Temperature fluctuations at sympathetic preganglionic neuron sites in the thoracolumbar section of the spinal column as cues to deception: a preliminary study

References

• Abootelebi, V., Mordai, M. H., & Khalilzadeh, M. A. (2006). A comparison of methods for ERP assessment in a P300-based GKT. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 309–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartol, C. R., & Bartol, A. M. (2004). Psychology and law: Theory, research, and application. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Shakhar, G., & Elaad, E. (2003). The validity of psychophysiological detection of information with the Guilty Knowledge Test: A meta- analytic review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 131–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception: A psychophysiological and international perspective. NewYork, NY: Springer-Verlag Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley, M., & Rettinger, J. (1992). Awareness of crime-relevant information and the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 55–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley, M. T., & Warfield, J. F. (1984). Innocence, information, and the guilty knowledge test in the detection of deception. Psychophysiology, 21, 683–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buller, D. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1996). Interpersonal deception theory. Communication Theory, 6, 203–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvin, K. L., & Duffy, V. G. (2007). Development of a facial skin temperature-based methodology for non-intrusive mental workload measurement. Occupational Ergonomics, 7, 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of Acoustic Society of America, 25(5), 975–979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, P. O. (1968). Validity of the guilty-knowledge technique: The effects of motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(1p1), 62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. L., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74–118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dowdall, J., Pavlidis, I., & Tsiamyrtzis, P. (2009). Coalitional tracker for deception detection in thermal imagery. In R. I. Hammoud (Ed.), Augmented vision perception in infrared: Algorithms and applied systems, advances in pattern recognition (pp. 113–137). London: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond, P., & Lance, J. (1987). Facial flushing and sweating mediated by the sympathetic nervous system. Brain, 110, 793–803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elaad, E. (1998). The challenge of the concealed knowledge polygraph test. Expert Evidence, 6, 161–187.
   Google Scholar
• Elaad, E., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (1991). Effects of mental countermeasures on psychophysiological detection in the guilty knowledge test. International Journal of Psychology, 11, 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Elntib, S., & Wagstaff, G. (2017). Are reality monitoring differences between truthful and deceptive autobiographical accounts affected by standardisation for word length and the presence of others? Psychology, Crime & Law.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamer, M. (2010). Does the Guilty Actions Tests allow for differentiating guilty participants from innocents? A re-examination. International Journal of Psychophysiology.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamer, M. (2014). Mind reading using neuroimaging: Is this the future of deception detection? European Psychologist, 19(3), 172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gane, L., Power, S., Kushki, A., & Chau, T. (2011). Thermal imaging of the periorbital regions during the presentation of an auditory startle stimulus. PloS One, 6(1–8), e27268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganis, G. (2015). Deception detection using neuroimaging. In P. A. Granhag, A. Vrij, & B. Verschuere (Eds.), Detecting deception: Currentvchallenges and cognitive approaches (pp. 105–121). Chichester,UK: Willey.
   Google Scholar
• Ganis, G., Rosenfeld, J. P., Meixner, J., Kievit, R. A., & Schendan, H. E. (2011). Lying in the scanner: Covert countermeasures disrupt deception detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage, 55(1), 312–319.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamill, R. W., Shapiro, R. E., & Vizzard, M. A. (2012). “Chapter 4 - Peripheral autonomic nervous system,” in Primer on the Autonomic Nervous System, 3rd Edn, eds Robertson D., Biaggioni I., Burnstock G., Low P. A., Paton J. F. R., editors. (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press ;), 17–26
   Google Scholar
• Honts, C. R. (2004). The phsychophysiological detection of deception. In P. A. Granhag & L. A. Stromwell (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 103–123). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinmuntz, B., & Szucko, J. J. (1984). Lie detection in ancient and modern times: A call for contemporary scientific study. American Psychologist, 39, 766–776.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levine, J. A., Pavlidis, I., & Cooper, M. (2001). The face of fear. Lancet, 357(9270), 1757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. A., & Cuppari, M. (2009). The polygraph: The truth lies within. Journal of Psychiatry and Law, 37, 85–92.
   Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-Smith, I. J. (2009). Anatomy of synaptic circuits controlling the activity of sympathetic preganglionic neurons. Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy, 38(2009), 231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llewellyn-Smith, I. J., & Verberne, A. J. M. (2011). Central regulation of autonomic function. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombroso, C. (1895). L’Homme criminal. Atlas. Paris, G. Bailliére et Cie./ F. Alcan, 2nd ed., 336–346).
   Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1959). The GSR in the detection of guilt. Journal of Applied Psychology, 43(6), 385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detector industry. American Psychologist, 29, 725-739. doi:10.1037/h0037441
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykken, D. T. (1998). A tremor in the blood: Uses and abuses of the lie detector. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lynn, R. (1966). Attention, arousal and the orientation reaction. New York, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacLaren, V. V. (2001). A quantitative review of the guilty knowledge test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 674–683.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacNeill, A. L., & Bradley, M. T. (2016). Temperature effects on polygraph detection of concealed information. Psychophysiology, 53(2), 143–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntosh, D. N., Zajonc, R. B., Vig, P. S., & Emerick, S. W. (1997). Facial movement, breathing, temperature, and affect: Implications of the vascular theory of emotional efference. Cognition and Emotion, 11, 171–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, E. H., Selle, N. K., Elber, L., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2014). Memory detection with the Concealed Information Test: A meta-analysis of skin conductance, respiration, heart rate, and P300 data. Psychophysiol, 51, 879–904.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, E. H., Verschuere, B., Gamer, M., Merckelbach, H., & Ben- Shakhar, G. (2016). Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty. Psychophysiology, 53, 593–604.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merla, A., & Romani, G. L. (2007). “Thermal Signatures of Emotional Arousal: A Functional Infrared Imaging Study,” In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon (France), 2007, pp. 247–249.
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, F. B., Faro, S. H., Gordon, N. J., Platek, S. M., Ahmad, H., & Williams, J. M. (2006). Brain mapping of deception and truth telling about an ecologically valid situation: Functional MR imaging and polygraph investigation—Initial experience. Radiology, 238(2), 679–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, M. (2002). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 49–86). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, K., Suk, H., Hwang, H., & Lee, J. (2013). A functional analysis of deception detection of a mock crime using infrared thermal imaging and the Concealed Information Test. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlidis, I., Eberhardt, N. L., & Levine, J. A. (2002). Seeing through the face of deception. Nature, 415, 35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavlidis, I., Levine, J., & Baukol, P. (2001). Thermal image analysis for anxiety detection. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Thessaloniki, Greece,Vol. 2, pp. 315–318.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlidis, I., & Levine, J. (2002). Thermal image analysis for polygraph testing. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, 21, 56–64.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pavlidis, I., Levine, J., & Baukol, P. (2001). Thermal image analysis for anxiety detection. In IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (pp. 315–318), Thessaloniki, Greece, Vol 2.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlov, I. P. (1927). Condition reflex. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollina, D. A., Dollins, A. B., Senter, S. M., Brown, T. E., Pavlidis, L., Levine, J. A., et al. (2006). Facial skin surface temperature changes during a “’concealed information” test. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 7, 1182–1189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajoub, B. A., & Zwiggelaar, R. (2014). Thermal facial analysis for deception detection. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 9(6), 1015–1023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santori, G., Agosta, S., Zogmaister, C., Ferrara, S. D., & Castiello, U. (2008). How to accurately detect autobiographical events. Psychology Science, 19(8), 772–780.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer, M. E., Brodt, S. E., & Croson, R. T. A. (2002). Seeing and believing: Visual access and the strategic use of deception. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 13, 258–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokolov, A. N. (1963). Perception and the conditional reflex. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov, E. N., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1997). Orienting and defense reflexes: Vector coding the cardiac response. In P. J. Lang & R. F. Simons (Eds.), Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Trovillo, P. V. (1939). A history of lie detection. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 29, 848–881.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiamyrtzis, P., Dowdall, J., Shastri, D., Pavlidis, I. T., Frank, M. G., & Ekman, P. (2007). Imaging facial physiology for the detection of deceit. International Journal of Computer Vision, 71, 197–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Prati, V., & De Houwer, J. (2009). Cheating the lie detector. Faking in the autobiographical Implicit Association Test. Psychological Science, 20(4), 410–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warmelink, L., Vrij, A., Mann, S., Leal, S., Forrester, D., & Fisher, R. P. (2011). Thermal imaging as a lie detection tool at airports. Law Hum Bahav, 35, 40–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar