Deaf cosmopolitanism: calibrating as a moral process

References

• Acharya, M. N. (2016). Cosmopolitanism. In N. B. Salazar & K. Jayaram (Eds.), Keywords of mobility: Critical engagements (pp. 33–54). Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Amit, V. (2015). Circumscribed cosmopolitanism: Travel aspirations and experiences. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power, 22(5), 551–568. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2014.975709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archibugi, D. (2005). The language of democracy: Vernacular or esperanto? A comparison between the multiculturalist and cosmopolitan perspectives. Political Studies, 53(3), 537–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00543.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagga-Gupta, S. (2000). Visual language environments. Exploring everyday life and literacies in Swedish deaf bilingual schools. Visual Anthropology Review, 15(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1525/var.2000.15.2.95
   Google Scholar
• Bagga-Gupta, S. (2004). Visually oriented language use: Discursive and technological resources in Swedish deaf pedagogical arenas. In M. V. Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond: Sociolinguistics in European deaf communities (pp. 171–207). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breivik, J. K. (2005). Deaf identities in the making: Local lives, transnational connections. Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Breivik, J.-K., Haualand, H., & Solvang, P. (2002). Rome—a temporary deaf city! Deaflympics 2001. Stein Rokkan Centre for Social Studies, Bergen University Research Foundation Report. http://bora.uib.no/bitstream/handle/1956/1434/N02-02%5b1%5d.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
   Google Scholar
• Byun, K. S., De Vos, C., Bradford, A., Zeshan, U., & Levinson, S. C. (2018). First encounters: Repair sequences in cross-signing. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(2), 314–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canagarajah, S. (2013). Translingual practice: Global Englishes and cosmopolitan relations. Routledge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Congress. (1900). Congrès International pour l’Etude des Questions d’Assistance et d’Education des Sourds-Muets. Section des Sourds-Muets. Compte rendu des débats et relations diverses. Paris: Imprimerie d’Ouvriers Sourds-Muets.
   Google Scholar
• Friedner, M. (2016). Understanding and not-understanding: What do epistemologies and ontologies do in deaf worlds? Sign Language Studies, 16(2), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2016.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedner, M., & Kusters, A. (Eds.). (2015). It’s a small world: International deaf spaces and encounters. Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glick Schiller, N., Darieva, T., & Gruner-Domic, S. (2011). Defining cosmopolitan sociability in a transnational age. An introduction. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 34(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.533781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, E. M. (2014). Building the tower of Babel: International sign, linguistic commensuration, and moral orientation. Language in Society, 43(4), 445–465. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404514000396
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, E. M. (2015). ‘One language, or maybe two: Direct communication, understanding, and informal interpreting in international deaf encounters’. In M. Friedner & A. Kusters (Eds.), It’s a small world: International deaf spaces and encounters (pp. 70–82). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gulliver, M. (2015). The Emergence of international deaf spaces in France: From desloges 1779 to the Paris Congress of 1900. In M. Friedner & A. Kusters (Eds.), It’s a small world: International deaf spaces and encounters (pp. 3–14). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. (1990). Cosmopolitans and locals in world culture. Theory, Culture & Society, 7(2-3), 237–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002014
   Google Scholar
• Hannerz, U. (2004). Cosmopolitanism. In D. Nugent & J. Vincent (Eds.), A companion to the anthropology of politics (pp. 69–85). John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Haualand, H., Kusters, A., & Friedner, M. (2016). Transnationalism. In G. Gertz & P. Boudreault (Eds.), The SAGE deaf studies encyclopaedia (pp. 979–982). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, M. R. (2018). Transmodalities and transnational encounters: Fostering critical cosmopolitan relations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, S. (1997). The ethnography of moralities. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Irving, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2014). Whose cosmopolitanism?: Critical perspectives, relationalities and discontents. Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Janssens, M., & Steyaert, C. (2014). Re-considering language within a cosmopolitan understanding: Toward a multilingual franca approach in international business studies. Journal of International Business Studies, 45(5), 623–639. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusters, A. (2020). The tipping point: On the use of signs from American sign language in international sign. Language & Communication, 75, 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusters, A. (2021). International sign and American sign language as different types of global deaf lingua francas. Sign Language Studies, 21(4), (page numbers forthcoming).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusters, A. M. J., & Friedner, M. I. (2015). Introduction: DEAF-SAME and difference in international deaf spaces and encounters. In M. Friedner & A. Kusters (Eds.), It's a small world: International deaf spaces and encounters (pp. ix–xxix). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kusters, A., Green, M., Moriarty, E., & Snoddon, K. (2020). Sign language ideologies: Practices and politics. In A. Kusters, M. Green, E. Moriarty, & K. Snoddon (Eds.), Sign language ideologies in practice (pp. 3–22). De Gruyter Mouton and Ishara Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R., & Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, P. (2015). Global deafhood: Exploring myths and realities. In M. Friedner & A. Kusters (Eds.), It’s a small world: International deaf spaces and encounters (pp. 274–286). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2012). Disinventing multilingualism: From monological multilingualism to multilingua francas. In M. Martin-Jones, A. Blackledge, & A. Creese (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of multilingualism (pp. 439–453). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Moriarty, E. (2020a). Filmmaking in a linguistic ethnography of deaf tourist encounters. Sign Language Studies, 20(4), 572–594. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2020.0019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty, E. (2020b). “Sign to me, not the children”: ideologies of language contamination at a deaf tourist site in Bali. Language & Communication, 75, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2020.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty Harrelson, E. (2015). Same-same but different: Tourism and the deaf global circuit in Cambodia. In M. Friedner & A. Kusters (Eds.), It’s a small world: International deaf spaces and encounters (pp. 199–211). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mottez, B. (1993). The deaf mute banquets and the birth of the deaf movement. In R. Fischer & H. Lane (Eds.), Looking Back: A reader on the history of deaf communities and their sign languages (pp. 143–156). Hamburg.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, J. (2007). One touch of nature makes the whole world kin”: The transnational lives of deaf Americans, 1870-1924 [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Iowa. https://ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1317&context=etd
   Google Scholar
• Nowicka, M., & Rovisco, M. (2009). Making sense of cosmopolitanism. In M. Nowicka & M. Rovisco (Eds.), Cosmopolitanism in practice (pp. 1–19). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Parks, E. S. (2014). Constructing national and international deaf identity: Perceived use of American sign language. In D. Watt & C. Llamas (Eds.), Language, borders and identity (pp. 206–217). Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2015). Metrolingualism: Language in the city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenstock, R. (2008). The role of iconicity in international sign. Sign Language Studies, 8(2), 131–159. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2008.0003
   Google Scholar
• Roudometof, V. (2005). Transnationalism, cosmopolitanism and glocalization. Current Sociology, 53(1), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392105048291
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In J. Lucy (Ed.), Reflexive language (pp. 33–57). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skrbis, Z., Kendall, G., & Woodward, I. (2004). Locating cosmopolitanism. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(6), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404047418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonntag, S. K. (2015). The violence of linguistic cosmopolitanism. In S. Brata Das & S. Choudhury (Eds.), The weight of violence: Religion, language, politics (pp. 201–218). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S. (2010). Cosmopolitanism. In K. Knott & S. McLoughlin (Eds.), Diasporas: Concepts, intersections, identities (pp. 63–68). Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Vertovec, S., & Cohen, R. (2002). Introduction: Conceiving cosmopolitanism. In S. Vertovec & R. Cohen (Eds.), Conceiving cosmopolitanism: Theory, context and practice (pp. 1–22). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wessendorf, S. (2014). Commonplace diversity: Social relations in a super-diverse context. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Zeshan, U. (2015). “Making meaning”: communication between sign language users without a shared language. Cognitive Linguistics, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2015-0011
   Google Scholar