References
- Baumann, Z. (2000). Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
- Ben-Rafael, E., Shohamy, E., Amara, M., & Trumper-Hecht, N. (2006). The symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3(1), 7–31. doi: 10.1080/14790710608668383
- Blommaert, J. (2010). Sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Deumert, A. (2014). Sociolinguistics and mobile communication. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
- Deumert, A. (2017). Mimesis and mimicry in language – creativity and aesthetics as the performance of (dis-)semblance. Language Sciences. doi: 10.1016/j.langsci.2017.03.009
- Higgins, C. (2017). Space, place and language. In S. Canagarajah (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of migration and language (pp. 102–116). London: Routledge.
- Hua, Z., Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. (2017). Multilingual, multisensory and multimodal repertoires in corner shops, streets and markets: Introduction. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 383–393. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2017.1334383
- Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (Eds.). (2010). Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space. London: Continuum.
- Jones, R. (Ed.). (2012). Discourse and creativity. London: Pearson Education.
- Jones, R. H. (Ed.). (2016). Routledge handbook of language and creativity. London: Routledge.
- Kallen, J. (2009). Tourism and representation in the Irish linguistic landscape. In E. Shohamy, & D. Gorter (Eds.), Linguistic landscape: Expanding the scenery (pp. 270–283). London: Routledge.
- Karlander, D. (2016). Backjumps: Writing, watching, erasing train graffiti. Social Semiotics, 28(1), 41–59. doi: 10.1080/10350330.2016.1200802
- Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language and Communication, 23, 409–425. doi: 10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7
- Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23–49. doi: 10.1177/0261927X970161002
- Maybin, J., & Swann, J. (2007). Everyday creativity in language: Textuality, contextuality, and critique. Applied Linguistics, 28(4), 497–517. doi: 10.1093/applin/amm036
- Peck, A., & Stroud, C. (2015). Skinscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 133–151. doi: 10.1075/ll.1.1-2.08pec
- Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2015). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 191–212. doi: 10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen
- Saito, Y. (2015). Aesthetics of the everyday. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/aesthetics-of-everyday/
- Shohamy, E., & Ben-Rafael, A. (2015). Introduction: Linguistic landscape, a new journal. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 1–5.
- Thurlow, C. (2012). Determined creativity: Language play in new media discourse. In R. Jones (Ed.), Discourse and creativity (pp. 169–190). London: Pearson.