References
- Adjorlolo, S., & Chan, H. C. O. (2019). Risk assessment of criminal offenders in Ghana: An investigation of the discriminant validity of the HCR-20V3. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 66, 101458. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101458
- Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (1995). The Level of Service Inventory–Revised. Multi-Health Systems.
- Bjørkly, S., Eidhammer, G., & Selmer, L. E. (2014). Concurrent validity and clinical utility of the HCR-20V3 compared with the HCR-20 in forensic mental health nursing: Similar tools but improved method. Journal of Forensic Nursing, 10(4), 234–242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000047
- Campbell, L., & Beech, A. (2018). Do scores on the HCR-20 and FAM predict frequency of self-harm in females within a secure psychiatric hospital? The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(6), 914–933. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2018.1477975
- Cawood, J. S. (2017). The interrater reliability and predictive validity of the HCR-20V3 in common workplace environments. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000071
- Cho, E., & Lee, S. J. (2008). Hare Psychopathy Checklist–Revised: Professional guidebook (Translation for the Korean Edition). Korea Psychological Services.
- Cook, A. N., Viljoen, S., Layden, B. K., Murray, A. A., McGinnis, C. R., & Hart, S. D. (2013, March). Validity of the PPI:SF and the TriPM using the CAPP as a Concept Map. [abstract]. American Psychology-Law Society Annual Conference, Portland, OR.
- Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2004). Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality–Institutional Rating Scale (CAPP–IRS). Glasgow Caledonian University.
- Cooke, D. J., Hart, S. D., Logan, C., & Michie, C. (2012). Explicating the construct of psychopathy: Development and validation of a conceptual model, the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP). The International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(4), 242–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.746759
- Corrado, R. R., Watkinson, A. V., Hart, S. D., & Cohen, I. M. (2006). Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality Disorder. Initial results with a serious and violent youth sample. Paper presented at the 6th annual conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services (IAFMHS), Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Corrado, R. R., Watkinson, A. V., Hart, S. D., Lussier, P., & Cohen, I. M. (2007). The interrater reliability of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality. Paper presented at the 3rd International Congress of Psychology and Law, Adelaide, Australia
- Darjee, R., Russell, K., Forrest, L., Milton, E., Savoie, V., Baron, E., & Stobie, S. (2016). Risk for sexual violence protocol (RSVP): A real world study of the reliability, validity and utility of a structured professional judgement instrument in the assessment and management of sexual offenders in South East Scotland. NHS Lothian Sex Offender Liaison Service.
- de Vogel, V., van den Broek, E., & de Vries Robbé, M. (2014). The use of the HCR-20V3 in Dutch forensic psychiatric practice. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 109–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.906518
- de Vries Robbé, M., & de Vogel, V. 2010. Pilot study of HCR-20 (Version 3) Unpublished data analyses. Van der Hoeven Kliniek.
- Dolan, M., & Blattner, R. (2010). The utility of the Historical Clinical Risk −20 Scale as a predictor of outcomes in decisions to transfer patients from high to lower levels of security-A UK perspective. BMC Psychiatry, 10(1), 76–83. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-10-76
- Douglas, K. S., & Belfrage, H. (2015). The structured professional judgment approach to violence risk assessment and management: Why it is useful, how to use it, and its empirical support. In C. A. Pietz & C. A. Mattson (Eds.), Violent offenders: Understanding and assessment (pp. 360–383). Oxford University Press.
- Douglas, K. S., & Belfrage, H. (2014). Interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the HCR-20 Version 3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 130–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.908429
- Douglas, K. S., Hart, S. D., Webster, C. D., & Belfrage, H. (2013). HCR-20V3: Assessing risk of violence – User guide. Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
- Douglas, K. S., & Reeves, K. (2010). The HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and review of the research. Handbook of violence risk assessment (pp.147-185). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Douglas, K. S., Shaffer, C., Blanchard, A. J. E., Guy, L. S., Reeves, K., & Weir, J. (2014). HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme: Overview and annotated bibliography. HCR-20 Violence Risk Assessment White Paper Series, #1. Burnaby, Canada: Mental Health, Law, and Policy Institute, Simon Fraser University.
- Douglas, K. S., & Strub, D. S. (2013). Predictive validity of HCR-20 (Version 3) amongst civil psychiatric patients and criminal offenders. Unpublished data analyses. Simon Fraser University.
- Douglas, K. S., Yeomans, M., & Boer, D. P. (2005). Comparative validity analysis of multiple measures of violence risk in a sample of criminal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 32(5), 479–510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0093854805278411
- Doyle, M., Power, L. A., Coid, J., Kallis, C., Ullrich, S., & Shaw, J. (2014). Predicting post-discharge community violence in England and Wales using the HCR-20V3. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 140–147. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.906517
- Doyle, M., Shaw, J., & Coid, J. (2013). Validation of risk assessments in medium secure services (VORAMSS): Preliminary HCR-20 (Version 3) analyses. Unpublished data analyses. University of Manchester, UK, and Queen Mary University of London.
- Edens, J. F., & Boccaccini, M. T. (2017). Taking forensic mental health assessment “out of the lab” and into “the real world”: Introduction to the special issue on the field utility of forensic assessment instruments and procedures. Psychological Assessment, 29(6), 599–610. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000475
- Eidhammer, G., Selmer, L. E., & Bjørkly, S., the SAFE Pilot Project Group. (2013). A brief report of a comparison of the HCR-20 (Version 2) and HCR-20 (Version 3) concerning internal consistency and clinical utility. Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital.
- Fleiss, J. L., Levin, B., & Paik, M. ca. 1981. The measurement of interrater agreement. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd Ed. Vols. (212-236):22–23. John Wiley & Sons.
- Grimbos, T., Penney, S. R., Fernane, S., Prosser, A., Ray, I., & Simpson, A. I. (2016). Gender comparisons in a forensic sample: Patient profiles and HCR-20: V2 reliability and item utility. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 15(2), 136–148. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2016.1152617
- Hanson, R. K., Lunetta, A., Phenix, A., Neeley, J., & Epperson, D. (2014). The field validity of Static-99/R sex offender risk assessment tool in California. Journal of Threat Assessment and Management, 1(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/tam0000014
- Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (1999). Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders (Vol. 2). Solicitor General Canada.
- Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Notes on the development of Static-2002. Solicitor General Canada.
- Hare, R. D. (1991). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised. Multi-Health Systems.
- Hare, R. D. (2003). The Hare Psychopathy Checklist—Revised manual (2nd ed.). MHS.
- Harris, A., Phenix, A., Hanson, R. K., & Thornton, D. (2003). Static 99: Coding rules revised 2003. Solicitor General Canada.
- Hart, S. D., Douglas, K. S., & Guy, L. S. (2016). The Structured Professional Judgement approach to violence risk assessment: Origins, nature, and advances. The Wiley Handbook on the Theories, Assessment and Treatment of Sexual Offending, 1643–666. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118574003.wattso030
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations across Nations. Sage (co-published in the PRC as Vol. 10 in the Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press SFLEP Intercultural Communication Reference Series, 2008).
- Hogan, N. R., & Olver, M. E. (2016). Assessing risk for aggression in forensic psychiatric inpatients: An examination of five measures. Law and Human Behavior, 40(3), 233–243. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000179
- Hogan, N. R., & Olver, M. E. (2018). A prospective examination of the predictive validity of five structured instruments for inpatient violence in a secure forensic hospital. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 17(2), 122–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2018.1431339
- Hogan, N. R., & Olver, M. E. (2019). Static and dynamic assessment of violence risk among discharged forensic patients. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 46(7), 923–938. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0093854819846526
- Howe, J., Rosenfeld, B., Foellmi, M., Stern, S., & Rotter, M. (2016). Application of the HCR-20 Version 3 in civil psychiatric patients. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 43(3), 398–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815605527
- Jackson, K. J. (2016). Validation of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol in adult sexual offenders. Department of Psychology.
- Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
- Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, 33, 159–174. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Lee, M., & Kim, H. (2009). The LSI-R risk factors and sentencing. Korean Association of Public Safety and Criminal Justice Review, 18(2), 215–247. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001356866
- Lee, S., & Ko, R. (2011). A study on the validity evidences of Korean Offender Risk Assessment System. Journal of Korean Criminological Association, 5(2), 221–258. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001615172
- Lee, S., Ko, R., & Park, H. (2008). Development of the Korean Sex Offender Risk Assessment Scale (KSORAS) and its validity evidences. Korean Criminological Review, 19(4), 309–345. https://www.kci.go.kr/kciportal/ci/sereArticleSearch/ciSereArtiView.kci?sereArticleSearchBean.artiId=ART001311833
- Mastromanno, B., Brookstein, D. M., Ogloff, J. R., Campbell, R., Chu, C. M., & Daffern, M. (2018). Assessing change in dynamic risk factors in forensic psychiatric inpatients: Relationship with psychopathy and recidivism. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 29(2), 323–336. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2017.1377277
- Müller, M. J., & Wetzel, H. (1998). Improvement of inter‐rater reliability of PANSS items and subscales by a standardized rater training. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 98(2), 135–139. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1998.tb10055.x
- Penney, S. R., Marshall, L. A., & Simpson, A. I. (2016). The assessment of dynamic risk among forensic psychiatric patients transitioning to the community. Law and Human Behavior, 40(4), 374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000183
- Persson, M., Belfrage, H., Fredriksson, B., & Kristiansson, M. (2017). Violence during imprisonment, forensic psychiatric care, and probation: Correlations and predictive validity of the risk assessment instruments COVR, LSI-R, HCR-20V3, and SAPROF. International journal of forensic mental health, 16(2), 117–129.
- Quinsey, V. L., Harris, G. T., Rice, M. E., & Cormier, C. A. (1998). Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. American Psychological Association.
- Reichelt, F. K., James, I. A., & Blackburn, I. M. (2003). Impact of training on rating competence in cognitive therapy. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 34(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7916(03)00022-3
- Ryan, T. J. (2016). An Examination of the Interrater Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide–Version 3 (SARA-V3) (Doctoral dissertation, Arts & Social Sciences: Department of Psychology). Simon Fraser University.
- Sea, J. (2018). Cross-cultural generalizability of the Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality (CAPP) in South Korea (Doctoral dissertation, Arts & Social Sciences: Department of Psychology). Simon Fraser University.
- Sea, J., & Hart, S. D. (2020). Interrater reliability and concurrent validity of the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol for Korean sexual offenders: A field study. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 0306624X2096796. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20967969
- Shepherd, S. M., Campbell, R. E., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2018). The utility of the HCR-20 in an Australian sample of forensic psychiatric patients. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 25(2), 273–282. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13218719.2017.1364676
- Smid, W. J., Kamphuis, J. H., Wever, E. C., & van Beek, D. J. (2014). A comparison of the predictive properties of nine sex offender risk assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 26(3), 691–703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036616
- Smith, S., & Edens, J. F. 2013. Concurrent validity between the HCR-20 (Version 3) and the PCL-R among male pre-trial offenders in Texas Unpublished data analyses. Texas A&M University.
- Strub, D. S., Douglas, K. S., & Nicholls, T. L. (2014). The validity of Version 3 of the HCR-20 violence risk assessment scheme amongst offenders and civil psychiatric patients. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 13(2), 148–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2014.911785
- Sutherland, A. A., Johnstone, L., Davidson, K. M., Hart, S. D., Cooke, D. J., Kropp, P. R., Logan, C., Michie, C., & Stocks, R. (2012). Sexual violence risk assessment: An investigation of the interrater reliability of professional judgments made using the Risk for Sexual Violence Protocol. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 11(2), 119–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2012.690020
- Watkinson, A. V., Corrado, R. R., Lussier, P., Hart, S. D., & Cohen, I. M. (2007). Comprehensive Assessment of Psychopathic Personality Disorder and the Psychopathy Checklist: Youth Version. Paper presented at the 7th annual conference of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services (IAFMHS), Montreal, Canada
- Watt, K. A., Hart, S., Wilson, C., Guy, L., & Douglas, K. S. (2006). An evaluation of the Risk of Sexual Violence Protocol. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Association of Forensic Mental Health Services, Miami, Florida
- Webster, C. D., Eaves, D., Douglas, K. S., & Wintrup, A. (1995). The HCR-20 scheme: The assessment of dangerousness and risk. Simon Fraser University and British Columbia Forensic Psychiatric Services Commission.
- Wilson, C. M., Desmarais, S. L., Nicholls, T. L., Hart, S. D., & Brink, J. (2013). Predictive validity of dynamic factors: Assessing violence risk in forensic psychiatric inpatients. Law and Human Behavior, 37(6), 377–388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000025