The development and clinical applications of proteomics: an Indian perspective

References

• Cobb M. 60 years ago, Francis Crick changed the logic of biology. PLoS Biol. 2017;15:e2003243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omenn GS, Lane L, Overall CM, et al. Progress on identifying and characterizing the human proteome: 2019 metrics from the HUPO human proteome project. J Proteome Res. 2019;18:4098–4107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piovesan A, Antonaros F, Vitale L, et al. Human protein-coding genes and gene feature statistics in 2019. BMC Res Notes. 2019;12:315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebersold R, Agar JN, Amster IJ, et al. How many human proteoforms are there? Nat Chem Biol. 2018;14:206–214.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Human Isoform Proteome. The human protein altas [ Internet]. [cited 2020 June 11]. Available from: https://www.proteinatlas.org/humanproteome/tissue/isoform
   Google Scholar
• Ponomarenko EA, Poverennaya EV, Ilgisonis EV, et al. The size of the human proteome: the width and depth. Int J Anal Chem. 2016;2016:7436849.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkins MR, Sanchez JC, Gooley AA, et al. Progress with proteome projects: why all proteins expressed by a genome should be identified and how to do it. Biotechnol Genet Eng Rev. 1996;13:19–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durmaz AA, Karaca E, Demkow U, et al. Evolution of genetic techniques: past, present, and beyond. Guan X, editor. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:461524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magalhaes S, Goodfellow BJ, Nunes A. Aging and proteins: what does proteostasis have to do with age? Curr Mol Med. 2018;18:178–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaips CL, Jayaraj GG, Hartl FU. Pathways of cellular proteostasis in aging and disease. J Cell Biol. 2018;217:51–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demichev V, Messner CB, Vernardis SI, et al. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput. Nat Methods. 2020;17:41–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima Y, Watanabe E, Umeyama T, et al. Optimization of data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry for deep and highly sensitive proteomic analysis. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:5932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morsa D, Baiwir D, La Rocca R, et al. Multi-enzymatic limited digestion: the next-generation sequencing for proteomics? J Proteome Res. 2019;18:2501–2513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu D, Wang Z, Cupp-Sutton KA, et al. Deep intact proteoform characterization in human cell lysate using high-pH and low-pH reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2019;30:2502–2513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang L, George J, Wang J. Deep profiling of cellular heterogeneity by emerging single-cell proteomic technologies. Proteomics. 2019;1900226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen ON. Interpreting the protein language using proteomics. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006;7:391–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormack AL, Schieltz DM, Goode B, et al. Direct analysis and identification of proteins in mixtures by LC/MS/MS and database searching at the low-femtomole level. Anal Chem. 1997;69:767–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JR, Gilchrist A, Howell KE, et al. Proteomics of organelles and large cellular structures. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2005;6:702–714.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates JR III. Recent technical advances in proteomics. F1000Research. 2019;8:351.
   Google Scholar
• Lippolis R, Angelis MD. Proteomics and human diseases. J Proteomics Bioinf. 2016;9:1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Dorr KM, Conlon FL. Proteomic-based approaches to cardiac development and disease. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2019;48:150–157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy PJ, Atak A, Ghantasala S, et al. Proteomics research in India: an update. J Proteomics. 2015;127:7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirdeshmukh R. Indian proteomics efforts and human proteome project. J Proteomics. 2015;127:147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingde SM. Has proteomics come of age in India? J Proteomics. 2015;127:3–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priyadarshini S. India making a mark in global proteomics research. Nat India Special Issue. 2015:3–4.
   Google Scholar
• Kim MS, Pinto SM, Getnet D, et al. A draft map of the human proteome. Nature. 2014;509:575–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navani S. Manual evaluation of tissue microarrays in a high-throughput research project: the contribution of Indian surgical pathology to the Human Protein Atlas (HPA) project. Proteomics. 2016;16:1266–1270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chromosome-Centric Human Proteome Project (C-HPP) [ Internet]. [cited 2020 June 6]. Available from: https://www.hupo.org/C-HPP
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee S, Bandyopadhyay A. Proteomics in India: the clinical aspect. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crutchfield CA, Thomas SN, Sokoll LJ, et al. Advances in mass spectrometry-based clinical biomarker discovery. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S. Empowering clinical diagnostics with mass spectrometry. ACS Omega. 2020;5:2041–2048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Koshy NR, Reddy PJ, et al. Virtual Labs in proteomics: new e-learning tools. J Proteomics. 2012;75:2515–2525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Koshy NR, Diwakar S, et al. Sakshat labs: India’s virtual proteomics initiative. PLoS Biol. 2012;10:e1001353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Cancer Proteogenome Consortium | Office of Cancer Clinical Proteomics Research [ Internet]. [cited 2020 June 12]. Available from: https://proteomics.cancer.gov/programs/international-cancer-proteogenome-consortium
   Google Scholar
• Bringans SD, Ito J, Stoll T, et al. Comprehensive mass spectrometry based biomarker discovery and validation platform as applied to diabetic kidney disease. EuPA Open Proteom. 2017;14:1–10.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Karkra K, Tetala KKR, Vijayalakshmi MA. A structure based plasma protein pre-fractionation using conjoint immobilized metal/chelate affinity (IMA) system. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2017;1052:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savane TS, Kumar S, Janakiraman VN, et al. Molecular insight in the purification of immunoglobulin by pseudobiospecific ligand l-histidine and histidyl moieties in histidine ligand affinity chromatography (HLAC) by molecular docking. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2016;1021:129–136.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasanna RR, Kamalanathan AS, Vijayalakshmi MA. Development of L-histidine immobilized CIM(®) monolithic disks for purification of immunoglobulin G. J Mol Recognit. 2015;28:129–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasanna RR, Sidhik S, Kamalanathan AS, et al. Affinity selection of histidine-containing peptides using metal chelate methacrylate monolithic disk for targeted LC-MS/MS approach in high-throughput proteomics. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2014;955–956:42–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan JX, Devenish AT, Wait R, et al. Fluorescence two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and mass spectrometry based proteomic analysis of Escherichia coli. Proteomics. 2002;2:1682–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutta M, Subramani E, Taunk K, et al. Investigation of serum proteome alterations in human endometriosis. J Proteomics. 2015;114:182–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollapalli K, Ray S, Srivastava R, et al. Investigation of serum proteome alterations in human glioblastoma multiforme. Proteomics. 2012;12:2378–2390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopalakrishnan V, Purushothaman P, Bhaskar A. Proteomic analysis of plasma proteins in diabetic retinopathy patients by two dimensional electrophoresis and MALDI-Tof-MS. J Diabetes Complications. 2015;29:928–936.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallikarjuna K, Sundaram CS, Sharma Y, et al. Comparative proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in primary retinoblastoma tumors. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010;4:449–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rukmangadachar LA, Kataria J, Hariprasad G, et al. Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) analysis of sera from visceral leishmaniasis patients. Clin Proteomics. 2011;8:4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saijyothi AV, Angayarkanni N, Syama C, et al. Two dimensional electrophoretic analysis of human tears: collection method in dry eye syndrome. Electrophoresis. 2010;31:3420–3427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I, et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2002;1:376–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dayon L, Hainard A, Licker V, et al. Relative quantification of proteins in human cerebrospinal fluids by MS/MS using 6-plex isobaric tags. Anal Chem. 2008;80:2921–2931.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN, et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2004;3:1154–1169.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chanukuppa V, Paul D, Taunk K, et al. XPO1 is a critical player for bortezomib resistance in multiple myeloma: A quantitative proteomic approach. J Proteomics. 2019;209:103504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam P, Nair SC, Gupta MK, et al. Proteins with altered levels in plasma from glioblastoma patients as revealed by iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis. PloS One. 2012;7:e46153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollapalli K, Ghantasala S, Atak A, et al. Tissue proteome analysis of different grades of human gliomas provides major cues for glioma pathogenesis. OMICS. 2017;21:275–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul D, Chanukuppa V, Reddy PJ, et al. Global proteomic profiling identifies etoposide chemoresistance markers in non-small cell lung carcinoma. J Proteomics. 2016;138:95–105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma S, Ray S, Moiyadi A, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of meningiomas for the identification of surrogate protein markers. Sci Rep. 2014;4:7140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai T, Yang Y, Ng SK. Advances in mammalian cell line development technologies for recombinant protein production. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2013;6:579–603.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ali SA, Kaur G, Kaushik JK, et al. Examination of pathways involved in leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)-induced cell growth arrest using label-free proteomics approach. J Proteomics. 2017;168:37–52.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mary S, Kulkarni MJ, Malakar D, et al. Placental proteomics provides insights into pathophysiology of pre-eclampsia and predicts possible markers in plasma. J Proteome Res. 2017;16:1050–1060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee S, Jagadeeshaprasad MG, Banerjee T, et al. Proteomic analysis of human plasma in chronic rheumatic mitral stenosis reveals proteins involved in the complement and coagulation cascade. Clin Proteomics. 2014;11:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi T, Song E, Nie S, et al. Advances in targeted proteomics and applications to biomedical research. Proteomics. 2016;16:2160–2182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillen L, Cools W, Vereyken L, et al. Comparison of triple quadrupole and high-resolution TOF-MS for quantification of peptides. Bioanalysis. 2012;4:565–579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi T, Su D, Liu T, et al. Advancing the sensitivity of selected reaction monitoring-based targeted quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2012;12:1074–1092.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson AC, Russell JD, Bailey DJ, et al. Parallel reaction monitoring for high resolution and high mass accuracy quantitative, targeted proteomics. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:1475–1488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillet LC, Navarro P, Tate S, et al. Targeted data extraction of the MS/MS spectra generated by data-independent acquisition: a new concept for consistent and accurate proteome analysis. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:O111 016717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Y, Huttenhain R, Collins B, et al. Mass spectrometric protein maps for biomarker discovery and clinical research. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2013;13:811–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell LA, Heeren RM. Imaging mass spectrometry. Mass Spectrom Rev. 2007;26:606–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walch A, Rauser S, Deininger SO, et al. MALDI imaging mass spectrometry for direct tissue analysis: a new frontier for molecular histology. Histochem Cell Biol. 2008;130:421–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delehanty JB, Ligler FS. Method for printing functional protein microarrays. BioTechniques. 2003;34:380–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Bilgin M, Bangham R, et al. Global analysis of protein activities using proteome chips. Science. 2001;293:2101–2105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutandy FX, Qian J, Chen CS, et al. Overview of protein microarrays. Curr Protoc Protein Sci. 2013;72:27.1.1–27.1.16. Chapter 27:Unit 27 1.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Zhu H. Protein array-based approaches for biomarker discovery in cancer. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf. 2017;15:73–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawar H, Kashyap MK, Sahasrabuddhe NA, et al. Quantitative tissue proteomics of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma for novel biomarker discovery. Cancer Biol Ther. 2011;12:510–522.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahasrabuddhe NA, Barbhuiya MA, Bhunia S, et al. Identification of prosaposin and transgelin as potential biomarkers for gallbladder cancer using quantitative proteomics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2014;446:863–869.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar D, Bansal G, Narang A, et al. Integrating transcriptome and proteome profiling: strategies and applications. Proteomics. 2016;16:2533–2544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar D, Yadav AK, Dash D. Choosing an optimal database for protein identification from tandem mass spectrometry data. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1549:17–29. New York, NY: Springer.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kumar D, Dash D. Proteogenomic tools and approaches to explore protein coding landscapes of eukaryotic genomes. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;926:1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar D, Yadav AK, Jia X, et al. Integrated transcriptomic-proteomic analysis using a proteogenomic workflow refines rat genome annotation. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2016;15:329–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathivanan S, Ahmed M, Ahn NG, et al. Human proteinpedia enables sharing of human protein data. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26:164–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandasamy K, Mohan SS, Raju R, et al. NetPath: a public resource of curated signal transduction pathways. Genome Biol. 2010;11:R3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal SM, Raghav D, Singh H, et al. CCDB: a curated database of genes involved in cervix cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:D975–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi A, Tuknait A, Anand P, et al. CancerPPD: a database of anticancer peptides and proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D837–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam A, Chaudhary K, Singh S, et al. Hemolytik: a database of experimentally determined hemolytic and non-hemolytic peptides. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42:D444–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choubey J, Choudhari JK, Patel A, et al. Respiratory cancer database: an open access database of respiratory cancer gene and miRNA. J Cancer Res Ther. 2017;13:487–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivakumaran S, Hariharaputran S, Mishra J, et al. The database of quantitative cellular signaling: management and analysis of chemical kinetic models of signaling networks. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:408–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balaji S, Sujatha S, Kumar SSC, et al. PALI—a database of phylogeny and alignment of homologous protein structures. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:61–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das AA, Sharma OP, Kumar MS, et al. PepBind: a comprehensive database and computational tool for analysis of protein–peptide interactions. Genomics Proteomics Bioinf. 2013;11:241–246.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gowri VS, Krishnadev O, Swamy CS, et al. MulPSSM: a database of multiple position-specific scoring matrices of protein domain families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D243–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadhav A, Ezhilarasan V, Sharma OP, et al. Clostridium-DTDB: a comprehensive database for potential drug targets of Clostridium difficile. Comput Biol Med. 2013;43:362–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnadev O, Rekha N, Pandit SB, et al. PRODOC: a resource for the comparison of tethered protein domain architectures with in-built information on remotely related domain families. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W126–W129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupa A, Abhinandan KR, Srinivasan N. KinG: a database of protein kinases in genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:D153–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudgal R, Sandhya S, Kumar G, et al. NrichD database: sequence databases enriched with computationally designed protein-like sequences aid in remote homology detection. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:D300–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma O, Das A, Krishna R, et al. Structural epitope database (SEDB): a web-based database for the epitope, and its intermolecular interaction along with the tertiary structure information. J Proteomics Bioinf. 2012;5:084–089.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma OP, Jadhav A, Hussain A, et al. VPDB: viral protein structural database. Bioinformation. 2011;6:324.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadewal NS, Zingde SM. Database and interaction network of genes involved in oral cancer: version II. Bioinformation. 2011;6:169–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gadewal NS, Zingde SM. Database and interactome map of genes involved in oral cancer. OJB. 2007;8:41–44.
   Google Scholar
• Bhartiya D, Kumar A, Singh H, et al. OrCanome: a comprehensive resource for oral cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17:1333–1336.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• The India State-Level Disease Burden Initiative | Public Health Foundation of India [ Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 June 6]. Available from: https://phfi.org/the-work/research/the-india-state-level-disease-burden-initiative/
   Google Scholar
• Lifestyle diseases in India [ Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 June 6]. Available from: https://pib.gov.in/Pressreleaseshare.aspx?PRID=1540840
   Google Scholar
• Gahoi N, Malhotra D, Moiyadi A, et al. Multi-pronged proteomic analysis to study the glioma pathobiology using cerebrospinal fluid samples. Proteomics – Clin Appl. 2018;12:1700056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollapalli K, Ghantasala S, Kumar S, et al. Subventricular zone involvement in glioblastoma - a proteomic evaluation and clinicoradiological correlation. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain R, Atak A, Yeola A, et al. Proteomic level changes associated with S3I201 treated U87 glioma cells. J Proteomics. 2017;150:341–350.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed P, Gupta S, Choudhary S, et al. Autoantibody profiling of glioma serum samples to identify biomarkers using human proteome arrays. Sci Rep. 2015;5:13895.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain R, Kulkarni P, Dhali S, et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of global effect of LLL12 on U87 cell’s proteome: an insight into the molecular mechanism of LLL12. J Proteomics. 2015;113:127–142.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumbalkar VC, Subhashini C, Dhople VM, et al. Differential protein expression in human gliomas and molecular insights. Proteomics. 2005;5:1167–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polisetty RV, Gautam P, Sharma R, et al. LC-MS/MS analysis of differentially expressed glioblastoma membrane proteome reveals altered calcium signaling and other protein groups of regulatory functions. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012;11:M111.013565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polisetty RV, Gautam P, Gupta MK, et al. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins and their interactors are a major class of deregulated proteins in anaplastic astrocytoma: a grade III malignant glioma. J Proteome Res. 2013;12:3128–3138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jayaram S, Gupta MK, Polisetty RV, et al. Towards developing biomarkers for glioblastoma multiforme: a proteomics view. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2014;11:621–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta MK, Polisetty RV, Sharma R, et al. Altered transcriptional regulatory proteins in glioblastoma and YBX1 as a potential regulator of tumor invasion. Sci Rep. 2019;9:10986.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijaguna MB, Patil V, Urbach S, et al. Glioblastoma-derived macrophage colony-stimulating factor (MCSF) induces microglial release of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP1) to promote angiogenesis. J Biol Chem. 2015;290:23401–23415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar DM, Patil V, Ramachandran B, et al. Temozolomide-modulated glioma proteome: role of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-4 (IRAK4) in chemosensitivity. Proteomics. 2013;13:2113–2124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar DM, Thota B, Shinde SV, et al. Proteomic identification of haptoglobin α2 as a glioblastoma serum biomarker: implications in cancer cell migration and tumor growth. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:5557–5567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somasundaram K, Nijaguna MB, Kumar DM. Serum proteomics of glioma: methods and applications. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2009;9:695–707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora A, Patil V, Kundu P, et al. Serum biomarkers identification by iTRAQ and verification by MRM: S100A8/S100A9 levels predict tumor-stroma involvement and prognosis in glioblastoma. Sci Rep. 2019;9:2749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajbhiye A, Dabhi R, Taunk K, et al. Multipronged quantitative proteomics reveals serum proteome alterations in breast cancer intrinsic subtypes. J Proteomics. 2017;163:1–13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pendharkar N, Gajbhiye A, Taunk K, et al. Quantitative tissue proteomic investigation of invasive ductal carcinoma of breast with luminal B HER2 positive and HER2 enriched subtypes towards potential diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers. J Proteomics. 2016;132:112–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gajbhiye A, Dabhi R, Taunk K, et al. Urinary proteome alterations in HER2 enriched breast cancer revealed by multipronged quantitative proteomics. Proteomics. 2016;16:2403–2418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korwar AM, Bhonsle HS, Ghole VS, et al. Proteomic profiling and interactome analysis of ER-positive/HER2/neu negative invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: towards proteomics biomarkers. OMICS. 2013;17:27–40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giri K, Mehta A, Ambatipudi K. In search of the altering salivary proteome in metastatic breast and ovarian cancers. FASEB Bioadv. 2019;1:191–207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solanki HS, Raja R, Zhavoronkov A, et al. Targeting focal adhesion kinase overcomes erlotinib resistance in smoke induced lung cancer by altering phosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor. Oncoscience. 2018;5:21–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babu N, Advani J, Solanki HS, et al. miRNA and proteomic dysregulation in non-small cell lung cancer in response to cigarette smoke. MicroRNA. 2018;7:38–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solanki HS, Advani J, Khan AA, et al. Chronic cigarette smoke mediated global changes in lung mucoepidermoid cells: a phosphoproteomic analysis. OMICS. 2017;21:474–487.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raja R, Sahasrabuddhe NA, Radhakrishnan A, et al. Chronic exposure to cigarette smoke leads to activation of p21 (RAC1)-activated kinase 6 (PAK6) in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:61229–61245.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sathe G, Pinto SM, Syed N, et al. Phosphotyrosine profiling of curcumin-induced signaling. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:13.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Govekar RB, D’Cruz AK, Alok Pathak K, et al. Proteomic profiling of cancer of the gingivo-buccal complex: identification of new differentially expressed markers. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2009;3:1451–1462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulzele A, Malgundkar SA, Govekar RB, et al. Proteomic profile of keratins in cancer of the gingivo buccal complex: consolidating insights for clinical applications. J Proteomics. 2013;91:242–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla S, Govekar RB, Sirdeshmukh R, et al. Tumor antigens eliciting autoantibody response in cancer of gingivo-buccal complex. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2007;1:1592–1604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla S, Pranay A, D’Cruz AK, et al. Immunoproteomics reveals that cancer of the tongue and the gingivobuccal complex exhibit differential autoantibody response. Cancer Biomark. 2009;5:127–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pranay A, Shukla S, Kannan S, et al. Prognostic utility of autoantibodies to α-enolase and Hsp70 for cancer of the gingivo-buccal complex using immunoproteomics. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2013;7:392–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivadasan P, Gupta MK, Sathe G, et al. Salivary proteins from dysplastic leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma and their potential for early detection. J Proteomics. 2020;212:103574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ananthi S, Lakshmi CNP, Atmika P, et al. Global quantitative proteomics reveal deregulation of cytoskeletal and apoptotic signalling proteins in oral tongue squamous cell carcinoma. Sci Rep. 2018;8:1567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dey KK, Pal I, Bharti R, et al. Identification of RAB2A and PRDX1 as the potential biomarkers for oral squamous cell carcinoma using mass spectrometry-based comparative proteomic approach. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:9829–9837.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chanukuppa V, Paul D, Taunk K, et al. Proteomics and functional study reveal marginal zone B and B1 cell specific protein as a candidate marker of multiple myeloma. Int J Oncol. 2020;57:325–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra RS, Bapat SA. Expression proteomics predicts loss of RXR-γ during progression of epithelial ovarian cancer. Plos One. 2013;8:e70398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra RS, Bapat SA. Proteomics to predict loss of RXR-γ during progression of epithelial ovarian cancer. In: Ray SK, editor. Retinoid and rexinoid signaling: methods and protocols [ Internet]. New York (NY): Springer; 2019 [cited 2020 Mar 26]. p. 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Kaul D, Kaur R, Baba I, et al. Functional proteomics of receptor-Ck in the developmental stages of human atherosclerotic arterial wall. Indian Heart J. 2003;55:252–255.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Basak T, Tanwar VS, Bhardwaj G, et al. Plasma proteomic analysis of stable coronary artery disease indicates impairment of reverse cholesterol pathway. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28042.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghatge M, Sharma A, Maity S, et al. Danger-recognizing proteins, β-defensin-128 and histatin-3, as potential biomarkers of recurrent coronary events. Int J Mol Med. 2017;40:531–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury D, Tangutur AD, Khatua TN, et al. A proteomic view of isoproterenol induced cardiac hypertrophy: prohibitin identified as a potential biomarker in rats. J Transl Med. 2013;11:130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta K, Basak T, Varshney S, et al. Quantitative proteomic changes during post myocardial infarction remodeling reveals altered cardiac metabolism and desmin aggregation in the infarct region. J Proteomics. 2017;152:283–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra A, Basak T, Ahmad S, et al. Comparative proteome profiling during cardiac hypertrophy and myocardial infarction reveals altered glucose oxidation by differential activation of pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit β. J Mol Biol. 2015;427:2104–2120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banarjee R, Sharma A, Bai S, et al. Proteomic study of endothelial dysfunction induced by AGEs and its possible role in diabetic cardiovascular complications. J Proteomics. 2018;187:69–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesavan SK, Bhat S, Golegaonkar SB, et al. Proteome wide reduction in AGE modification in streptozotocin induced diabetic mice by hydralazine mediated transglycation. Sci Rep. 2013;3:1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korwar AM, Vannuruswamy G, Jagadeeshaprasad MG, et al. Development of diagnostic fragment ion library for glycated peptides of human serum albumin: targeted quantification in prediabetic, diabetic, and microalbuminuria plasma by parallel reaction monitoring, SWATH, and MSE. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2015;14:2150–2159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagadeeshaprasad MG, Batkulwar KB, Meshram NN, et al. Targeted quantification of N-1-(carboxymethyl) valine and N-1-(carboxyethyl) valine peptides of β-hemoglobin for better diagnostics in diabetes. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rathore R, Sonwane BP, Jagadeeshaprasad MG, et al. Glycation of glucose sensitive lysine residues K36, K438 and K549 of albumin is associated with prediabetes. J Proteomics. 2019;208:103481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagadeeshaprasad MG, Venkatasubramani V, Unnikrishnan AG, et al. Albumin abundance and its glycation status determine hemoglobin glycation. ACS Omega. 2018;3:12999–13008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthik D, Vijayakumar R, Pazhanichamy K, et al. A proteomics approach to identify the differential protein level in cardiac muscle of diabetic rat. Acta Biochim Pol. 2014;61:285–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marikanty RK, Gupta MK, Cherukuvada SVB, et al. Identification of urinary proteins potentially associated with diabetic kidney disease. Indian J Nephrol. 2016;26:434–445.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhattacharjee M, Balakrishnan L, Renuse S, et al. Synovial fluid proteome in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balakrishnan L, Bhattacharjee M, Ahmad S, et al. Differential proteomic analysis of synovial fluid from rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis patients. Clin Proteomics. 2014;11:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharjee M, Sharma R, Goel R, et al. A multilectin affinity approach for comparative glycoprotein profiling of rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthropathy. Clin Proteomics. 2013;10:11.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroha A, Biswas S, Chatterjee BP, et al. Altered glycosylation and expression of plasma alpha-1-acid glycoprotein and haptoglobin in rheumatoid arthritis. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2011;879:1839–1843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saroha A, Kumar S, Chatterjee BP, et al. Jacalin bound plasma O-glycoproteome and reduced sialylation of alpha 2-HS glycoprotein (A2HSG) in rheumatoid arthritis patients. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e46374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai P, Kota V, Deendayal M, et al. Differential proteome profiling of eutopic endometrium from women with endometriosis to understand etiology of endometriosis. J Proteome Res. 2010;9:4407–4419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh D, Nagpal S, Bhat MA, et al. Gel-free proteomics reveals neoplastic potential in endometrium of infertile patients with stage IV ovarian endometriosis. J Reprod Health Med. 2015;2:83–95.
   Google Scholar
• Rashid N, Nigam A, Jain SK, et al. Proteomic sift through serum and endometrium profiles unraveled signature proteins associated with subdued fertility and dampened endometrial receptivity in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cell Tissue Res. 2020. DOI:10.1007/s00441-020-03171-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patil K, Yelamanchi S, Kumar M, et al. Quantitative mass spectrometric analysis to unravel glycoproteomic signature of follicular fluid in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0214742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambekar AS, Kelkar DS, Pinto SM, et al. Proteomics of follicular fluid from women with polycystic ovary syndrome suggests molecular defects in follicular development. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:744–753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mary S, Kulkarni MJ, Mehendale SS, et al. Differential accumulation of vimentin fragments in preeclamptic placenta. Cytoskeleton (Hoboken). 2017;74:420–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mary S, Kulkarni MJ, Mehendale SS, et al. Tubulointerstitial nephritis antigen-like 1 protein is downregulated in the placenta of pre-eclamptic women. Clin Proteomics. 2017;14:8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahar T, Nigam A, Anjum S, et al. Interactome Analysis of the differentially expressed proteins in uterine leiomyoma. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19:1293–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawat P, Bathla S, Baithalu R, et al. Identification of potential protein biomarkers for early detection of pregnancy in cow urine using 2D DIGE and label free quantitation. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty G, Jena SR, Nayak J, et al. Quantitative proteomics decodes clusterin as a critical regulator of paternal factors responsible for impaired compensatory metabolic reprogramming in recurrent pregnancy loss. Andrologia. 2020;52:e13498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomar AK, Sooch BS, Raj I, et al. Isolation and identification of concanavalin A binding glycoproteins from human seminal plasma: a step towards identification of male infertility marker proteins. Dis Markers. 2011;31:379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomar AK, Sooch BS, Singh S, et al. Differential proteomics of human seminal plasma: A potential target for searching male infertility marker proteins. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2012;6:147–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav VK, Kumar V, Chhikara N, et al. Purification and characterization of a native zinc-binding high molecular weight multiprotein complex from human seminal plasma. J Sep Sci. 2011;34:1076–1083.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kant K, Tomar AK, Singh S, et al. Ageing associated proteomic variations in seminal plasma of Indian men. J Proteins Proteomics. 2019;10:83–89.
   Google Scholar
• Mohanty G, Jena SR, Nayak J, et al. Proteomic signatures in spermatozoa reveal the role of paternal factors in recurrent pregnancy loss. World J Mens Health. 2020;38:103–114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sinha A, Singh V, Singh S, et al. Proteomic analyses reveal lower expression of TEX40 and ATP6V0A2 proteins related to calcium ion entry and acrosomal acidification in asthenozoospermic males. Life Sci. 2019;218:81–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh M, Mukherjee P, Narayanasamy K, et al. Proteome analysis of plasmodium falciparum extracellular secretory antigens at asexual blood stages reveals a cohort of proteins with possible roles in immune modulation and signaling. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2009;8:2102–2118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acharya P, Pallavi R, Chandran S, et al. Clinical proteomics of the neglected human malarial parasite plasmodium vivax. Plos One. 2011;6:e26623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh A, Lahiri A, Reddy PJ, et al. Identification of highly expressed plasmodium vivax proteins from clinical isolates using proteomics. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2018;12:e1700046.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh A, Aggarwal S, Kumar S, et al. Comprehensive proteomics investigation of P. vivax-infected human plasma and parasite isolates. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranjan R, Chugh M, Kumar S, et al. Proteome analysis reveals a large merozoite surface protein-1 associated complex on the Plasmodium falciparum merozoite surface. J Proteome Res. 2011;10:680–691.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Renu D, Srivastava R, et al. Proteomic investigation of falciparum and vivax malaria for identification of surrogate protein markers. Plos One. 2012;7:e41751.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Patel SK, Venkatesh A, et al. Clinicopathological analysis and multipronged quantitative proteomics reveal oxidative stress and cytoskeletal proteins as possible markers for severe vivax malaria. Sci Rep. 2016;6:1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi G, Tyagi S, Kumar V, et al. A proteogenomic analysis of haptoglobin in malaria. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2018;12:e1700077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Patel SK, Venkatesh A, et al. Quantitative proteomics analysis of plasmodium vivax induced alterations in human serum during the acute and convalescent phases of infection. Sci Rep. 2017;7:4400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadhav M, Nayak M, Kumar S, et al. Clinical proteomics and cytokine profiling for dengue fever disease severity biomarkers. OMICS. 2017;21:665–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray S, Srivastava R, Tripathi K, et al. Serum proteome changes in dengue virus-infected patients from a dengue-endemic area of India: towards new molecular targets? OMICS. 2012;16:527–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anbarasu D, Raja CP, Raja A. Multiplex analysis of cytokines/chemokines as biomarkers that differentiate healthy contacts from tuberculosis patients in high endemic settings. Cytokine. 2013;61:747–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar B, Sharma D, Sharma P, et al. Proteomic analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates resistant to kanamycin and amikacin. J Proteomics. 2013;94:68–77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyagi P, Pal VK, Agrawal R, et al. Mycobacterium tuberculosis reactivates HIV-1 via exosome-mediated resetting of cellular redox potential and bioenergetics. mBio. 2020;11(2):e03293–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arya R, Dabral D, Faruquee HM, et al. Serum small extracellular vesicles proteome of tuberculosis patients demonstrated deregulated immune response. Proteomics – Clin Appl. 2020;14:1900062.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishwal SC, Das MK, Badireddy VK, et al. Sputum proteomics reveals a shift in vitamin D-binding protein and antimicrobial protein axis in tuberculosis patients. Sci Rep. 2019;9:1036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu J, Verma A, Verma I, et al. Proteomic changes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv under hyperglycemic conditions favour its growth through altered expression of Tgs3(Rv3234c) and supportive proteins (Rv0547c, AcrA1 and Mpa). Tuberculosis. 2019;115:154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganji R, Dhali S, Rizvi A, et al. Understanding HIV-Mycobacteria synergism through comparative proteomics of intra-phagosomal mycobacteria during mono- and HIV co-infection. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganji R, Dhali S, Rizvi A, et al. Proteomics approach to understand reduced clearance of mycobacteria and high viral titers during HIV-mycobacteria co-infection. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18:355–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal K, Dalal B, Bhatia S, et al. Analysis of serum haptoglobin using glycoproteomics and lectin immunoassay in liver diseases in hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Chim Acta. 2019;495:309–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalal K, Khorate P, Dalal B, et al. Differentially expressed serum host proteins in hepatitis B and C viral infections. Virusdisease. 2018;29:468–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gouthamchandra K, Kumar A, Shwetha S, et al. Serum proteomics of hepatitis C virus infection reveals retinol-binding protein 4 as a novel regulator. J Gen Virol. 2014;95:1654–1667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja S, Sen S, Gupta VK, et al. Plasma and urine biomarkers in acute viral hepatitis E. Proteome Sci. 2009;7:39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taneja S, Ahmad I, Sen S, et al. Plasma peptidome profiling of acute hepatitis E patients by MALDI-TOF/TOF. Proteome Sci. 2011;9:5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Singh S, Ahirwar SK, et al. Proteomics-based identification of plasma proteins and their association with the host-pathogen interaction in chronic typhoid carriers. Int J Infect Dis. 2014;19:59–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg G, Ali V, Singh K, et al. Quantitative secretome analysis unravels new secreted proteins in amphotericin B resistant Leishmania donovani. J Proteomics. 2019;207:103464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejazi SA, Bhattacharyya A, Choudhury ST, et al. Immunoproteomic identification and characterization of Leishmania membrane proteins as non-invasive diagnostic candidates for clinical visceral leishmaniasis. Sci Rep. 2018;8:12110.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh N, Goel R, Jain E. Differential metabolic pathway analysis of the proteomes of Leishmania donovani and Leptomonas seymouri. Proteomics – Clin Appl. 2018;12:1600087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamdhade MD, Pawar H, Chavan S, et al. Comprehensive proteomics analysis of glycosomes from Leishmania donovani. OMICS. 2015;19:157–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh AK, Pandey RK, Siqueira-Neto JL, et al. Proteomic-based approach to gain insight into reprogramming of THP-1 cells exposed to Leishmania donovani over an early temporal window. Infect Immun. 2015;83:1853–1868.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar A, Misra P, Sisodia B, et al. Proteomic analyses of membrane enriched proteins of Leishmania donovani Indian clinical isolate by mass spectrometry. Parasitol Int. 2015;64:36–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das R, Mitra G, Mathew B, et al. Mass spectrometry-based diagnosis of hemoglobinopathies: a potential tool for the screening of genetic disorder. Biochem Genet. 2016;54:816–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar S, Banerjee D, Chakrabarti A. Platelet proteomics in thalassemia: factors responsible for hypercoagulation. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2016;10:239–247.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya D, Saha S, Basu S, et al. Differential regulation of redox proteins and chaperones in HbEβ-thalassemia erythrocyte proteome. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2010;4:480–488.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmakar S, Saha S, Banerjee D, et al. Differential proteomics study of platelets in asymptomatic constitutional macrothrombocytopenia: altered levels of cytoskeletal proteins. Eur J Haematol. 2015;94:43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu A, Saha S, Karmakar S, et al. 2D DIGE based proteomics study of erythrocyte cytosol in sickle cell disease: altered proteostasis and oxidative stress. Proteomics. 2013;13:3233–3242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saha S, Ramanathan R, Basu A, et al. Elevated levels of redox regulators, membrane-bound globin chains, and cytoskeletal protein fragments in hereditary spherocytosis erythrocyte proteome. Eur J Haematol. 2011;87:259–266.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy KR, Goel R, Subbannayya Y, et al. Proteomic analysis of human vitreous humor. Clin Proteomics. 2014;11:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danda R, Ganapathy K, Sathe G, et al. Membrane proteome of invasive retinoblastoma: differential proteins and biomarkers. Proteomics Clin Appl. 2018;12:e1700101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danda R, Ganapathy K, Sathe G, et al. Proteomic profiling of retinoblastoma by high resolution mass spectrometry. Clin Proteomics. 2016;13:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naru J, Aggarwal R, Singh U, et al. Proteomic analysis of differentially expressed proteins in vitreous humor of patients with retinoblastoma using iTRAQ-coupled ESI-MS/MS approach. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:13915–13926.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shahulhameed S, Vishwakarma S, Chhablani J, et al. A systematic investigation on complement pathway activation in diabetic retinopathy. Front Immunol [ Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Mar 19];11. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.00154/full
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthiban N, Sampath NL, JeyaMaheshwari J, et al. Quantitative profiling of tear proteome reveals down regulation of zinc alpha-2 glycoprotein in Aspergillus flavus keratitis patients. Exp Eye Res. 2019;186:107700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikhalashree S, George R, Shantha B, et al. Detection of proteins associated with extracellular matrix regulation in the aqueous humour of patients with primary glaucoma. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44:1018–1025.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basu K, Maurya N, Kaur J, et al. Possible role of differentially expressing novel protein markers (Ligatin and fibulin-7) in human aqueous humor and trabecular meshwork tissue in glaucoma progression. Cell Biol Int. 2019;43:820–834.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goel R, Murthy KR, Srikanth SM, et al. Characterizing the normal proteome of human ciliary body. Clin Proteomics. 2013;10:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur I, Kaur J, Sooraj K, et al. Comparative evaluation of the aqueous humor proteome of primary angle closure and primary open angle glaucomas and age-related cataract eyes. Int Ophthalmol. 2019;39:69–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murthy KR, Rajagopalan P, Pinto SM, et al. Proteomics of human aqueous humor. OMICS. 2015;19:283–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karthikkeyan G, Subbannayya Y, Najar MA, et al. Human optic nerve: an enhanced proteomic expression profile. OMICS. 2018;22:642–652.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srivastava SK. Adoption of electronic health records: a roadmap for India. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22:261–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturvedi S, Srinivas KR, Muthuswamy V. Biobanking and privacy in India. J Law Med Ethics. 2016;44:45–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yadav BK, Bihari C. Biobanking in India and its importance in cancer research. Edorium J Cancer. 2017;3:10–12.
   Google Scholar