Telematic performance enforced by the pandemic: NeuroKnitting Beethoven

References

• Ascott, Roy. 2003. Telematic Embrace: Visionary Theories of Art, Technology, and Consciousness. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barbara, Jean-Gaël. 2006. “Franco-British Relations in Neurophysiology in Edgar Adrian's Era.” In 2e colloque international de la European Society for the History of Science et la Société Française d’Histoire des Sciences et des Techniques intitulé “Echanges franco-britanniques entre savants depuis le XVIIe siècle”, 4-p.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, G. Douglas. 2017. “The Brain at Work: Cognitive Labor and the Posthuman Brain in Alvin Lucier’s Music for Solo Performer.” Postmodern Culture 27 (3), doi:10.1353/pmc.2018.0003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borck, Cornelius. 2001. “Electricity as a Medium of Psychic Life: Electrotechnological Adventures into Psychodiagnosis in Weimar Germany.” Science in Context 14 (4): 565–590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borck, Cornelius.. 2018. Brainwaves: A Cultural History of Electroencephalography. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Dragicevic, Pierre, Yvonne Jansen, and Andrew Vande Moere. 2020. “Data Physicalization.” In Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, edited by JeanVanderdonckt, Philippe Palanque, and MarcoWinckler, 1–51. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gabriel, Ulrike. 1997. “Terrain_01.” Artist Website. Accessed April 10, 2023. llllllll.de/terrain_02_e.html#b0.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, Alexander. 2021. Uncomputable: Play and Politics in the Long Digital Age. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Guljajeva, Varvara. 2018. “From Interaction to Post-Participation: The Disappearing Role of the Active Participant.” PhD diss., Estonian Academy of Arts. https://eka.entu.ee/shared/429088/GsqzlotFPrFi1tdtAmVX1Wo8cxFWi4iQjntDJcO4n0mE5NAx8K8pef9V3AC9k3lB
   Google Scholar
• Guljajeva, Varvara. 2020. “Exploring Biometrical Data as a Score and Artistic Material, panel by Kelomees, R., Guljajeva, V., Laas, O., Montgomery, S., Aesthetic and User Experience in Biofeedback Art. In WHY SENTIENCE? 26th International Symposium on Electronic Art ISEA2020, edited by Christine Ross and Chris Salter, 638–639. Montreal: ISEA International.
   Google Scholar
• Guljajeva, Varvara, and MarCanet Sola. 2011. "The Rhythm of City. Geo-Located Social Data as an Artistic Medium." In ISEA2011, the 17th International Symposium on Electronic Art September 14-21, 2011, Istanbul, Turkey, 1077–1083.
   Google Scholar
• Guljajeva, Varvara, and MarCanet Sola. 2014. “Circular Knitic,” 1.0.0, Zenodo, 2014. doi:10.5281/zenodo.6124168.
   Google Scholar
• Guljajeva, Varvara, and MarCanet Sola. 2015. “An Example of Soft Digital Fabrication.” In Crafting Our Digital Futures, edited by IriniPapadimitriou, AndrewPrescott, and JonRogers, 48–49. London: Uniform Communications.
   Google Scholar
• Guljajeva, Varvara, and MarCanet Sola. 2021. “ENA Participative Art Forms During Pandemics.” In HyMEx Hybrid Museums Symposium Proceedings, edited by LíviaNolasco-Rózsas and BorbálaKálmán, 78–83. Budapest: Ludwig Museum.
   Google Scholar
• Guljajeva, Varvara, MarCanet Sola, and SebastianMealla. 2012. “Neuroknitting.” Varvara & Mar. Accessed September 21, 2023. www.varvarag.info/neuroknitting/.
   Google Scholar
• He, Shiqing. 2021. “Finding the Grammar of Generative Craft.” PhD diss., The University of Michigan. deepblue.lib.umich.edu/handle/2027.42/169800.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan, Trevor. 2018. “Data Sensification: Beyond Representation Modality, Toward Encoding Data in Experience.” In Design as a Catalyst for Change – DRS International Conference, Limerick, Ireland. 25–28 June 2018, edited by C. Storni, K. Leahy, M. McMahon, P. Lloyd, and E. Bohemia, 1410–1424. doi:10.21606/drs.2018.238
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, Krister. 2014. “Hans Berger and the EEG.” Thresholds 42: 88–97. doi:10.1162/thld_a_00080.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, Douglas. 2013. Earth Sound Earth Signal: Energies and Earth Magnitude in the Arts. Berkeley: University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Lancel, Karen, Hermen Maat, and Frances Brazier. 2019. “EEG KISS: Shared Multi-Modal, Multi Brain Computer Interface Experience, in Public Space.” Brain Art: Brain-Computer Interfaces for Artistic Expression, 207–228. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14323-7_7.
   Google Scholar
• Lucier, Alvin. 2012. Music 109: Notes on Experimental Music. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luckhurst, Roger. 2002. The Invention of Telepathy, 1870–1901. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lysen, Flora. 2019. “The Interface is the (Art) Work: Eeg-Feedback, Circuited Selves and the Rise of Real-Time Brainmedia (1964–1977).” Brain Art: Brain-Computer Interfaces for Artistic Expression, 33–63. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14323-7_2.
   Google Scholar
• Macy, Alan, Mark-David Hosale, and Alysia Michelle James. 2021. “The Body Inverse.” Artist Website. Accessed September 21, 2023. www.mdhosale.com/bodyinverse/.
   Google Scholar
• Manovich, Lev. 2008. “Introduction to Info-Aesthetics.” Accessed September 21, 2023. https://manovich.net/content/04-projects/060-introduction-to-info-aesthetics/57-article-2008.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nijholt, Anton, and Chang S. Nam. 2015. “Arts and Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCIs).” Brain-Computer Interfaces 2 (2–3): 57–59. doi:10.1080/2326263X.2015.1100514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearlman, Ellen. 2022. “‘DANCEDEMIC’ in a Pandemic: A New Networked Reality.” Journal of Network Music and Arts 4 (1): 5.
   Google Scholar
• Prpa, Mirjana, and Philippe Pasquier. 2019. “Brain-Computer Interfaces in Contemporary Art: A State of the Art and Taxonomy.” Brain Art: Brain-Computer Interfaces for Artistic Expression, 65–115. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-14323-7_3.
   Google Scholar
• Robles-Angel, Claudia.. 2011. "EEG Data in Interactive Art.” In ISEA2011, the 17th International Symposium on Electronic Art September 14-21, 2011, Istanbul, Turkey, 99–102.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenboom, David. 1999. “Extended Musical Interface with the Human Nervous System: Assessment and Prospectus.” Leonardo 32 (4): 257–257. doi:10.1162/002409499553398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shure, Caitlin. 2018. Brain Waves, A Cultural History: Oscillations of Neuroscience, Technology, Telepathy, and Transcendence. New York: Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Straebel, Volker , and Wilm Thoben. 2014. “Alvin Lucier’s Music for Solo Performer: Experimental Music Beyond Sonification.” Organised Sound 19 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1017/S135577181300037X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez-Davis, John. 2022. “Data Isn’t ‘the New Oil’ – It’s Way More Valuable Than That.” The Drum, December 12. www.thedrum.com/opinion/2022/12/12/data-isn-t-the-new-oil-it-s-way-more-valuable.
   Google Scholar
• Teitelbaum, Richard. 1976. “In Tune: Some Early Experiments in Biofeedback Music (1966–1974).” In Biofeedback and the Arts, Results of Early Experiments, Vol. 74, edited by David Rosenboom, 35–56. Vancouver: Aesthetic Research Center of Canada Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile Books.
   Google Scholar