Evaluating the utility of ‘strength’ items when assessing the risk of young offenders

References

• Abidin, Z., Davoren, M., Naughton, L., Gibbons, O., Nulty, A., & Kennedy, H. G. (2013). Susceptibility (risk and protective) factors for in-patient violence and self-harm: Prospective study of structured professional judgment instruments START and SAPROF, DUNDRUM-3 and DUNDRUM-4 in forensic mental health services. BMC Psychiatry, 13(197). doi:10.1186/1471-244X-13-197
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D. A., Bonta, J. L., & Wormith, J. S. (2004). Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI): An offender assessment system. Toronto: MHS.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2016). Youth justice in Australia 2014–15 (Bulletin 133). Canberra: AIHW.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. (2017). Youth justice in Australia 2015–16 (Bulletin 139). Canberra: AIHW.
   Google Scholar
• Bhanwer, A., Shaffer, C., & Viljoen, J. L. (2016). Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version (START:AV) Annotated Bibliography. Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Borum, R., Bartel, P., & Forth, A. (2006). Manual for the structured assessment for violence risk in youth (SAVRY). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Catchpole, R., & Gretton, H. (2003). The predictive validity of risk assessment with violent young offenders: A 1 year examination of criminal outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 688–708. doi:10.1177/0093854803256455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, C. M., Thomas, S. D. M., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Daffern, M. (2011). The predictive validity of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a secure forensic hospital: Risk factors and strengths. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(4), 337–345. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.629715
   Google Scholar
• Chu, C. M., Lee, Y., Zeng, G., Yim, G., Tan, C. Y., Chin, S., … Ruby, K. (2015). Assessing youth offenders in a non-Western context: The predictive validity of the YLS/CMI ratings. Psychological Assessment, 27(3), 1013–1021. doi:10.1037/a0038670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, C. M., Goh, M. L., & Chong, D. (2016). The predictive validity of SAVRY ratings for assessing youth offenders in Singapore. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(6), 793–810. doi:10.1177/0093854815616842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vogel, V., De Ruiter, C., Bouman, Y., & De Vries Robbe, M. (2009). SAPROF. Guidelines for the assessment of protective factors for violence risk. Utrecht: Forum Educatief.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries Robbé, M., & Willis, G. M. (2017). Assessment of protective factors in clinical practice. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 55–63. doi:10.1016/j/avb.2016.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries Robbé, M., de Vogel, V., Douglas, K. S., & Nijman, H. K. (2015). Changes in dynamic risk and protective factors for violence during inpatient forensic psychiatric treatment: Predicting reductions in postdischarge community recidivism. Law and Human Behavior, 39(1), 53–61. doi:10.1037/lhb0000089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries Robbé, M., De Vogel, V., Wever, E. C., Douglas, K. S., & Nijman, H. L. I. (2016). Risk and protective factors for inpatient aggression. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(10), 1364–1385. doi:10.1177/0093854816637889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., Wilson, C. M., & Brink, J. (2012). Using dynamic risk and protective factors to predict inpatient aggression: Reliability and validity of START assessments. Psychological Assessment, 24(3), 685–700. doi:10.1037/a0026668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrington, D. P., Ttofi, M. M., & Piquero, A. R. (2016). Risk, promotive, and protective factors in youth offending: Results from the Cambridge study in delinquent development. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 63–70. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergusson, D. M., & Horwood, L. J. (2003). Resilience to childhood adversity: Results of a 21 year study. In S. S. Luthar (Ed.), Resilience and vulnerability: Adaptation in the context of childhood adversities (pp. 130–155). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511615788
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, F., Daffern, M., Talevski, D., & Ogloff, J. R. P. O. (2013). The role of aggression-related cognition in the aggressive behavior of offenders: A general aggression model perspective. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(2), 119–138.10.1177/0093854812467943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, A. L., Viljoen, J. L., & Douglas, K. D. (2015, March). Assessing risk and need in male and female adolescent offenders: Predictive validity of the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Psychology – Law Society, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, J. E., Simon, T. R., Mercy, J. A., Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., & Lee, R. D. (2012). Centers for disease control and prevention’s expert panel on protective factors for youth violence perpetration: Background and overview. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S1–S7. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, S., Sturmey, P., Logan, C., & McMurran, M. (2011). Forensic case formulation. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 10(2), 118–126. doi:10.1080/14999013.2011.577137
   Google Scholar
• Hilterman, E. L., Nicholls, T. L., & van Nieuwenhuizen, C. (2014). Predictive validity of risk assessments in juvenile offenders: Comparing the SAVRY, PCL: YV, and YLS/CMI with unstructured clinical assessments. Assessment, 21(3), 324–339. doi:10.1177/1073191113498113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2010). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (YLS/CMI). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Hoge, R. D., & Andrews, D. A. (2011). Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (2nd ed.): YLS/CMI Interview guide. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
   Google Scholar
• Holtfreter, K., & Cupp, R. (2007). Gender and risk assessment – The empirical status of the LSI-R for Women. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 23(4), 363–382. doi:10.1177/1043986207309436
   Google Scholar
• Joliffe, D., Farrington, D. P., Loeber, R., & Pardini, D. (2016). Protective factors for violence: Results from the Pittsburgh youth study. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 32–40. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenny, D. T., & Nelson, P. K. (2008). Young offenders on community orders: Health, welfare and criminogenic needs. Sydney: Sydney University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, B. K. E., Gilman, A. B., Hill, K. G., & Hawkins, J. D. (2016). Examining protective factors against violence among high-risk youth: Findings from the Seattle social development project. Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2016.02.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klepfisz, G., Daffern, M., & Day, A. (2017). Understanding protective factors for violent reoffending in adults. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 80–87. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, K., Olver, M. E., & Wong, S. C. P. (2012). The Violence Risk Scale: Predictive validity and linking changes in risk with violent recidivism in a sample of high-risk offenders with psychopathic traits. Assessment, 20(2), 150–164. doi:10.1177/1073191112441242
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewijks, H. P. B., Doreleijers, T. A., de Ruiter, C., & Borum, R. (2008). Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) during residential treatment. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 31(3), 263-271. DOI; 10.1016/j.ijlp.2008.04.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lodewijks, H. P. B., De Ruiter, C., & Doreleijers, T. A. (2010). The impact of protective factors in desistance from violent reoffending: A study in three samples of adolescent offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25(3), 568–587. doi:10.1177/0886260509334403
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeber, R., Farrington, D. P., Stouthamer-Loeber, M., & White, H. R. (2008). Violence and serious theft: Development and prediction from childhood to adulthood. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lösel, F., & Farrington, D. P. (2012). Direct protective and buffering protective factors in the development of youth violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(2), S8–S23. doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2012.04.029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marczyk, G. R., Heilbrun, K., Lander, T., & DeMatteo, D. (2003). Predicting juvenile recidivism with the PCL: YV, MAYSI & YLS/CMI. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 2(1), 7–18. doi:10.1080/14999013.2003.10471175
   Google Scholar
• Nonstad, K., Nesset, M. B., Kroppan, E., Pedersen, T. W., Nøttestad, J. A., Almvik, R., & Palmstierna, T. (2010). Predictive validity and other psychometric properties of the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START) in a Norwegian high secure hospital. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 294–299. doi:10.1080/14999013.2010.534958
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, L. E., & Dickens, G. L. (2014). Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START): Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 990–1002. doi:10.1037/a0036794
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, L. E., & Dickens, G. L. (2015). Contribution of protective factors assessment to risk prediction: Systematic review and meta-analysis. European Psychiatry, 30(Suppl. 1), 28–31. doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(15)30171-1
   Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2009). Risk assessment with young offenders: A meta-analysis of three assessment measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 329–353. doi:10.1177/0093854809331457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C., & Wormith, J. S. (2014). Thirty years of research on the level of service scales: A meta-analytic examination of predictive accuracy and sources of variability. Psychological Assessment, 26, 156–176. doi:10.1037/a0035080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaschek, D. L. L. (2016). Desistance and dynamic risk factors belong together. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22(1-2), 171–189. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2015.1114114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, C., & Dolan, M. C. (2010). The significance of protective factors in the assessment of risk. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 20(1), 8–22. doi:10.1002/cbm.750
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, K. (2011). What makes juvenile offenders different from adult offenders. Trends & issues in crime and criminal justice, 409. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/tandi_pdf/tandi409.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rocque, M., & Plummer-Beale, J. (2014). In the eye of the beholder? An examination of the inter-rater reliability of the LSI-R and YLS/CMI in a correctional agency. Journal of Criminal Justice,42(6), 568–578. doi:10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2014.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2000). The uncritical acceptance of risk assessment in forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior, 24(5), 595–605. doi:10.1023/A:1005575113507
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer-Gagnier, K. (2013). Toward a strengths-based approach to risk assessments: An examination of the measurement and clinical use of information about youth strengths (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). York University, Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Royer-Gagnier, K., Skilling, T. A., Brown, S. L., Moore, T. E., & Rawana, J. S. (2016). The Strengths Assessment Inventory–Youth Version: An evaluation of the psychometric properties with male and female justice-involved youth. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 563–574. doi:10.1037/pas0000199
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serin, R. C., & Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Examining the process of offender change: The transition to crime desistance. Psychology Crime and Law, 15(4), 347–364. doi:10.1080/10683160802261078
   Google Scholar
• Serin, R. C., Chadwick, N., & Lloyd, C. D. (2016). Dynamic risk and protective factors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 22, 151–170. doi:10.1080/1068316X.2015.1112013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M. (2015). Criminal engagement and Australian culturally and linguistically diverse populations: Challenges and implications for forensic risk assessment. Psychiatry, Psychology, & Law., 23(2), 256–274. doi:10.1080/13218719.2015.1053164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M. (2016). Violence risk instruments may be culturally unsafe for use with Indigenous patients. Australasian Psychiatry, 24(6), 565–567. doi:10.1177/1039856216665287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., & Ilalio, T. (2016). Maori and Pacific Islander overrepresentation in the Australian criminal justice system – What are the determinants? Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 55(2), 113–128. doi:10.1080/10509674.2015.1124959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., & Lewis-Fernandez, R. (2016). Forensic risk assessment and cultural diversity: Contemporary challenges and future directions. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 22(4), 427–438. doi:10.1037/law0000102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., Luebbers, S., & Dolan, M. (2013). Identifying gender differences in an Australian youth offender population. Sage Open, 3(2). doi:10.1177/2158244013492082
   Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., Singh, J. P., & Fullam, R. (2015). Does the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory generalize across ethnicity? International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 14, 193–204. doi:10.1080/14999013.2015.1086450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., Luebbers, S., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2016). The role of protective factors and the relationship with recidivism for high-risk young people in detention. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(7), 863–878. doi:10.1177/0093854815626489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd, S. M., Newton, D., Harries, C., Fix, R. L., & Fullam, R. (2018). It begins with the family – An analysis of high-risk offending pathways for young females in custody. Manuscript submitted for publication
   Google Scholar
• Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Loeber, R., Wei, E., Farrington, D. P., & Wikström, P. H. (2002). Risk and promotive effects in the explanation of persistent serious delinquency in boys. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70, 111–123.10.1037/0022-006X.70.1.111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stouthamer-Loeber, M., Wei, E., Loeber, R., & Masten, A. S. (2004). Desistance from persistent serious delinquency in the transition to adulthood. Development and Psychopathology, 16(4), 897–918. doi:10.1017/S0954579404040064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. P., & McGrath, A. (2012). Subgroup differences and implications for contemporary risk-need assessment with juvenile offenders. Law and Human Behavior, 36(4), 345–355. doi:10.1037/h0093930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, A. P., & Pope, Z. (2005). Assessing juvenile offenders: Preliminary data for the Australian adaptation of the youth level of service/case management inventory. Australian Psychologist, 40, 207–214. doi:10.1080/00050060500243491
   Google Scholar
• Upperton, R. A., & Thompson, A. P. (2007). Predicting juvenile offender recidivism: Risk-need assessment and juvenile justice officers. Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law, 14, 138–146. doi:10.1375/pplt.14.1.138
   Google Scholar
• Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E., Salisbury, E., & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of gender responsive assessment. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261–288. doi:10.1177/0093854809357442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., McLachlan, K., & Vincent, G. M. (2010). Assessing violence risk and psychopathy in juvenile and adult offenders: A survey of clinical practices. Assessment, 17, 377–395. doi:10.1177/10731911093595879587
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Beneteau, J. L., Gulbransen, E., Brodersen, E., Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., & Cruise, K. R. (2012). Assessment of multiple risk outcomes, strengths, and change with the START:AV: A short-term prospective study with adolescent offenders. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(3), 165–180. doi:10.1080/14999013.2012.737407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viljoen, J. L., Nicholls, T. L., Cruise, K. R., Desmarais, S. L., Webster, C. D., & with contributions by Douglas-Beneteau, J. (2014). Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability: Adolescent Version (START:AV) – User Guide. Burnaby, BC: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Viljoen, S., Nicholls, T. L., Roesch, R., & Brink, J. (2016). Exploring gender differences in the utility of strength based risk assessment measures. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15(2), 149–163. doi:10.1080/14999013.2016.1170739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T. (2017). Prediction and agency: The role of protective factors in correctional rehabilitation and desistance. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 32, 19–28. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2016.11.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, T., & Maruna, S. (2007). Rehabilitation: Beyond the risk paradigm. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, C. D., Martin, M. L., Brink, J., Nicholls, T. L., & Desmarais, S. (2009). Manual for the short-term assessment of risk and treatability (START). Port Coquitlam, BC: Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission and St. Joseph’s Healthcare.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. M., Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., & Brink, J. (2010). The role of client strengths in assessments of violence risk using the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START). International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 9, 282–293. doi:10.1080/14999013.2010.534694
   Google Scholar