Crosslinguistic influence in L3 acquisition across linguistic modules

References

• Agebjörn, A. (2020). Explicit and implicit knowledge of article semantics in Belarusian learners of English: Implications for teaching. In A. Trotzke, & T. Kupisch (Eds.), Formal linguistics and language education: New empirical perspectives (Vol. 43, pp. 179–201). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, D. M., Dunn, L. M., & National Foundation for Educational Research in England and Wales. (2009). British picture vocabulary scale 3. GL assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, Y., & Bardel, C. (2010). The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition: The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistic in Language Teaching, 48(2–3), 185–220. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2010.009
   Google Scholar
• Falk, Y., Lindqvist, C., & Bardel, C. (2015). The role of L1 explicit metalinguistic knowledge in L3 oral production at the initial state. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728913000552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flynn, S., Foley, C., & Vinnitskaya, I. (2004). The cumulative-enhancement model for language acquisition: Comparing adults’ and children’s patterns of development in first, second and third language acquisition of relative clauses. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710408668175
   Google Scholar
• Ionin, T., Ko, H., & Wexler, K. (2004). Article semantics in L2 acquisition: The role of specificity. Language Acquisition, 12(1), 3–69. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1201_2
   Google Scholar
• Lago, S., Mosca, M., & Stutter Garcia, A. (2021). The role of crosslinguistic influence in multilingual processing: Lexicon versus syntax. Language Learning, 71(S1), 163–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12412
   Google Scholar
• Lenth, R. V., Singman, H., Love, J., Buerkner, P., & Herve, M. (2019). R package “emmeans”: estimated marginal means. Aka Least-Squares Means.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. L. (2000). Grammaticality judgments in a second language: Influences of age of acquisition and native language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21(3), 395–423. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400003064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(3), 381–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mykhaylyk, R., Mitrofanova, M., Rodina, Y., & Westergaard, M. (2015). The Linguistic Proximity Model: The case of verb-second revisited. In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (BUCLD). Somerville: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
   Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2011). L3 syntactic transfer selectivity and typological determinacy: The typological primacy model. Second Language Research, 27(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658310386439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J. (2015). Linguistic and cognitive motivations for the typological primacy model (TPM) of third language (L3) transfer: Timing of acquisition and proficiency considered. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18(2), 179–190. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891300059X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, J., & Cabrelli Amaro, J. (2010). What variables condition syntactic transfer? A look at the L3 initial state. Second Language Research, 26(2), 189–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658309349410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (1996). L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access hypothesis. Second Language Research, 12(1), 40–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, B. D., & Sprouse, R. A. (2020). The full transfer/full access model and L3 cognitive states. Keynote article in Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism.
   Google Scholar
• Slabakova, R. (2017). The scalpel model of third language acquisition. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916655413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M. (2003). Unlearning V2: Transfer, markedness, and the importance of input cues in the acquisition of word order in English by Norwegian children. EUROSLA Yearbook, 3(1), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.3.07wes
   Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M. (2009). Microvariation as diachrony: A view from acquisition. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, 12(1), 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10828-009-9025-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M. (2019). Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition. Print version published 2021 in Second Language Research, 37(3), 379–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658319884116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M. (2021). L3 acquisition and crosslinguistic influence as co-activation. Response to commentaries on the keynote “Microvariation in multilingual situations: The importance of property-by-property acquisition.”. Second Language Research, 37(3), 501–518. https://doi.org/10.1177/02676583211007897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westergaard, M., Mitrofanova, N., Mykhaylyk, R., & Rodina, Y. (2017). Crosslinguistic influence in the acquisition of a third language: The Linguistic Proximity Model. International Journal of Bilingualism, 21(6), 666–682. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006916648859
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, L. (1985). The ‘pro-drop’ parameter in adult second language acquisition. Language Learning, 35(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1985.tb01014.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar