Judges’ views on evidence of genetic contributions to mental disorders in court

References

• Anderson, C. (2010). Presenting and evaluating qualitative research. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 74, 141–148.10.5688/aj7408141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S. (2005). Law & psychiatry: Behavioral genetics and the punishment of crime. Psychiatric Services, 56, 25–27.10.1176/appi.ps.56.1.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S., & Scurich, N. (2014). Impact of behavioral genetic evidence on the adjudication of criminal behavior. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 42, 91–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S., Scurich, N., & Raad, R. (2015). Effects of behavioral genetic evidence on perceptions of criminal responsibility and appropriate punishment. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 21, 134–144.10.1037/law0000039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aspinwall, L. G., Brown, T. R., & Tabery, J. (2012). The double-edged sword: Does biomechanism increase or decrease judges’ sentencing of psychopaths? Science, 337, 846–849.10.1126/science.1219569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsky, A. E. (2012). Clinicians in court: A guide to subpoenas, depositions, testifying, and everything else you need to know. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beecher-Monas, E., & Garcia-Rill, E. (2006). Genetic predictions of future dangerousness: Is there a blueprint for violence? Law and Contemporary Problems, 301–341.
   Google Scholar
• Berryessa, C. M. (2014a). Judicial perceptions of media portrayals of offenders with high functioning autistic spectrum disorders. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 3, 46–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berryessa, C. M. (2014b). Judiciary views on criminal behaviour and intention of offenders with high-functioning autism. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour, 5, 97–106.10.1108/JIDOB-02-2014-0002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berryessa, C. M., & Cho, M. K. (2013). Ethical, legal, social, and policy implications of behavioral genetics. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics, 14, 515–534.10.1146/annurev-genom-090711-163743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broussard v. Maples, 535 F. App’x 825, 11th Cir. (2013).
   Google Scholar
• California Courts. (2015). Superior Courts. http://www.courts.ca.gov/superiorcourts.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Cecil, J. S. (2005). Ten years of judicial gatekeeping under Daubert. American Journal of Public Health, 95(S1), S74–S80.10.2105/AJPH.2004.044776
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, B. Y., & Heine, S. J. (2015). The double-edged sword of genetic accounts of criminality: Causal attributions from genetic ascriptions affect legal decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41, 1723–1738.10.1177/0146167215610520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, M., Posada, D. C. K. A., & Crandall, K. A. (2000). TCS: A computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Molecular Ecology, 9, 1657–1659.10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01020.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Denno, D. W. (2011). Courts’ increasing consideration of behavioral genetics evidence in criminal cases: Results of a longitudinal study. Michigan State Law Review, 2011, 967–1047.
   Google Scholar
• DeVries, A. C., & Nelson, R. J. (2007). Behavioral genetics. In J. Cacioppo, L. Tassinary, & G. Berntson (Eds.), Handbook of Psychophysiology (pp. 393–409). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511546396
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfuss, R. C., & Nelkin, D. (1992). Jurisprudence of genetics. Vanderbilt Law Review, 45, 313–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahany, N. A. (2016). Neuroscience and behavioral genetics in US criminal law: An empirical analysis. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 2(3), 485–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahany, N. A., & Bernet, W. (2006). Behavioural genetics in criminal cases: Past, present and future. Genomics, Society and Policy, 2, 72–79.
   Google Scholar
• Fuss, J., Dressing, H., & Briken, P. (2015). Neurogenetic evidence in the courtroom: A randomised controlled trial with German judges. Journal of Medical Genetics, 52, 730–737.10.1136/jmedgenet-2015-103284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12, 436–445.10.2307/798843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, D. E., & Rothenberg, K. H. (2007). Judging genes: Implications of the second generation of genetic tests in the courtroom. Maryland Law Review, 66, 858–922.
   Google Scholar
• Jasper, M. (1994). Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 1, 309–314.10.1111/jan.1994.19.issue-2
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, G. E. (2014). Our administrative system of criminal justice. Fordham Law Review, 83, 1673–2150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maykut, P., & Morehouse, R. (1994). Beginning qualitative research: A philosophic and practical guide. London: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• McGarity, T. O. (2005). Daubert and the proper role for the courts in health, safety, and environmental regulation. American Journal of Public Health, 95, S92–S98.10.2105/AJPH.2004.044545
   Google Scholar
• Morgan, D. (1993). Qualitative content analysis: A guide to paths not taken. Qualitative Health Research, 3, 112–121.10.1177/104973239300300107
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pattenden, R. (1982). The judge, discretion, and the criminal trial. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, M. (1970). Judicial discretion of the trial court, viewed from above. Syracuse Law Review, 22, 635–643.
   Google Scholar
• Rothstein, M. A. (1999). Impact of behavioral genetics on the law and the courts. Judicature, 83, 116–123.
   Google Scholar
• Scurich, N., & Appelbaum, P. (2015). The blunt-edged sword: Genetic explanations of misbehavior neither mitigate nor aggravate punishment. Journal of Law and the Biosciences, 1–18. doi: 10.1093/jlb/lsv053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (Vol. 15). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, G. (1997). Phylogenetic analysis: Getting its day in court. Science, 275, 1559–1560.10.1126/science.275.5306.1559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wistrich, A. J., Rachlinski, J. J., & Guthrie, C. (2014). Heart versus head: Do judges follow the law of follow their feelings. Texas Law Review, 93, 855–923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar