Group size, misinformation and unanimity influences on co-witness judgements

References

• Allwood, C. , Jonsson, A. , & Granhag, P. (2005). The effects of source and type of feedback on child witnesses’ metamemory accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 19 (3), 331–344. doi:10.1002/acp.1071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allwood, C. , Knutsson, J. , & Anders Granhag, P. (2006). Eyewitnesses under influence: How feedback affects the realism in confidence judgements. Psychology, Crime & Law , 12 (1), 25–38. doi:10.1080/10683160512331316316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgment. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership and men (pp. 222– 236). Pittsburgh, PA : Carnegie Press.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Asch, S. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American , 193 (5), 31–35. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican1155-31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R. , Vandello, J. , & Brunsman, B. (1996). The forgotten variable in conformity research: Impact of task importance on social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 71 (5), 915–927. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.71.5.915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basden, D. , & Basden, B. (1995). Some tests of the strategy disruption interpretation of part-list cuing inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, And Cognition , 21 (6), 1656–1669. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.21.6.1656
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basden, B. , Basden, D. , Bryner, S. , & Thomas, R. (1997). A comparison of group and individual remembering: Does collaboration disrupt retrieval strategies? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 23 (5), 1176–1189. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1176
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank, H. (2009). Remembering. Social Psychology , 40 (3), 164–175. doi:10.1027/1864-9335.40.3.164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R. (2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations , 8 (4), 331–354. doi:10.1177/1368430205056464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, J. , & Fairey, P. (1989). Informational and normative routes to conformity: The effect of faction size as a function of norm extremity and attention to the stimulus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 57 (3), 457–468. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.57.3.457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cann, D. , & Katz, A. (2005). Habitual acceptance of misinformation: Examination of individual differences and source attributions. Memory & Cognition , 33 (3), 405–417. doi:10.3758/bf03193059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardozo, B. N. (2009). Reevaluating lineups: Why witnesses make mistakes and how to reduce the chance of a misidentification . New York : Innocence Project,.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, C. (1979). A cybernetic model of self-attention processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 37 (8), 1251–1281. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carver, C. , & Scheier, M. (1981). The self-attention-induced feedback loop and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 17 (6), 545–568. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(81)90039-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Curral, L. , Forrester, R. , Dawson, J. , & West, M. (2001). It's what you do and the way that you do it: Team task, team size, and innovation-related group processes. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology , 10(2), 187–204. doi:10.1080/13594320143000627.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlström, Ö. , Danielsson, H. , Emilsson, M. , & Andersson, J. (2011). Does retrieval strategy disruption cause general and specific collaborative inhibition? Memory , 19 (2), 140–154. doi:10.1080/09658211.2010.539571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, D. , & Loftus, E. F. (2006). Internal and external sources of misinformation in adult witness memory. In M. P. Toglia , J. D. Read , D. F. Ross , & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), Memory for events. Handbook of eyewitness psychology (Vol. l, pp. 195–237). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Deutsch, M. , & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informative social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology. , 51 (6), 29–36. doi:10.1037/h0046408
   Google Scholar
• Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations , 7 (2), 117–140. doi:10.1177/001872675400700202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K. (2000). Beware of samples! A cognitive-ecological sampling approach to judgment biases. Psychological Review , 107 (4), 659–676. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.4.659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, L. , Garry, M. , & Mori, K. (2008). You say tomato? Collaborative remembering leads to more false memories for intimate couples than for strangers. Memory , 16 (3), 262–273. doi:10.1080/09658210701801491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• French, L. , Garry, M. , & Mori, K. (2011). Relative – not absolute – judgments of credibility affect susceptibility to misinformation conveyed during discussion. Acta Psychologica , 136 (1), 119–128. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenda, S. , Nichols, R. , & Loftus, E. (2011). Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 20 (1), 20–23. doi:10.1177/0963721410396620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F. , Memon, A. , & Allan, K. (2003). Memory conformity: Can eyewitnesses influence each other’s memories for an event? Applied Cognitive Psychology , 17 (5), 533–543. doi:10.1002/acp.885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabbert, F. , Memon, A. , & Wright, D. (2006). Memory conformity: Disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 13(3), 480–485. doi:10.3758/bf03193873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardikiotis, A. , Martin, R. , & Hewstone, M. (2005). Group consensus in social influence: type of consensus information as a moderator of majority and minority influence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , 31 (9), 1163–1174. doi:10.1177/0146167205277807
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerard, H. , Wilhelmy, R. , & Conolley, E. (1968). Conformity and group size. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 8(1, Pt.1), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025325 10.1037/h0025325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, K. , Kukucka, J. , & Hawks, I. (2012). Co-witness confidence, conformity, and eyewitness memory: An examination of normative and informational social influences. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 27 (1), 91–100. doi:10.1002/acp.2877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertwig, R. , Gigerenzer, G. , & Hoffrage, U. (1997). The reiteration effect in hindsight bias. Psychological Review , 104 (1), 194–202. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.104.1.194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hewitt, L. Y. , Kane, R. , & Garry, M. (2013). Speaking order predicts memory conformity after accounting for exposure to misinformation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review , 20 (3), 558–565. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0377-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hope, L. , Ost, J. , Gabbert, F. , Healey, S. , & Lenton, E. (2008). “With a little help from my friends…”: The role of co-witness relationship in susceptibility to misinformation. Acta Psychologica , 127 (2), 476–484. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.08.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonas, E. , Schulz-Hardt, S. , Frey, D. , & Thelen, N. (2001). Confirmation bias in sequential information search after preliminary decisions: An expansion of dissonance theoretical research on selective exposure to information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 80 (4), 557. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.4.557
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kebbell, M. , & Milne, R. (1998). Police officers' perceptions of eyewitness performance in forensic investigations. The Journal of Social Psychology , 138 (3), 323–330. doi:10.1080/00224549809600384
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latané, B. , & Wolf, S. (1981). The social impact of majorities and minorities. Psychological Review , 88 (5), 438–453. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.88.5.438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebman, J. , McKinley-Pace, M. , Leonard, A. , Sheesley, L. , Gallant, C. , Renkey, M. , & Lehman, E. (2002). Cognitive and psychosocial correlates of adults’ eyewitness accuracy and suggestibility. Personality and Individual Differences , 33 (1), 49–66. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00135-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loftus, E. (2005). Planting misinformation in the human mind: A 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learning & Memory , 12 (4), 361–366. doi:10.1101/lm.94705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luus, C. , & Wells, G. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology , 79 (5), 714–723. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mannes, A. (2009). Are we wise about the wisdom of crowds? The use of group judgments in belief revision. Management Science , 55 (8), 1267–1279. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1090.1031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memon, A. , Dalton, G. , Horry, R. , Mine, R. , & Wright, D. (2016). How do witnesses fare with video identification parades, and are police forces following good practice? Researchers into real cases on both sides of the border present their findings. The Journal . Retrieved from http://www.journalonline.co.uk/Magazine/57-11/1011839.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Mojtahedi, D. , Ioannou, M. , & Hammond, L. (2017). Personality correlates of co-witness suggestibility. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice. , 17 (4), 249–274. doi:10.1080/24732850.2017.1358996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, C. , Hazlett, G. , Baranoski, M. , Doran, A. , Southwick, S. , & Loftus, E. (2007). Accuracy of eyewitness identification is significantly associated with performance on a standardized test of face recognition. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry , 30 (3), 213–223. doi:10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori, K. , & Mori, H. (2008). Conformity among cowitnesses sharing same or different information about an event in experimental collaborative eyewitness testimony. Perceptual and Motor Skills , 106 (1), 275–290. doi:10.2466/pms.106.1.275-290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, W. , & Miller, R. (1975). The effects of consensus-breaking and consensus-preempting partners on reduction of conformity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 11 (3), 215–223. doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(75)80023-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B. (1983). Operationalizing the effect of the group on the individual: A self-attention perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 19 (4), 295–322. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(83)90025-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordholm, L. (1975). Effects of group size and stimulus ambiguity on conformity. The Journal of Social Psychology , 97 (1), 123–130. doi:10.1080/00224545.1975.9923321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. , & Kemp, R. (2006a). Comparing methods of encountering post-event information: The power of co-witness suggestion. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 20 (8), 1083–1099. doi:10.1002/acp.1261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paterson, H. , & Kemp, R. (2006b). Co-witnesses talk: A survey of eyewitness discussion. Psychology, Crime & Law , 12 (2), 181–191. doi:10.1080/10683160512331316334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, L. (1961). Group size, prior experience, and conformity. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 63 (2), 436–437. doi:10.1037/h0047007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schacter, D. , Guerin, S. , & St. St. Jacques, P. (2011). Memory distortion: An adaptive perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences , 15 (10), 467–474. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheck, B. , Neufeld, P. , & Dwyer, J. (2003). Actual innocence (1st ed.). (p. 243). New York, NY: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz, S. , & Roebers, C. (2006). Age differences in the effects of social influence on children’s eyewitness performance and their metacognitive monitoring. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 94 (3), 229–248. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semmler, C. , Brewer, N. , & Wells, G. (2004). Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology , 89 (2), 334–346. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.2.334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skagerberg, E. , & Wright, D. (2008a). Manipulating power can affect memory conformity. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 22 (2), 207–216. doi:10.1002/acp.1353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skagerberg, E. , & Wright, D. (2008b). The prevalence of co-witnesses and co-witness discussions in real eyewitnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law , 14 (6), 513–521. doi:10.1080/10683160801948980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skagerberg, E. , & Wright, D. (2009). Susceptibility to postidentification feedback is affected by source credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 23 (4), 506–523. doi:10.1002/acp.1470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang, D. (1976). Group size effects on conformity. The Journal of Social Psychology , 98 (2), 175–181. doi:10.1080/00224545.1976.9923388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steblay, N. , Dysart, J. , Fulero, S. , & Lindsay, R. (2003). Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior , 27 (5), 523–540. doi:10.1023/a:1025438223608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevens, J. (2009). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (1st ed.). New York, NY : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thorley, C. (2015). Blame conformity: Innocent bystanders can be blamed for a crime as a result of misinformation from a young, but not elderly, adult co-witness. PLoS One , 10 (7).https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134739
   Google Scholar
• Thorley, C. , & Dewhurst, S. (2009). False and veridical collaborative recognition. Memory , 17 (1), 17–25. doi:10.1080/09658210802484817
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorley, C. , & Rushton-Woods, J. (2013). Blame conformity: Leading eyewitness statements can influence attributions of blame for an accident. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 27 (3), 291–296. doi:10.1002/acp.2906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tousignant, J. , Hall, D. , & Loftus, E. (1986). Discrepancy detection and vulnerability to misleading postevent information. Memory & Cognition , 14 (4), 329–338. doi:10.3758/bf03202511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walther, E. , Bless, H. , Strack, F. , Rackstraw, P. , Wagner, D. , & Werth, L. (2002). Conformity effects in memory as a function of group size, dissenters and uncertainty. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 16 (7), 793–810. doi:10.1002/acp.828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells, G. , & Olson, E. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology , 54 (1), 277–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, P. , Weber, N. , & Robertson, M. (2013). The effect of expertise on memory conformity: A test of informational influence. Behavioral Sciences & The Law , 31 (5), 607–623. doi:10.1002/bsl.2094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. , London, K. , & Waechter, M. (2009). Social anxiety moderates memory conformity in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology , 24 (7), 1034–1045. doi:10.1002/acp.1604
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. , Memon, A. , Skagerberg, E. , & Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science , 18 (3), 174–178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01631.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, D. , & Skagerberg, E. (2007). Postidentification feedback affects real eyewitnesses. Psychological Science , 18 (2), 172–178. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01868.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar