Repeated assemblages in the interactions of deaf youth in Peru

References

• Adami, E., & Swanwick, R. (2019). Signs of understanding and turns-as-actions: A multimodal analysis of deaf–hearing interaction. Visual Communication, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357219854776
   Google Scholar
• Bagga-Gupta, S. (2000). Visual language environments. Exploring everyday life and literacies in Swedish deaf bilingual schools. Visual Anthropology Review, 15(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1525/var.2000.15.2.95
   Google Scholar
• Bagga-Gupta, S. (2004). Visually oriented bilingualism. Discursive and technological resources in Swedish deaf pedagogical arenas. In V. Herreweghe & M. Vermeerbergen (Eds.), To the lexicon and beyond. Sociolinguistics in european deaf communities (Vol 10) (pp. 171–207). Gallaudet University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. M. ([1975] 1981). The dialogic imagination. The University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bazzanella, C. (2011). Redundancy, repetition, and intensity in discourse. Language Sciences, 33(2), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.10.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casillas, M., De Vos, C., Crasborn, O., & Levinson, S. C. (2015). The perception of stroke-to-stroke turn boundaries in signed conversation. In D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, & P. R. Maglio (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 315–320). Cognitive Science Society.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (1992). Arenas of language Use. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, H. H. (2003). Pointing and placing. In S. Kita (Ed.), Pointing: Where language, culture, and cognition meet (pp. 243–268). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Clayman, S. E. (2002). Sequence and solidarity. In E. J. Lawler & S. R. Thye (Eds.), Advances in group processes: Group cohesion, trust and solidarity (Vol. 19, pp. 229–253). Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, P. (2013). Turn design. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 131–149). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Du Bois, J. W. (2014). Towards a dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics, 25(3), 359–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2014-0024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ELAN (Version 5.8) [Computer software]. (2018). Nijmegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, The Language Archive. https://archive.mpi.nl/tla/elan
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1953). Communication Conduct in an Island Community [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Goico, S. A. (2017). Marginalization as a dynamic process: The microanalysis of interactions of a deaf student in a mainstream classroom. In S. Bagga-Gupta (Ed.), Marginalization processes across different settings: Going beyond the mainstream (pp. 199–227). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goico, S. A. (2019a). The impact of ‘inclusive’ education on the language of deaf youth in iquitos, Peru. Sign Language Studies, 19(3), 348–374. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2019.0001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goico, S. A. (2019b). The social lives of deaf youth in Iquitos, Peru [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Goico, S. A. (2020). A linguistic ethnography approach to the study of deaf youth and local signs in iquitos, Peru. Sign Language Studies, 20(4), 619–643. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2020.0021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2000). Action and embodiment within situated human interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(10), 1489–1522. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00096-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2007). Environmentally coupled gestures. In S. D. Duncan, J. Cassell, & E. T. Levy (Eds.), Gesture and the dynamic dimension of language: Essays in honor of David McNeill (Vol. 1) (pp. 195–212). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, C. (2018). Co-operative action. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among black children. Vol. 618. Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., & Cekaite, A. (2018). Embodied family choreography: Practices of control, care, and mundane creativity. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Goodwin, M. H., Cekaite, A., & Goodwin, C. (2012). Emotion as stance. In M.-L. Sorjonen & A. Perakyla (Eds.), Emotion in interaction (pp. 16–41). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, E. M. (2014). The nature of signs: Nepal’s deaf society, local sign, and the production of communicative sociality [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of California at Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Haviland, J. B. (2013). The emerging grammar of nouns in a first generation sign language: Specification, iconicity, and syntax. Gesture, 13(3), 309–353. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.13.3.04hav
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, L. (2020). Seeing signs: Linguistic ethnography in the study of homesign systems in Guatemala. Sign Language Studies, 20(4), 644–663. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2020.0022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, L., & Kusters, A. (2020). Sign languages. In K. Tusting (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of linguistic ethnography (pp. 340–355). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Humphries, T., Kushalnagar, P., Mathur, G., Napoli, D. J., Padden, C., Rathmann, C., & Smith, S. (2016). Avoiding linguistic neglect of deaf children. Social Service Review, 90(4), 589–619. https://doi.org/10.1086/689543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidwell, M. (2005). Gaze as social control: How very young children differentiate ‘the look’ from a ‘mere look’ by their adult caregivers. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(4), 417–449. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3804_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kita, S., van Gijn, I., & van der Hulst, H. (1998). Movement phases in signs and co-speech gestures, and their transcription by human coders. Nijmegen, Gelderland, the Netherlands: Max-Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics & Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Kusters, A. (2017). Gesture-based customer interactions: Deaf and hearing mumbaikars’ multimodal and metrolingual practices. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusters, A., Spotti, M., Swanwick, R., & Tapio, E. (2017). Beyond languages, beyond modalities: Transforming the study of semiotic repertoires. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1321651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mesh, K., & Hou, L. (2018). Negation in San Juan Quiahije Chatino Sign Language: The integration and adaptation of conventional gestures. Gesture, 17(3), 330–374. https://doi.org/10.1075/gest.18017.mes
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. E., & Karchmer, M. A. (2004). Chasing the mythical ten percent: Parental hearing status of deaf and hard of hearing students in the United States. Sign Language Studies, 4(2), 138–163. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2004.0005
   Google Scholar
• Mondada, L. (2014). The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 65, 137–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moriarty Harrelson, E. (2019). Deaf people with “no language”: mobility and flexible accumulation in languaging practices of deaf people in Cambodia. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(1), 55–72. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyst, V., Sylla, K., & Magassouba, M. (2012). Deaf signers in douentza, a rural area in Mali. In U. Zeshan & C. D. Vos (Eds.), Sign languages in village communities: Anthropological and linguistic insights (pp. 251–276). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Paugh, A., & Izquierdo, C. (2009). Why is this a battle every night?: Negotiating food and eating in American dinnertime interaction. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 19(2), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2009.01030.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safar, J. (2019). Translanguaging in Yucatec Maya signing communities. Applied Linguistics Review, 10(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2017-0082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stivers, T. (2013). In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 191–209). Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Tannen, D. (2007). Talking voices: Repetition, dialogue, and imagery in conversational discourse (Vol. 26). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tapio, E. (2019). The patterned ways of interlinking linguistic and multimodal elements in visually oriented communities. Deafness & Education International, 21(2–3), 133–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14643154.2018.1561781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar