1,090
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research papers

How do they know it is a parallelogram? Analysing geometric discourse at van Hiele Level 3

&

References

  • Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 2, pp. 483–908). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Battista, M. T. (2009). Highlights of research on learning school geometry. In T.V. Craine & R. Rubenstein (Eds.), Understanding geometry for a changing world (pp. 91–108). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the van Hiele levels of development in geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31–48. doi:10.2307/749317
  • Crowley, M. L. (1987). The van Hiele model of the development of geometric thought. In M. Lindquist (Ed.), Learning and teaching geometry, K-12 (pp. 1–16). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  • Crowley, M. L. (1990). Criterion referenced reliability indices associated with the van Hiele geometry test. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 21, 238–241. doi:10.2307/749377
  • Gee, J. (2011). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Gutiérrez, A., Jaime, A., & Fortuny, J. M. (1991). An alternative paradigm to evaluate the acquisition of the van Hiele levels. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22, 237–251. doi:10.2307/749076
  • Hoffer, A. (1981). Geometry is more than proof. Mathematics Teacher, 74, 11–18.
  • Mayberry, J. (1983). The van Hiele levels of geometric thought in undergraduate preservice teachers. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(1), 58–69. doi:10.2307/748797
  • Moschkovich, J. N. (2010) Recommendations for research on language and mathematics education. In J. N. Moschkovich (Ed.), Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research (pp. 151–170). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Newton, J. (2010). An examination of K-8 geometry state standards through the lens of the van Hiele levels of geometry thinking. In J. P. Smith III (Ed.), Variability is the rule: A companion analysis of K-8 state mathematics standards. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  • Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Usiskin, Z. (1982). Van Hiele levels and achievement in secondary school geometry. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
  • Van Hiele, P. M. (1959/1985). The child's thought and geometry. In D. Fuys, D. Geddes, & R. Tischler (Eds.), English translation of selected writings of Dina van Hiele-Geldof and Pierre M. Van Hiele (pp. 243–252). Brooklyn, NY: Brooklyn College, School of Education.
  • Van Hiele, P. M. (1986). Structure and insight: A theory of mathematics education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
  • Wang, S. (2011). The van Hiele theory through the discursive lens: Prospective teachers' geometric discourses ( Doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University. Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Thesis database. (UMI No. 3489785).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.