Catching liars: training mental health and legal professionals to detect high-stakes lies

References

• Aamodt, M., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar?: A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. The Forensic Examiner, 15, 6–11. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
   Google Scholar
• Blair , J. , Levine , T. and Shaw , A. 2010 . Content in context improves deception detection accuracy . Human Communication Research , 36 : 423 – 442 . doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2010.01382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, C., & Uysal, A. (2007). On lie detection ‘Wizards’. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 109–115. doi: 10.1007/s10979-006-9016-1
   Google Scholar
• Bond , C. and DePaulo , B. 2006 . Accuracy of deception judgments . Personality and Social Psychology Review , 10 : 214 – 234 . doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond , C. and DePaulo , B. 2008 . Individual differences in judging deception: Accuracy and bias . Psychological Bulletin , 134 : 477 – 492 . doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond , G.D. 2008 . Deception detection expertise . Law And Human Behavior , 32 : 339 – 351 . doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9110-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bull, R. (2004). Training to detect deception from behavioural cues: Attempts and problems. The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 251–268). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490071.011
   Google Scholar
• Corder , G. and Foreman , D. 2009 . Nonparametric statistics for non-statisticians: A step-by-step approach , New York , NY : John Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B., & Kirkendol, S. (1989). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception. Credibility assessment (pp. 51–70). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• DePaulo , B. , Lanier , K. and Davis , T. 1983 . Detecting the deceit of the motivated liar . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 45 : 1096 – 1103 . doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.45.5.1096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo , B. , Lindsay , J. , Malone , B. , Muhlenbruck , L. , Charlton , K. and Cooper , H. 2003 . Cues to deception . Psychological Bulletin , 129 : 74 – 118 . doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• deTurck, M., Roman, L., & Feeley, T. (1997). Vocal and Visual Cue Training in Behavioral Lie Detection. Communication Research Reports, 14, 249–259. Retrieved from Communication & Mass Media Complete database.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman , P. and O’Sullivan , M. 1991 . Who can catch a liar? . American Psychologist , 46 : 913 – 920 . doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman , P. , O’Sullivan , M. and Frank , M. 1999 . A few can catch a liar . Psychological Science , 10 : 263 – 266 . doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etcoff , N.L. , Ekman , P. , Magee , J.J. and Frank , M.G. 2000 . Lie detection and language comprehension . Nature , 405 doi: 10.1038/35012129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M., & Feeley, T. (2003). To catch a liar: Challenges for research in lie detection training. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 31, 58. Retrieved from Communication & Mass Media Complete database.
   Google Scholar
• Gustrafson , L. and Orne , M. 1965 . The effects of verbal responses on the laboratory detection of deception . Psychophysiology , 2 : 10 – 13 . doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1965.tb02629.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartwig , M. , Granhag , P. , Strömwall , L. and Vrij , A. 2004 . Police officers’ lie detection accuracy: Interrogating freely versus observing video . Police Quarterly , 7 : 429 – 456 . doi: 10.1177/1098611104264748
   Google Scholar
• Kassin, S.M. (2006). A critical appraisal of modern police interrogations. In T. Williamson (Ed.), Investigative interviewing: Rights, research, regulation (pp. 207–228). Devon: Willan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kassin , S. and Fong , C. 1999 . ‘I’m innocent!’: Effects of training on judgments of truth and deception in the interrogation room . Law and Human Behavior , 23 : 499 – 516 . doi: 10.1023/A:1022330011811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detect deceptive eyewitness statements: Does it work? Social Behaviour, 2, 1–17. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
   Google Scholar
• Leach , A. , Lindsay , R.L. , Koehler , R. , Beaudry , J.L. , Bala , N.C. , Lee , K. and Talwar , V. 2009 . The reliability of lie detection performance . Law And Human Behavior , 33 ( 1 ) : 96 – 109 . doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9137-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann , S. , Vrij , A. and Bull , R. 2002 . Suspects, lies, and videotape: An analysis of authentic high-stake liars . Law and Human Behavior , 26 : 365 – 376 . doi: 10.1023/A:1015332606792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masip, J., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2009). Heuristic versus systematic processing of information in detecting deception: Questioning the truth bias. Psychological Reports, 105, 11–36. Retrieved from PsycINFO database.
   Google Scholar
• Meissner , C. and Kassin , S. 2002 . ‘He’s guilty!’: Investigator bias in judgments of truth and deception . Law and Human Behavior , 26 : 469 – 480 . doi: 10.1023/A:1020278620751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan , M. 2008 . Home runs and humbugs: Comment on Bond and DePaulo (2008) . Psychological Bulletin , 134 : 493 – 497 . doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.493
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan , M. , Frank , M. , Hurley , C. and Tiwana , J. 2009 . Police lie detection accuracy: The effect of lie scenario . Law and Human Behavior , 33 : 530 – 538 . doi: 10.1007/s10979-008-9166-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan, M., & Ekman, P. (2004). The wizards of deception detection. The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 269–286). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511490071.012
   Google Scholar
• Porter , S. , Campbell , M. , Stapleton , J. and Birt , A.R. 2002 . The influence of judge, target, and stimulus characteristics on the accuracy of detecting deceit . Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science , 34 : 172 – 185 . doi: 10.1037/h0087170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter , S. , Juodis , M. , ten Brinke , L. , Klein , R. and Wilson , K. 2010 . Evaluation of the effectiveness of a brief deception detection training program . Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology , 21 : 66 – 76 . doi: 10.1080/14789940903174246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter , S. and ten Brinke , L. 2009 . Dangerous decisions: A theoretical framework for understanding how judges assess credibility in the courtroom . Legal and Criminological Psychology , 14 : 119 – 134 . doi: 10.1348/135532508X281520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter , S. and ten Brinke , L. 2010 . The truth about lies: What works in detecting high-stakes deception? . Legal and Criminological Psychology , 15 : 57 – 75 . doi: 10.1348/135532509X433151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter , S. , ten Brinke , L. and Wilson , K. 2009 . Crime profiles and conditional release performance of psychopathic and non-psychopathic sexual offenders . Legal and Criminological Psychology , 14 : 109 – 118 . doi: 10.1348/135532508X284310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter , S. , Woodworth , M. and Birt , A. 2000 . Truth, lies, and videotape: An investigation of the ability of federal parole officers to detect deception . Law and Human Behavior , 24 : 643 – 658 . doi: 10.1023/A:1005500219657
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R. v. Marquard (1993) 4 S.C.R. 223. Retrieved from http://canlii.ca/t/1frx2
   Google Scholar
• Rogers , R. , Salekin , R. , Sewell , K. , Goldstein , A. and Leonard , K. 1998 . A comparison of forensic and nonforensic malingerers: A prototypical analysis of explanatory models . Law and human behavior , 22 : 353 – 367 . doi: 10.1023/A:1025714808591
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömwall, L.A., Granhag, P., & Hartwig, M. (2004). Practitioners’ beliefs about deception. In P. Granhag & L. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 229–250). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511490071.010
   Google Scholar
• Strömwall , L. and Granhag , P. 2003 . How to detect deception? Arresting the beliefs of police officers, prosecutors and judges . Psychology, Crime & Law , 9 : 19 – 36 . doi: 10.1080/10683160308138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan , K. , Lange , R. and Dawes , S. 2007 . Methods of detecting malingering and estimated symptom exaggeration base rates in Australia . Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology , 4 : 49 – 70 . doi: 10.1300/J151v04n04_04
   Google Scholar
• The Global Deception Research Team . 2006 . A world of lies . Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology , 37 : 60 – 74 . doi: 10.1177/0022022105282295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. 1994 . The impact of information and setting on detection of deception by police detectives . Journal of Nonverbal Behavior , 18 : 117 – 136 . doi: 10.1007/BF02170074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. 2005 . Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies . Psychology, Public Policy, and Law , 11 : 3 – 41 . doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. 2008 . Detecting lies and deceit: Pitfalls and opportunities , 2nd ed. , Chichester : Wiley .
   Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. 2008 . Nonverbal dominance versus verbal accuracy in lie detection: A plea to change police practice . Criminal Justice and Behavior , 35 : 1323 – 1336 . doi: 10.1177/0093854808321530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. , Akehurst , L. and Knight , S. 2006 . Police officers’, social workers’, teachers’ and the general public’s beliefs about deception in children, adolescents and adults . Legal and Criminological Psychology , 11 : 297 – 312 . doi: 10.1348/135532505X608.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., & Granhag, P. (2007). Interviewing to detect deception. In S.Å. Christianson (Ed.), Offenders’ memories of violent crimes (pp. 279–304). New York, NY: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Vrij, A., Granhag, P.A., & Porter, S. (2010). Pitfalls and opportunities in nonverbal and verbal lie detection. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 11, 89–121. doi:10.1177/1529100610390861
   Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. and Heaven , S. 1999 . Vocal and verbal indicators of deception as a function of lie complexity . Psychology, Crime & Law , 5 : 203 – 215 . doi: 10.1080/10683169908401767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. , Mann , S. , Robbins , E. and Robinson , M. 2006 . Police officers ability to detect deception in high stakes situations and in repeated lie detection tests . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 20 : 741 – 755 . doi: 10.1002/acp. 1200
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vrij , A. , Leal , S. , Mann , S. , Warmelink , L. , Granhag , P. and Fisher , R.P. 2010 . Drawings as an innovative and successful lie detection tool . Applied Cognitive Psychology , 24 : 587 – 594 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis , J. and Todorov , A. 2006 . First impressions: Making up your mind after a 100-Ms exposure to a face . Psychological Science , 17 : 592 – 598 . doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01750.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuckerman , M. , Koestner , R. and Colella , M. 1985 . Learning to detect deception from three communication channels . Journal of Nonverbal Behavior , 9 : 188 – 194 . doi: 10.1007/BF01000739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar