A-signifying semiotics and deaf/nondeaf becomings

References

• Allegranti, B. (2013). The politics of becoming bodies: Sex, gender and intersubjectivity in motion. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 40(4), 394–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aip.2013.05.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagga-Gupta, S. (2019). Languaging across time and space in educational contexts. Language Studies and Deaf Studies, Deafness & Education International, 21(2–3), 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2019.1594081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman, H.-D. (2008). Open your eyes. Deaf studies talking. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, A. L., von Scheve, C. V., Ural, Y., & Walter-Jochum, R. (2019). Reading for affect: A methodological proposal for analyzing affective dynamics in discourse. In A. Kahl (Ed.), Analyzing affective societies: Methods and methodologies (pp. 45–62). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429424366-3
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, G. (2020a). Theorizing vitality in the literacy classroom. Reading Research Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldt, G. (2020b). On learning to stay in the room: Notes from the classroom and clinic. In A. Nicollini, N. Lesko, B. Dernikos, & S. McCall (Eds.), Mapping the affective turn in education: Theory, research, and pedagogy (pp. 229–245). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, G., & Leander, K. (2020). Affect theory in reading research: Imagining the radical difference. Reading Psychology, 41(6), 515–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2020.1783137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldt, G., & Valente, J. M. (2014). Bring back the asylum: Reimagining inclusion in the presence of others. In M. Bloch, B. Swadener, & G. Canella (Eds.), Reconceptualizing early childhood care and education: Critical questions, new imaginaries and social activism (pp. 201–213). Peter Lang. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2016.1168260
   Google Scholar
• Boldt, G., & Valente, J. M. (2016). L’école Gulliver and La Borde: A Ethnographic account of collectivist integration and institutional psychotherapy. Curriculum Inquiry, 46(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2016.1168260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chumley, L. (2017). Qualia and ontology: Language, semiotics, and materiality; an introduction. Signs and Society, 5(S1), S1–S20. https://doi.org/10.1086/690190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conquergood, D. (1998). Beyond the text: Toward a performative cultural politics. In S. J. Dailey (Ed.), The future of performance studies: Visions and revisions (pp. 25–36). National Communication Association.
   Google Scholar
• Cowley, S. J. (2019). The return of languaging. Chinese Semiotic Studies, 15(4), 483–512. https://doi.org/10.1515/css-2019-0027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, V. (2010). A rhizomatics of hearing: Becoming deaf in the workplace and other affective spaces of hearing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(4), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2010.504369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G. (1995). Negotiations 1972-1990 (M. Joughin, Trans.). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Meulder, M., Kusters, A., Moriarty, E., & Murray, J. J. (2019). Describe, don't prescribe. The practice and politics of translanguaging in the context of deaf signers. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40(10), 892–906. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1592181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography: Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Di Paolo, E. A., Cuffari, E. C., & De Jaegher, H. (2018). Linguistic bodies: The continuity between life and language. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foolen, A., Lüdtke, U. M., Racine, T. P., & Zlatev, J. (Eds.). (2012). Moving ourselves, moving others: Motion and emotion in intersubjectivity, consciousness and language (Vol. 6). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, K., Pelias, R., Russell, L., Spry, T., & Wyatt, J. (2013). Intensity: A collaborative autoethnography. International Review of Qualitative Research, 6(1), 165–180. https://doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2013.6.1.165
   Google Scholar
• Gale, K., & Wyatt, J. (2013). Assemblage/ethnography: Troubling constructions of self in the play of materiality and representation. In N. P. Short, L. Turner, & A. Grant (Eds.), Contemporary British autoethnography (pp. 139–155). Brill Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Genosko, G. (2014). Information and asignification. FOOTPRINT, 8(14), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.8.1.798
   Google Scholar
• Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hauptmann, D., & Radman, A. (2014). Asignifying semiotics as proto-theory of singularity: Drawing is not writing and architecture does not speak. FOOTPRINT, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.8.1.794
   Google Scholar
• Hetrick, J. (2014). Video assemblages: ‘Machinic animism’ and ‘asignifying semiotics’ in the work of Melitopoulos and Lazzarato. FOOTPRINT, 8(14), 53–68. https://doi.org/10.7480/footprint.8.1.801
   Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moody, A. (2019). Deleuze and masculinity. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Kanngieser, A. (2012).  … And … and … and … the transversal politics of performative encounters. Deleuze Studies, 6(2), 265–290. https://doi.org/10.3366/dls.2012.0062
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2016). Performative-we: Multisensory and collective performance of selected young Korean artists in London. Critical Arts, 30(3), 392–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2016.1205328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R., & Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazzarato, M. (2006). Semiotic pluralism and the new government of signs: Homage to Félix Guattari (M. O’Neill, Trans.). http://eipcp.net/transversal/0107/lazzarato/en
   Google Scholar
• Leander, K., & Boldt, G. (2013). Rereading “A pedagogy of multiliteracies”: Bodies, texts, and emergence. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X12468587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leppänen, T. (2017). Unfolding non-audist methodologies in music research. Signing hip hop artist signmark and becoming deaf with music. In P. Moisala, T. Leppänen, M. Tiainen, & H. Väätäinen (Eds.), Musical encounters with deleuze and guattari (pp. 33–49). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Monaghan, L., Schmaling, C., Nakamura, K., & Turner, G. H. (Eds.). (2003). Many ways of be deaf. International variation in deaf communities. Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2018). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Spry, T. (2016). Autoethnography and the other: Unsettling power through utopian performatives. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, J. M. (2011). d/Deaf and d/Dumb: A portrait of a deaf kid as a young superhero. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, J. M. (2014). Monster’s analysis: Vulnerable anthropology and deaf superhero-becomings. In N. Oka & M. Sasaki (Eds.), Literacies of the challenged: To construct a truly inclusive society (Multiliteracies Series, pp. 10–36). Kuroshio Shuppan Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, J. M. (2019). In between Spiderman and the Incredible Hulk: Crises of collage, mutating Identities, and collective subjectivities. In I. W. Leigh & C. A. O'Brien (Eds.), Deaf identities: Exploring new frontiers (pp. 349–369). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, J. M., & Boldt, G. (2015). The rhizome of the deaf child. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415581885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, J. C. (2018). Becoming deaf in the posthuman era: Posthumanism, arts-based research and deaf education [Doctoral dissertation]. Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Regina.
   Google Scholar
• Wetherell, M. (2013). Affect and discourse–what’s the problem? From affect as excess to affective/discursive practice. Subjectivity, 6(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1057/sub.2013.13
   Google Scholar
• Wyatt, J., & Gale, K. (2016). Getting out of selves. In S. H. Jones, T. E. Adams, & C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of autoethnography (pp. 300–312). Routledge.
   Google Scholar