References
- Cox J, Hein MY, Luber CA, et al. Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2014;13:2513–2526.
- Chen YY, Chambers MC, Li M, et al. IDPQuantify: combining precursor intensity with spectral counts for protein and peptide quantification. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:4111–4121.
- Tabb DL, Vega-Montoto L, Rudnick PA, et al. Repeatability and reproducibility in proteomic identifications by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:761–776.
- Zhang Y, Wen Z, Washburn MP, et al. Effect of dynamic exclusion duration on spectral count based quantitative proteomics. Anal Chem. 2009;81:6317–6326.
- Navarro P, Kuharev J, Gillet LC, et al. A multicenter study benchmarks software tools for label-free proteome quantification. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:1130–1136.
- Tsou CC, Avtonomov D, Larsen B, et al. DIA-umpire: comprehensive computational framework for data-independent acquisition proteomics. Nat Methods. 2015;12:258–264. 7 p following 64.
- Ting YS, Egertson JD, Bollinger JG, et al. PECAN: library-free peptide detection for data-independent acquisition tandem mass spectrometry data. Nat Meth. 2017;14:903–908.
- Smith RD, Anderson GA, Lipton MS, et al. An accurate mass tag strategy for quantitative and high-throughput proteome measurements. Proteomics. 2002;2:513–523.
- Shen X, Shen S, Li J, et al. An Ionstar experimental strategy for ms1 ion current-based quantification using ultrahigh-field Orbitrap: reproducible, in-depth, and accurate protein measurement in large cohorts. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:2445–2456.
- Sandin M, Teleman J, Malmstrom J, et al. Data processing methods and quality control strategies for label-free LC-MS protein quantification. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1844:29–41.
- Bruderer R, Bernhardt OM, Gandhi T, et al. Extending the limits of quantitative proteome profiling with data-independent acquisition and application to acetaminophen-treated three-dimensional liver microtissues. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:1400–1410.
- Chawade A, Sandin M, Teleman J, et al. Data processing has major impact on the outcome of quantitative label-free LC-MS analysis. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:676–687.
- Weisser H, Choudhary JS. Targeted feature detection for data-dependent shotgun proteomics. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:2964–2974.
- Zhang B, Kall L, Zubarev RA. DeMix-Q: Quantification-Centered Data Processing Workflow. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15:1467–1478.
- Shen X, Shen S, Li J, et al. IonStar enables high-precision, low-missing-data proteomics quantification in large biological cohorts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115:4767–4776.
- Sadygov RG, Maroto FM, Huhmer AF. ChromAlign: a two-step algorithmic procedure for time alignment of three-dimensional LC-MS chromatographic surfaces. Anal Chem. 2006;78:8207–8217.
- Filzmoser P, Maronna R, Werner M. Outlier identification in high dimensions. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2008;52:1694–1711.
- Schubert OT, Gillet LC, Collins BC, et al. Building high-quality assay libraries for targeted analysis of SWATH MS data. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:426–441.
- Moruz L, Hoopmann MR, Rosenlund M, et al. Mass fingerprinting of complex mixtures: protein inference from high-resolution peptide masses and predicted retention times. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:5730–5741.