Effects of jurors’ gender and attitudes toward intellectual disability on judgments in cases involving disabled juvenile defendants

References

• Akrami, N., Ekehammar, B., Claesson, M., & Sonnander, K. (2006). Classical and modern prejudice: Attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 605–617. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2005.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Lawyer/Court TV Video Library Service. (1991). Kentucky v. English trial story [ Motion picture]. Available from Courtroom Television Network, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91. doi:10.1023/A:1022326807441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Golding, J. G., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R., & Wozniak, J. (2007). A review of factors affecting jurors’ decisions in child sexual abuse cases. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), The handbook of eyewitness psychology, Vol. I: Memory for events (pp. 509–545). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bottoms, B. L., Nysse-Carris, K. L., Harris, T., & Tyda, K. (2003). Jurors’ perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 205–227. doi:10.1023/A:1022551314668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, D. M. R., Noblin, C. D., & Prosser, V. (2004). Adjudicative competency in a juvenile population. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31, 438–462.10.1177/0093854804265175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochran, J. K., Boots, D. P., & Heide, K. M. (2003). Attribution styles and attitudes toward capital punishment for juveniles, the mentally incompetent, and the mentally retarded. Justice Quarterly, 20, 65–93. doi:10.1080/07418820300095461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, C. A., Britner, P. A., Jodl, K. M., & Portwood, S. G. (1995). The juvenile death penalty and the Eighth Amendment: An empirical investigation of societal consensus and proportionality. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 245–261. doi:10.1007/BF01501659
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., & Caughlin, D. E. (2014). Do they matter? A meta-analytic investigation of individual characteristics and guilt judgments. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 20, 109–134.10.1037/law0000006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devine, D. J., Clayton, L. D., Dunford, B. B., Seying, R., & Pryce, J. (2001). Jury decision making: 45 years of empirical research on deliberating groups. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 622–727. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.7.3.622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571. doi:10.1023/A:1024831908377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, F. X., Gibbons, B. N., & Kassin, S. M. (1981). Reactions to the criminal behavior of intellectually disabled and nondisabled offenders. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86, 235–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldstein, N. E. S., Condie, L. O., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., & Geier, J. L. (2003). Juvenile offenders’ Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confession. Assessment, 10, 359–369.10.1177/1073191103259535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., Addie, S., Adams, B., & Firestine, K. (2011). Trying juveniles as adults: An analysis of state transfer laws and reporting. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Griffitt, W., & Jackson, T. (1973). Simulated jury decisions: The influence of jury-defendant attitude similarity-dissimilarity. Social Behavior and Personality, 1, 1–7.10.2224/sbp.1973.1.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegerich, T. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2000). Empathy and jurors’ decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421–448. doi:10.1023/A:1005592213294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haegerich, T. M., Salerno, J. M., & Bottoms, B. L. (2013). Are the effects of juvenile offender stereotypes maximized or minimized by jury deliberation? Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 19, 81–97. doi:10.1037/a0027808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, D., Keys, C., Jopp, D., & Balcazar, F. (1996). The community living attitudes scale, mental retardation form: Development and psychometric properties. Mental Retardation, 34, 149–158.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kalven, H., & Zeisel, H. (1966). The American jury. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. E. (2000). Adolescent development, mental disorders, and decision making of delinquent youths. In T. Grisso & R. G. Schwartz (Eds.), Youth on trial: A developmental perspective on juvenile justice (pp. 33–65). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, N. L., Hymes, R. W., Anderson, A. B., & Weathers, J. E. (1995). Defendant-juror similarity and mock juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 545–567.10.1007/BF01499374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassiter, G. D. (2002). Illusory causation in the courtroom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 204–208. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCoun, R. J., & Kerr, N. L. (1988). Asymmetric influence in mock jury deliberation: Jurors’ bias for leniency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 21–33. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.21
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12, 125–135. doi:10.1037/h0027568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najdowski, C. J., & Bottoms, B. L. (2012). Understanding jurors’ judgments in cases involving juvenile defendants: Effects of confession evidence and intellectual disability. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 18, 297–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Vargas, M. C. (2009). Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: The influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 27, 401–430. doi:10.1002/bsl.873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunez, N., Dahl, M. J., Tang, C. M., & Jensen, B. L. (2007). Trial venue decisions in juvenile cases: Mitigating and extralegal factors matter. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 12, 21–39. doi:10.1348/135532505X73768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 32, 396–402.10.3758/BF03200807
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Perlin, M. L. (2003). Beyond Atkins: A symposium on the implications of Atkins v. Virginia. New Mexico Law Review, 33, 315–348.
   Google Scholar
• Puzzanchera, C. (2009). Juvenile arrests 2007. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.
   Google Scholar
• Redlich, A. D., Ghetti, S., & Quas, J. A. (2008). Perceptions of children during a police interview: A comparison of alleged victims and suspects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38, 705–735. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2007.00323.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno, J. M., Najdowski, C. J., Stevenson, M. C., Wiley, T. R. A., Bottoms, B. L., Vaca, R. A., & Pimentel, P. S. (2010). Psychological mechanisms underlying support for juvenile sex offender registry laws: Prototypes, moral outrage, and perceived threat. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 28, 58–83. doi:10.1002/bsl.921
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandys, M., & Dillehay, R. C. (1995). First-ballot votes, predeliberation dispositions, and final verdicts in jury trials. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 175–195. doi:10.1007/BF01499324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilit, J. (1979). The mentally retarded offender and criminal justice personnel. Exceptional Children, 46, 16–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, J. I., & Skolnick, P. (1995). Effects of prohibitive and informative judicial instructions on jury decision making. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 23, 319–325. doi:10.2224/sbp.1995.23.4.319
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stalans, L. J., & Henry, G. T. (1994). Societal views of justice for adolescents accused of murder: Inconsistency between community sentiment and automatic legislative transfers. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 675–696. doi:10.1007/BF01499331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. C., & Bottoms, B. L. (2009). Race shapes perceptions of juvenile offenders in criminal court. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 1660–1689. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00499.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, M. C., Najdowski, C. J., Bottoms, B. L., & Haegerich, T. M. (2009). Understanding adults’ perceptions of juvenile offenders. In B. L. Bottoms, C. J. Najdowski, & G. S. Goodman (Eds.), Children as victims, witnesses, and offenders: Psychological science and the law (pp. 349–368). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., & Roesch, R. (2005). Competence to waive interrogation rights and adjudicative competence in adolescent defendants: Cognitive development, attorney contact, and psychological symptoms. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 723–742.10.1007/s10979-005-7978-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar