References
- Duff, R. A. (1993). Choice, character, and criminal liability. Law and Philosophy, 12.
- Herber, E. (2020). Lay and expert contributions to Japanese criminal justice. Routhledge.
- Hermann, J. (2002). The death penalty in Japan: An “absurd” punishment. Brooklyn Law Review, 67(3), 827.
- Holmes, R. M., & DeBurger, J. (1988). Serial murder. SAGE.
- Johnson, D. T. (2009a). Capital punishment without capital trials in Japan’s lay judge system. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 7.
- Johnson, D. T. (2009b). Early returns from Japan’s new criminal trials. The Asia-Pacific Journal, 7(36).
- Kashiwagi, H., & Hirabayashi, N. (2018). Death penalty and psychiatric evaluation in Japan. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9, 550. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00550
- Kashiwagi, H., Shingo, Y., & Naotsugu, H. (2020). Investigating the verdicts of mass murder cases in which the prosecutors sought the death penalty and criminal responsibility became the focus: The change of psychiatric evaluations and criminal responsibility judgements in serious cases. Psychiatria et Neurologia Japonica, 122, 118.
- Livings, B., Reed, A., & Wake, N. (2015). Mental condition defences and the criminal justice system: Perspective from law and medicine. Cambridge Scholars.
- Morris, N. (1953). ”Wrong” in the M’Naghten Rules. The Modern Law Review, 16(4), 435. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.1953.tb02133.x
- Okaue, M. (2012). Some theoretical problems concerning the sentencing under the Lay-Judge System in Japan. Tsukuba Law Journal, 3, 87.
- Research and Training Institute, White Paper on Crime. (2022). The Ministry of Justice Japan.
- Rix, K. J. B. (2016). Towards a more just insanity defence: Recovering moral wrongfulness in the M’Naghten Rules. BJPsych Advances, 22, 44. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.115.014951
- Slater, E. (1954). The M’Naghten Rules and modern concepts of responsibility. The British Medical Journal, 2, 713. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.2.4890.713
- Supreme Court of Japan, ‘Outline of Criminal Justice in Japan’. (2023). Retrieved November 8, 2023 https://www.courts.go.jp/english/vc-files/courts-en/Material/Outline_of_Criminal_Justice_in_JAPAN_2023.pdf
- Weihofen, H. (1967). Capacity to appreciate wrongfulness or criminality under the A.L.I Model penal code test of mental responsibility. Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 58(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.2307/1141365
- Yamauchi, H. (2009). The Tsutomu Miyazaki case: His ambivalence for little girls. 16 Journal of Social and Information Studies, 13–25.
Cases
- M’Naghten’s Case (1843) 10 Cl & Fin 210.
- Osaka District Court (1984, April 20) LEX/DB27921922.
- Osaka High Court (2008) (A) 1718, verdict of 8 December 2009.
- R v Chaulk (1990) 3 SCR 1303.
- R v Codère (1917) 12 Cr App R 21.
- R v Johnson (2007) EWCA Crim 1978.
- R v Keal (2022) EWCA Crim 341.
- R v Kemp (1957) 1 QB 399.
- R v Sodeman (1936) HCA 75.
- R v Windle (1952) 2 QB 826.
- Supreme Court Second Petty Bench (2006) (A) 876, verdict of 25 April 2008.
- Supreme Court Third Petty Bench (1983) (A) 1761, verdict of 3 July 1984.
- Supreme Court Third Petty Bench (2001) (A) 1205, verdict of 17 January 2006.
- Tokyo District Court (1997, April 14) Hanrei Times, No 952, 75.
- Tokyo District Court (2011, March 24) LEX/DB06427452.
- Tokyo High Court (2000, December 11) LEX/DB28075525.
- Tokyo High Court (2018) (U) 744, verdict of 9 March 2022.
- Yokohama District Court (2018a, March 22) LEX/DB25560322.
- Yokohama District Court (2018b) (WA) 2033, verdict of 9 November 2021.