Novel strategies for rapid identification and susceptibility testing of MRSA

References

• Ogston A. Report upon Micro-Organisms in Surgical Diseases. Br Med J. 1881;1:369.b2-375.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newsom SWB. Ogston’s coccus. J Hosp Infect. 2008;70:369–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rammelkamp CH, Maxon T. Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus to the Action of Penicillin. Pro Soc Exp Biol Med. 1942;51:386–389.
   Google Scholar
• Lowy FD. Antimicrobial resistance: the example of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1265–1273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevons MP. “Celbenin” - resistant Staphylococci. Br Med J. 1961;1:124–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neu HC. Antistaphylococcal Penicillins. Med Clin North Am. 1982;66:51–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner NA, Sharma-Kuinkel BK, Maskarinec SA, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus : an overview of basic and clinical research. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019;17:203–218. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers HF, DeLeo FR. Waves of resistance: staphylococcus aureus in the antibiotic era. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7:629–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakhundi S, Zhang K. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: molecular Characterization, Evolution, and Epidemiology. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• David MZ, Daum RS. Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and Clinical Consequences of an Emerging Epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23:616–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandenesch F, Naimi T, Enright MC, et al. Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carrying Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Genes: worldwide Emergence. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:978–984.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter JA, French GL. Community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: the case for a genotypic definition. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81:143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otter JA, French GL. Nosocomial transmission of community-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging threat. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006;6:753–755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez BE, Rueda AM, Shelburne SA, et al. Community-Associated Strains of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococccus aureus as the Cause of Healthcare-Associated Infection. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2006;27:1051–1056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devriese LA, Van Damme LR, Fameree L. Methicillin (cloxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis cases. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B. 1972;19: 598–605.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuny C, Friedrich A, Kozytska S, et al. Emergence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in different animal species. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300:109–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrasa-Villar JI, Aibar-Remón C, Prieto-Andrés P, et al. Impact on Morbidity, Mortality, and Length of Stay of Hospital-Acquired Infections by Resistant Microorganisms. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65:644–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein RA. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—the new zoonosis. Inter J Infect Dis. 2009;13:299–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance (EARS-Net). Annual epidemiological report for 2014. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Kourtis AP, Hatfield K, Baggs J, et al. Vital Signs: epidemiology and Recent Trends in Methicillin-Resistant and in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections - United States. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68:214–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht VS, Limbago BM, Moran GJ, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and Strain Type at Various Body Sites among Patients with a Closed Abscess and Uninfected Controls at U.S. Emergency Departments. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:3478–3484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mermel LA, Cartony JM, Covington P, et al. Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization at Different Body Sites: a Prospective, Quantitative Analysis▿. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1119–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang ES, Tan J, Eells S, et al. Body site colonization in patients with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and other types of S. aureus skin infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:425–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paling FP, Olsen K, Ohneberg K, et al. Risk prediction for Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection following cardiothoracic surgery; A secondary analysis of the V710-P003 trial. Plos One. 2018;13:e0193445.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheuch M, Freiin von Rheinbaben S, Kabisch A, et al. Staphylococcus aureus colonization in hemodialysis patients: a prospective 25 months observational study. BMC Nephrol. 2019;20:153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honda H, Krauss MJ, Coopersmith CM, et al. Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization and subsequent infection in intensive care unit patients: does methicillin resistance matter? Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010;31:584–591.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo-Viñas M, De Angelis G, Rohner P, et al. Burden of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections at a Swiss University hospital: excess length of stay and costs. J Hosp Infect. 2013;84:132–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney JC, Schneider-Lindner V, Brassard P, et al. Mortality after infection with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus(MRSA) diagnosed in the community. BMC Med. 2008;6:2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gould IM, Reilly J, Bunyan D, et al. Costs of healthcare-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and its control. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010;16:1721–1728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katayama Y, Ito T, Hiramatsu K. A New Class of Genetic Element, Staphylococcus Cassette Chromosome mec, Encodes Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2000;44:1549–1555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elements (IWG-SCC) IWG on the C of SCC. Classification of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec (SCCmec): guidelines for Reporting Novel SCCmec Elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2009;53:4961–4967.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baig S, Johannesen TB, Overballe-Petersen S, et al. Novel SCCmec type XIII (9A) identified in an ST152 methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;61:74–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urushibara N, Aung MS, Kawaguchiya M, et al. Novel staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type XIV (5A) and a truncated SCCmec element in SCC composite islands carrying speG in ST5 MRSA in Japan. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020;75:46–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utsui Y, Yokota T. Role of an altered penicillin-binding protein in methicillin- and cephem-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1985;28:397–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García-Álvarez L, Holden MT, Lindsay H, et al. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2011;11:595–603.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore AC, Deasy EC, Slickers P, et al. Detection of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome mec Type XI Carrying Highly Divergent mecA, mecI, mecR1, blaZ, and ccr Genes in Human Clinical Isolates of Clonal Complex 130 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55:3765–3773.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ballhausen B, Kriegeskorte A, Schleimer N, et al. The mecA Homolog mecC Confers Resistance against β-Lactams in Staphylococcus aureus Irrespective of the Genetic Strain Background. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58:3791–3798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford BA. mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus: hiding in Plain Sight. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01549–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker K, van Alen S, Idelevich EA, et al. Plasmid-Encoded Transferable mecB-Mediated Methicillin Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Emerging Infect Dis. 2018;24:242–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calfee DP, Salgado CD, Milstone AM, et al. Strategies to Prevent Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Transmission and Infection in Acute Care Hospitals: 2014 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014;35:772–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbarth S, Fankhauser C, Schrenzel J, et al. Universal Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus at Hospital Admission and Nosocomial Infection in Surgical Patients. JAMA. 2008;299:1149–1157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth VR, Longpre T, Coyle D, et al. Cost Analysis of Universal Screening vs. Risk Factor-Based Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Schildgen O, editor. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0159667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robotham JV, Deeny SR, Fuller C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of national mandatory screening of all admissions to English National Health Service hospitals for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a mathematical modelling study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:348–356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parente DM, Cunha CB, Mylonakis E, et al. The Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nasal Screening to Rule Out MRSA Pneumonia: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis With Antimicrobial Stewardship Implications. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:1–7. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr AL, Daley MJ, Givens Merkel K, et al. Clinical Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Screening for Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Review of Current Literature. Pharmacotherapy. 2018;38:1216–1228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chipolombwe J, Török ME, Mbelle N, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus multiple sites surveillance: a systemic review of the literature. Infect Drug Resist. 2016;9:35–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis MF, Hu B, Carroll KC, et al. Comparison of Culture-Based Methods for Identification of Colonization with Methicillin-Resistant and Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in the Context of Cocolonization. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:1907–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wendt C, Havill NL, Chapin KC, et al. Evaluation of a New Selective Medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Different Specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2223–2227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havill NL, Boyce JM. Evaluation of a New Selective Medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Stool Specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:2228–2230.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Veenemans J, Verhulst C, Punselie R, et al. Evaluation of Brilliance MRSA 2 Agar for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Clinical Samples. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1026–1027.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang H-Y, Suh J-T, Lee H-J. Evaluation of Commercial Selective Agars in Screening for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2010;40:252–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodémont M, Verhulst C, Nonhoff C, et al. Prospective Two-Center Comparison of Three Chromogenic Agars for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening in Hospitalized Patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:3014–3016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson JF, Riebe KM, Hall GS, et al. Spectra MRSA, a New Chromogenic Agar Medium To Screen for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:215–219.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Denys GA, Renzi PB, Koch KM, et al. Three-Way Comparison of BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, MRSASelect, and Spectra MRSA for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Nasal Surveillance Cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:202–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris K, Wilson C, Wilcox MH. Evaluation of chromogenic meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus media: sensitivity versus turnaround time. J Hosp Infect. 2012;81:20–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry JD. A Decade of Development of Chromogenic Culture Media for Clinical Microbiology in an Era of Molecular Diagnostics. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2017;30:449–479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luteijn JM, Hubben GAA, Pechlivanoglou P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of culture-based and PCR-based detection tests for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17:146–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupieux C, Kolenda C, Larsen AR, et al. Variable performance of four commercial chromogenic media for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates harbouring mecC. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2017;50:263–265.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stamper PD, Louie L, Wong H, et al. Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates misidentified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:1240–1244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanc DS, Basset P, Nahimana-Tessemo I, et al. High Proportion of Wrongly Identified Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Carriers by Use of a Rapid Commercial PCR Assay Due to Presence of Staphylococcal Cassette Chromosome Element Lacking the mecA Gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:722–724.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouillet-Assant S, Rasigade J-P, Lustig S, et al. Ward-Specific Rates of Nasal Cocolonization with Methicillin-Susceptible and -Resistant Staphylococcus spp. and Potential Impact on Molecular Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Screening Tests. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2418–2420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parcell B, Phillips G. Evaluation of the use of Xpert MRSA PCR Assay as a point of care test in two clinical areas: category: lesson in Microbiology & Infection Control. J Infect. 2011;63:e109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PA, Robicsek A, Grayes A, et al. Evaluation of multiple real-time PCR tests on nasal samples in a large MRSA surveillance program. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143:652–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PA, Schora DM, Peterson KE, et al. Performance of the Cepheid Xpert® SA Nasal Complete PCR assay compared to culture for detection of methicillin-sensitive and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;80:32–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May L, McCann C, Brooks G, et al. Dual-site sampling improved detection rates for MRSA colonization in patients with cutaneous abscesses. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;80:79–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacqmin H, Schuermans A, Desmet S, et al. Performance of three generations of Xpert MRSA in routine practice: approaching the aim? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36:1363–1365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarbrough ML, Warren DK, Allen K, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA NxG Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01381–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel PA, Ledeboer NA, Ginocchio CC, et al. Performance of the BD GeneOhm MRSA Achromopeptidase Assay for Real-Time PCR Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2266–2268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalpke AH, Hofko M, Zimmermann S. Comparison of the BD Max Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Assay and the BD GeneOhm MRSA Achromopeptidase Assay with Direct- and Enriched-Culture Techniques Using Clinical Specimens for Detection of MRSA. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3365–3367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabsch EA, Xie S, Szczurek PB, et al. Assessment of the BD GeneOhm MRSA ACP assay using combined swabs for the detection of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonisation. Pathology. 2013;45:612–614.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalpke AH, Hofko M, Stock C, et al. Evaluation of the BD Max MRSA XT assay for use with different swab types. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:4343–4346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepainteur M, Delattre S, Cozza S, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Two PCR-Based Methods for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): xpert MRSA Gen 3 and BD-Max MRSA XT. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:1955–1958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen XC, Madsen TV, Engberg J. Evaluation of Xpert MRSA Gen 3 and BD MAX MRSA XT for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening in a routine diagnostic setting in a low-prevalence area. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66:90–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydiner A, Lüsebrink J, Schildgen V, et al. Comparison of Two Commercial PCR Methods for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Screening in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Plos One. 2012;7:e43935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson LR, Liesenfeld O, Woods CW, et al. Multicenter evaluation of the LightCycler methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) advanced test as a rapid method for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance swabs. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:1661–1666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yam WC, Siu GKH, Ho PL, et al. Evaluation of the LightCycler Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Advanced Test for Detection of MRSA Nasal Colonization. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2869–2874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson LR, Woods CW, Davis TE, et al. Performance of the cobas MRSA/SA Test for Simultaneous Detection of Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus From Nasal Swabs. Am J Clin Pathol. 2017;148:119–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moure R, Á C, Muíño M, et al. Use of the cobas 4800 system for the rapid detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Microbiol Methods. 2016;120:50–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 510(k) Substantial Equivalence Determination Decision Summary MRSA/SA ELITe MGB [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 12]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K112937.
   Google Scholar
• Hirvonen JJ, Kaukoranta -S-S. GenomEra MRSA/SA, a fully automated homogeneous PCR assay for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and the marker of methicillin resistance in various sample matrixes. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013;13:655–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henares D, Brotons P, Buyse X, et al. Evaluation of the eazyplex MRSA assay for the rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus in pleural and synovial fluid. Inter J Infect Dis. 2017;59:65–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvonen JJ. The use of molecular methods for the detection and identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Biomark Med. 2014;8:1115–1125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maalej SM, Rhimi FM, Fines M, et al. Analysis of borderline oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (BORSA) strains isolated in Tunisia. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3345–3348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argudín MA, Roisin S, Nienhaus L, et al. Genetic Diversity among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates Showing Oxacillin and/or Cefoxitin Resistance Not Linked to the Presence of mec Genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62. DOI:10.1128/AAC.00091-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing. CLSI Standard M100. 29th ed. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Kaase M, Baars B, Friedrich S, et al. Performance of MicroScan WalkAway and Vitek 2 for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in a Set of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates with Diverse Genetic Backgrounds. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:2623–2625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junkins AD, Lockhart SR, Heilmann KP, et al. BD Phoenix and Vitek 2 Detection of mecA-Mediated Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with Cefoxitin. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:2879–2882.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobenchik AM, Hindler JA, Giltner CL, et al. Performance of Vitek 2 for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Staphylococcus spp. and Enterococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:392–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallon O, Pina P, Gravet A, et al. Performance of a New MicroScan WalkAway PC30 Panel and Disk Diffusion Method for Detection of Oxacillin Resistance in Staphylococcus spp. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:2269–2271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen F-J, Huang I-W, Wang C-H, et al. mecA-Positive Staphylococcus aureus with Low-Level Oxacillin MIC in Taiwan. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:1679–1683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriegeskorte A, Idelevich EA, Schlattmann A, et al. Comparison of Different Phenotypic Approaches To Screen and Detect mecC-Harboring Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e00826–17. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akcam FZ, Tinaz GB, Kaya O, et al. Evaluation of methicillin resistance by cefoxitin disk diffusion and PBP2a latex agglutination test in mecA-positive Staphylococcus aureus, and comparison of mecA with femA, femB, femX positivities. Microbiol Res. 2009;164:400–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nonhoff C, Roisin S, Hallin M, et al. Evaluation of Clearview Exact PBP2a, a New Immunochromatographic Assay, for Detection of Low-Level Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LL-MRSA). J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:3359–3360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupieux C, Trouillet-Assant S, Tasse J, et al. Evaluation of a commercial immunochromatographic assay for rapid routine identification of PBP2a-positive Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;86:262–264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trienski TL, Barrett HL, Pasquale TR, et al. Evaluation and use of a rapid Staphylococcus aureus assay by an antimicrobial stewardship program. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013;70:1908–1912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SA, Karichu J, Kohner P, et al. Multicenter Evaluation of a Modified Cefoxitin Disk Diffusion Method and PBP2a Testing To Predict mecA -Mediated Oxacillin Resistance in Atypical Staphylococcus aureus. Carroll KC, editor. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:485–494.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupieux C, Bouchiat C, Larsen AR, et al. Detection of mecC-Positive Staphylococcus aureus: what To Expect from Immunological Tests Targeting PBP2a? J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:1961–1963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Gómez MP, Quiles-Melero I, Navarro C, et al. Evaluation of the BinaxNOW PBP2a assay for the direct detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood culture bottles. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;72:282–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delport JA, Mohorovic I, Burn S, et al. Rapid detection of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia using combined three-hour short-incubation matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight MS identification and Alere Culture Colony PBP2a detection test. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:626–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oviaño M, Bou G. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Rapid Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Beyond. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;32:e00037-18,/cmr/32/1/e00037-18.atom.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JM, Kim I, Chung Y, et al. Rapid Discrimination of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus by MALDI-TOF MS. Pathogens. 2019;8:214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Belkum A, Welker M, Pincus D, et al. Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Microbiology: what Are the Current Issues? Ann Lab Med. 2017;37:475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chatterjee SS, Chen L, Joo H-S, et al. Distribution and Regulation of the Mobile Genetic Element-Encoded Phenol-Soluble Modulin PSM-mec in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Horsburgh MJ, editor. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e28781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Josten M, Dischinger J, Szekat C, et al. Identification of agr-positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring the class A mec complex by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304:1018–1023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhoads DD, Wang H, Karichu J, et al. The presence of a single MALDI-TOF mass spectral peak predicts methicillin resistance in staphylococci. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;86:257–261. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxson T, Taylor-Howell CL, Minogue TD. Semi-quantitative MALDI-TOF for antimicrobial susceptibility testing in Staphylococcus aureus. Becker K, editor. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0183899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparbier K, Lange C, Jung J, et al. MALDI Biotyper-Based Rapid Resistance Detection by Stable-Isotope Labeling. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:3741–3748.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto Y, Kosai K, Yamakawa H, et al. Detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae using the MALDI Biotyper Selective Testing of Antibiotic Resistance–β-Lactamase (MBT STAR-BL) assay. J Microbiol Methods. 2019;160:154–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peaper DR, Kulkarni MV, Tichy AN, et al. Rapid detection of carbapenemase activity through monitoring ertapenem hydrolysis in Enterobacteriaceae with LC–MS/MS. Bioanalysis. 2013;5:147–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behera B, Anil Vishnu GK, Chatterjee S, et al. Emerging technologies for antibiotic susceptibility testing. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019;142:111552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Poel B, Meersseman P, Debaveye Y, et al. Performance and potential clinical impact of Alfred60AST (Alifax®) for direct antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood culture bottles. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;39:53–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anton-Vazquez V, Adjepong S, Suarez C, et al. Evaluation of a new Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility system for Gram-negative and Gram-positive bloodstream infections: speed and accuracy of Alfred 60AST. BMC Microbiol. 2019;19:268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Carrillo C, Pescador P, Ricote R, et al. Evaluation of the Alfred AST® system for rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:1665–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boland L, Streel C, De Wolf H, et al. Rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing on positive blood cultures through an innovative light scattering technology: performances and turnaround time evaluation. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19:989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden RT, Clinton LK, Hewitt C, et al. Rapid Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Using Forward Laser Light Scatter Technology. Patel R, editor. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:2701–2706.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beganovic M, McCreary EK, Mahoney MV, et al. Interplay between Rapid Diagnostic Tests and Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs among Patients with Bloodstream and Other Severe Infections. J Appl Lab Med. 2019;3:601–616.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salimnia H, Fairfax MR, Lephart PR, et al. Evaluation of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel: results of a Multicenter Controlled Trial. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:687–698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 510(k) Substantial Equivalence Determination Decision Summary FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panel [Internet]. [cited 2019 Nov 16]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfpmn/pmn.cfm?ID=K130914.
   Google Scholar
• McCoy MH, Relich RF, Davis TE, et al. Performance of the FilmArray® blood culture identification panel utilized by non-expert staff compared with conventional microbial identification and antimicrobial resistance gene detection from positive blood cultures. J Med Microbiol. 2016;65:619–625.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng X, Polanco W, Carter D, et al. Rapid Identification of Pathogens from Pediatric Blood Cultures by Use of the FilmArray Blood Culture Identification Panel. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52:4368–4371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand KH, Delano JP. Direct identification of bacteria in positive blood cultures: comparison of two rapid methods, FilmArray and mass spectrometry. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;79:293–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiori B, D’Inzeo T, Giaquinto A, et al. Optimized Use of the MALDI BioTyper System and the FilmArray BCID Panel for Direct Identification of Microbial Pathogens from Positive Blood Cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:576–584.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantell C. Multiplexed Automated Digital Microscopy for Rapid Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria and Yeast Directly from Clinical Samples. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2015;37:161–167.
   Google Scholar
• Charnot-Katsikas A, Tesic V, Love N, et al. Use of the Accelerate Pheno System for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Pathogens in Positive Blood Cultures and Impact on Time to Results and Workflow. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01166–17.
   Google Scholar
• Sofjan AK, Casey BO, Xu BA, et al. Accelerate PhenoTestTM BC Kit Versus Conventional Methods for Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing of Gram-Positive Bloodstream Isolates: potential Implications for Antimicrobial Stewardship. Ann Pharmacother. 2018;52:754–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutgring JD, Bittencourt C, McElvania TeKippe E, et al. Evaluation of the accelerate pheno system: results from two academic medical centers. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(4):e01672-17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pancholi P, Carroll KC, Buchan BW, et al. multicenter evaluation of the accelerate phenotest BC kit for rapid identification and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing using morphokinetic cellular analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchan BW, Ginocchio CC, Manii R, et al. multiplex identification of gram-positive bacteria and resistance determinants directly from positive blood culture broths: evaluation of an automated microarray-based nucleic acid test. PLoS Med. 2013;10:e1001478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vareechon C, Mestas J, Polanco CM, et al. A 5-year study of the performance of the Verigene Gram-positive blood culture panel in a pediatric hospital. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2018;37:2091–2096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman M, Washam MC, DeBurger B, et al. Reliability of the Verigene system for the identification for Gram-positive Bacteria and detection of antimicrobial resistance markers from children with bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;93:191–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuel LP, Tibbetts RJ, Agotesku A, et al. Evaluation of a Microarray-Based Assay for Rapid Identification of Gram-Positive Organisms and Resistance Markers in Positive Blood Cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:1188–1192.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• 510(k) Substantial Equivalence Determination Decision Summary ePlex Blood Culture Identification Gram-Positive (BCID-GP) Panel [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Nov 18]. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfPMN/pmn.cfm?ID=K181663.
   Google Scholar
• Buchan BW, Allen S, Burnham C-AD, et al. Comparison of the Next-Generation Xpert MRSA/SA BC Assay and the GeneOhm StaphSR Assay to Routine Culture for Identification of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Positive-Blood-Culture Broths. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:804–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Gómez MP, Muñoz-Velez M, Gómez-Gil R, et al. Evaluation of combined use of MALDI-TOF and Xpert® MRSA/SA BC assay for the direct detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood culture bottles. J Infect. 2013;67:91–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spencer DH, Sellenriek P, Burnham C-AD. Validation and Implementation of the GeneXpert MRSA/SA Blood Culture Assay in a Pediatric Setting. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011;136:690–694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yossepowitch O, Dan M, Kutchinsky A, et al. A cost-saving algorithm for rapid diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus and susceptibility to oxacillin directly from positive blood culture bottles by combined testing with BinaxNOW® S. aureus and Xpert MRSA/SA assay. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;78:352–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biendo M, Mammeri H, Pluquet E, et al. Value of Xpert MRSA/SA blood culture assay on the Gene Xpert® Dx System for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci in patients with staphylococcal bacteremia. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;75:139–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pescador P, Romero-Gómez MP, Gómez Gil R, et al. Evaluation of combined use of the MALDI-TOF and GenomEra MRSA/SA assay for the direct detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus from positive blood culture bottles. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2016;34:687–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eigner U, Weizenegger M, Fahr A-M, et al. Evaluation of a Rapid Direct Assay for Identification of Bacteria and the mecA and van Genes from Positive-Testing Blood Cultures. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:5256–5262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galiana A, Coy J, Gimeno A, et al. Evaluation of the Sepsis Flow Chip assay for the diagnosis of blood infections. Plos One. 2017;12:e0177627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrara L, Navarro F, Turbau M, et al. Molecular diagnosis of bloodstream infections with a new dual-priming oligonucleotide-based multiplex PCR assay. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:1673–1679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marco D, Carlo S, Sara C, et al. MagicplexTM Sepsis Real-Time test to improve bloodstream infection diagnostics in children. Eur J Pediatr. 2016;175:1107–1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreiber J, Nierhaus A, Braune SA, et al. Comparison of three different commercial PCR assays for the detection of pathogens in critically ill sepsis patients. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2013;108:311–318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenover FC, Tickler IA. Is That Staphylococcus aureus Isolate Really Methicillin Susceptible? Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2015;37:79–84. .
   Google Scholar
• Goering RV, Swartzendruber EA, Obradovich AE, et al. Emergence of Oxacillin Resistance in Stealth Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Due to mecA Sequence Instability. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(8):e00558-19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Southern TR, VanSchooneveld TC, Bannister DL, et al. Implementation and performance of the BioFire FilmArray® Blood Culture Identification panel with antimicrobial treatment recommendations for bloodstream infections at a midwestern academic tertiary hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;81:96–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee G-H, Pang S, Coombs GW. Misidentification of Staphylococcus aureus by the Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA BC Assay Due to Deletions in the spa Gene. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(7):e00530-18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tenover FC, Tickler IA, Le VM, et al. Updating Molecular Diagnostics for Detecting Methicillin-Susceptible and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates in Blood Culture Bottles. J Clin Microbiol. 2019;57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirvonen JJ, von Lode P, Nevalainen M, et al. One-step sample preparation of positive blood cultures for the direct detection of methicillin-sensitive and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci within one hour using the automated GenomEra CDXTM PCR system. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31:2835–2842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tissari P, Zumla A, Tarkka E, et al. Accurate and rapid identification of bacterial species from positive blood cultures with a DNA-based microarray platform: an observational study. Lancet. 2010;375:224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afshari A, Schrenzel J, Ieven M, et al. Bench-to-bedside review: rapid molecular diagnostics for bloodstream infection - a new frontier? Crit Care. 2012;16:1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolk DM, Struelens MJ, Pancholi P, et al. Rapid Detection of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in Wound Specimens and Blood Cultures: multicenter Preclinical Evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA Skin and Soft Tissue and Blood Culture Assays. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:823–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubouix-Bourandy A, de Ladoucette A, Pietri V, et al. Direct Detection of Staphylococcus Osteoarticular Infections by Use of Xpert MRSA/SA SSTI Real-Time PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:4225–4230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parta M, Goebel M, Matloobi M, et al. Identification of Methicillin-Resistant or Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in Blood Cultures and Wound Swabs by GeneXpert. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:1609–1610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouza E, Onori R, Semiglia-Chong MA, et al. Fast track SSTI management program based on a rapid molecular test (GeneXpert® MRSA/SA SSTI) and antimicrobial stewardship. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2020;53:328–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Self WH, Wunderink RG, Williams DJ, et al. Staphylococcus aureus Community-acquired Pneumonia: prevalence, Clinical Characteristics, and Outcomes. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63:300–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Pasquale MF, Sotgiu G, Gramegna A, et al. Prevalence and Etiology of Community-acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Patients. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68:1482–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones BE, Brown KA, Jones MM, et al. Variation in Empiric Coverage Versus Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Hospitalizations for Community-Onset Pneumonia Across 128 US Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38:937–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aliberti S, Reyes LF, Faverio P, et al. Global initiative for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia (GLIMP): an international, observational cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16:1364–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher K, Trupka T, Micek ST, et al. A Prospective One-Year Microbiologic Survey of Combined Pneumonia and Respiratory Failure. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2017;18:827–833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillamet CV, Kollef MH. Update on ventilator-associated pneumonia. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21:430–438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinstein E, Kollef MH, Nathwani D. Pneumonia Caused by Methicillin‐Resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:S378–S385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B, et al. Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens Associated With Healthcare-Associated Infections: summary of Data Reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011–2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37:1288–1301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadros M, Williams V, Coleman BL, et al. Epidemiology and Outcome of Pneumonia Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in Canadian Hospitals. Kluytmans J, editor. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cercenado E, Marin M, Burillo A, et al. Rapid Detection of Staphylococcus aureus in Lower Respiratory Tract Secretions from Patients with Suspected Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert MRSA/SA SSTI Assay. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50:4095–4097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trevino SE, Pence MA, Marschall J, et al. Rapid MRSA PCR on respiratory specimens from ventilated patients with suspected pneumonia: a tool to facilitate antimicrobial stewardship. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36:879–885.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paonessa JR, Shah RD, Pickens CI, et al. Rapid Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in BAL. Chest. 2019;155:999–1007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppens J, Van Heirstraeten L, Ruzin A, et al. Comparison of GeneXpert MRSA/SA ETA assay with semi-quantitative and quantitative cultures and nuc gene-based qPCR for detection of Staphylococcus aureus in endotracheal aspirate samples. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019;8:4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunze N, Moerer O, Steinmetz N, et al. Point-of-care multiplex PCR promises short turnaround times for microbial testing in hospital-acquired pneumonia – an observational pilot study in critical ill patients. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2015;14:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Personne Y, Ozongwu C, Platt G, et al. ‘Sample-in, answer-out’? Evaluation and comprehensive analysis of the Unyvero P50 pneumonia assay. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;86:5–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papan C, Meyer-Buehn M, Laniado G, et al. Assessment of the multiplex PCR-based assay Unyvero pneumonia application for detection of bacterial pathogens and antibiotic resistance genes in children and neonates. Infection. 2018;46:189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozongwu C, Personne Y, Platt G, et al. The Unyvero P55 ‘sample-in, answer-out’ pneumonia assay: A performance evaluation. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2017;13:1–6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadsby NJ, McHugh MP, Forbes C, et al. Comparison of Unyvero P55 Pneumonia Cartridge, in-house PCR and culture for the identification of respiratory pathogens and antibiotic resistance in bronchoalveolar lavage fluids in the critical care setting. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:1171–1178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr S, Broadbent K, Balada-Llasa JM, et al. Clinical Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray pneumonia panel plus. Am Soc Microbiol Microbe Meeting, 2018, Abstract #356.
   Google Scholar
• Webber DM, Johnson C, Wallace MA, et al. Evaluation of the BioFire FilmArray pneumonia panel for detection of viral and bacterial pathogens in lower respiratory tract specimens in the setting of a tertiary care academic medical center. Am Soc Microbiol Microbe Meeting, 2019, Abstract #725.
   Google Scholar
• Ross JJ. Septic arthritis of native joints. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2017;31:203–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson DJ, Spratt D, Liddle AD. Implant materials and prosthetic joint infection: the battle with the biofilm. EFORT Open Rev. 2019;4:633–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Montanaro L. Implant infections: adhesion, biofilm formation and immune evasion. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018;16:397–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drago L, Clerici P, Morelli I, et al. The World Association against Infection in Orthopaedics and Trauma (WAIOT) procedures for Microbiological Sampling and Processing for Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJIs) and other Implant-Related Infections. JCM. 2019;8:933.
   Google Scholar
• Rak M, KavčIč M, Trebše R, et al. Detection of bacteria with molecular methods in prosthetic joint infection: sonication fluid better than periprosthetic tissue. Acta Orthop. 2016;87:339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sambri A, Pignatti G, Romagnoli M, et al. Intraoperative diagnosis of Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus using Xpert MRSA/SA SSTI assay in prosthetic joint infection. New Microbiol. 2017;40:130–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titécat M, Loïez C, Senneville E, et al. Evaluation of rapid mecA gene detection versus standard culture in staphylococcal chronic prosthetic joint infections. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;73:318–321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titécat M, Wallet F, Robineau O, et al. Focus on MRSA/SA SSTI Assay Failure in Prosthetic Joint Infections: 213 Consecutive Patients Later. Patel R, editor. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:635–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villa F, Toscano M, De Vecchi E, et al. Reliability of a multiplex PCR system for diagnosis of early and late prosthetic joint infections before and after broth enrichment. Int J Med Microbiol. 2017;307:363–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malandain D, Bémer P, Leroy AG, et al. Assessment of the automated multiplex-PCR Unyvero i60 ITI® cartridge system to diagnose prosthetic joint infection: a multicentre study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:83.e1-83.e6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curetis GmBH. Operating manual for the Unyvero ITI application manual. [updated 2019 5]. Available from: https://curetis.com/wp-content/uploads/00207-Rev-5.0-ITI-Application-Manual_EN_PDF_A.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Price J, Claire Gordon N, Crook D, et al. The usefulness of whole genome sequencing in the management of Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19:784–789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price JR, Didelot X, Crook DW, et al. Whole genome sequencing in the prevention and control of Staphylococcus aureus infection. J Hosp Infect. 2013;83:14–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tagini F, Greub G. Bacterial genome sequencing in clinical microbiology: a pathogen-oriented review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2017;36:2007–2020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys H, Coleman DC. Contribution of whole-genome sequencing to understanding of the epidemiology and control of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J Hosp Infect. 2019;102:189–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roisin S, Gaudin C, De Mendonça R, et al. Pan-genome multilocus sequence typing and outbreak-specific reference-based single nucleotide polymorphism analysis to resolve two concurrent Staphylococcus aureus outbreaks in neonatal services. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22:520–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinnevey PM, Shore AC, Mac Aogáin M, et al. Enhanced Tracking of Nosocomial Transmission of Endemic Sequence Type 22 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Type IV Isolates among Patients and Environmental Sites by Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54:445–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schürch AC, Arredondo-Alonso S, Willems RJL, et al. Whole genome sequencing options for bacterial strain typing and epidemiologic analysis based on single nucleotide polymorphism versus gene-by-gene–based approaches. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:350–354. .
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang P, Croxen MA, Hasan MR, et al. Infection control in the new age of genomic epidemiology. Am J Infect Control. 2017;45:170–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besser J, Carleton HA, Gerner-Smidt P, et al. Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies and their Application to the Study and Control of Bacterial Infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018;24:335–341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peacock SJ, Parkhill J, Brown NM. Changing the paradigm for hospital outbreak detection by leading with genomic surveillance of nosocomial pathogens. Microbiology. 2018;164:1213–1219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar