Approaches to biofilm-associated infections: the need for standardized and relevant biofilm methods for clinical applications

References

• Geesey GG, Mutch R, Costerton JW, et al. Sessile bacteria: an important component of the microbial population in small mountain streams 1. Limnol Oceanogr. 1978;23(6):1214–1223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James G, Swogger E, Wolcott R, et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16(1):37–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Jensen PØ, et al. Why chronic wounds will not heal: a novel hypothesis. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16(1):2–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh PD, Bradshaw DJ. Dental plaque as a biofilm. J Ind Microbiol. 1995;15(3):169–175.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marsh PD. Microbiology of dental plaque biofilms and their role in oral health and caries. Dent Clin North Am. 2010;54(3):441–454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lam J, Chan R, Lam K, et al. Production of mucoid microcolonies by Pseudomonas aeruginosa within infected lungs in cystic fibrosis. Infect Immun. 1980;28(2):546–556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costerton JW. Cystic fibrosis pathogenesis and the role of biofilms in persistent infection. Trends Microbiol. 2001;9(2):50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høiby N, Ciofu O, Bjarnsholt T. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms in cystic fibrosis. Future Microbiol. 2010;5(11):1663–1674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole SJ, Records AR, Orr MW, et al. Catheter-associated urinary tract infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa is mediated by exopolysaccharide-independent biofilms. Infect Immun. 2014;82(5):2048–2058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hola V, Peroutkova T, Ruzicka F. Virulence factors in bacteria from biofilm communities of catheter-associated urinary tract infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;65(2):343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall-Stoodley L, Hu FZ, Gieseke A, et al. Direct detection of bacterial biofilms on the middle-ear mucosa of children with chronic otitis media. JAMA. 2006;296(2):202–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boase S, Von Kleist M, Castillo ME, et al. The microbiome of chronic rhinosinusitis: culture, molecular diagnostics and biofilm detection. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13(1):1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConoughey SJ, Howlin R, Granger JF, et al. Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections. Future Microbiol. 2014;9(8):987–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ojha AK, Baughn AD, Sambandan D, et al. Growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis biofilms containing free mycolic acids and harbouring drug-tolerant bacteria. Mol Microbiol. 2008;69(1):164–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpentier B, Cerf O. Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry. J Appl Bacteriol. 1993;75(6):499–511.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, et al. Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1995;49(1):711–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder MJ, Stapleton F, Evans E, et al. Biofilm-related infections in ophthalmology. Eye. 1995;9(1):102–109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Stoodley L, Costerton JW, Stoodley P. Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases. Nat Rev Micro. 2004;2(2):95–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter JA, Vickery K, Walker JT, et al. Surface-attached cells, biofilms and biocide susceptibility: implications for hospital cleaning and disinfection. J Hosp Infect. 2015;89(1):16–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters MC, Roe F, Bugnicourt A, et al. Contributions of antibiotic penetration, oxygen limitation, and low metabolic activity to tolerance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to ciprofloxacin and tobramycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003;47(1):317–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anwar H, Van Biesen T, Dasgupta M, et al. Interaction of biofilm bacteria with antibiotics in a novel in vitro chemostat system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1989;33(10):1824–1826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado I, Graça J, Lopes H, et al. Antimicrobial pressure of ciprofloxacin and gentamicin on biofilm development by an endoscope-isolated Pseudomonas aeruginosa. ISRN Biotechnol. 2013;2013:1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart PS, William Costerton J. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. The Lancet. 2001;358(9276):135–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen I. Biofilm-specific antibiotic tolerance and resistance. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(5):877–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis K. Persister cells and the riddle of biofilm survival. Biochemistry (Moscow). 2005;70(2):267–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng BS, Zhang W, Harrison JJ, et al. The extracellular matrix protects Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms by limiting the penetration of tobramycin. Environ Microbiol. 2013;15(10):2865–2878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Beer D, Stoodley P, Roe F, et al. Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1994;43(11):1131–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James GA, Ge Zhao A, Usui M, et al. Microsensor and transcriptomic signatures of oxygen depletion in biofilms associated with chronic wounds. Wound Repair and Regeneration; 2016;24(2):373–383.
   Google Scholar
• Kvist M, Hancock V, Klemm P. Inactivation of efflux pumps abolishes bacterial biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(23):7376–7382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooun A, Liu S, Lewis K. A dose-response study of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44(3):640–646.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoads DD, Wolcott RD, Percival SL. Biofilms in wounds: management strategies. J Wound Care. 2008;17(11):502–508.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kathju S, Nistico L, Tower I, et al. Bacterial biofilms on implanted suture material are a cause of surgical site infection. Surg Infect. 2014;15(5):592–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waters V, Ratjen F. Standard versus biofilm antimicrobial susceptibility testing to guide antibiotic therapy in cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(3):CD009528. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009528.pub3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceri H, Olson ME, Stremick C, et al. The Calgary Biofilm Device: new technology for rapid determination of antibiotic susceptibilities of bacterial biofilms. J Clin Microbiol. 1999;37(6):1771–1776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogman ME, Vuorela PM, Fallarero A. Combining biofilm matrix measurements with biomass and viability assays in susceptibility assessments of antimicrobials against Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Antibiot. 2012;65(9):453–459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters E, Nelis HJ, Coenye T. Comparison of multiple methods for quantification of microbial biofilms grown in microtiter plates. J Microbiol Methods. 2008;72(2):157–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker AE, Hamilton MA, Tomasino SF. A statistical model for assessing performance standards for quantitative and semiquantitative disinfectant test methods. J AOAC Int. 2014;97(1):58–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeres DM, Loetterle LR, Hamilton MA, et al. Statistical assessment of a laboratory method for growing biofilms. Microbiology. 2005;151(3):757–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton MA, Hamilton HG, Goeres DM, et al. Guidelines for the statistical analysis of a collaborative study of a laboratory method for testing disinfectant product performance. J AOAC Int. 2013;96(5):1138–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health, Therapeutic Goods Administration Guidelines for the evaluation of sterilants and disinfectants. 1998. Available from: https://www.tga.gov.au/node/5327
   Google Scholar
• Stojicic S, Shen Y, Haapasalo M. Effect of the source of biofilm bacteria, level of biofilm maturation, and type of disinfecting agent on the susceptibility of biofilm bacteria to antibacterial agents. J Endod. 2013;39(4):473–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASTM International. ASTM E2562-12, standard test method for quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm grown with high shear and continuous flow using CDC biofilm reactor. 2012. Available from: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?E2562-12
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. Standard test method for quantification of pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm grown with medium shear and continuous flow using rotating disk reactor. 2012. Available from: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?E2196-12
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. Standard test method for quantification of pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm grown using drip flow biofilm reactor with low shear and continuous flow. 2013. Available from: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?E2647-13
   Google Scholar
• ASTM International. Standard test method for testing disinfectant efficacy against pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm using the MBEC assay. 2012. Available from: http://www.astm.org/cgi-bin/resolver.cgi?E2799-12
   Google Scholar
• Coenye T, Nelis HJ. In vitro and in vivo model systems to study microbial biofilm formation. J Microbiol Methods. 2010;83(2):89–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts AEL, Kragh KN, Bjarnsholt T, et al. The limitations of in vitro experimentation in understanding biofilms and chronic infection. J Mol Biol. 2015;427(23):3646–3661.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomes IB, Simões M, Simões LC. An overview on the reactors to study drinking water biofilms. Water Res. 2014;62:63–87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zelver N, Hamilton M, Pitts B, et al. Methods for Measuring Antimicrobial Effects on Biofilm Bacteria: from Laboratory to Field. Invited Chapter, Biofilms: Methods Enzymology Series, R.J. Doyle (Ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1999. pp. 608–628.
   Google Scholar
• Goeres DM, Hamilton MA, Beck NA, et al. A method for growing a biofilm under low shear at the air-liquid interface using the drip flow biofilm reactor. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(5):783–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods J, Boegli L, Kirker KR, et al. Development and application of a polymicrobial in vitro wound biofilm model. J Appl Microbiol. 2012;112(5):998–1006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donlan RM, Piede JA, Heyes CD, et al. Model system for growing and quantifying Streptococcus pneumoniae biofilms in situ and in real time. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(8):4980–4988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison JJ, Stremick CA, Turner RJ, et al. Microtiter susceptibility testing of microbes growing on peg lids: a miniaturized biofilm model for high-throughput screening. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(7):1236–1254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeres, D.M., T. Palys, B.B. Sandel, J., et al. Evaluation of disinfectant efficacy against biofilm and suspended bacteria in a laboratory swimming pool model. Water Res. 2004;38(13):3103–3109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goeres DM, Loetterle LR, Hamilton MA. A laboratory hot tub model for disinfectant efficacy evaluation. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;68(1):184–192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pajkos A, Vickery K, Cossart Y. Is biofilm accumulation on endoscope tubing a contributor to the failure of cleaning and decontamination? J Hosp Infect. 2004;58(3):224–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall-Stoodley L, Stoodley P. Evolving concepts in biofilm infections. Cell Microbiol. 2009;11(7):1034–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, SB, Irie, Y, Borlee BR, et al. Different methods for culturing biofilms in vitro. In: T. Bjarnsholt, et al., editors. Biofilm infections. New York (NY): Springer; 2011. 251–266.
   Google Scholar
• Buckingham-Meyer K, Goeres DM, Hamilton MA. Comparative evaluation of biofilm disinfectant efficacy tests. J Microbiol Methods. 2007;70(2):236–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwiecinska-Pirog J, Bogiel T, Gospodarek E. Effects of ceftazidime and ciprofloxacin on biofilm formation in Proteus mirabilis rods. J Antibiot. 2013;66(10):593–597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muñoz-Egea M-C, García-Pedrazuela M, Mahillo I, et al. Effect of ciprofloxacin in the ultrastructure and development of biofilms formed by rapidly growing mycobacteria. BMC Microbiol. 2015;15(1):18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng Z, Stewart PS. Penetration of rifampin through Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002;46(3):900–903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmberg A, Mörgelin M, Rasmussen M. Effectiveness of ciprofloxacin or linezolid in combination with rifampicin against Enterococcus faecalis in biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(2):433–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lety MA, Nair S, Berche P, et al. A single point mutation in the embB gene is responsible for resistance to ethambutol in Mycobacterium smegmatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1997;41(12):2629–2633.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Høiby N, Bjarnsholt T, Moser C, et al. ESCMID∗ guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of biofilm infections 2014. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(Supplement 1):S1–S25.
   Google Scholar
• Parsek MR, Singh PK. Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2003;57(1):677–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjarnsholt T, Alhede M, Alhede M, et al. The in vivo biofilm. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21(9):466–474.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomasino SF. Development and assessment of disinfectant efficacy test methods for regulatory purposes. Am J Infect Control. 2013;41(5):S72–S76.
   Google Scholar
• Croes S, Beisser PS, Neef C, et al. Unpredictable effects of rifampin as an adjunctive agent in elimination of rifampin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains grown in biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(9):3907–3912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gennip M, Christensen LD, Alhede M, et al. Interactions between polymorphonuclear leukocytes and Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms on silicone implants in vivo. Infect Immun. 2012;80(8):2601–2607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar