. H. McCoy, and W. A. Rhoades. 1980. Conceptual Design Characteristics of a Denatured Molten-Salt Reactor with Once-through Fueling. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• EPRI. 2015. Program on Technology Innovation: Technology Assessment of a Molten Salt Reactor Design. Palo Alto, CA: Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI).
   Google Scholar
• Estrada, J. 2014. “Stocks, Bonds, Risk, and the Holding Period: An International Perspective.” The Journal of Wealth Management 16 (2): 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Fanghänel, T., J.-P. Glatz, R. J. M. Konings, V. V. Rondinella, and J. Somers. 2010. “Transuranium Elements in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle.” In Handbook of Nuclear Engineering, edited by D. G. Cacuci, 2935–2998. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, C. W. 2006. Molten-Salt-Reactor Technology Gaps. 2006 International Congress on the Advances in Nuclear Power Plants. Reno, NV: American Nuclear Society.
   Google Scholar
• Furukawa, Kazuo, Kazuto Arakawa, L. Berrin Erbay, Yasuhiko Ito, Yoshio Kato, Hanna Kiyavitskaya, Alfred Lecocq, et al. 2008. “A Road Map for the Realization of Global-scale Thorium Breeding Fuel Cycle by Single Molten-Fluoride Flow.” Energy Conversion and Management 49: 1832–1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furukawa, K., H. Numata, Y. Kato, K. Mitachi, R. Yoshioka, A. Furuhashi, Y. Sato, and K. Arakawa. 2005. “New Primary Energy Source by Thorium Molten-Salt Reactor Technology.” Electrochemistry 73 (8): 552–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gormley, R., J. Sinkiewicz, and B. Wolfe. 2020. License Renewals Could Modernize U.S. Nuclear; Supply Base Will Need to Keep Pace: Power Magazine. Rockville, MD. https://www.powermag.com/license-renewals-could-modernize-u-s-nuclear-supply-base-will-need-to-keep-pace/
   Google Scholar
• Greaves, E. D., K. Furukawa, L. Sajo-Bohus, and H. Barros. 2012. “The Case for the Thorium Molten Salt Reactor.” AIP Conference Proceedings 1423 (453). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3688845.
   Google Scholar
• Hargraves, R. 2012. Thorium: Energy Cheaper Than Coal. Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Amazon.
   Google Scholar
• Hargraves, R., and R. Moir. 2010. “Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors: An Old Idea in Nuclear Power Gets Reexamined.” American Scientist 98 (July-August): 304–313.
   Google Scholar
• Haubenreich, P. N., and J. R. Engel. 1970. “Experience with the Molten-salt Reactor Experiment.” Nuclear Applications and Technology 8 (2): 118–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Héder, M. 2017. “From NASA to EU: The Evolution of the TRL Scale in Public Sector Innovation.” The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal 22 (2): Paper no. 3.
   Google Scholar
• Hollenbach, D. F., and J. M. Herndon. 2001. “Deep-earth Reactor: Nuclear Fission, Helium, and the Geomagnetic Field.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 98 (20): 11085–11090.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huh, C.-A., W. S. Moore, and David C. Kadko. 1989. “Oceanic 232Th: A Reconnaissance and Implications of Global Distribution from Manganese Nodules.” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 53: 1357–1366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2005. Thorium Fuel Cycle — Potential Benefits and Challenges. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. Wien: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2018. Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. Wien: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2019. Nuclear Power Reactors in the World. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IAEA. 2020. Advances in Small Modular Reactor Technology Developments – A Supplement to: IAEA Advanced Reactors Information System (ARIS).IAEA Nuclear Energy Series. Wien: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Department of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power Technology Development Section (NPTDS).
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014 Mitigation of Climate Change: Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• IRENA. 2012. Renewable Energy Technologies: Cost Analysis Series. Abu Dhabi: United Arab Emirates,International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), IRENA Innovation and Technology Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, S., O. Deschenes, and A. Jha. 2019. The Private and External Costs of Germany's Nuclear Phase-Out. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, M., H. Xu, and Z. Dai. 2012. “Advanced Fission Energy Program-TMSR Nuclear Energy System.” Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences 27: 366–374.
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, A. J., R. A. Rarick, and R. Rangarajan. 2009. High Efficiency Nuclear Power Plants Using Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor Technology: NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI). Cleveland, OH: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), Glenn Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Kamei, T. 2011. “Implementation Strategy of Thorium Nuclear Power in the Context of Global Warming.” In Nuclear Power: Deployment, Operation and Sustainability, edited by P. Tsvetkov, 365–382. Rijeka: InTech.
   Google Scholar
• Kazimi, M. S. 2004. “Thorium Fuel for Nuclear Energy.” American Scientist 91 (September–October): 408–415.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, S. 2008. “New power generation.” Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• LANL. 2009. Plutonium Processing at Los Alamos. Actinide Research Quarterly. Los Alamos: Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL).
   Google Scholar
• LeBlanc, D. 2010. “Molten Salt Reactors: A New Beginning for an Old Idea.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 240 (6): 1644–1656.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovering, J. R., A. Yip, and T. Nordhaus. 2016. “Historical Construction Costs of Global Nuclear Power Reactors.” Energy Policy 91 (April): 371–382.
   Google Scholar
• MacPherson, H. G. 1985. “The Molten Salt Reactor Adventure.” Nuclear Science and Engineering 90: 374–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markandya, A., and P. Wilkinson. 2007. “Electricity Generation and Health.” The Lancet 370 (9591): 979–990.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2009. “Utanium Is so Last Century – Enter Thorium, the New Green Nuke.” Wired Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, R. 2012. Super Fuel: Thorium, the Green Energy Source for the Future. New York: Plagrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mathieu, L., D. Heuer, R. Brissot, C. Garzenne, C. Le Brun, D. Lecarpentier, E. Liatard, et al. 2006. “The Thorium Molten Salt Reactor: Moving on from the MSBR.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 48: 664–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mignacca, B., and G. Locatelli. 2020. “Economics and Finance of Molten Salt Reactors.” Progress in Nuclear Energy 129. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2020.103503.
   Google Scholar
• MIT. 2003. The Future of Nuclear Power – An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• MIT. 2009. Update of the MIT 2003 The Future of Nuclear Power – An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• MIT. 2018. The Future of Nuclear Energy in a Carbon-Constrained World – An Interdisciplinary MIT Study. Boston, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Moir, R. W. 2002. “The Cost of Electricity from Molten Salt Reactors (MSR).” Nuclear Technology 138 (1): 93–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moir, R. W., and E. Teller. 2005. “Thorium-fueled Underground Power Plant Based on Molten Salt Technology.” Nuclear Technology 151 (September): 334–340.
   Google Scholar
• National Audit Office. 2017. Hinkley Point C. London: National Audit Office, Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Nozaki, Y., and Y. Horibe. 1983. “Alpha-emitting Thorium Isotopes in Northwest Pacific Deep Waters.” Earth and Planetary Science Letters 65: 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NRC. 2021a. Three Mile Island Accident. Backgrounder. Washington, DC: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
   Google Scholar
• NRC. 2021b. Fermi – Unit 1. Washington, DC: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). https://www.nrc.gov/info-finder/decommissioning/power-reactor/enrico-fermi-atomic-power-plant-unit-1.html.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. 2012. Nuclear Energy Today. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA. 2015. Introduction of Thorium in the Nuclear Fuel Cycle; Short- to Long-term Considerations. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Nuclear Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA and IAEA. 2008. Uranium 2008: Resources, Production and Demand (Red Book): A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
   Google Scholar
• OECD/NEA and IAEA. 2014. Uranium 2014: Resources, Production and Demand (Red Book): A Joint Report by the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).
   Google Scholar
• Olsson, L. E. 1994. “Energy-meteorology: A New Discipline.” Renewable Energy 5 (Part II): 1243–1246.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Power Authority. 2008. Facilitating the Development and Use of Renewable Energy and Enabling 2010 and 2025 Renewable Targets. Toronto: Ontario Power Authority (OPA).
   Google Scholar
• ORNL. 2012. Categorization of Used Nuclear Fuel Inventory in Support of a Comprehensive National Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategy. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. F. 2003. “Multiple-Reheat Brayton Cycles for Nuclear Power Conversion with Molten Coolants.” Nuclear Technology 144 (3): 279–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pioro, I. L. 2016. Handbook of Generation IV Nuclear Reactors.Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Radkowsky, A. 1984. “The Thorium Nuclear Power's Future.” The New York Times. May 15th, Section A.
   Google Scholar
• Radkowsky, A., and A. Galperin. 1998. “The Nonproliferative Light Water Thorium Reactor: A New Approach to Light Water Reactor Core Technology.” Nuclear Technology 124 (3): 215–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenberg, L., F. Hedemus, M. Odenberger, and F. Johnsson. 2018. “The Marginal System LCOE of Variable Renewables – Evaluating High Penetration Levels of Wind and Solar in Europe.” Energy 152: 914–924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. C. 1971. Conceptual Design Study of a Single-fluid Molten-salt Breeder Reactor. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
   Google Scholar
• Robertson, R. C., O. L. Smith, R. B. Briggs, and E. S. Bettis. 1970. Two-fluid Molten-salt Breeder Reactor Design Study. Oak Ridge, TN: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, P., and C. V. Sundaram. 1981. “Nuclear and Materials Aspects of the Thorium Fuel Cycle.” Journal of Nuclear Materials 100 (1–3): 227–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogelj, J., D. Shindell, K. Jiang, S. Fifita, P. Forster, V. Ginzburg, C. Handa, et al. 2018. “Mitigation Pathways Compatible with 1.5°C in the Context of Sustainable Development. Global Warming of 1.5°C.” In An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C Above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, edited by Valérie Masson-Delmotte, Panmao Zhai, Hans-Otto Pörtner, Debra Roberts, Jim Skea, Priyadarshi R. Shukla, Anna Pirani, etal, 93–174. Geneva: IPCC/WMO.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, M. W. 2009. An Account of Oak Ridge National Laboratory’s Thirteen Nuclear Reactors. Oak Ridge, TN: Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL).
   Google Scholar
• Rubbia, C. 2013. A Future for Thorium Power? The Thorium Energy Conference 2013. Geneva: CERN.
   Google Scholar
• Rubbia, C., et al. 2016. “A Future for Thorium Power? Thorium Energy for the World: Proceedings of the ThEC13 Conference.” In CERN, Globe of Science and Innovation, Geneva, edited by J.-P. Revol and M. Bourquin, 9–25. Geneva: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffer, M. B. 2013. “Abundant Thorium as an Alternative Nuclear Fuel: Important Waste Disposal and Weapon Proliferation Advantages.” Energy Policy 60 (September): 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Siemer, D. D. 2015. “Why the Molten Salt Fast Reactor (MSFR) is the ‘Best’ Gen IV Reactor.” Energy Science & Engineering 3 (2): 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder, H. 2019. “Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines.” Journal of Business Research 104 (November): 333–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sovacool, B. K., R. Andersen, S. Sorensen, K. Sorensen, V. Tienda, A. Vainorius, O. M. Schirach, and F. Bjørn-Thygesen. 2016. “Balancing Safety with Sustainability: Assessing the Risk of Accidents for Modern Low-carbon Energy Systems.” Journal of Cleaner Production 112 (5): 3952–3965.
   Google Scholar
• Tsouris, C. 2017. “Uranium Extraction: Fuel from Seawater.” Nature Energy 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2017.22.
   Google Scholar
• Ueckerdt, F., L. Hirth, G. Luderer, and O. Edenhofer. 2013. “System LCOE: What Are the Costs of Variable Renewables?” Energy 63: 61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• US EIA. 2019a. Electric Power Annual 2019. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration.
   Google Scholar
• US EIA. 2019b. Levelized Cost and Levelized Avoided Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2019. Washington, DC: US Energy Information Administration.
   Google Scholar
• Vijayan, P. K. 2013. Overview of Thorium Programme in India. Thorium Energy for the World. Proceedings of the ThEC13 Conference, October 27-31, 2013. Geneva: CERN.
   Google Scholar
• Waltar, A. E., and A. B. Reynolds. 1981. Fast Breeder Reactors. New York: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. M. 1997. “The Proto-History of the Molten Salt System.” Journal of Acceleration Plasma Research 2: 22–26.
   Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. M., and R. P. Hammond. 1970. “Limits to the Use of Energy.” American Scientist 58 (4): 412–418.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2011. Nuclear Power Reactor Characteristics.WNA Pocket Guide. London: World Nuclear Association.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2019. Economics of Nuclear Power. London: World Nuclear Association.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2020. Molten Salt Reactors. London: World Nuclear Association. https://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/molten-salt-reactors.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• World Nuclear Association. 2021. Fukushima: Background on Reactors. London: World Nuclear Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, J., J. Chen, X. Kang, X. Li, C. Yu, C. Zou, and X. Cai. 2019. “A Novel Concept for a Molten Salt Reactor Moderated by Heavy Water.” Annals of Nuclear Energy 132: 391–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, C. Y., C. Z. Cai, C. G. Yu, J. H. Wu, and J. G. Chen. 2018. “Transition to Thorium Fuel Cycle for TMSR.” Nuclear Engineering and Design 330: 420–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar