Normative expectations of government as a policy actor: the case of UK steel industry decarbonisation

References

• Alkemade, Floortje, and Roald A. A. Suurs. 2012. “Patterns of Expectations for Emerging Sustainable Technologies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (3): 448–456. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2011.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2021. Oral Evidence: Liberty Steel and the Future of the UK Steel Industry, HC 118’, Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee. London: House of Commons.
   Google Scholar
• Bakker, Sjoerd, and Björn Budde. 2012. “Technological Hype and Disappointment: Lessons from the Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Case.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (6): 549–563. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.693662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BCSA. 2021. “BCSA 2050 Decarbonisation Roadmap.” British Constructional Steelwork Association, 24.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2017a. The Clean Growth Strategy: Leading the way to a low Carbon Future. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2017b. “Future Capacities and Capabilities of the UK Steel Industry.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, 26, 19.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2017c. Upgrading our Energy System: Smart Systems and Flexibility Plan. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2017d. “Industrial Strategy: The Grand Challenges, updated 26 January 2021.” Accessed May 11, 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/industrial-strategy-the-grand-challenges/industrial-strategy-the-grand-challenges.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2019a. Creating a Clean Steel Fund: Call for Evidence. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2019b. “The Grand Challenge Missions.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2020a. “Summary of Responses to the Clean Steel Fund Call for Evidence. Putting the Steel Sector on a Path Consistent with Net-Zero.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London, 38.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2020b. CCS Deployment at Dispersed Industrial Sites, 89. London: Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2021a. “Net Zero Strategy: Build Back Greener.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London, 368.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2021b. “Net Zero Innovation Portfolio.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2021c. “Industrial Decarbonisation Strategy.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London, 170.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2022b. “Digest of UK Energy Statistics, Annual Data for 2021.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2022c. “Steel Procurement Pipeline 2022.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London.
   Google Scholar
• BEIS. 2022d. “Energy Intensive Industries (EIIS). Guidance for Applicants Seeking a certificate for an Exemption from the Indirect Costs of Funding Contracts for Difference (CFD), the Renewables Obligation (RO) and the Small-Scale Feed in Tariff (FIT).” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business (ed.), (London).
   Google Scholar
• BEIS and UK Steel. 2022. “Steel Procurement Taskforce. Final Report.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business and MAKEUK, London.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, Frans. 2006. “Normative Expectations in Systems Innovation.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4): 299–311. doi:10.1080/09537320600777010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, Cristina. 2005. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Borup, Mads, N. Brown, K. Konrad, and H. Van Lente. 2006. “The Sociology of Expectations in Science and Technology.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4): 285–298. doi:10.1080/09537320600777002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office. 2021. National Procurement Policy Statement’.
   Google Scholar
• Chiappinelli, O., T. Gerres, K. Neuhoff, F. Lettow, H. de Coninck, B. Felsmann, F. Joltreau, G. Khandekar, P. Linares, J. Richstein, A. Śniegocki, J. Stede, T. Wyns, C. Zandt, and L. Zetterberg. 2021. “A Green COVID-19 Recovery of the EU Basic Materials Sector: Identifying Potentials, Barriers and Policy Solutions.” Climate Policy 21 (10): 1328–1346. doi:10.1080/14693062.2021.1922340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment). 2019. “The Climate Change Act 2008 (2050 Target Amendment) Order 2019.” In Energy and Industrial Strategy. Department for Business, London.
   Google Scholar
• DeKrey, Steven J., and Edwin J. Portugal. 2014. “Strategic Sensemaking: Challenges Faced by a New Leader of an SME.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 150: 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.007.
   Google Scholar
• ECIU. 2021. Stuck on the Starting Line. How the UK is Falling Behind Europe in the Race to Clean Steel. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit.
   Google Scholar
• Elia, A., M. Kamidelivand, F. Rogan, and B. Ó Gallachóir. 2021. “Impacts of Innovation on Renewable Energy Technology Cost Reductions.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 138: 110488. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2020.110488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Environmental Audit Committee. 2022. “Technological Innovations and Climate Change Inquiry: Green Steel.” In House of Commons, London, 7.
   Google Scholar
• Garvey, Alice, and Peter G Taylor. 2020. “Industrial Decarbonisation Policies for a UK Net Zero Target. A review of mechanisms for ambitious greenhouse gas mitigation.” Centre for Research and Energy Demands Solutions (CREDS).
   Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-Level Perspective and a Case-Study.” Research Policy 31 (8): 1257–1274. doi:10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights About Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 33 (6): 897–920. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. 2014. “Regime Resistance Against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power Into the Multi-Level Perspective.” Theory, Culture & Society 31 (5): 21–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W., and Johan Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, Frank W., G. K. Sovacool, T. Schwanen, and S. Sorrell. 2017. “Sociotechnical Transitions for Deep Decarbonisation.” Science 357 (6357): 1242. doi:10.1126/science.aao3760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green Alliance. 2021a. Clean Steel in the UK. Making the UK a world leader in the production of clean steel’, HNZ0095 - The role of hydrogen in achieving Net Zero. UK Parliament.
   Google Scholar
• Green Alliance. 2021b. “Making the UK a World Leader in the Production of Clean Steel”, 9.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Ian. 2017. The All Party Parliamentary Group on Steel and Metal Related Industries. Forging a Future for the British Steel Industry. London: The All Party Parliamentary Group on Steel and Metal Related Industries.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, Paul W., and Geoffrey P. Hammond. 2019. “Industrial Energy use and Carbon Emissions Reduction in the Iron and Steel Sector: A UK Perspective.” Applied Energy 249: 109–125. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HS2. 2022. “High Speed Two Ltd.” Accessed October 3, 2022. https://www.hs2.org.uk/.
   Google Scholar
• Hutton, Georgina. 2021. “UK Steel Industry: Statistics and Policy.” In House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2020a. Energy Technology Perspectives 2020. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2020b. Iron and Steel Technology Roadmap. Towards More Sustainable Steelmaking, Energy Technology Perspectives. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• IEA. 2020c. “The Challenge of Reaching Zero Emissions in Heavy Industry.” https://www.iea.org/articles/the-challenge-of-reaching-zero-emissions-in-heavy-industry.
   Google Scholar
• Jalonen, Kari, Henri Schildt, and Eero Vaara. 2018. “Strategic Concepts as Micro-Level Tools in Strategic Sensemaking.” Strategic Management Journal 39 (10): 2794–2826. doi:10.1002/smj.2924.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Jinsoo, B. K. Sovacool, M. Bazilian, S. Griffiths, J. Lee, M. Yang, and J. Lee. 2022. “Decarbonising the Iron and Steel Industry: A Systematic Review of Sociotechnical Systems, Technological Innovations, and Policy Options.” Energy Research & Social Science 89: 102565. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2022.102565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, Kornelia. 2006. “The Social Dynamics of Expectations: The Interaction of Collective and Actor-Specific Expectations on Electronic Commerce and Interactive Television.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3-4): 429–444. doi:10.1080/09537320600777192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytton, Wilf, and Phil MacDonald. 2021. Mapping Coal Use in the UK Steel Sector. UK steel Database, October 11, 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Maitlis, Sally, and Marlys Christianson. 2014. “Sensemaking in Organisations: Taking Stock and Moving Forward.” The Academy of Management Annals 8 (1): 57–125. doi:10.1080/19416520.2014.873177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MAKEUk. 2021a. “The UK’s Uncompetitive Electricity Costs Are a Barrier to Decarbonisation Says New UK Steel Report.” Accessed August 11, 2022. https://www.makeuk.org/insights/reports/a-barrier-to-decarbonisation-industrial-electricity-prices-faced-by-uk-steelmakers.
   Google Scholar
• MAKEUk. 2021b. A Barrier to Decarbonisation: Industrial Electricity Prices Faced by UK Steelmakers. MAKEUK.
   Google Scholar
• Mandova, Hana, Piera Patrizio, Sylvain Leduc, Jan Kjärstad, Chuan Wang, Elisabeth Wetterlund, Florian Kraxner, and William Gale. 2019. “Achieving Carbon-Neutral Iron and Steelmaking in Europe Through the Deployment of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage.” Journal of Cleaner Production 218: 118–129. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.01.247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milford, Rachel L., Stefan Pauliuk, Julian M. Allwood, and Daniel B. Müller. 2013. “The Roles of Energy and Material Efficiency in Meeting Steel Industry CO2 Targets.” Environmental Science & Technology 47 (7): 3455–3462. doi:10.1021/es3031424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuhoff, Karsten, B. Vanderborght, A. Ancygier, A. T. Atasoy, M. Haussner, R. Ismer, B. Mack, et al. 2014. Carbon Control and Competitiveness Post 2020: The Steel Report. Climate Strategies.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, Jonathan, Alice Garvey, and John Barrett. 2019. Clean Steel Fund: Call for Evidence. Oxford: Centre for Research into Energy Demand Solutions (CREDS).
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2021. “Last Developments in Steel Making Capacity, September 2021.” Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Ozsozgun Caliskan, Arzu, Emel Esen, and Ralf Barkemeyer. 2021. “Impression Management Tactics in the CEO Statements of Turkish Sustainability Reports.” Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 30 (4): 485–506. doi:10.1111/beer.12374.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm, Andrew J., Tim T. Cockerill, and William F. Gale. 2021. “Energy System Requirements of Fossil-Free Steelmaking Using Hydrogen Direct Reduction.” Journal of Cleaner Production 312: 127665. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, Sarah. 2019. “Net Zero in the UK.” In House of Commons Library.
   Google Scholar
• Raval, Anjli, et al. 2022. “Tata Threatens to Close Port Talbot Steelworks Without £1.5bn of Aid.” Financial Times.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, Daniel, and Adrian Rinscheid. 2020. “Deliberate Decline: An Emerging Frontier for the Study and Practice of Decarbonization.” WIREs Climate Change 11: e669. doi:10.1002/wcc.669.
   Google Scholar
• Sato, Misato, and Josh Burke. 2021. What is Carbon Leakage? Clarifying Misconceptions for a Better Mitigation Effort’.
   Google Scholar
• Smeeton, George. 2021. Report: UK is Falling Behind Europe in Clean Steel Race [Press Release]. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit. https://eciu.net/media/press-releases/2023/further-delays-to-energy-efficiency-in-private-rented-sector.
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, Kathleen M. 2016. “Sensemaking.” In The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, edited by Mie Augier, and David J. Teece, 1–4. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, James B., Shawn M. Clark, and Dennis A. Gioia. 1993. Strategic Sensemaking and Organizational Performance: Linkages among Scanning, Interpretation, Action, and Outcomes.” The Academy of Management Journal 36 (2): 239–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsvetanova, Lora, Laura Carraresi, Michael Wustmans, and Stefanie Bröring. 2022. “Actors’ Strategic Goals in Emerging Technological Innovation Systems: Evidence from the Biorefinery Sector in Germany.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 34 (7): 760–773. doi:10.1080/09537325.2021.1919300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2020. “PM Commits £350 Million to Fuel Green Recovery.” London.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. 2022. “Environmental Taxes, Reliefs and Schemes for Businesses.” https://www.gov.uk/green-taxes-and-reliefs/climate-change-levy.
   Google Scholar
• UK Steel. 2021a. “Key Statistics Guide for 2021.” MAKEUk, 10.
   Google Scholar
• UK Steel. 2021b. “Maximising Value: Positive Procurement of Steel, MAKE UK.” The Manufacturer's Organisation, 16.
   Google Scholar
• UK Steel. 2021c. Closing the Gap: How Competitive Electricity Prices can Build a Sustainable Low Carbon Steel Sector, Make UK.
   Google Scholar
• Upham, Paul, Paula Bögel, Elisabeth Dütschke, Uta Burghard, Christian Oltra, Roser Sala, Monica Lores, and Julia Brinkmann. 2020. “The Revolution is Conditional? The Conditionality of Hydrogen Fuel Cell Expectations in Five European Countries.” Energy Research & Social Science 70: 101722. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Upham, Paul, Paula Bögel, and Katinka Johansen. 2019. Energy Transitions and Social Psychology: A Sociotechnical Perspective. 1st ed. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Upham, Paul, Elisabeth Dütschke, Uta Schneider, Christian Oltra, Roser Sala, Monica Lores, Rita Klapper, and Paula Bögel. 2018. “Agency and Structure in a Sociotechnical Transition: Hydrogen Fuel Cells, Conjunctural Knowledge and Structuration in Europe.” Energy Research & Social Science 37: 163–174. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lente, Harro. 1993. Promising Technology. The Dynamics of Expectations in Technological Developments, Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Van Lente, Harro. 2012. “Navigating Foresight in a sea of Expectations: Lessons from the Sociology of Expectations.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 24 (8): 769–782. doi:10.1080/09537325.2012.715478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lente, Harro, and Sjoerd Bakker. 2010. “Competing Expectations: The Case of Hydrogen Storage Technologies.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22 (6): 693–709. doi:10.1080/09537325.2010.496283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl, Valentin, Max Åhman, and Lars J. Nilsson. 2018. “Assessment of Hydrogen Direct Reduction for Fossil-Free Steelmaking.” Journal of Cleaner Production 203: 736–745. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in Organisations (Foundations for Organizational Science). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weick, Karl E., Kathleen M. Sutcliffe, and David Obstfeld. 2005. “Organising and the Process of Sensemaking.” Organization Science 16 (4): 409–421. doi:10.1287/orsc.1050.0133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar