Insights from protein-protein interaction studies on bacterial pathogenesis

References

• Payne DJ. Microbiology. Desperately seeking new antibiotics. Science. 2008;321:1644–1645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellberg B, Guidos R, Gilbert D, et al. The epidemic of antibiotic-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46:155–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morens DM, Fauci AS. Emerging infectious diseases: threats to human health and global stability. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9:e1003467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the infectious diseases society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Benjamin DK Jr., et al. 10 x ‘20 Progress–development of new drugs active against gram-negative bacilli: an update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1685–1694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca I, Akova M, Baquero F, et al. The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: science for intervention. New Microbes New Infect. 2015;6:22–29.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassetti M, Merelli M, Temperoni C, et al. New antibiotics for bad bugs: where are we? Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2013;12:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giske CG, Monnet DL, Cars O, et al. Clinical and economic impact of common multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:813–821.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: an overview of our work. London, UK: Review on Antimicrobial Resistance; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Taniguchi Y, Choi PJ, Li GW, et al. Quantifying E. coli proteome and transcriptome with single-molecule sensitivity in single cells. Science. 2010;329:533–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rüter C, Hardwidge PR. ‘Drugs from Bugs’: bacterial effector proteins as promising biological (immune-) therapeutics. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2014;351:126–132.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uchugonova A, Zhang Y, Salz R, et al. Imaging the different mechanisms of prostate cancer cell-killing by tumor-targeting Salmonella typhimurium A1-R. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:5225–5229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash P. Proteomics of bacterial pathogens. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2008;3:461–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert JP, Ethier M, Smith JC, et al. Proteomics: from gel based to gel free. Anal Chem. 2005;77:3771–3787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semanjski M, Macek B. Shotgun proteomics of bacterial pathogens: advances, challenges and clinical implications. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2016;13:139–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jean Beltran PM, Federspiel JD, Sheng X, et al. Proteomics and integrative omic approaches for understanding host-pathogen interactions and infectious diseases. Mol Syst Biol. 2017 Mar 27 13(3):922. doi: 10.15252/msb.201670626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemann GS, Brown RN, Gustin JK, et al. Discovery of novel secreted virulence factors from Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by proteomic analysis of culture supernatants. Infect Immun. 2011;79:33–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields S, Song O. A novel genetic system to detect protein-protein interactions. Nature. 1989;340:245–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fields S, Sternglanz R. The two-hybrid system: an assay for protein-protein interactions. Trends Genet. 1994;10:286–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petschnigg J, Wong V, Snider J, et al. Investigation of membrane protein interactions using the split-ubiquitin membrane yeast two-hybrid system. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;812:225–244.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grefen C, Lalonde S, Obrdlik P. Split-ubiquitin system for identifying protein-protein interactions in membrane and full-length proteins. Curr Protoc Neurosci. 2001. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci.41:5.27.1-5.27.41.
   Google Scholar
• Iyer K, Burkle L, Auerbach D, et al. Utilizing the split-ubiquitin membrane yeast two-hybrid system to identify protein-protein interactions of integral membrane proteins. Sci STKE. 2005;2005:pl3.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petschnigg J, Groisman B, Kotlyar M, et al. The mammalian-membrane two-hybrid assay (MaMTH) for probing membrane-protein interactions in human cells. Nat Meth. 2014;11:585–592.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lievens S, Gerlo S, Lemmens I, et al. Kinase substrate sensor (KISS), a mammalian in situ protein interaction sensor. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:3332–3342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brückner A, Polge C, Lentze N, et al. Yeast two-hybrid, a powerful tool for systems biology. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:2763–2788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suter B, Zhang X, Pesce CG, et al. Next-generation sequencing for binary protein-protein interactions. Front Genet. 2015;6:346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uetz P. Two-hybrid arrays. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2002;6:57–62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornbrough JM, Worley MJ. A naturally occurring single nucleotide polymorphism in the Salmonella SPI-2 Type III effector srfH/sseI controls early extraintestinal dissemination. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worley MJ, Nieman GS, Geddes K, et al. Salmonella typhimurium disseminates within its host by manipulating the motility of infected cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:17915–17920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernal-Bayard J, Ramos-Morales F. Salmonella type III secretion effector SlrP is an E3 ubiquitin ligase for mammalian thioredoxin. J Biol Chem. 2009;284:27587–27595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zouhir S, Bernal-Bayard J, Cordero-Alba M, et al. The structure of the Slrp–Trx1 complex sheds light on the autoinhibition mechanism of the type III secretion system effectors of the NEL family. Biochem J. 2014;464:135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallstrom KN, Srikanth CV, Agbor TA, et al. PERP, a host tetraspanning membrane protein, is required for Salmonella-induced inflammation. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17:843–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerppola TK. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis as a probe of protein interactions in living cells. Annu Rev Biophys. 2008;37:465–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang XE, Cui Z, Wang D. Sensing of biomolecular interactions using fluorescence complementing systems in living cells. Biosens Bioelectron. 2016;76:243–250.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller KE, Kim Y, Huh WK, et al. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) analysis: advances and recent applications for genome-wide interaction studies. J Mol Biol. 2015;427:2039–2055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciruela F, Vilardaga J-P, Fernández-Dueñas V. Lighting up multiprotein complexes: lessons from GPCR oligomerization. Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:407–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerppola TK. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation: visualization of molecular interactions in living cells. Methods Cell Biol. 2008;85:431–470.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann C, Fraiture M, Hernàndez-Reyes C, et al. The Salmonella effector protein SpvC, a phosphothreonine lyase is functional in plant cells. Front Microbiol.2014 Oct 17;5:548.
   Google Scholar
• Proell M, Gerlic M, Mace PD, et al. The CARD plays a critical role in ASC foci formation and inflammasome signaling. Biochem J. 2013;449:613–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enninga J, Mounier J, Sansonetti P, et al. Secretion of type III effectors into host cells in real time. Nat Meth. 2005;2:959–965.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charpentier X, Oswald E. Identification of the secretion and translocation domain of the enteropathogenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli effector Cif, using TEM-1 β-lactamase as a new fluorescence-based reporter. J Bacteriol. 2004;186:5486–5495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geddes K, Cruz F, Heffron F. Analysis of cells targeted by Salmonella type III secretion in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 2007;3:e196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodrigues CD, Enninga J. The ‘when and whereabouts’ of injected pathogen effectors. Nat Meth. 2010;7:267–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pechous RD, Goldman WE. Illuminating targets of bacterial secretion. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Engelenburg SB, Palmer AE. Imaging type-III secretion reveals dynamics and spatial segregation of Salmonella effectors. Nat Meth. 2010;7:325–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snapp E. Design and use of fluorescent fusion proteins in cell biology. Curr Protoc Cell Biol. 2005;Chapter 21:Unit–21.4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boute N, Jockers R, Issad T. The use of resonance energy transfer in high-throughput screening: BRET versus FRET. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002;23:351–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou BH, Takanaga H, Grossmann G, et al. Optical sensors for monitoring dynamic changes of intracellular metabolite levels in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc. 2011;6:1818–1833.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopeit T, Øverbø K, Danielson UH, et al. Efficient screening of marine extracts for protease inhibitors by combining FRET based activity assays and surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy based binding assays. Mar Drugs. 2013;11:4279–4293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medintz IL, Mattoussi H. Quantum dot-based resonance energy transfer and its growing application in biology. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2009;11:17–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu Y, Piston DW, Johnson CH. A bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) system: application to interacting circadian clock proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:151–156.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borroto-Escuela DO, Flajolet M, Agnati LF, et al. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer methods to study G protein-coupled receptor-receptor tyrosine kinase heteroreceptor complexes. Methods Cell Biol. 2013;117:141–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocan M, See HB, Seeber RM, et al. Demonstration of improvements to the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) technology for the monitoring of G protein-coupled receptors in live cells. J Biomol Screen. 2008;13:888–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dragulescu-Andrasi A, Chan CT, De A, et al. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) imaging of protein-protein interactions within deep tissues of living subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:12060–12065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie Q, Soutto M, Xu X, et al. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) imaging in plant seedlings and mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;680:3–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romero-Fernandez W, Borroto-Escuela DO, Tarakanov AO, et al. Agonist-induced formation of FGFR1 homodimers and signaling differ among members of the FGF family. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2011;409:764–768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cui B, Wang Y, Song Y, et al. Bioluminescence resonance energy transfer system for measuring dynamic protein-protein interactions in bacteria. MBio. 2014;5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan WT, Balsa D, Espinosa M. One cannot rule them all: are bacterial toxins-antitoxins druggable? FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2015;39:522–540.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieto C, Pellicer T, Balsa D, et al. The chromosomal relBE2 toxin-antitoxin locus of Streptococcus pneumoniae: characterization and use of a bioluminescence resonance energy transfer assay to detect toxin-antitoxin interaction. Mol Microbiol. 2006;59:1280–1296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lioy VS, Rey O, Balsa D, et al. A toxin-antitoxin module as a target for antimicrobial development. Plasmid. 2010;63:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazova MD, Butler MT, Shimizu TS, et al. Salmonella chemoreceptors McpB and McpC mediate a repellent response to L-cystine: a potential mechanism to avoid oxidative conditions. Mol Microbiol. 2012;84:697–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McShan AC Elucidation of the needle-tip and tip-translocon interactions of the Salmonella SPI-1 type III secretion system and identification of small molecule binders of the tip and translocon proteins [Dissertation]: University of Kansas; 2016
   Google Scholar
• Dickenson NE, Picking WD. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) as a tool for dissecting the molecular mechanisms for maturation of the Shigella type III secretion needle tip complex. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:15137–15161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensrud KF, Adam PR, La Mar CD, et al. Deoxycholate interacts with IpaD of Shigella flexneri in inducing the recruitment of IpaB to the type III secretion apparatus needle tip. J Biol Chem. 2008;283:18646–18654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buntru A, Zimmermann T, Hauck CR. Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based subcellular visualization of pathogen-induced host receptor signaling. BMC Biol. 2009;7:81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carriba P, Navarro G, Ciruela F, et al. Detection of heteromerization of more than two proteins by sequential BRET-FRET. Nat Methods. 2008;5:727–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rebois RV, Robitaille M, Pétrin D, et al. Combining protein complementation assays with resonance energy transfer to detect multipartner protein complexes in living cells. Methods. 2008;45:214–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredriksson S, Gullberg M, Jarvius J, et al. Protein detection using proximity-dependent DNA ligation assays. Nat Biotechnol. 2002;20:473–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderberg O, Gullberg M, Jarvius M, et al. Direct observation of individual endogenous protein complexes in situ by proximity ligation. Nat Meth. 2006;3:995–1000.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen TC, Lin KT, Chen CH, et al. Using an in situ proximity ligation assay to systematically profile endogenous protein-protein interactions in a pathway network. J Proteome Res. 2014;13:5339–5346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koos B, Andersson L, Clausson CM, et al. Analysis of protein interactions in situ by proximity ligation assays. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2014;377:111–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhillon HS, Johnson G, Shannon M, et al. Homogeneous and digital proximity ligation assays for the detection of Clostridium difficile toxins A and B. Biomol Detect Quantif. 2016;10:2–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leslie DC, Sohrabi A, Ikonomi P, et al. Size-based separations as an important discriminator in development of proximity ligation assays for protein or organism detection. Electrophoresis. 2010;31:1615–1622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattoon D, Michaud G, Merkel J, et al. Biomarker discovery using protein microarray technology platforms: antibody-antigen complex profiling. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2005;2:879–889.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J-R, Magee DM, Gaster RS, et al. Emerging protein array technologies for proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2013;10:65–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang W, Wang S, Festa F, et al. Measurement of small molecule binding kinetics on a protein microarray by plasmonic-based electrochemical impedance imaging. Anal Chem. 2014;86:9860–9865.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin K, Steinberg TH, Cooley LA, et al. Quantitative analysis of protein phosphorylation status and protein kinase activity on microarrays using a novel fluorescent phosphorylation sensor dye. Proteomics. 2003;3:1244–1255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Qian J. Applications of functional protein microarrays in basic and clinical research. Adv Genet. 2012;79:123–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi H, Uematsu A, Yamanaka S, et al. Establishment of a wheat cell-free synthesized protein array containing 250 human and mouse E3 ubiquitin ligases to identify novel interaction between E3 ligases and substrate proteins. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0156718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi H, Nemoto K, Abdelaziz R, et al. Technology of wheat cell-free-based protein array for biochemical analyses of protein kinases and ubiquitin E3 ligases. In: Inoue J-I, Takekawa M, Eds. Protein modifications in pathogenic dysregulation of signaling. Tokyo: Springer Japan; 2015. p. 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jones RB, Gordus A, Krall JA, et al. A quantitative protein interaction network for the ErbB receptors using protein microarrays. Nature. 2006;439:168–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syahir A, Usui K, Tomizaki K-Y, et al. Label and label-free detection techniques for protein microarrays. Microarrays. 2015;4:228–244.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen HH, Park J, Kang S, et al. Surface plasmon resonance: a versatile technique for biosensor applications. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland). 2015;15:10481–10510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell CT, Kim G. SPR microscopy and its applications to high-throughput analyses of biomolecular binding events and their kinetics. Biomaterials. 2007;28:2380–2392.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho Y-H, Sung T-C, Chen C-S. Lactoferricin B inhibits the phosphorylation of the two-component system response regulators BasR and CreB. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:M111.014720.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu Y-H, Ho Y-H, Chuang Y-C, et al. Identification of lactoferricin B intracellular targets using an Escherichia coli proteome chip. PLoS One. 2011;6:e28197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yi C-R, Allen JE, Russo B, et al. Systematic analysis of bacterial effector-postsynaptic density 95/disc large/zonula occludens-1 (PDZ) domain interactions demonstrates Shigella OspE protein promotes protein kinase C activation via PDLIM proteins. J Biol Chem. 2014;289:30101–30113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scietti L, Sampieri K, Pinzuti I, et al. Exploring host-pathogen interactions through genome wide protein microarray analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:27996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu X, Decker KB, Barker K, et al. Host-pathogen interaction profiling using self-assembling human protein arrays. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:1920–1936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutandy FX, Qian J, Chen CS, et al. Overview of protein microarrays. Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2013;27:Unit–27.1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoppe S, Bier FF, von Nickisch-Rosenegk M. Microarray-based method for screening of immunogenic proteins from bacteria. J Nanobiotechnology. 2012;10:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smits AH, Vermeulen M. Characterizing protein-protein interactions using mass spectrometry: challenges and opportunities. Trends Biotechnol. 2016;34:825–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dworzanski JP, Snyder AP. Classification and identification of bacteria using mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2005;2:863–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003;422:198–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Schirle M, Sweetman G, et al. Quantitative mass spectrometry in proteomics: a critical review. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007;389:1017–1031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JR, Ruse CI, Nakorchevsky A. Proteomics by mass spectrometry: approaches, advances, and applications. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2009;11:49–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palagi PM, Arhné E, Müller M, et al. Bioinformatics tools for detecting post-translational modifications in mass spectrometry data. Amino Acids. 2011;5(14):463–475. Peptides and Proteins in Organic Chemistry: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
   Google Scholar
• Conrads TP, Hood BL, Veenstra TD. Mass spectrometric characterization of post-translational modifications. Proteomics for biological discovery. Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2006. p. 63–90.
   Google Scholar
• Altelaar AF, Munoz J, Heck AJ. Next-generation proteomics: towards an integrative view of proteome dynamics. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:35–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mena M, Albar JP. Next generation instruments and methods for proteomics. Foodomics. 2013. pp. 15–67. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Carini M, Orioli M. Mass spectrometric strategies for identification and characterization of carbonylated peptides and proteins. Biomarkers for antioxidant defense and oxidative damage: principles and practical applications. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 173–197.
   Google Scholar
• Husain M, Jones-Carson J, Song M, et al. Redox sensor SsrB Cys(203) enhances Salmonella fitness against nitric oxide generated in the host immune response to oral infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:14396–14401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domon B, Aebersold R. Options and considerations when selecting a quantitative proteomics strategy. Nat Biotech. 2010;28:710–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otto A, Becher D, Schmidt F. Quantitative proteomics in the field of microbiology. Proteomics. 2014;14:547–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcilla M, Albar JP. Quantitative proteomics: A strategic ally to map protein interaction networks. IUBMB Life. 2013;65:9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panchaud A, Affolter M, Moreillon P, et al. Experimental and computational approaches to quantitative proteomics: status quo and outlook. J Proteomics. 2008;71:19–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glish GL, Vachet RW. The basics of mass spectrometry in the twenty-first century. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2003;2:140–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellacheruvu D, Wright Z, Couzens AL, et al. The CRAPome: a contaminant repository for affinity purification-mass spectrometry data. Nat Meth. 2013;10:730–736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor CD, Clarke IN, Skipp P. Quest for complete proteome coverage. Methods Biochem Anal. 2006;49:27–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trevisiol S, Ayoub D, Lesur A, et al. The use of proteases complementary to trypsin to probe isoforms and modifications. Proteomics. 2016;16:715–728.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim M-S, Pandey A. Electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry in proteomics. Proteomics. 2012;12:530–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han X, Aslanian A, Yates JR. Mass spectrometry for proteomics. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2008;12:483–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oudenhove L, Devreese B. A review on recent developments in mass spectrometry instrumentation and quantitative tools advancing bacterial proteomics. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013;97:4749–4762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chait BT. Mass spectrometry: bottom-up or top-down? Science. 2006;314:65–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tran JC, Zamdborg L, Ahlf DR, et al. Mapping intact protein isoforms in discovery mode using top down proteomics. Nature. 2011;480:254–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang X, Scotcher J, Wu S, et al. The first pilot project of the consortium for top-down proteomics: A status report. Proteomics. 2014;14:1130–1140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlf DR, Thomas PM, Kelleher NL. Developing top down proteomics to maximize proteome and sequence coverage from cells and tissues. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2013;17:787–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansong C, Wu S, Meng D, et al. Top-down proteomics reveals a unique protein S-thiolation switch in Salmonella Typhimurium in response to infection-like conditions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:10153–10158.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham WH, Mullin M, Gingras AC. Affinity-purification coupled to mass spectrometry: basic principles and strategies. Proteomics. 2012;12:1576–1590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subbotin RI, Chait BT. A Pipeline for determining protein–protein interactions and proximities in the cellular milieu. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:2824–2835.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stengel F, Aebersold R, Robinson CV. Joining forces: integrating proteomics and cross-linking with the mass spectrometry of intact complexes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:R111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holding AN. XL-MS: protein cross-linking coupled with mass spectrometry. Methods. 2015;89:54–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu F, Heck AJR. Interrogating the architecture of protein assemblies and protein interaction networks by cross-linking mass spectrometry. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2015;35:100–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrero C, Tagwerker C, Kaiser P, et al. An integrated mass spectrometry-based proteomic approach: quantitative analysis of tandem affinity-purified in vivo cross-linked protein complexes (QTAX) to decipher the 26 S proteasome-interacting Network. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2006;5:366–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinnefeld V, Sickmann A, Ahrends R. Catch me if you can: challenges and applications of cross-linking approaches. Eur J Mass Spectrom. 2014;20:99–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu M, Vlasblom J, Pu S, et al. Interaction landscape of membrane-protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2012;489:585–589.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babu M, Kagan O, Guo H, et al. Identification of protein complexes in Escherichia coli using sequential peptide affinity purification in combination with tandem mass spectrometry. J Vis Exp. 2012;4057.
   Google Scholar
• Hu P, Janga SC, Babu M, et al. Global functional atlas of Escherichia coli encompassing previously uncharacterized proteins. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury SM, Shi L, Yoon H, et al. A method for investigating protein-protein interactions related to Salmonella Typhimurium pathogenesis. J Proteome Res. 2009;8:1504–1514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamanova J, Sun H, Lara-Tejero M, et al. The Salmonella effector protein SopA modulates innate immune responses by targeting TRIM E3 Ligase Family Members. PLOS Pathog. 2016;12:e1005552.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiskin E, Bhogaraju S, Herhaus L, et al. Structural basis for the recognition and degradation of host TRIM proteins by Salmonella effector SopA. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auweter SD, Bhavsar AP, De Hoog CL, et al. Quantitative mass spectrometry catalogues Salmonella pathogenicity island-2 effectors and identifies their cognate host binding partners. J Biol Chem. 2011;286:24023–24035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sontag RL, Nakayasu ES, Brown RN, et al. Identification of novel host interactors of effectors secreted by Salmonella and Citrobacter. mSystems. 2016;1:e00032–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roux KJ. Marked by association: techniques for proximity-dependent labeling of proteins in eukaryotic cells. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2013;70:3657–3664.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert J-P, Tucholska M, Go C, et al. Proximity biotinylation and affinity purification are complementary approaches for the interactome mapping of chromatin-associated protein complexes. J Proteomics. 2015;118:81–94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamb CA, Nühlen S, Judith D, et al. TBC1D14 regulates autophagy via the TRAPP complex and ATG9 traffic. Embo J. 2016;35:281–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojica SA, Hovis KM, Frieman MB, et al. SINC, a type III secreted protein of Chlamydia psittaci, targets the inner nuclear membrane of infected cells and uninfected neighbors. Mol Biol Cell. 2015;26:1918–1934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown RN, Sanford JA, Park JH, et al. A comprehensive subcellular proteomic survey of Salmonella grown under phagosome-mimicking versus standard laboratory conditions. Int J Proteomics. 2012;2012:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A, Kochanowski K, Vedelaar S, et al. The quantitative and condition-dependent Escherichia coli proteome. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:104–110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collado-Romero M, Aguilar C, Arce C, et al. Quantitative proteomics and bioinformatic analysis provide new insight into the dynamic response of porcine intestine to Salmonella Typhimurium. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2015;5:64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walian PJ, Allen S, Shatsky M, et al. High-throughput isolation and characterization of untagged membrane protein complexes: outer membrane complexes of Desulfovibrio vulgaris. J Proteome Res. 2012;11:5720–5735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havugimana PC, Hart GT, Nepusz T, et al. A census of human soluble protein complexes. Cell. 2012;150:1068–1081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan C, Borgeson B, Phanse S, et al. Panorama of ancient metazoan macromolecular complexes. Nature. 2015;525:339–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kodama Y, Hu C-D. Bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC): A 5-year update and future perspectives. BioTechniques. 2012;53:285–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X, Wan F, Mateo K, et al. Bacterial effector binding to ribosomal protein S3 subverts NF-κB function. PLOS Pathog. 2009;5:e1000708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulliainen AT, Pieles K, Brand CS, et al. Bacterial effector binds host cell adenylyl cyclase to potentiate Gαs-dependent cAMP production. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:9581–9586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razick S, Magklaras G, Donaldson IM. iRefIndex: A consolidated protein interaction database with provenance. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammari MG, Gresham CR, McCarthy FM, et al. HPIDB 2.0: a curated database for host–pathogen interactions. Database. 2016;2016:baw103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wattam AR, Davis JJ, Assaf R, et al. Improvements to PATRIC, the all-bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D535–D542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wattam AR, Abraham D, Dalay O, et al. PATRIC, the bacterial bioinformatics database and analysis resource. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D581–D91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmuş Tekir S, Çakır T, Ardıç E, et al. PHISTO: pathogen–host interaction search tool. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:1357–1358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snyder EE, Kampanya N, Lu J, et al. PATRIC: the VBI pathosystems resource integration center. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35:D401–D6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, et al. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:D566–D573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxson T, Mitchell DA. Targeted treatment for bacterial infections: prospects for pathogen-specific antibiotics coupled with rapid diagnostics. Tetrahedron. 2016;72:3609–3624.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer MD, Neff C, Dufford M, et al. The human-bacterial pathogen protein interaction networks of Bacillus anthracis, Francisella tularensis, and Yersinia pestis. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidhu M, van der Poorten D. The gut microbiome. Aust Fam Physician. 2017;46:206–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder R, Wisniewski PJ, Alderman BL, et al. Microbes and mental health: A review. Brain Behav Immun. 2017;S0889–S1591:30016–30018.
   Google Scholar
• Choi HW, Brooking R, Neupane S, et al. Salmonella Typhimurium impedes innate immunity with a mast cell-suppressing tyrosine phosphatase SptP. Immunity. 2013;39:1108–1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabbagh SC, Forest CG, Lepage C, et al. So similar, yet so different: uncovering distinctive features in the genomes of Salmonella enterica serovars Typhimurium and Typhi. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2010;305:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woolhouse M, Ward M, van Bunnik B, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in humans, livestock and the wider environment. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370:20140083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagarinova A, Emili A. Genome-scale genetic manipulation methods for exploring bacterial molecular biology. Mol Biosyst. 2012;8:1626–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbanus ML, Quaile AT, Stogios PJ, et al. Diverse mechanisms of metaeffector activity in an intracellular bacterial pathogen, Legionella pneumophila. Mol Syst Biol. 2016;12:893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar