672
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Multilingual acquisition of vowels in L1 Polish, L2 Danish and L3 English

Pages 476-495 | Received 11 Feb 2016, Accepted 29 Jun 2016, Published online: 22 Sep 2016

References

  • Adank, P., Smits, R., & van Hout, R. (2004). A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3099–3107. doi: 10.1121/1.1795335
  • Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2007). The role of the second language in third language acquisition: The case of Germanic syntax. Second Language Research, 23, 459–484. doi:10.1177/0267658307080557
  • Bardel, C., & Falk, Y. (2012). Behind the L2 status factor: A neurolinguistic framework for L3 research. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 61–78). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2013). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 5.3.40.) [Computer program]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
  • Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2013). The phonological permeability hypothesis: Measuring regressive L3 influence to the L1 and L2 phonological representations (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
  • Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2016). Testing the phonological permeability hypothesis: L3 phonological effects on L1 versus L2 systems. International Journal of Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/1367006916637287
  • Cabrelli Amaro, J., & Rothman, J. (2010). L3 acquisition and phonological permeability: A new test case for debates on the mental representation of non-native phonological systems. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48(2/3), 273–294. doi:10.1515/iral.2010.012
  • Cenoz, J. (2001). The effect of linguistic distance, L2 status and age on cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic Perspectives (pp. 8–20). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Cenoz, J. (2003). The role of typology in the organization of the multilingual lexicon. In J. Cenoz, J. B. Hufesein, & U. Jessner (Eds.), The multilingual lexicon (pp. 103–116). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
  • Cerrato, L. (1992). Acoustical analysis of English vowels uttered in spontaneous speech (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Naples Federico II, Naples.
  • Chamot, A. U. (1973). Phonological problems in learning English as a third language. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 11, 243–250.
  • Chang, S. U. (2015). Degree and direction of foreign accentedness in L2 and L3 Korean speech. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th international congress of phonetic sciences. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow. Retrieved from https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphs-proceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0002.pdf
  • Cheung, S. C. (2011). Influence of L3 German on L2 English among Cantonese native speakers in the domain of tense-aspect (Unpublished PhD dissertation). University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • De Angelis, G. (2007). Third or additional language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Dewaele, J.-M. (1998). Lexical inventions: French interlanguage as L2 versus L3. Applied Linguistics, 19, 471–490. doi:10.1093/applin/19.4.471
  • Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., & Weckwerth, J. (2012). The ‘native speaker’ and prototypicality. In R. K. Agnihotri & R. Singh (Eds.), Indian English: Towards a new paradigm (pp. 225–230). Hyderabad: Orient Black Swan.
  • Ejstrup, M., & Foget Hansen, G. (2004, May 26–28). Vowels in regional variants of Danish. Proceedings, FONETIK 2004, the XVIIth Swedish phonetics conference, Stockholm (pp. 88–91).
  • Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 48, 185–220. doi:10.1515/iral.2010.009
  • Fernandes-Boëchat, M. H., & Siebeneicher Brito, K. (2008). Speaking models: From Levelt’s monolingual to Williams & Hammarberg’s polyglot. In A. Schurt Rauber, M. A. Watkins, & B. O. Baptista (Eds.), New sounds 2007: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on the acquisition of second language speech (pp. 199–206). Florianópolis: Federal University of Santa Catarina.
  • Grønnum, N. (1997). Danish vowels: The psychological reality of a morphophonemic representation. In La voyelle dans tous ses états: Journées d'études linguistiques, Nantes 5 et 6 décembre 1997 (pp. 91–97). Nantes: Groupe AAI - Université de Nantes.
  • Grønnum, N. (2009). A Danish phonetically annotated spontaneous speech corpus (DanPASS). Speech Communication, 51, 594–603. doi:10.1016/j.specom.2008.11.002
  • Gut, U. (2010). Cross-linguistic influence in L3 phonological acquisition. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 19–38. doi: 10.1080/14790710902972248
  • Hammarberg, B. (2001). Roles of L1 and L2 in L3 production and acquisition. In J. Cenoz, B. Hufeisen, & U. Jessner (Eds.), Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 21–41). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism. Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
  • Jassem, W. (2003). Illustrations of the IPA: Polish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33(1), 103–107. doi:10.1017/s0025100303001191
  • Jessner, U. (2006). Linguistic awareness in multilinguals: English as a third language. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • Kellerman, E. (1977). Towards a characterization of the strategy of transfer in second language learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 2(5), 58–145. London: Routledge.
  • Lipińska, D. (2015). Production of L3 vowels: Is it possible to separate them from L1 and L2 sounds? Research in Language, 13(1), 77–92. doi:10.1515/rela-2015-0011
  • Llama, R., Cardoso, W., & Collins, L. (2010). The influence of language distance and language status on the acquisition of L3 phonology. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7(1), 39–57. doi: 10.1080/14790710902972255
  • Llisterri, J., & Poch-Olivé, D. (1987, August 1–7). Phonetic interference in bilinguals learning a third language. Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Academy of Sciences of the Estonian SSR, Tallinn (pp. 134–137).
  • Mackay, I. R. A., & Flege, J. E. (2004). Effects of the age of second language learning on the duration of first and second language sentences: The role of suppression. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 373–396. doi: 10.1017.S0142716404001171
  • Meisel, J. (1983). Transfer as a second language strategy. Language and Communication, 3, 11–46. doi:10.1016/0271-5309(83)90018-6
  • Mora, J. C., Keidel, J. L., & Flege, J. E. (2015). Effects of Spanish use on the production of Catalan vowels by early Spanish-Catalan bilinguals. In J. Romera & M. Riera (Eds.), The phonetics-phonology interface. Representations and methodologies (pp. 33–54). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Petersen, N. R. (2012). Vokaler (Unpublished teaching material). University of Copenhagen.
  • Pinto, J. (2013). Cross-linguistic influence at lexical level. A study with Moroccan learners of Portuguese as an L3/LN. Revista Nebrija de Lingüística Aplicada, 12, 3–50.
  • Roach, P. (2000). English phonetics and phonology: A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The Typological Primacy Model. Second Language Research, 27, 107–127. doi:10.1177/0267658310386439
  • Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the Typological Primacy Model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18, 179–190. doi: 10.1017/S136672891300059X
  • Schmid, M. (2007). The role of L1 use for L1 attrition. In B. Barbara Köpke, S. Schmid, M. Keijzer, & S. Dostert (Eds.), Language attrition. Theoretical perspectives (pp. 135–153). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Strycharczuk, P., & Jurgec, P. (2008, July). Prosodic influences on formant frequencies of Polish vowels. Paper presented at the Third Newcastle Postgraduate Conference in Theoretical Applied Linguistics, Newcastle.
  • Sypiańska, J. (2013). Quantity and quality of language use and L1 attrition of Polish due to L2 Danish and L3 English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań.
  • Thomas, E. R., & Kendall, T. (2007). NORM: The vowel normalization and plotting suite. Retrieved from http://ncslaap.lib.ncsu.edu/tools/norm/
  • Thorsen, N., Thorsen, O., & Holtse, P. (1978). Fonetik for Sprogstuderende. Copenhagen: Københavns Universitet, Institut for Fonetik.
  • Tremblay, M. C. (2006). Cross-linguistic influence in third language acquisition: The role of L2 proficiency and L2 exposure. Cahier’s Linguistiques d’Ottawa, 34, 109–119.
  • Tremblay, M. C. (2007, August). L2 influence on L3 pronunciation: Native-like VOT in the L3 Japanese of English-French bilinguals. Paper presented at the Satellite Workshop of ICPhS XVI, Freiburg.
  • Williams, S., & Hammarberg, B. (1998). Language switches in L3 production: Implications for a polyglot speaking model. Applied Linguistics, 19(3), 295–333. doi: 10.1093/applin/19.3.295
  • Wrembel, M. (2012). Foreign accentedness in third language acquisition; The case of L3 English. In J. Cabrelli Amaro, S. Flynn, & J. Rothman (Eds.), Third language acquisition in adulthood (pp. 281–309). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Wrembel, M. (2014). VOT patterns in the acquisition of third language phonology. Concordia Papers in Applied Linguistics (COPAL), 5, 751–771.
  • Wunder, E. (2010, May 1–3). Phonological cross-linguistic influence in third or additional language acquisition. Proceedings of 6th New Sounds 2010, Poznań (pp. 566–571).
  • Yao, Y., Tilsen, S., Sprouse, R. L., & Johnson, K. (2010). Automated measurement of vowel formants in the Buckeye Corpus. Gengo Kenkyu (Journal of the Linguistic Society of Japan), 138, 99–113.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.