The role of cognition in fitness to stand trial: a systematic review

References

• Ammons, R.B., & Ammons, C.H. (1962). The quick test (QT): Provisional manual. Missoula, MT: Psychological Test Specialists.
   Google Scholar
• Ardolf, B.R., Denney, R.L., & Houston, C.M. (2007). Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 899–916.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, A. (1976). The Canter Bender in practice: Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. NashvilleTN: Counsellor Recordings and Tests.
   Google Scholar
• Cornblatt, B.A., Risch, N.J., Faris, G., Friedman, D., & Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1995). New findings about sustained attention in normal families. Psychiatry Research, 26, 223–238.
   Google Scholar
• Criminal Code of Canada (C.C.C.), 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Denney, R.L. (2008). Negative response bias and malingering during neuropsychological assessment in criminal forensic settings. In R.L. Denney & J.P. Sullivan (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology in the criminal forensic setting (pp. 91–134). New YorkNY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dusky v. United States, 362 US. 402 (1960).
   Google Scholar
• Endicott, J., & Spitzer, R.L. (1978). A diagnostic interview. Archives of General Psychiatry, 35, 837–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everington, C.T., DeBerge, K., & Mauer, D. (2000). The relationship between language skills and competence to stand trial abilities in persons with mental retardation. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 28, 475–492.
   Google Scholar
• Everington, C.T., & Dunn, C. (1995). A second validation study of the competence assessment for standing trial for defendants with mental retardation (CAST-MR). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 22, 44–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gannon, J.L. (1989). Validation of the competency assessment instrument and elements of competency to stand trial (Unpublished Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 8921297).
   Google Scholar
• Gorham, D.R. (1956). Proverbs test. Missoula, MT: Psychological Test Specialists.
   Google Scholar
• Grandjean, N.R. (2004). Neuropsychological predictors of incompetency to stand trial in defendants referred for competency restoration (Unpublished Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 3181043).
   Google Scholar
• Green, D. (2010). Utility of cognitive malingering measures in a forensic psychaitric sample (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 3438475).
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, W.C. (1947). Brain and intelligence. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, R.K. (1981). Wisconsin card sorting testing manual. Odessa, TX: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, S.K., Poythress, N., Bonnie, R., Eisenberg, M., Monahan, J., Feucht-Haviar, T., & Oberlander, L. (1996). Mentally ill and non-mentally ill defendants’ abilities to understand information relevant to adjudication: A preliminary study. Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 24, 187–197.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jastak, S., & Wikinson, G.S. (1984). The wide range achievement test-revised: Administration manual. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkish, P., & Sreenivasan, S. (1999). Neuropsychological assessment of competency to stand trial evaluations: A practical conceptual model. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 27, 101–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, K.L. (2010). Neuropsychological and personality predictors of competence to stand trial: A social cognitive perspective (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 3433643).
   Google Scholar
• Lesser, F.I. (1989). Formulating a prediction model for regaining competency to stand trial (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 9016493).
   Google Scholar
• Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., & Loring, D.W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. New YorkNY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liberati, A., Altman, D.G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P.C., Ioannidis, J.P.A., ... Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martell, D.A. (1992). Forensic neuropsychology and the criminal law. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 313–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, J.P., Hartman, M., Gottlieb, D., Godwin, S., Apperson, L.J., & Wilson, W. (1996). Common sense, insight, and neuropsychological test performance in schizophrenia patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 22, 635–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGarry, A.L. (1973). Competency to stand trial and mental illness. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Melton, G.B., Petrila, J., Poythress, N.G., & Slobogin, C. (2007). Psychological evaluations for the courts: A handbook for mental health professionals and lawyers (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers, J.E., & Meyers, K.R. (1995). Rey complex figure test and recognition trial. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G., & PRISMA Group. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6, e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mossman, D. (2007). AAPL practice guideline for the forensic psychiatric evaluation of competence to stand trial. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 35, s3–s72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Health and Medical Research Council (2009). NHMRC levels of evidence and grades for recommendation for developers of guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/_files_nhmrc/file/guidelines/developers/nhmrc_levels_grades_evidence_120423.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, H.E., & Willison, J. (1991). The national adult reading test (NART): Test manual (2nd ed.). Windsor: NFER Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Nestor, P.G., Daggett, D., Haycock, J., & Price, M. (1999). Competence to stand trial: A neuropsychological inquiry. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 397–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson, R.A., & Kugler, K.E. (1991). Competent and incompetent criminal defendants: A quantitative review of comparative research. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 355–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, D., Mamak, M., Tremblay, H., Wright, P., & Callaghan, J. (1998). The METFORS Fitness Questionnaire (MFQ): A self-report measure for screening competency to stand trial. American Journal of Forensic Psychology, 16, 41–65.
   Google Scholar
• Otto, R., Poythress, N., Nicholson, R., Edens, J.F., Monahan, J., Bonnie, R.J., … Eisenberg, M. (1998). Psychometric properties of the Macarthur competence assessment tool-criminal adjudication. Psychological Assessment, 10, 435–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirelli, G., Gottdiener, W.H., & Zapf, P.A. (2011). A meta-analytic review of competency to stand trial research. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 17(1), 1–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirelli, G., Zapf, P.A., & Gottdiener, W.H. (2011). Competency to stand trial research: Guidelines and future directions. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 1–31. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2011.552622
   Google Scholar
• Ponsford, J., Sloan, S., & Snow, P. (2013). Traumatic brain injury: Rehabilitation for everyday adaptive living (2nd ed.). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poythress, N.G., Nicholson, R., Otto, R.K., Edens, J.F., Bonnie, R.J., Monahan, J., & Hoge, S.K. (1999). Professional manual for the MacArthur competence assessment tool – Criminal adjudication. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• R v. Presser, VR 45 (1958).
   Google Scholar
• R v. Pritchard, 7C & P303 (1836).
   Google Scholar
• Reitan, R.M., & Wolfson, D. (1985). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Tillbrook, C.E., & Sewell, K.W. (2004). Evaluation of competency to stand trial – Revised (Ecst-R). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., Ustad, K.L., Sewell, K.W., & Reinhardt, V. (1996). Dimensions of incompetency: A factor analytic study of the Georgia court competency test. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 14, 323–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothschild, M.A., Erdmann, E., & Parzeller, M. (2007). Fitness for interrogation and fitness to stand trial. Dtsch Arztebl, 104, 3029–3033.
   Google Scholar
• Ryba, N.L., & Zapf, P.A. (2011). The influence of psychiatric symptoms and cognitive abilities on competence-related abilities. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10, 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sachsenmaier, S.J. (1990). The relationship between traditional psychometric test scores and the determination of criminal responsibility and competency to stand trial (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 9118101).
   Google Scholar
• Schofield, P.W., Butler, T.G., Hollis, S.J., Smith, N.E., Lee, S.J., & Kelso, W.M. (2006). Traumatic brain injury among Australian prisoners: Rates, recurrence and sequelae. Brain Injury, 20, 499–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schretlen, D. (1996). Brief test of attention. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, C.L. (2004). Competence to stand trial: Cognitive-related abilities and other factors (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 3164653).
   Google Scholar
• Shiroma, E.J., Ferguson, P.L., & Pickelsimer, E.E. (2010). Prevalence of traumatic brain injury in an offender population: A meta-analysis. Journal of Correctional Health Care, 16, 147–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simon, M.J. (1987). Use of the proverbs test in the assessment of competency to stand trial. Psychological Reports, 60, 1166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stimmel, M., Green, D., Belfi, B., & Klaver, J. (2012). Exploring the accuracy and utility of the Rey Fifteen Item Test (RMT) with recognition trial in a forensic psychiatric population. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11, 51–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, E., Sherman, E., & Spreen, O. (2006). A compendium of neuropsychological tests: Administration, norms and commentary (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford Univerisity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1974). The Wechsler memory scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler memory scale-revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997a). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997b). Wechsler memory scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008a). WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008b). WMS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wecshler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated intelligence scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, P., & Stuss, D. (1992). The common item estimation task. Unpublished document. Baycrest Centre for Geriatric Care.
   Google Scholar
• Zapf, P.A. (1999). An investigation of the construct of competence in a criminal and civil context: A comparison of the FIT, the MacCAT-CA, and the MacCAT-T. (adjudicative competence, treatment competence, Macarthur competence assessment tool) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).. Available from proquest dissertations and theses database (UMI: 304563739).
   Google Scholar