Behavior on the ward of personality-disordered inpatients and chronically psychotic inpatients during a three-year stay in a Dutch forensic psychiatric hospital

References

• American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, R.D., & Hall, J.N. (1988). REHAB: A new assessment instrument for chronic psychiatric patients. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 14, 97–111. doi:10.1093/schbul/14.1.97 10.1093/schbul/14.1.97
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfrage, H., & Douglas, K.S. (2002). Treatment effects on forensic psychiatric patients measured with the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 25–36. doi:10.1080/14999013.2002.10471158 10.1080/14999013.2002.10471158
   Google Scholar
• Chakhssi, F., De Ruiter, C., & Bernstein, D. (2010). Change during forensic treatment in psychopathic versus nonpsychopathic offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 21, 660–682. doi:10.1080/14789949.2010.483283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicchetti, D.V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychological Assessment, 6, 284–290.10.1037/1040-3590.6.4.284
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, D.G., Peterson, C.S., & Richards, H. (1999). Anger as a predictor of aggression among incarcerated adolescents. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 108–115. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.1.108 10.1037/0022-006X.67.1.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1989). NEO personality inventory-revised. Port Huron, MI: Sigma Assessment Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Costa Jr, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and the five factor inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• De Beurs, E., & Barendregt, M. (2008). Mogelijkheden voor therapie-effectonderzoek in de tbs-sector: komen tot een evidence base onder zorgprogramma’s [Possibilities for therapy effect-research in the tbs-sector: Arriving at an evidence base for treatment programs]. Utrecht/The Hague, NL: NIFP/WODC.
   Google Scholar
• De Jonge, E., Nijman, H.L.I., & Lammers, S.M.M. (2009). Gedragsverandering tijdens tbs-behandeling: een multicenter onderzoek [Behavior change during tbs-treatment: A multi-center study]. Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie [Dutch Journal of Psychiatry] 51, 205–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Vries Robbé, M., De Vogel, V., & Douglas, K.S. (2013). Risk factors and protective factors: A two-sided dynamic approach to violence risk assessment. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology, 24, 440–457. doi:10.1080/14789949.2013.818162 10.1080/14789949.2013.818162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edens, J.F., Campbell, J.S., & Weir, J.M. (2007). Youth psychopathy and criminal recidivism: A meta-analysis of the psychopathy checklist measures. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 53–75. doi:10.1007/s10979-006-9019-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guy, L.S., Edens, J.F., Anthony, C., & Douglas, K.S. (2005). Does psychopathy predict institutional misconduct among adults: A meta-analytic investigation. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1056–1064. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1056 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R.D. (1980). The assessment of psychopathy in criminal populations. Personality and Individual Differences, 1, 111–119. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8 10.1016/0191-8869(80)90028-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hare, R.D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R.D. (2003). The hare psychopathy checklist-revised. (2nd ed.). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hare, R.D., & Neumann, C.S. (2006). The PCL-R assessment of psychopathy: Development, structural properties, and new directions. In: C.J. Patrick (Ed.), Handbook of Psychopathy (pp. 58–88). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, S.D., Cox, D.N., & Hare, R.D. (1995). Hare psychopathy checklist: Screening version. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, K., Hart, S.D., Hare, R.D., Gustafson, D., Nunez, C., & White, A.J. (1998). Inpatient and postdischarge aggression in mentally disordered offenders: The role of psychopathy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13, 514–527. doi:10.1177/088626098013004007 10.1177/088626098013004007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, M., & De Ruiter, C. (2012). Psychopathic traits and change on indicators of dynamic risk factors during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35, 276–288. doi:10.1017/j.ijlp.2012.04.001 10.1016/j.ijlp.2012.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildebrand, M., De Ruiter, C., & Nijman, H. (2004). PCL-R psychopathy predicts disruptive behavior among male offenders in a Dutch forensic psychiatric hospital. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 13–29. doi:10.1177/0886260503259047 10.1177/0886260503259047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, H.A., Ormel, J., & De Fruyt, F. (1996). Handleiding NEO Persoonlijkheidsvragenlijsten [Manual NEO personality questionnaires]. Lisse: Swets Test Services.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsveld, R.H.J., Muris, P.E.H.M., & Kraaimaat, F.W. (2011). The Novaco anger scale-provocation inventory (1994 version) in Dutch forensic psychiatric patients. Psychological Assessment, 23, 937–944. doi:10.1037/a0024018 10.1037/a0024018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsveld, R.H.J., Muris, P., Kraaimaat, F.W., & Meesters, C. (2009). Psychometric properties of the aggression questionnaire in Dutch violent forensic psychiatric patients and secondary vocational students. Assessment, 16, 181–192. doi:10.1177//1073191108325894 10.1177/1073191108325894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsveld, R.H.J., Nijman, H.L.I., Hollin, C.R., & Kraaimaat, F.W. (2007). Development of the observation scale for aggressive behavior (OSAB) for Dutch forensic psychiatric inpatients with an antisocial personality disorder. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 480–491. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.09.009 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornsveld, R.H.J., Nijman, H.L.I., & Kraaimaat, F.W. (2008). Aggression Control Therapy for violent forensic psychiatric patients: First results. Psychology, Crime and Law, 14, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennealy, P.J., Skeem, J.L., Walters, G.D., & Camp, J. (2010). Do core interpersonal and affective traits of the PCL-R psychopathy interact with antisocial behavior and disinhibition to predict violence? Psychological Assessment, 22, 569–580. doi:10.1037/a0019618 10.1037/a0019618
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerlinger, F. (1975). Foundations of behavioral research. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Laurell, J., Belfrage, H., & Hellström, Å. (2010). Facets on the psychopathy checklist screening version and instrumental violence in forensic psychiatric patients. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 20, 285–294. doi:10.1002/cbm.779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leistico, A.R., Salekin, R.T., DeCoster, J., & Rogers, R. (2008). A large-scale meta-analysis relating the Hare measures of psychopathy to antisocial conduct. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 28–45. doi:10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6 10.1007/s10979-007-9096-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, J. (2013). ‘What works’ to reduce re-offending. 18 Years on. In: L. A. Craig, L. Dixon, & T. A. Gannon (Eds.), What works in offender rehabilitation: An evidence-based approach to assessment and treatment (pp. 20–49). Chichester: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/978111832065510.1002/9781118320655
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Security and Justice. (2002). Handleiding HKT-30. Risicotaxatie in de Forensische Psychiatrie [Manual HKT-30. Risk assessment in forensic psychiatry]. The Hague: Ministry of Safety and Justice.
   Google Scholar
• Nachtegaal, M.H., Van der Horst, R.P., & Schönberger, H.J.M. (2011). Inzicht in de verblijfsduur van tbs-gestelden [Insight in the length of stay for offenders detained by hospital order]. Den Haag: Boom Juridische uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Nijman, H., De Kruyk, C., & Van Nieuwenhuizen, Ch. (2004). Behavioral changes during forensic psychiatric (TBS) treatment in the Netherlands. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 27, 79–85. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.12.001 10.1016/j.ijlp.2003.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, V., Woods, P., & Robinson, D. (2000). Behavioural status index (BEST-Index): A ‘life skills’ assessment for selecting and monitoring therapy in mental health care. Sheffield: Psychometric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rorschach, H. (1942). Psychodiagnostics: A diagnostic test based on perception. Bern: Hans Huber (Original work published 1921).
   Google Scholar
• Singh, J.P., Grann, M., & Fazel, S. (2011). A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 499–513. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009 10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sloore, H., Derksen, J.J.L., Hellenbosch, G., & De Mey, H.R.A. (1993). De Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-II (Dutch translation). Nijmegen, NL: PEN Test Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C.D. (1980). Preliminary manual for the state-trait anger scale (STAS). Tampa: University of South Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C.D. (1988). State-trait anger expression inventory: Professional manual. (research ed.). Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, J.P. (2007). Intermediate statistics: A modern approach (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Timmerman, I.G.H., Vastenburg, N.C., & Emmelkamp, P.M.G. (2001). The forensic inpatient observation scale (FIOS): Development and validity. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 11, 144–162.10.1002/(ISSN)1471-2857
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, H.M., Defares, P.B., & Spielberger, C.D. (1982). Handleiding bij de Zelf-Analyse Vragenlijst, ZAV [Manual for the Self-Analysis Questionnaire, ZAV]. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Van Marle, H.J.C. (2002). The Dutch entrustment act (TBS): It’s principles and innovations. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 1, 83–92. doi:10.1080/14999013.2002.10471163.10.1080/14999013.2002.10471163
   Google Scholar
• Vertommen, H., Verheul, R., De Ruiter, C., & Hildebrand, M. (2002). De herziene versie van Hare’s Psychopathie Checklist (PCL-R) [The revised version of Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist (PCL-R)]. Lisse: Swets Test Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Vitacco, M.J., Van Rybroek, G.J., Rogstad, J.E., Yahr, L.E., Tomony, J.D., & Saewert, E. (2009). Predicting short-term institutional aggression in forensic patients: A multi-trait method for understanding subtypes of aggression. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 308–319. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9155-7 10.1007/s10979-008-9155-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D., & Heilbrun, K. (2010). Violence risk assessment and facet 4 of the psychopathy checklist: Predicting institutional and community aggression in two forensic samples. Assessment, 17, 259–268. doi:10.1177/1073191109356685 10.1177/1073191109356685
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, G.D., Knight, R.A., Grann, M., & Dahle, K. (2008). Incremental validity of the psychopathy checklist facet scores: Predicting release outcome in six samples. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 396–405. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.396 10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.396
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, C.D., Douglas, K.S., Eaves, D., & Hart, S.D. (1997). HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (version 2). Burnaby: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, M., Wong, S.C.P., & Coid, J. (2010). The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 740–767. doi:10.1037/a0020473 10.1037/a0020473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar