References
- Biza, I., Jaworski, B., & Hemmi, K. (2014). Communities in university mathematics. Research in Mathematics Education, 16(2), 161–176.
- Goodchild, S. (2011). Using different sociocultural perspectives in mathematics teaching development research. In M. Pytlak, E. Swoboda, & T. Rowland (Eds.), CERME 7: Proceedings of the seventh congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 2421–2430). Rzeszów, Poland: European Society for Research in Mathematics Education.
- Hemmi, K. (2006). Approaching proof in a community of mathematical practice. Doctoral dissertation, Stockholm University. Stockholm, Sweden: Department of Mathematics Stockholm University.
- Jaworski, B., & Matthews, J. (2011). Developing teaching of mathematics to first year engineering students. Teaching Mathematics and its Applications, 30, 178–185. doi:10.1093/teamat/hrr020
- Jaworski, B., Robinson, C., Matthews, J., & Croft, A. C. (2012). An activity theory analysis of teaching goals versus student epistemological positions. International Journal of Technology in Mathematics Education, 19(4), 147–152.
- Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture and Activity, 3, 149–164. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2
- Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
- Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69–102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.